Re: [Python-Dev] Most 3.x buildbots are green again, please don't break them and watch them!

2016-04-14 Thread Senthil Kumaran
On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 4:40 AM, Victor Stinner wrote: > Last months, most 3.x buildbots failed randomly. Some of them were > always failing. I spent some time to fix almost all Windows and Linux > buildbots. There were a lot of different issues. > > So please try to

Re: [Python-Dev] Most 3.x buildbots are green again, please don't break them and watch them!

2016-04-14 Thread Brett Cannon
On Thu, 14 Apr 2016 at 03:26 Victor Stinner wrote: > > Le 14 avr. 2016 11:16 AM, "Serhiy Storchaka" a > écrit : > > A desirable but nonexistent feature is to write emails to authors of > commits that broke buildbots. How hard to implement this? > >

Re: [Python-Dev] Most 3.x buildbots are green again, please don't break them and watch them!

2016-04-14 Thread Victor Stinner
Le 14 avr. 2016 11:16 AM, "Serhiy Storchaka" a écrit : > A desirable but nonexistent feature is to write emails to authors of commits that broke buildbots. How hard to implement this? Yeah I also had this idea since many years but buildbots were quite unstable. Maybe we

Re: [Python-Dev] Most 3.x buildbots are green again, please don't break them and watch them!

2016-04-14 Thread Martin Panter
On 14 April 2016 at 09:15, Serhiy Storchaka wrote: > On 13.04.16 14:40, Victor Stinner wrote: >> By the way, I don't understand why "AMD64 OpenIndiana 3.x" is >> considered as stable since it's failing with multiple issues since >> many months and nobody is working on these

Re: [Python-Dev] Most 3.x buildbots are green again, please don't break them and watch them!

2016-04-14 Thread Serhiy Storchaka
On 13.04.16 14:40, Victor Stinner wrote: Last months, most 3.x buildbots failed randomly. Some of them were always failing. I spent some time to fix almost all Windows and Linux buildbots. There were a lot of different issues. Excelent! Many thanks for doing this. And new features of regrtest

Re: [Python-Dev] Most 3.x buildbots are green again, please don't break them and watch them!

2016-04-13 Thread Brett Cannon
On Wed, 13 Apr 2016 at 13:17 Zachary Ware wrote: > [SNIP] > --- > > After receiving a suggestion from koobs several months ago, I've been > intermittently thinking about completely redoing our buildmaster setup > such that instead of a single builder per version on

Re: [Python-Dev] Most 3.x buildbots are green again, please don't break them and watch them!

2016-04-13 Thread Zachary Ware
On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 6:40 AM, Victor Stinner wrote: > Hi, > > Last months, most 3.x buildbots failed randomly. Some of them were > always failing. I spent some time to fix almost all Windows and Linux > buildbots. There were a lot of different issues. Thank you for

Re: [Python-Dev] Most 3.x buildbots are green again, please don't break them and watch them!

2016-04-13 Thread Brett Cannon
On Wed, 13 Apr 2016 at 06:14 Stefan Krah wrote: > Victor Stinner gmail.com> writes: > > Maybe it's time to move more 3.x buildbots to the "stable" category? > > http://buildbot.python.org/all/waterfall?category=3.x.stable > > +1 I think anything that is actually stable

Re: [Python-Dev] Most 3.x buildbots are green again, please don't break them and watch them!

2016-04-13 Thread Brett Cannon
On Wed, 13 Apr 2016 at 05:57 Tim Golden wrote: > On 13/04/2016 12:40, Victor Stinner wrote: > > Last months, most 3.x buildbots failed randomly. Some of them were > > always failing. I spent some time to fix almost all Windows and Linux > > buildbots. There were a lot of

Re: [Python-Dev] Most 3.x buildbots are green again, please don't break them and watch them!

2016-04-13 Thread Stefan Krah
Victor Stinner gmail.com> writes: > Maybe it's time to move more 3.x buildbots to the "stable" category? > http://buildbot.python.org/all/waterfall?category=3.x.stable +1 I think anything that is actually stable should be in that category. > By the way, I don't understand why "AMD64

Re: [Python-Dev] Most 3.x buildbots are green again, please don't break them and watch them!

2016-04-13 Thread Tim Golden
On 13/04/2016 12:40, Victor Stinner wrote: > Last months, most 3.x buildbots failed randomly. Some of them were > always failing. I spent some time to fix almost all Windows and Linux > buildbots. There were a lot of different issues. Can I state the obvious and offer a huge vote of thanks for

Re: [Python-Dev] Most 3.x buildbots are green again, please don't break them and watch them!

2016-04-13 Thread Eric V. Smith
On 4/13/2016 7:40 AM, Victor Stinner wrote: > Last months, most 3.x buildbots failed randomly. Some of them were > always failing. I spent some time to fix almost all Windows and Linux > buildbots. There were a lot of different issues. Thanks for all of your work on this, Victor. It's much

Re: [Python-Dev] Most 3.x buildbots are green again, please don't break them and watch them!

2016-04-13 Thread Chris Angelico
On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 9:40 PM, Victor Stinner wrote: > Maybe it's time to move more 3.x buildbots to the "stable" category? > http://buildbot.python.org/all/waterfall?category=3.x.stable Move the Bruces into stable, perhaps? The AMD64 Debian Root one. Been fairly

[Python-Dev] Most 3.x buildbots are green again, please don't break them and watch them!

2016-04-13 Thread Victor Stinner
Hi, Last months, most 3.x buildbots failed randomly. Some of them were always failing. I spent some time to fix almost all Windows and Linux buildbots. There were a lot of different issues. So please try to not break buildbots again and remind to watch them sometimes: