-cc: python-steering-council
On Fri, Mar 5, 2021 at 4:26 PM Guido van Rossum wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 5, 2021 at 11:11 AM Brett Cannon wrote:
>
>> Speaking for myself ...
>>
>
> Ditto ...
>
> On Fri, Mar 5, 2021 at 7:04 AM Mark Shannon wrote:
>> [...]
>>
>>> In some cases, the PEP would have
On Sun, 30 Jan 2022 at 20:36, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
>
> On Sun, Jan 30, 2022 at 08:36:43AM -0800, Jelle Zijlstra wrote:
>
> > Agree, the count of 1.6k open PRs is not a good look for new contributors.
>
> How does that compare to other comparable open source projects?
How it compares is a
On Sun, Jan 30, 2022 at 08:36:43AM -0800, Jelle Zijlstra wrote:
> Agree, the count of 1.6k open PRs is not a good look for new contributors.
How does that compare to other comparable open source projects?
Number of open PRs per KLOC seems like a more useful metric than just
the number of open
El dom, 30 ene 2022 a las 2:40, Irit Katriel via Python-Dev (<
python-dev@python.org>) escribió:
>
> A non-core approval changes the label from "awaiting review" to "awaiting
> core review".
>
Interestingly, it also changes if a non-core dev requests changes (e.g.,
see
On 1/30/22 04:45, Inada Naoki wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 30, 2022 at 7:37 PM Irit Katriel
> wrote:
> Some people may do "approval without review" to make their "Profile"
> page richer, because GitHub counts it as a contribution.
> Creating spam issues or pull requests can be reported as spam very
>
On Sun, Jan 30, 2022 at 7:37 PM Irit Katriel wrote:
>
> If people spam the approvals (i.e., approve PRs without reviewing them) then
> the distinction between the labels becomes meaningless, of course. Though I
> do wonder what the motivation for doing that repeatedly would be. My basic
>
A non-core approval changes the label from "awaiting review" to "awaiting
core review". I find this useful, and occasionally filter on "awaiting core
review" because it indicates that at least one other person found the PR
sound / interesting. I would not like this to change - I think high
On Sat, Jan 29, 2022 at 7:38 PM Inada Naoki wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 30, 2022 at 12:03 PM Ethan Smith wrote:
> >
> > As a non-committer, I want to make a plea for non-committer approval
> reviews, or at least that they have a place. When asked how outsiders can
> contribute I frequently see "review
