On Sunday, September 30, 2012 5:35:02 PM UTC-7, Peter Farrell wrote:
Thanks for trying to help, everybody. Sorry I didn't post the whole error
message. Now my problem is I just installed VPython and I'm trying to run the
very first example, bounce.py which I located. I opened it and ran it in
On 01/10/2012 01:58, 8 Dihedral wrote:
Your question seems vague to me. If you know you are storing
only immutable tuples in a list, then the way to iterate is simple.
Does Python have a magic method that let's me use mutable tuples? I'd
also like immutable lists. Is it worth raising
Hello,
I wrote this piece of code but I am not able to modify it in order to use
IGMPV3
and use the source feature of IGMPV3, how can I add a membership for a group on
an interface for specified source ?
Something like this piece of code (C under Linux):
On 01/10/2012 04:06, Edward Diener wrote:
On 9/30/2012 3:38 PM, Andrew Berg wrote:
Unix-based OSes should already obey the shebang line, and on Windows,
there's py.exe in 3.3 that will launch the intended version based on
that shebang line.
The problem with that is that one has to already
On 01/10/2012 02:25, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
On Sun, 30 Sep 2012 17:35:02 -0700, Peter Farrell wrote:
Thanks for trying to help, everybody. Sorry I didn't post the whole
error message. Now my problem is I just installed VPython and I'm trying
to run the very first example, bounce.py which I
Am 01.10.2012 02:11, schrieb Jason Friedman:
$ crontab -l
* * * * * env
This produces mail with the following contents:
[...]
SHELL=/bin/sh
^^^
[...]
On the other hand
$ env
produces about 100 entries, most of which are provided by my .bashrc;
bash != sh
Instead of
Jason Friedman ja...@powerpull.net writes:
[...]
I want my python 3.2.2 script, called via cron, to know what those
additional variables are. How?
This is not a python question. Have a look at the crontab(5) man page,
it's all explained there.
-- Alain.
--
I want my python 3.2.2 script, called via cron, to know what those
additional variables are. How?
Thank you for the feedback. A crontab line of
* * * * * . /path/to/export_file /path/to/script.py
does indeed work, but for various reasons this approach will not
always be available to me.
Op vrijdag 21 september 2012 16:15:30 UTC+2 schreef Joel Goldstick het volgende:
On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 9:58 AM, BobAalsma wrote:
Op vrijdag 21 september 2012 15:36:11 UTC+2 schreef Jerry Hill het volgende:
On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 9:31 AM, BobAalsma wrote:
Thanks, Joel, yes, but
On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 12:12 AM, Jason Friedman ja...@powerpull.net wrote:
Let me restate my question. I have a file that looks like this:
export VAR1=foo
export VAR2=bar
# Comment
export VAR3=${VAR1}${VAR2}
I want this:
my_dict = {'VAR1': 'foo', 'VAR2': 'bar', 'VAR3': 'foobar'}
I can
On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 12:37 AM, Jason Friedman ja...@powerpull.net wrote:
Is there a reason to use that format, rather than using Python
notation? I've at times made config files that simply get imported.
Instead of a dictionary, you'd have a module object:
# config.py
VAR1='foo'
1. Added benchmarks for python 3.3
2. Captured total numbers of calls made by corresponding template engine and
number of unique functions used.
http://mindref.blogspot.com/2012/07/python-fastest-template.html
Comments or suggestions are welcome.
Andriy
On Monday, October 1, 2012 10:42:02 PM UTC+8, Chris Angelico wrote:
On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 12:37 AM, Jason Friedman ja...@powerpull.net wrote:
Is there a reason to use that format, rather than using Python
notation? I've at times made config files that simply get imported.
Instead of
where to view range([start], stop[, step])'s C implementation source code ？
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On 1/10/12 16:12:50, Jason Friedman wrote:
I want my python 3.2.2 script, called via cron, to know what those
additional variables are. How?
Thank you for the feedback. A crontab line of
* * * * * . /path/to/export_file /path/to/script.py
does indeed work, but for various reasons
On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 9:28 AM, iMath redstone-c...@163.com wrote:
where to view range([start], stop[, step])'s C implementation source code ？
http://hg.python.org/cpython/file/3f739f42be51/Objects/rangeobject.c
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Sun, 30 Sep 2012 15:14:17 -0400, Edward Diener wrote:
Has there been any official software that allows both the Python 2.x and
3.x releases to coexist on the same OS so that the end-user can easily
switch between them when invoking Python scripts after each has been
installed to their own
If I am trying to access a google scholar search result using python, I
get the following error(403):
$ python
Python 2.7.3 (default, Jul 24 2012, 10:05:38)
[GCC 4.7.0 20120507 (Red Hat 4.7.0-5)] on linux2
Type help, copyright, credits or license for more information.
from HTMLParser import
urllib2.urlopen('http://scholar.google.co.uk/scholar?q=albert
...
urllib2.HTTPError: HTTP Error 403: Forbidden
Will you kindly explain me the way to get rid of this?
Looks like Google blocks non-browser user agents from retrieving this query.
You *could* work around it by setting the
On Sep 28, 2:42 pm, Franck Ditter fra...@ditter.org wrote:
Hi !
Here is Python 3.3
Is it better in any way to use print(x,x,x,file='out')
or out.write(x) ? Any reason to prefer any of them ?
There should be a printlines, like readlines ?
Thanks,
franck
There is
out.writelines(lst)
--
On 2012-10-01, Nick Cash nick.c...@npcinternational.com wrote:
urllib2.urlopen('http://scholar.google.co.uk/scholar?q=albert
...
urllib2.HTTPError: HTTP Error 403: Forbidden
Will you kindly explain me the way to get rid of this?
Looks like Google blocks non-browser user agents from
I know one more python app that do the same thing
http://www.icir.org/christian/downloads/scholar.py
and few other app(Mendeley desktop) for which I found an explanation:
(from
http://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/2567/api-eula-and-scraping-for-google-scholar
)
that:
I know how Mendley
On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 1:28 PM, রুদ্র ব্যাণার্জী bnrj.ru...@gmail.com wrote:
So, If I manage to use the User-Agent as shown by you, will I still
violating the google EULA?
Very likely, yes. The overall Google Terms of Services
(http://www.google.com/intl/en/policies/terms/) say Don’t misuse
On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 11:55 PM, Dave Angel d...@davea.name wrote:
The problem with that is that one has to already being using 3.3 to
use this facility. I was hoping for a solution which was backwards
compatible with Python 2.x.
...
That does not solve the problem for Python 2.x
On 01/10/2012 20:36, David Robinow wrote:
On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 11:55 PM, Dave Angel d...@davea.name wrote:
The problem with that is that one has to already being using 3.3 to
use this facility. I was hoping for a solution which was backwards
compatible with Python 2.x.
...
That does not
On 1 October 2012 09:19, Mark Lawrence breamore...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
On 01/10/2012 01:58, 8 Dihedral wrote:
Your question seems vague to me. If you know you are storing
only immutable tuples in a list, then the way to iterate is simple.
Does Python have a magic method that let's me
Changes by Manuel Pégourié-Gonnard m...@elzevir.fr:
--
nosy: +mpg
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue1185124
___
___
Python-bugs-list
Sebastian Noack added the comment:
Yes, you could also look at the shared/exclusive lock as one lock with
different states. But this approach is neither more common, have a look at
Java's ReadWriteLock [1] for example, which works just like my patch does,
except that a factory is returned
Chris Jerdonek added the comment:
Attaching proposed patch. This updates the docstrings for int() and str(), as
well as for range() and slice() in a similar way.
It also makes the documentation for str() closer to that of the docstring. The
documentation for int(), range(), and slice() has
Sebastian Noack added the comment:
@richard: I'm sorry, but both of my patches contain changes to
'Lib/threading.py' and can be applied on top of Python 3.3.0. So can you
explain what do you mean, by missing the changes to threading.py?
--
___
Kristján Valur Jónsson added the comment:
Personally, I would prefer to make the shared and exclusive locks
attributes of the same object, so one could do
with selock.shared:
...
with selock.exclusive:
...
Please note, the same object could simply be a namedtuple
Kristján Valur Jónsson added the comment:
shared/exclusive - abstract description of what it is
If you want to argue it this way, I counter that the attributes shared and
exclusive apply to the type of access to the protected object you are
talking about, and yet, the name suggest that they
Richard Oudkerk added the comment:
@richard: I'm sorry, but both of my patches contain changes to
'Lib/threading.py' and can be applied on top of Python 3.3.0. So can you
explain what do you mean, by missing the changes to threading.py?
I was reading the Rietveld review page
Richard Oudkerk added the comment:
With this, you are stuck with employing a context manager model only.
You loose the flexibility to do explicit acquire_read() or
acquire_write().
You are not restricted to the context manager model. Just use
selock.shared.acquire() or
Kristján Valur Jónsson added the comment:
Perhaps I should have pointed out, for Sebastian's benefit, that my second
patch uses timeout rather than blocking since that is the new black in
python 3.
Also, I think the threading implementation shows clearly the problem of
having two independent
Wael Al Jishi added the comment:
Shouldn't this issue be closed, or is there more to be done?
--
nosy: +Wael.Al.Jishi
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue9957
___
Wael Al Jishi added the comment:
The attached file is very different to the current source, including the
docstring. Is this from python 2.x?
--
nosy: +Wael.Al.Jishi
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue16007
Sebastian Noack added the comment:
If you want to argue it this way, I counter that the attributes
shared and exclusive apply to the type of access to the
protected object you are talking about, and yet, the name suggest
that they are attributes of the lock itself.
A lock's sole purpose is
Nathan Robertson added the comment:
This is also an issue on openSUSE 12.2 with the release version of Python 3.3
when compiling from sources.
OBS (openSUSE Build Service) has RPMs for 3.3rc1. I'm assuming they've got a
patch which fixes this issue, and looking at the spec file (lines 61, 62
New submission from Wael Al Jishi:
Minor fix to a comment in the read() function definition in codecs.py
Diff attached.
--
components: None
files: comment-codecs-fix.patch
keywords: patch
messages: 171705
nosy: Wael.Al.Jishi
priority: normal
severity: normal
status: open
title: Minor
: Library (Lib)
files: heapq-use-bisect.20121001.patch
keywords: patch
messages: 171706
nosy: haldean
priority: normal
severity: normal
status: open
title: Bisect optimization in heapq.nsmallest is never used
type: performance
versions: Python 3.4
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file27372/heapq-use
Ed Campbell added the comment:
I'd suggest using unittest.TestCase.assertRaises() as a context manager to
remove some try-excepts. For example I think function
test_userptr_without_set() on line 245 could use:
with self.assertRaises(curses.panel.error):
p.userptr()
I could create a patch
Richard Oudkerk added the comment:
I think Sebastian's algorithm does not correctly deal with the non-blocking
case. Consider the following situation:
* Thread-1 successfully acquires exclusive lock.
Now num_got_lock == 1.
* Thread-2 blocks waiting for shared lock.
Will block until
Richard Oudkerk added the comment:
My previous comment applied to Sebastian's first patch. The second seems to
fix the issue.
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue8800
___
Christian Heimes added the comment:
I wonder, why are you creating your own algorithm here? There must be plenty of
reference implementations that are already used in production code. Don't be a
shamed to copy a Java implementation! :) The entire threading module is a
rip-off of the Java
New submission from Nikolay Bogoychev:
Robotparser doesn't support two quite important optional parameters from the
robots.txt file. I have implemented those in the following way:
(Robotparser should be initialized in the usual way:
rp = robotparser.RobotFileParser()
rp.set_url(..)
rp.read
)
Christian Heimes added the comment:
Thanks for the patch. New features must be implemented in Python 3.4. Python
2.7 is in feature freeze mode and therefore doesn't get new features.
--
keywords: +gsoc
nosy: +christian.heimes
stage: - test needed
versions: +Python 3.4 -Python 2.7
Sebastian Noack added the comment:
I would love to see how other people would implement a shared/exclusive lock
that can be acquired from different processes. However it really seems that
nobody did it before. If you know a reference implementation I would be more
than happy.
There are
Changes by Antoine Pitrou pit...@free.fr:
--
nosy: +rhettinger, stutzbach
stage: - patch review
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue16098
___
Antoine Pitrou added the comment:
On the naming front: shorthands like Shrd and Excl are a bit frown upon.
Since SharedExclusiveLock is on the long side, I would suggest calling the
API SELock.
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
Nikolay Bogoychev added the comment:
Okay, sorry didn't know that (:
Here's the same patch (Same functionality) for python3
Feedback is welcome, as always (:
--
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file27374/robotparser.patch
___
Python tracker
Christian Heimes added the comment:
A RW lock is part of POSIX threads [1]. It's usually a good idea to either use
POSIX functions or to mimic their behavior. After all POSIX is an industry
standard.
Boost and Java have several lock and rw lock implementations. Wikipedia [2] is
a good
Antoine Pitrou added the comment:
A RW lock is part of POSIX threads [1]. It's usually a good idea to
either use POSIX functions or to mimic their behavior. After all POSIX
is an industry standard.
We've already departed from that. Our Lock is nothing like a mutex, for
example (it's more of
Sebastian Noack added the comment:
Thanks, but as I already said there are a lot of implementations for
shared/exclusive lock that can be acquired from different threads. But we need
with threading as well as with multiprocessing.
And by the way POSIX is the standard for implementing
Christian Heimes added the comment:
We have a team that mentors new contributors. If you are interested to get your
patch into Python 3.4, please read http://pythonmentors.com/ . The people are
really friendly and will help you with every step of the process.
--
keywords: +easy -gsoc
Changes by Tim Golden m...@timgolden.me.uk:
--
assignee: - tim.golden
nosy: +tim.golden
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue16097
___
Charles-François Natali added the comment:
The page also mentions a seqlock which looks interesting to me as
it's fast for few writers with lots of readers.
A seqlock is suitable for consistent views of simple data structures (e.g. a
counter in the Linux kernel), but it won't fly for a
Martin v. Löwis added the comment:
What matters is that precompiled stay compatible; in addition, existing source
code should continue to compile unmodified.
In the specific case, the flags type also shows up in PyType_Spec. As a
consequence, the actual TPFLAGS_ values *do* constitute a part
New submission from Sascha:
Hello there,
I hope I'm right here.
I tried to compile vim with Python 3.3 32bit support.
OS: Windows 7 64bit
Compiler: MinGW
Compiling vim with Python 3.2 32bit support works!
The error message:
obj/if_python3.o:if_python3.c:(.text+0x739): undefined reference to
STINNER Victor added the comment:
tp_flags type is long, not int.
Le 1 oct. 2012 16:42, Martin v. Löwis rep...@bugs.python.org a écrit :
Martin v. Löwis added the comment:
What matters is that precompiled stay compatible; in addition, existing
source code should continue to compile
Felipe Cruz added the comment:
Hello!
Just sent the Contributor Agreement Form.
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue15897
___
___
Roundup Robot added the comment:
New changeset bb77400af434 by Tim Golden in branch '3.3':
Issue16097 Fix small typo in comment (patch by Wael Al Jishi)
http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/bb77400af434
New changeset cbf651ab3e21 by Tim Golden in branch 'default':
Issue16097 Fix small typo in
Tim Golden added the comment:
Committed in bb77400af434.
Thanks
--
resolution: - fixed
status: open - closed
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue16097
___
R. David Murray added the comment:
We don't currently support mingw, and I don't think any of our active
developers have experience with it. If this actually worked in 3.2 then the
fix *might* be relatively easy. Hopefully you or someone else will be
interested enough to work out a patch.
Mike Hoy added the comment:
Here is a link to our docs page with the info that needs to be changed:
http://docs.python.org/py3k/library/xml.etree.elementtree.html#supported-xpath-syntax
I was going to work on a patch but in irc we decided to wait to see what people
had to say about this. Also
Sascha added the comment:
Actually I'd have no problem using 3.2
Though with 3.2 I got the problem described here:
https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups=#!topic/vim_dev/5MYb23t9ZBM
I was hoping this is fixed in 3.3, but now I can't even compile it
--
R. David Murray added the comment:
Well, that looks like a bug in VIM, not Python. Though if that order of calls
is required and it is not documented, that would be a doc bug (especially if it
used to work in the other order in python2.)
--
___
Chris Jerdonek added the comment:
Ed, yes, switching all of test_curses to using unittest patterns is the
eventual goal of this issue, though this may be done in more than one stage.
As I said in my previous comment, I limited the first patch to focusing on the
proper setUp(), tearDown(),
Changes by Antoine Pitrou pit...@free.fr:
--
priority: normal - high
stage: - needs patch
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue16076
___
Chris Jerdonek added the comment:
Ed, yes, switching all of test_curses to using unittest patterns is the
eventual goal of this issue, though this may be done in more than one stage.
As I said in my previous comment, I limited the first patch to focus on the
proper setUp(), tearDown(), etc
New submission from Brett Cannon:
It's probably time to examine what modules are imported at startup and whether
they are necessary or if some can be trimmed off so as to avoid the overhead.
--
messages: 171733
nosy: brett.cannon
priority: normal
severity: normal
status: open
title:
Xavier de Gaye added the comment:
The attached script, named duplicate_code_names.py, takes a file
name list as argument and prints duplicate code names found in these
files ordered by function, class, method and nested class or
function.
The script output on the whole std lib (see the result
Changes by Xavier de Gaye xdeg...@gmail.com:
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file27376/std_lib_duplicates.txt
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue16079
___
Martin v. Löwis added the comment:
tp_flags type is long, not int.
Indeed, and PyType_Spec.flags is int, not long.
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue16086
___
New submission from Serhiy Storchaka:
Function uuid._netbios_getnode() in Lib/uuid.py is not properly ported from
Python 2. At least it uses indexing on map result. Perhaps there are other
errors. The function obviously not been tested for years.
--
components: Library (Lib), Windows
Serhiy Storchaka added the comment:
In 3.2 repr(xml.etree.ElementTree.Element) is class
'xml.etree.ElementTree.Element'.
In 3.3 repr(xml.etree.ElementTree.Element) is class 'Element'.
--
versions: +Python 3.4
___
Python tracker
Georg Brandl added the comment:
Let's make sure this gets into 3.3.1.
--
priority: critical - release blocker
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue16089
___
Antoine Pitrou added the comment:
Here is a collection of assorted small fixes for celementtree. There are
probably other problems lurking (the coding style there is quite old).
I cannot say anything about the crasher until there's a simple reproducer :)
--
nosy: +pitrou
Added file:
Antoine Pitrou added the comment:
Antoine, are you OK with setting the switch interval to 1e-5 for
all platforms? Otherwise we'll probably have many platform specific
workarounds.
Yes, I'm ok with it.
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
Stefan Krah added the comment:
I can't reproduce it either even on the machine that magically caught
every problem in #15781.
FWIW, the Gentoo bot also had a completely isolated segfault in
test_ssl lately.
Antoine, are you OK with setting the switch interval to 1e-5 for
all platforms?
Antoine Pitrou added the comment:
More assorted celementtree cleanups.
--
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file27378/ctree2.patch
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue16089
___
New submission from Terry J. Reedy:
Problem is only 2.7.3 (not 3.2.3, 3.3.0), tested on Windows
Command Line Window
help()
...
help _
The _ is blinking, waiting for input.
IDLE Shell
help()
...
help
Traceback (most recent call last):
File pyshell#0, line 1, in module
help()
File
New submission from Daniel Holth:
compileall would benefit approximately linearly from additional CPU cores.
There should be an option.
The noisy output would have to change. Right now it prints compiling and then
done synchronously with doing the actual work.
--
messages: 171744
New submission from Felipe Cruz:
It's possible to set a read only FD to signal.set_wakeup_fd(fd)
Since write call[1] inside 'trip_signal' return code is ignored, no error will
be raised.
An untested solution is to call fcntl in this FD to check presence of write
flags.
1 -
Antoine Pitrou added the comment:
By the way, the crash involves an _ElementInterface subclass named
SimpleElementTreeVar:
#0 0x00524c0f in visit_decref (op=Traceback (most recent call last):
File /home/antoine/cpython/33/python-gdb.py, line 1298, in to_string
pyop =
Nadeem Vawda added the comment:
Ah, nice - I didn't think of that optimization. Neater and faster.
I've committed this patch [e6d872b61c57], along with a minor bugfix
[7252f9f95fe6], and another optimization for readline()/readlines()
[6d7bf512e0c3]. [merge with default: a19f47d380d2]
If
Antoine Pitrou added the comment:
Ok, the problem is that _elementtree.TreeBuilder expects to receive
_elementtree.Element instances, but simpleTAL's element_factory instead gives
_ElementInterface instances.
In other words, TreeBuilder is completely broken.
--
Antoine Pitrou added the comment:
Example of this is the following code in treebuilder_handle_start:
if (this != Py_None) {
if (element_add_subelement((ElementObject*) this, node) 0)
goto error;
(note the overly optimistic cast)
but this is really a pervasive problem,
Roundup Robot added the comment:
New changeset 484a4b9349af by Stefan Krah in branch '3.3':
Issue #15599: Increase the switch interval. Several systems cannot handle
http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/484a4b9349af
--
___
Python tracker
Antoine Pitrou added the comment:
I'll still commit my cleanup patch in the meantime :-)
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue16089
___
Roundup Robot added the comment:
New changeset f9224f23f473 by Antoine Pitrou in branch '3.3':
Sanitize and modernize some of the _elementtree code (see issue #16089).
http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/f9224f23f473
New changeset 9fb0a8fc5d79 by Antoine Pitrou in branch 'default':
Sanitize and
Eli Bendersky added the comment:
Thank you, Antoine, for looking into this. I wish I could participate in a
meaningful way, but alas it will be days or weeks before I can recreate a
suitable setup to get back hacking on Python.
--
___
Python
Changes by STINNER Victor victor.stin...@gmail.com:
--
nosy: +haypo
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue16105
___
___
Python-bugs-list
Roundup Robot added the comment:
New changeset 559a430e563c by Victor Stinner in branch 'default':
Issue #15609: Optimize str%args for integer argument
http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/559a430e563c
--
nosy: +python-dev
___
Python tracker
Changes by STINNER Victor victor.stin...@gmail.com:
--
resolution: - fixed
status: open - closed
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue15609
___
Roundup Robot added the comment:
New changeset f3ed5e211fcc by Victor Stinner in branch 'default':
Close #15766: Catch exceptions while raising the ImportError in
imp.load_dynamic()
http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/f3ed5e211fcc
--
resolution: - fixed
stage: - committed/rejected
STINNER Victor added the comment:
What is the status of this issue? Is anyone able to reproduce it? If not, I
would like to close it.
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue13572
STINNER Victor added the comment:
I didn't see this issue recently, 'm unable to reproduce it, so I close this
issue.
--
resolution: - works for me
status: open - closed
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue12069
Brett Cannon added the comment:
This should probably use concurrent.futures instead of multiprocessing
directly, but yes it would be useful.
Then again, the whole module should probably be rewritten to use importlib as
well.
--
components: +Library (Lib)
nosy: +brett.cannon
priority:
Brett Cannon added the comment:
I can't, so setting to pending so that if no one speaks up the issue will close.
--
status: open - pending
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue13572
1 - 100 of 132 matches
Mail list logo
