Dear Group,
I am using Python on Windows 7 SP-1 (64 bit).
I have two versions of Python installed 2.7 and 3.2.
I want to install networkx in both.
How may I do that?
If any one may kindly let me know.
Regards,
Subhabrata.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Gelonida N gelonida at gmail.com writes:
I wondered whether some of you have a little more insight into what's
going on with PIL.
AFAIK the latest PIL stuff lives here:
hg.effbot.org
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
I've noticed a strange thing with python lately:
Python 2.6.2 (r262:71600, Aug 21 2009, 12:23:57)
[GCC 4.4.1 20090818 (Red Hat 4.4.1-6)] on linux2
Type help, copyright, credits or license for more information.
def f(): print x
...
f()
terminate called after throwing an instance of
http://www.pip-installer.org/en/latest/index.html
--
Ritchie Flick
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Daniel Fetchinson wrote:
I've noticed a strange thing with python lately:
Python 2.6.2 (r262:71600, Aug 21 2009, 12:23:57)
[GCC 4.4.1 20090818 (Red Hat 4.4.1-6)] on linux2
Type help, copyright, credits or license for more information.
def f(): print x
...
f()
terminate called after
On 10/02/2012 04:43 AM, subhabangal...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear Group,
I am using Python on Windows 7 SP-1 (64 bit).
I have two versions of Python installed 2.7 and 3.2.
I want to install networkx in both.
How may I do that?
If any one may kindly let me know.
Doing a search for networkx,
I've noticed a strange thing with python lately:
Python 2.6.2 (r262:71600, Aug 21 2009, 12:23:57)
[GCC 4.4.1 20090818 (Red Hat 4.4.1-6)] on linux2
Type help, copyright, credits or license for more information.
def f(): print x
...
f()
terminate called after throwing an instance of
On 2012-10-02 09:26:56 +, WhisperingWally said:
Gelonida N gelonida at gmail.com writes:
I wondered whether some of you have a little more insight into what's
going on with PIL.
AFAIK the latest PIL stuff lives here:
hg.effbot.org
Certainly true, though somewhat meaningless in the
In order to provide more reliable benchmark, I get rid of application server
and network boundary. As a result I simulated a valid WSGI request and isolated
calls just to the web framework alone. Also I found interesting to take a look
at total number of calls and unique functions used by
Greetings!
I'm trying to unittest a class hierachy using Python 2.7. I have a
common baseclass Base and derived classes D1 and D2 that I want to test.
The baseclass in not instantiatable on its own. Now, the first approach
is to have test cases TestD1 and TestD2, both derived from class
[1] in C++ I would call that a mixin
Mixins are perfectly valid Python constructs as well and are perfectly
valid (imho) for this use case.
On a side note, I usually append a Mixin suffix to my mixin classes in
order to make it obvious to the reader.
--
Demian Brecht
@demianbrecht
On Tue, Oct 02, 2012 at 02:27:11PM +0200, Ulrich Eckhardt wrote:
As you see, the code for test_base() is redundant, so the idea is to
move it to a baseclass:
class TestBase(unittest.TestCase):
def test_base(self):
...
class TestD1(TestBase):
def test_r(self):
I don't use them anymore, but I'm curious about others opinions on this
list...
The more time I spend in Python, discovering what Pythonic code is and
such, it seems that I throw away much in terms of academic learnings as
far as OOP correctness goes. In doing so, I find that, in general,
Ulrich Eckhardt wrote:
As you see, the code for test_base() is redundant, so the idea is to
move it to a baseclass:
class TestBase(unittest.TestCase):
def test_base(self):
...
class TestD1(TestBase):
def test_r(self):
...
def test_s(self):
Peter Otten wrote:
Ulrich Eckhardt wrote:
The problem here is that TestBase is not a complete test case (just
as
class Base is not complete), but the unittest framework will still
try
to run it on its own.
How exactly are you invoking the test runner? unittest? nose? You can
tell the test
On Monday 2012 October 01 08:35, Hans Mulder wrote:
AFAIK, there is no Python module that can read shell syntax.
The stdlib's shlex might be that module.
--
Yonder nor sorghum stenches shut ladle gulls stopper torque wet
strainers.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Monday, 1 October 2012 13:47:50 UTC+5:30, Mark Lawrence wrote:
On 01/10/2012 01:58, 8 Dihedral wrote:
Your question seems vague to me. If you know you are storing
only immutable tuples in a list, then the way to iterate is simple.
Does Python have a magic method
On Tuesday, 2 October 2012 21:34:04 UTC+5:30, xDog Walker wrote:
On Monday 2012 October 01 08:35, Hans Mulder wrote:
AFAIK, there is no Python module that can read shell syntax.
The stdlib's shlex might be that module.
--
Yonder nor sorghum stenches shut ladle gulls stopper
Am 02.10.2012 16:06, schrieb Thomas Bach:
On Tue, Oct 02, 2012 at 02:27:11PM +0200, Ulrich Eckhardt wrote:
As you see, the code for test_base() is redundant, so the idea is to
move it to a baseclass:
class TestBase(unittest.TestCase):
def test_base(self):
...
class
On Monday, 1 October 2012 19:49:27 UTC+5:30, BobAalsma wrote:
Op vrijdag 21 september 2012 16:15:30 UTC+2 schreef Joel Goldstick het
volgende:
On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 9:58 AM, BobAalsma wrote:
Op vrijdag 21 september 2012 15:36:11 UTC+2 schreef Jerry Hill het
volgende:
On 02/10/2012 17:12, Ramchandra Apte wrote:
On Monday, 1 October 2012 13:47:50 UTC+5:30, Mark Lawrence wrote:
On 01/10/2012 01:58, 8 Dihedral wrote:
Your question seems vague to me. If you know you are storing
only immutable tuples in a list, then the way to iterate is simple.
Am 02.10.2012 16:06, schrieb Thomas Bach:
On Tue, Oct 02, 2012 at 02:27:11PM +0200, Ulrich Eckhardt wrote:
As you see, the code for test_base() is redundant, so the idea is to
move it to a baseclass:
class TestBase(unittest.TestCase):
def test_base(self):
...
class
Ulrich Eckhardt wrote:
Am 02.10.2012 16:06, schrieb Thomas Bach:
On Tue, Oct 02, 2012 at 02:27:11PM +0200, Ulrich Eckhardt wrote:
As you see, the code for test_base() is redundant, so the idea is to
move it to a baseclass:
class TestBase(unittest.TestCase):
def test_base(self):
Fayaz Yusuf Khan wrote:
Peter Otten wrote:
Ulrich Eckhardt wrote:
The problem here is that TestBase is not a complete test case (just
as
class Base is not complete), but the unittest framework will still
try
to run it on its own.
How exactly are you invoking the test runner? unittest?
On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 9:23 AM, Demian Brecht demianbre...@gmail.comwrote:
I don't use them anymore, but I'm curious about others opinions on this
list...
Interesting question. I think they haven't been useful for representing
the real world as everyone hoped, but are pretty good for
Am I missing something? Is there something that wasn't answered by my reply
about using mixins?
from unittest import TestCase
class SharedTestMixin(object):
def test_shared(self):
self.assertNotEquals('foo', 'bar')
class TestA(TestCase, SharedTestMixin):
def test_a(self):
On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 2:44 AM, Mark Lawrence breamore...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
What happened to freedom of speech? If I want to talk to a bot, I'll talk
to a bot. Besides I'm not convinced it/he/she is a bot. Plus if you read
my post carefully, add in several years experience of Python the
Am I missing something? Is there something that wasn't answered by my reply
about using mixins?
from unittest import TestCase
class SharedTestMixin(object):
def test_shared(self):
self.assertNotEquals('foo', 'bar')
class TestA(TestCase, SharedTestMixin):
def test_a(self):
On 02/10/2012 18:58, Chris Angelico wrote:
Dihedral might be a bot and might not. I've come to the conclusion
that it's not worth trying to find out, given that a good bot can
outdo a lot of humans in useful conversation.
ChrisA
Try telling that to the newbies on the Python tutor mailing
On 02/10/2012 19:06, Demian Brecht wrote:
Am I missing something? Is there something that wasn't answered by my reply
about using mixins?
from unittest import TestCase
class SharedTestMixin(object):
def test_shared(self):
self.assertNotEquals('foo', 'bar')
class TestA(TestCase,
On 10/2/2012 10:23 AM, Demian Brecht wrote:
I don't use them anymore, but I'm curious about others opinions on this
list...
The more time I spend in Python, discovering what Pythonic code is and
such, it seems that I throw away much in terms of academic learnings as
far as OOP correctness goes.
On 10/2/2012 1:58 PM, Chris Angelico wrote:
On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 2:44 AM, Mark Lawrence breamore...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
What happened to freedom of speech? If I want to talk to a bot, I'll talk
to a bot. Besides I'm not convinced it/he/she is a bot. Plus if you read
my post carefully, add
My efforts at trying to unsubscribe are not working. Could you help me with
this, or take this email as a request to unsubscribe.
Thanks,
Timothy Holmes
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Hello all:
I'm looking at a skill/perk system, where the player builds up his char
by using perk points to add abilities.
Each perk is under a category, and generally costs go up as you increase
the perk.
So I'm trying to figure something out; first, I'd really like the cost
calculation and
On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 3:01 PM, timothy holmes timothyh2s...@gmail.com wrote:
My efforts at trying to unsubscribe are not working. Could you help me with
this, or take this email as a request to unsubscribe.
Thanks,
Timothy Holmes
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Go
On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 2:00 PM, Littlefield, Tyler ty...@tysdomain.com wrote:
Hello all:
I'm looking at a skill/perk system, where the player builds up his char by
using perk points to add abilities.
Each perk is under a category, and generally costs go up as you increase the
perk.
So I'm
On Monday, October 1, 2012 4:17:50 PM UTC+8, Mark Lawrence wrote:
On 01/10/2012 01:58, 8 Dihedral wrote:
Your question seems vague to me. If you know you are storing
only immutable tuples in a list, then the way to iterate is simple.
Does Python have a magic method that
Job Title: Python developers
Duration: 6 months;
Location: Austin TX
Responsibilities / Skills:
1) distributed complex application experience
2) prefer experience with enterprise class identity management systems,
particularly around auth/credentials
3) experience with openstack
4) experience
Ulrich Eckhardt ulrich.eckha...@dominolaser.com writes:
I want test_base() to be run as part of both TestD1 and TestD2,
because it tests basic functions provided by both classes D1 and D2.
It sounds, from your description so far, that you have identified a
design flaw in D1 and D2.
The common
On Wednesday, August 29, 2012 6:21:50 AM UTC-4, Rakesh Rocker RuLZzz wrote:
I tried installing pyopencv in mac but i gives me an error
I have installed all the dependent softwares like opencv,boost, etcstill
unable to fix it.
also i have updated xcode and using python 2.7
I also
In article mailman.1734.1349199947.27098.python-l...@python.org,
Peter Otten __pete...@web.de wrote:
Another is to remove it from the global namespace with
del TestBase
When I had this problem, that's the solution I used.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Steven D'Aprano於 2012年10月3日星期三UTC+8上午8時57分20秒寫道：
On Wed, 03 Oct 2012 03:58:02 +1000, Chris Angelico wrote:
Dihedral might be a bot and might not. I've come to the conclusion that
it's not worth trying to find out, given that a good bot can outdo a lot
of humans in useful
On Tue, 02 Oct 2012 18:11:20 -0700, 8 Dihedral wrote:
Steven D'Aprano於 2012年10月3日星期三UTC+8上午8時57分20秒寫道：
Oh, I'm convinced that it's a bot.
The fact that Dihedral never responds to conversations about him/it is
a give away: nearly all people are far to egotistical to let
accusations of
On Wed, 03 Oct 2012 08:30:19 +1000, Ben Finney wrote:
Ulrich Eckhardt ulrich.eckha...@dominolaser.com writes:
I want test_base() to be run as part of both TestD1 and TestD2, because
it tests basic functions provided by both classes D1 and D2.
It sounds, from your description so far, that
Steven D'Aprano於 2012年10月3日星期三UTC+8上午9時24分13秒寫道：
On Tue, 02 Oct 2012 18:11:20 -0700, 8 Dihedral wrote:
Steven D'Aprano於 2012年10月3日星期三UTC+8上午8時57分20秒寫道：
Oh, I'm convinced that it's a bot.
The fact that Dihedral never responds to conversations about him/it is
a give
code1
def foo():
... a = 1
... def bar():
... b=2
... print a + b
... bar()
...
...
foo()
3
code2
def foo():
... a = 1
... def bar():
... b=2
... a = a + b
... print a
... bar()
...
foo()
Traceback (most recent call last):
File
On 10/02/2012 10:03 PM, contro opinion wrote:
code1
def foo():
... a = 1
... def bar():
... b=2
... print a + b
... bar()
...
...
foo()
3
code2
def foo():
... a = 1
... def bar():
... b=2
... a = a + b
Because your function
On Tuesday, 2 October 2012 22:13:20 UTC+5:30, Mark Lawrence wrote:
On 02/10/2012 17:12, Ramchandra Apte wrote:
On Monday, 1 October 2012 13:47:50 UTC+5:30, Mark Lawrence wrote:
On 01/10/2012 01:58, 8 Dihedral wrote:
Your question seems vague to me. If you know you
Ah, fair enough. Well, since you're using the full range of bash
functionality, the only viable way to parse it is with bash itself.
I'd recommend going with the version you have above:
* * * * * . /path/to/export_file /path/to/script.py
Under what circumstances is this not an option?
On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 1:49 PM, Jason Friedman ja...@powerpull.net wrote:
Based on your responses and everyone's responses I'm guessing that
what I am doing is sufficiently novel that there is no canned
solution. I looked at shlex but did not see how that would be
helpful.
The only canned
Jonathan Hayward christos.jonathan.hayw...@gmail.com wrote:
I've made an experimental Python-based Unix/Linux shell at:
http://JonathansCorner.com/cjsh/
An experimental Unix/Linux command line shell, implemented in Python 3,
that takes advantage of some more recent concepts in terms of
On 12-10-02 07:26 PM, Dave Angel wrote:
if you're stuck with Python2.x, you can use a mutable object for a, and
mutate it, rather than replace it. For example,
def foo():
a = [3]
def bar():
b=2
a.append(b) #this mutates a, but doesn't assign it
Changes by Ezio Melotti ezio.melo...@gmail.com:
--
versions: +Python 3.2, Python 3.3, Python 3.4 -Python 3.0
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue3991
___
Changes by Ezio Melotti ezio.melo...@gmail.com:
--
stage: - needs patch
type: performance - enhancement
versions: +Python 2.7, Python 3.2, Python 3.3, Python 3.4 -Python 2.6, Python
3.0
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
Georg Brandl added the comment:
Are you serious?
--
nosy: +georg.brandl
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue16106
___
___
Changes by Ezio Melotti ezio.melo...@gmail.com:
--
nosy: +pitrou
versions: +Python 3.2, Python 3.3, Python 3.4 -Python 2.6, Python 3.0, Python
3.1
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue5497
Changes by Ezio Melotti ezio.melo...@gmail.com:
--
keywords: +easy
versions: +Python 2.7 -Python 2.6, Python 3.0
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue3849
___
Changes by Antoine Pitrou pit...@free.fr:
--
nosy: +loewis
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue5497
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing
Changes by Ezio Melotti ezio.melo...@gmail.com:
--
keywords: +easy
stage: - needs patch
versions: +Python 3.3, Python 3.4 -Python 2.6, Python 3.0, Python 3.1
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue6477
Charles-François Natali added the comment:
I would not say that is a bug, but there is a write(wakeup_fd) call
with ignored return code and maybe this can be improved to an output
to stderr, or maybe a better solution.
The problem is that it's called from the signal handler, so there's not
Christian Heimes added the comment:
Ezio is as serious as the antigravity module. *g*
--
nosy: +christian.heimes
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue16106
___
Stefan Krah added the comment:
Nice find. -- The Python version does this:
_Element = _ElementInterface = Element
So (naively) I would think the same should be done for the C version
after importing Element.
But then one runs into the object layouts conflict that you mentioned.
On the
Serhiy Storchaka added the comment:
f = lambda t, c, *, _f=(lambda a, b, c: a + b + c): _f(*(unpack_tuple(2, t) +
(c,)))
def unpack_tuple(n, t):
t = tuple(t)
if len(t) n:
raise ValueError('too many values to unpack (expected %d)' % (n,))
if len(t) n:
raise
Kristján Valur Jónsson added the comment:
You are not restricted to the context manager model. Just use
selock.shared.acquire() or selock.exclusive.acquire().
The unlock operation is the same, so now you have to arbitrarily pick one of
the lockd and chose release(). Why take a construct
Kristján Valur Jónsson added the comment:
We've already departed from that. Our Lock is nothing like a mutex, for
example (it's more of a binary semaphore).
This is not by nature of good design, but an accident. C python needed both
mutex and signaling ability and decided that a single
Kristján Valur Jónsson added the comment:
I have implemented the simplest possible acquisition order.
The lock acquired first will be granted first. Without that (or a more
advanced policy) in applications with concurrent threads/processes
that are heavily using the shared lock, the
Richard Oudkerk added the comment:
I think you got that argument backwards. The simple greedy policy you
implement works well provided there are not too many readers. Otherwise,
the writers will be starved, since they have to wait for an oppertune
moment when no readers are active to get
Roundup Robot added the comment:
New changeset 5ddc7b3f2795 by Victor Stinner in branch 'default':
Issue #15609: Fix refleak introduced by my last optimization
http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/5ddc7b3f2795
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
Richard Oudkerk added the comment:
The unlock operation is the same, so now you have to arbitrarily pick one
of the lockd and chose release().
That depends on the implementation. In the three implementations on
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Readers-writers_problem
the unlock
Changes by Vinay Sajip vinay_sa...@yahoo.co.uk:
--
hgrepos: +150
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue15776
___
___
Python-bugs-list
Changes by Vinay Sajip vinay_sa...@yahoo.co.uk:
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file27384/e14d4c28bb03.diff
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue15776
___
Kristján Valur Jónsson added the comment:
Here is a new patch. it is complete with:
threading implementation and tests
multiprocessing implementation and tests.
Let's leave the naming bikeshedding a bit and focus on some practical aspects:
1) The threading version contains a RWLock and a
Václav Šmilauer added the comment:
Being a newcomer to this issue, I would like to ask for a brief summary about
which parts of the patch are checked in for 3.3.0 and which are still to be
applied.
Roumen mentions #15483, #15484, #15268 and the ac_cv_thread in the previous
post as mandatory
Kristján Valur Jónsson added the comment:
Oh, I forgot to mention: Once one gets into the domain of allowing such
niceties as writer priority, surely you can agree that the implementation of
both locking modes belongs in the same class instance. That is just plain good
coding practice,
Sebastian Noack added the comment:
Exactly, with my implemantation the lock acquired first will be granted
first. There is no way that either shared nor exclusive locks can starve, and
therefore it should satisfy all use cases. Since you can only share simple
datastructures like integers
Sebastian Noack added the comment:
@Kristján: Uhh, that is a huge amount of code, more than twice as much (don't
counting tests) as my implementation, to accomplish the same. And it seems that
there is not much code shared between the threading and multiprocessing
implementation. And for
Jean-Paul Calderone added the comment:
Since Benjamin originally requested this feature, and then decided that he
could accomplish his desired goal (ftplib porting, as far as I can tell)
without it, I think that the rejected status is actually incorrect. I think
that Benjamin just wanted to
Kristján Valur Jónsson added the comment:
This amount of code provides recursion, context managers, condition variable
compatibility, timeout functionality, error checking and conformance with the
unit tests.
The actual locking code is encapsulated in the three functions acquire_read(),
Kristján Valur Jónsson added the comment:
Ah, you are implementing an FIFO lock. That should have been made clear.
I see it now that you grant the lock in the order that the acquisition is
attempted.
Ok, this is fine, but with one important caveat: Explicit handoff such as that
can suffer
Martin v. Löwis added the comment:
I think this issue is outdated. ocean-city, is this still concern for you?
FWIW, I'll be removing the VC6 build process from the 3.4 (default) branch soon.
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
Christian Heimes added the comment:
The proposal sounds like a good idea to me.
Benjamin, what needs to be done to implement the feature?
--
nosy: +christian.heimes
versions: +Python 3.4 -Python 3.1
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
Changes by Brett Cannon br...@python.org:
--
dependencies: +Speedup sysconfig startup, locale can be imported at startup but
relies on too many library modules
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue16101
Serhiy Storchaka added the comment:
Formatting is a very complicated part of Python (especially after Victor's
optimizations). I think no one wants to maintain this code for a long time. The
price of maintaining exceeds the potential very limited benefits from the use.
--
nosy:
Brett Cannon added the comment:
It's actually a nice example of using unittest.mock. =)
--
nosy: +brett.cannon
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue16106
___
Chris Jerdonek added the comment:
The section of the Dev Guide on affirmative tone should also be applied:
The documentation focuses on affirmatively stating what the language does and
how to use it effectively
http://docs.python.org/devguide/documenting.html#affirmative-tone
--
Eric V. Smith added the comment:
I was just logging in to make this point, but Serhiy beat me to it. When I
wrote several years ago that this was easy, it was before the (awesome) PEP
393 work. I suspect, but have not verified, that having a bytes version of this
code would now require an
Jean-Paul Calderone added the comment:
The price of maintaining exceeds the potential very limited benefits from the
use.
The very limited benefits of being able to write I/O code without roughly 3
times code bloat? Perhaps for people who don't write code that does
non-trivial I/O, but
Eric V. Smith added the comment:
The implementation may be difficult, therefore no one should attempt it?
The development cost and maintenance cost is surely part of the evaluation when
deciding whether to implement a feature, no?
--
___
Python
Michael Foord added the comment:
What happens if test_geohash runs first? It looks like test_antigravity will
only pass if it is run first. You could remove the order dependence by ensuring
antigravity is not in sys.modules. sys.modules.pop('antigravity', None)
--
Jean-Paul Calderone added the comment:
The development cost and maintenance cost is surely part of the evaluation
when deciding whether to implement a feature, no?
Sure, but in an open source project where almost all contributions are done by
volunteers (ie, donated), what is the
Serhiy Storchaka added the comment:
I suspect, but have not verified, that having a bytes version of this code
would now require an implementation that shared very little with the str
version.
This is not all. The usage model will be completely different too.
* The default formatting
Chris Jerdonek added the comment:
Oh, this explains it. I was wondering why my browser was opening xkcd whenever
I tried running doctest against all modules in the library.
--
nosy: +chris.jerdonek
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
Benjamin Peterson added the comment:
As Serhiy suggests, it would be best to collect th eusecases for a format-like
method for bytes and design something which can meet them. It's definitely a
PEP.
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
Roundup Robot added the comment:
New changeset 26c3d170fd56 by Vinay Sajip in branch 'default':
Issue #15452: Added verify option for logging configuration socket listener.
http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/26c3d170fd56
--
nosy: +python-dev
___
Python
Changes by Serhiy Storchaka storch...@gmail.com:
Removed file: http://bugs.python.org/file25934/decode_charmap_fffe.patch
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue14850
___
Vinay Sajip added the comment:
I've updated logging as discussed in this issue, except for the removal of the
two calls to eval() in logging.config. I propose to resolve that as follows:
1. Add the Evaluator implemented in the Gist I linked to to ast.py.
2. Expose a function
Éric Araujo added the comment:
Thanks, will apply.
--
versions: +3rd party
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue16107
___
___
Éric Araujo added the comment:
LGTM.
--
priority: critical - normal
stage: needs patch - patch review
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue15776
___
New submission from Christian Fertig:
wespe:/tmp/python2.7 # cat /etc/SuSE-release
openSUSE 12.1 (x86_64)
VERSION = 12.1
CODENAME = Asparagus
wespe:/tmp/python2.7 # rpm -q python
python-2.7.2-7.17.1.x86_64
wespe:/tmp/python2.7 # python
Python 2.7.2 (default, Aug 19 2011, 20:41:43) [GCC] on
New submission from thbach:
Currently logging.config provides a fileConfig function which reads a ini-style
file via configparser.ConfigParser. I would like to have a function e.g.
configParserConfig which accepts a ConfigParser instance and configures logging
directly from the settings found
1 - 100 of 158 matches
Mail list logo
