On Aug 8, 7:18 pm, David C. Ullrich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The one thing that puzzles me about
all the results is why // is so much slower than / inside
that Psyco loop.
Just an oversight. The optimization about '/' between integers
was not copied for the case of '//' between integers.
On 8 Aug, 20:36, John Krukoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One possibility for the performance difference, is that as I understand
it the psyco developer has moved on to working on pypy, and probably
isn't interested in keeping psyco updated and optimized for new python
syntax.
More here on the
In article
[EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
John Krukoff:
One possibility for the performance difference, is that as I understand
it the psyco developer has moved on to working on pypy, and probably
isn't interested in keeping psyco updated and optimized for new python
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Delaney, Timothy (Tim) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
David C. Ullrich wrote:
f: 0.0158488750458
g: 0.000610113143921
h: 0.00200295448303
f: 0.0184948444366
g: 0.000257015228271
h: 0.00116610527039
I suspect you're hitting the point of diminishing
On Fri, 2008-08-08 at 12:18 -0500, David C. Ullrich wrote:
Curiously smug grin g is exactly how I'd planned on doing it
before trying anything. The one thing that puzzles me about
all the results is why // is so much slower than / inside
that Psyco loop.
Tim Delaney
One possibility for
John Krukoff:
One possibility for the performance difference, is that as I understand
it the psyco developer has moved on to working on pypy, and probably
isn't interested in keeping psyco updated and optimized for new python
syntax.
Somebody correct me if I'm wrong, but last I heard there's
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Erik Max Francis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
David C. Ullrich wrote:
Thanks. I would have guessed that I'd want low-level style code;
that's the sort of thing I have in mind. In fact the only thing
that seems likely to come up right now is looping through an
On Aug 6, 8:52 pm, David C. Ullrich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In article
[EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
David C. Ullrich:
Thanks. If I can get it installed and it works as advertised
this means I can finally (eventually) finish the process of
dumping MS Windows: the only
In article
[EMAIL PROTECTED],
MRAB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Aug 6, 8:52 pm, David C. Ullrich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In article
[EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
David C. Ullrich:
Thanks. If I can get it installed and it works as advertised
this means I can
David C. Ullrich wrote:
f: 0.0158488750458
g: 0.000610113143921
h: 0.00200295448303
f: 0.0184948444366
g: 0.000257015228271
h: 0.00116610527039
I suspect you're hitting the point of diminishing returns with g, and
any further investigations into optimisation are purely for fun and
learning
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Erik Max Francis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
David C. Ullrich wrote:
Just heard about Psycho. I've often wondered why someone
doesn't make something that does exactly what Psycho does - keen.
Silly question: It's correct, is it not, that Psycho doesn't
David C. Ullrich:
Thanks. If I can get it installed and it works as advertised
this means I can finally (eventually) finish the process of
dumping MS Windows: the only reason I need it right now is for
the small number of Delphi programs I have for which straight
Python is really not
In article
[EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
David C. Ullrich:
Thanks. If I can get it installed and it works as advertised
this means I can finally (eventually) finish the process of
dumping MS Windows: the only reason I need it right now is for
the small number of Delphi
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
David C. Ullrich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In article
[EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
David C. Ullrich:
Thanks. If I can get it installed and it works as advertised
this means I can finally (eventually) finish the process of
dumping MS
David C. Ullrich wrote:
Thanks. I would have guessed that I'd want low-level style code;
that's the sort of thing I have in mind. In fact the only thing
that seems likely to come up right now is looping through an
array of bytes, modifying them. The plan is to use the array
module first to
Erik Max Francis:
If len(bytes) is large, you might want to use `xrange`, too. `range`
creates a list which is not really what you need.
That's right for Python, but Psyco uses normal loops in both cases,
you can time this code in the two situations:
def foo1(n):
count = 0
for i in
David C. Ullrich wrote:
Just heard about Psycho. I've often wondered why someone
doesn't make something that does exactly what Psycho does - keen.
Silly question: It's correct, is it not, that Psycho doesn't
actually modify the Python installation, except by adding a
module or two (so that
17 matches
Mail list logo
