>
> The bytecode compiler doesn't know that you intend RANGE
> to be a constant -- it thinks it's a variable to bind a
> value to.
>
> To make this work you need to find a way to refer to the
> value that isn't just a bare name. One way would be to
> define your constants using an enum:
>
> class
On Thu, 8 Jun 2023 at 08:19, Jason Friedman via Python-list
wrote:
>
> This gives the expected results:
>
> with open(data_file, newline="") as reader:
> csvreader = csv.DictReader(reader)
> for row in csvreader:
> #print(row)
> match row[RULE_TYPE]:
> case "RANGE":
> print("range")
> case
On 8/06/23 10:18 am, Jason Friedman wrote:
SyntaxError: name capture 'RANGE' makes remaining patterns unreachable
The bytecode compiler doesn't know that you intend RANGE
to be a constant -- it thinks it's a variable to bind a
value to.
To make this work you need to find a way to refer to the
On 8/19/20 3:29 PM, Ethan Furman wrote:
> On 8/19/20 12:40 PM, Tim Daneliuk wrote:
>> On 8/19/20 2:00 PM, Karen Shaeffer wrote:
>
>>> Considering all your posts on this thread, it is reasonable to infer you
>>> have some ideological motivations.
>>
>> My motivation was to demonstrate that if
Tim,
Technology is political. Deal with it.
Signed,
Common Fucking Sense
On Wed, Aug 19, 2020 at 4:02 PM Tim Daneliuk wrote:
> On 8/19/20 1:10 PM, J. Pic wrote:
> > Tim, don't you also think that statements should be backed by
> > evidence, even more if they are particularly accusatory ?
> >
On 8/19/20 12:40 PM, Tim Daneliuk wrote:
On 8/19/20 2:00 PM, Karen Shaeffer wrote:
Considering all your posts on this thread, it is reasonable to infer you have
some ideological motivations.
My motivation was to demonstrate that if people of your ilk are free to
peddle their worldview,
On 8/19/20 1:10 PM, J. Pic wrote:
> Tim, don't you also think that statements should be backed by
> evidence, even more if they are particularly accusatory ?
>
> We'll be lucky if S's editor doesn't sue the PSF for slandering for
> publishing that S "upholds white supremacy".
>
As a general
On 8/19/20 2:00 PM, Karen Shaeffer wrote:
> Where you conclude with: "Methinks there is an ideological skunk in the
> parlor …”
>
> Considering all your posts on this thread, it is reasonable to infer you have
> some ideological motivations.
My motivation was to demonstrate that if people of
On Wed, Aug 19, 2020 at 3:33 AM Tim Daneliuk wrote:
> On 8/18/20 6:34 PM, rmli...@riseup.net wrote:
> > I would kindly recommend that folks just educate themselves on what
> > ...
> > Resources:
> > The Invention of the White Race: Volume II:
>
> On Aug 19, 2020, at 8:47 AM, Tim Daneliuk wrote:
>
> On 8/19/20 8:35 AM, Alexandre Brault wrote:
>> I've not seen anyone objecting to the idea of removing the reference to
>> Strunk and White in favour of the underlying message of "be understandable
>> by others who may read your comments"
Tim, don't you also think that statements should be backed by
evidence, even more if they are particularly accusatory ?
We'll be lucky if S's editor doesn't sue the PSF for slandering for
publishing that S "upholds white supremacy".
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On 8/18/20 12:18 PM, gia wrote:
> That's why I picked Math, it is also universally accepted, it's very
> strict, and it leaves the reader to decide its color based on themselves
> (it's not white btw :)
Sorry, but when it comes to the demands of the woke, you are not
immune. Reported widely
On 8/19/20 8:35 AM, Alexandre Brault wrote:
> I've not seen anyone objecting to the idea of removing the reference to
> Strunk and White in favour of the underlying message of "be understandable by
> others who may read your comments" (there were at most a few philosophical
> "what is
On Wed, Aug 19, 2020 at 4:06 PM Ethan Furman wrote:
> The purported issue is that Strunk and White itself is doing the upholding.
Still trying to find some actual evidence.
--
∞
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On 8/19/20 6:35 AM, Alexandre Brault wrote:
What people *are* complaining about is the use of a commit message to
stand on a soapbox and preach. The time to preach was when debating the
change; commit messages, in many people's opinions, is not the time to
espouse non-technical opinions
An
On 2020-08-18 7:34 p.m., rmli...@riseup.net wrote:
There are many reasons Elements is a terrible English style guide:
https://www.pure.ed.ac.uk/ws/files/8520953/PULLUM_2010_The_land_of_the_free_and_the_elements_of_style.pdf
I would kindly recommend that folks just educate themselves on what
On 8/19/20 2:55 AM, J. Pic wrote:
[...] but still, I
don't understand how this sentence (changed by the patch):
When writing English, follow Strunk and White.
Does "uphold relics of white supremacy" (as per the commit message).
Thanks in advance for your simple explanation (I'm not a
On Wed, Aug 19, 2020 at 3:33 AM Tim Daneliuk wrote:
>
> I would also like to help you become educated. Be sure to check
> out these literary treasures - they are the foundation of the
> worldview you are espousing:
>
>
> The_Origin of the Family, Private Property, and the State - Engels
>
> Das
My origins are Jewish Algerian which is just hated by just all parties
you could think off, but can not be considered as white.
Nonetheless, I'm not angry in any way, rather amused, but still, I
don't understand how this sentence (changed by the patch):
> When writing English, follow Strunk and
On 18/08/2020 19:45, Tim Daneliuk wrote:
On 8/18/20 12:28 PM, justin walters wrote:
I apologize for being ageist earlier as well. That was out of line.
I am likely older than you and there is no reason to apologise.
Only the profoundly undeveloped psyche takes every opportunity to
find
> On Aug 18, 2020, at 6:13 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>
> On 8/18/20 7:34 PM, rmli...@riseup.net wrote:
>> I would also caution against relying on the idea of human rights when
>> defending against accusations of being political, since they too are
>> political. Life is political. We continue to
On 8/18/20 6:34 PM, rmli...@riseup.net wrote:
> I would kindly recommend that folks just educate themselves on what
Speaking of being educated ... Could you please do an exposition
for all us ignorant types on the books that really animate
your worldview:
The_Origin of the Family, Private
On 8/18/20 6:34 PM, rmli...@riseup.net wrote:
> I would kindly recommend that folks just educate themselves on what
I would also like to help you become educated. Be sure to check
out these literary treasures - they are the foundation of the
worldview you are espousing:
The_Origin of the
On 8/18/20 7:34 PM, rmli...@riseup.net wrote:
> I would also caution against relying on the idea of human rights when
> defending against accusations of being political, since they too are
> political. Life is political. We continue to this day trying to
> redefine, as a society, what human rights
>
> > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> > than "Re: Contents of Python-list digest..."
> >
> > Today's Topics:
> >
> >1. why the connection set with ?keep live? in urllib.request
> > always set to be?cl
> always set to be?closed, thanks (xuanwu348)
>2. Final statement from Steering Council on politically-charged
> commit messages (Chris Angelico)
>3. Re: Final statement from Steering Council on
> politically-charged commit messages (Dylan Distasio)
>
On Wed, Aug 19, 2020 at 7:11 AM Kyle Stanley wrote:
>
> On Mon, Aug 17, 2020 at 2:37 PM Chris Angelico wrote:
>>
>> Yes. I was hoping for "we should rewrite that commit", and would have
>> been content with "we won't rewrite it, but we don't want that
>> repeated". But the SC said that it is
On Mon, Aug 17, 2020 at 2:37 PM Chris Angelico wrote:
> Yes. I was hoping for "we should rewrite that commit", and would have
> been content with "we won't rewrite it, but we don't want that
> repeated". But the SC said that it is absolutely fine to write commit
> messages like that.
>
While
On 8/18/20 12:28 PM, justin walters wrote:
> I apologize for being ageist earlier as well. That was out of line.
I am likely older than you and there is no reason to apologise.
Only the profoundly undeveloped psyche takes every opportunity to
find offense when none is intended. It is the sign
I believe the commit message was written in bad faith. It reeks of virtue
signaling. Commit messages should remain purely technical in nature.
However, I do think the change itself is valid.
I don't care about the style of comments as long as they are clear and
communicate their message well. How
That's why I picked Math, it is also universally accepted, it's very
strict, and it leaves the reader to decide its color based on themselves
(it's not white btw :)
On Tue, Aug 18, 2020 at 11:36 AM Tim Daneliuk wrote:
> On 8/17/20 1:26 PM, Chris Angelico wrote:
> > For context, see this
On 8/17/20 1:26 PM, Chris Angelico wrote:
> For context, see this commit:
>
> https://github.com/python/peps/commit/0c6427dcec1e98ca0bd46a876a7219ee4a9347f4
>
> The commit message is highly politically charged and is now a
> permanent part of the Python commit history. The Python Steering
>
I'm sorry Igor, I didn't mean to ruin your "conspiracy theories just
hit the commit log day"
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Hi,
On Tue, Aug 18, 2020 at 10:27 AM J. Pic wrote:
>
> I think this commit message is not enough: we should take it further
> and demand that Elwyn Brooks White choose change their last name to
> something less supremacist.
>
> Also: I've been waiting long enough to see this drama hit the chess
On 18/08/2020 04:53, thronobu...@gmail.com wrote:
"Truth is a social construct."
much as I deplore the politicization of computers, logic, maths and other areas of human interest by particular interest
groups, according to some physicists, reality might be an observer based construct
I think this commit message is not enough: we should take it further
and demand that Elwyn Brooks White choose change their last name to
something less supremacist.
Also: I've been waiting long enough to see this drama hit the chess
world by itself so I'm explicitly making the suggestion here.
--
On Tue, Aug 18, 2020 at 11:12 PM Richard Damon wrote:
>
> On 8/18/20 1:22 AM, justin walters wrote:
> > I for one don't want to see politics involved in PL development. However,
> > inclusivity isn't a political issue, it's a human rights issue.
> >
> > Do I agree with the PR, not exactly.
On 8/18/20 1:22 AM, justin walters wrote:
> I for one don't want to see politics involved in PL development. However,
> inclusivity isn't a political issue, it's a human rights issue.
>
> Do I agree with the PR, not exactly. However, I do think we as a community
> should be accommodating to people
> Do I agree with the PR, not exactly. However, I do think we as a community
> should be accommodating to people
> Whose use of the English language differs from the standard as long as the
> meaning is clear.
Remember that the problem isn't the change in wording of the PEP. That's all
well and
I for one don't want to see politics involved in PL development. However,
inclusivity isn't a political issue, it's a human rights issue.
Do I agree with the PR, not exactly. However, I do think we as a community
should be accommodating to people
Whose use of the English language differs from the
On Monday, August 17, 2020 at 1:26:33 PM UTC-5, Chris Angelico wrote:
> For context, see this commit:
>
> https://github.com/python/peps/commit/0c6427dcec1e98ca0bd46a876a7219ee4a9347f4
>
> The commit message is highly politically charged and is now a
> permanent part of the Python commit
On Monday, August 17, 2020 at 1:26:33 PM UTC-5, Chris Angelico wrote:
> For context, see this commit:
>
> https://github.com/python/peps/commit/0c6427dcec1e98ca0bd46a876a7219ee4a9347f4
>
> The commit message is highly politically charged and is now a
> permanent part of the Python commit
Math should stop being standardized, as it could alienate people of other
colors to it.
Commit should be rewritten as "Remove book advert from comments".
On Mon, Aug 17, 2020 at 1:39 PM Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 18, 2020 at 4:34 AM Dylan Distasio
> wrote:
> >
> > That's quite an
On Tue, Aug 18, 2020 at 4:34 AM Dylan Distasio wrote:
>
> That's quite an interesting ruling by the SC. I'm not surprised to see them
> bend the knee to PC, but it is disheartening to see they're fine opening a
> can of political worms in a programming language. I suspect they will
> deplore
That's quite an interesting ruling by the SC. I'm not surprised to see
them bend the knee to PC, but it is disheartening to see they're fine
opening a can of political worms in a programming language. I suspect they
will deplore messages outside of their bubble though.
On Mon, Aug 17, 2020 at
On 2020-01-28 12:14 PM, L A Smit wrote:
Please help me with this.
squares =input("\nSquares: ")
print(float((squares) *float(.15)) *(1.3))
Cant print answer.
print(float((squares) * float(.15)) *(1.3))
TypeError: can't multiply sequence by non-int of type 'float'
You have some
On Sun, Apr 16, 2017 at 5:21 PM, Mikhail V wrote:
> I am in the category "I just want to express some
> algorithm and don't want to learn every year new concepts".
> I tend to think that extremely restricted syntax, in the sence
> of having only few flow control instructions
On 14 April 2017 at 03:44, Steve D'Aprano wrote:
> On Fri, 14 Apr 2017 12:52 am, bartc wrote:
>
>> I know this isn't the Python need-for-speed thread, but this is a
>> classic example where the lack of one simple feature leads to using
>> slower, more cumbersome ones.
On 04/14/2017 07:19 AM, Dennis Lee Bieber wrote:
On Fri, 14 Apr 2017 11:44:59 +1000, Steve D'Aprano
declaimed the following:
Even that's not enough for some. Donald Knuth, who supports the use of GOTO
under some circumstances, maintains that any program using
On Sat, Apr 15, 2017 at 12:13 AM, Dennis Lee Bieber
wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Apr 2017 18:36:57 -0600, Ian Kelly
> declaimed the following:
>
>>
>>Well, you can do it in Assembly. And BASIC, if you count the primitive
>>GOSUB-type subroutines, though
Bernd Nawothnig wrote:
> On 2017-04-13, Mikhail V wrote:
> > On 13 April 2017 at 18:48, Ian Kelly wrote:
> >> On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 10:23 AM, Mikhail V wrote:
> >>> Now I wonder, have we already collected *all* bells
On 2017-04-13, Grant Edwards wrote:
> On 2017-04-13, Rob Gaddi wrote:
>
>> No, C doesn't support exception handling. As a result, handling error
>> conditions in C is a huge pain for which (forward-only) goto is often,
>> while not the only remedy, the least
On 2017-04-13, Mikhail V wrote:
> On 13 April 2017 at 18:48, Ian Kelly wrote:
>> On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 10:23 AM, Mikhail V wrote:
>>> Now I wonder, have we already collected *all* bells and whistles of Python
>>> in these two examples, or is there
On 14/04/2017 02:44, Steve D'Aprano wrote:
On Fri, 14 Apr 2017 12:52 am, bartc wrote:
I know this isn't the Python need-for-speed thread, but this is a
classic example where the lack of one simple feature leads to using
slower, more cumbersome ones.
Dear gods, have I fallen back in time to
On Friday, April 14, 2017 at 7:15:11 AM UTC+5:30, Steve D'Aprano wrote:
> On Fri, 14 Apr 2017 12:52 am, bartc wrote:
>
> > I know this isn't the Python need-for-speed thread, but this is a
> > classic example where the lack of one simple feature leads to using
> > slower, more cumbersome ones.
>
On Fri, 14 Apr 2017 12:52 am, bartc wrote:
> I know this isn't the Python need-for-speed thread, but this is a
> classic example where the lack of one simple feature leads to using
> slower, more cumbersome ones.
Dear gods, have I fallen back in time to 1975 again?
The Goto Wars are over, and
On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 4:59 PM, bartc wrote:
> On 13/04/2017 22:58, Ian Kelly wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 3:27 PM, Dennis Lee Bieber
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Thu, 13 Apr 2017 15:52:24 +0100, bartc declaimed the
>>> following:
>>>
On 13/04/2017 22:58, Ian Kelly wrote:
On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 3:27 PM, Dennis Lee Bieber
wrote:
On Thu, 13 Apr 2017 15:52:24 +0100, bartc declaimed the
following:
'goto' would be one easy-to-execute byte-code; no variables, objects or
types to worry
On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 3:27 PM, Dennis Lee Bieber
wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Apr 2017 15:52:24 +0100, bartc declaimed the
> following:
>
>>'goto' would be one easy-to-execute byte-code; no variables, objects or
>>types to worry about. If implemented properly
Rob Gaddi :
> On 04/13/2017 08:26 AM, Marko Rauhamaa wrote:
>> I have occasionally felt the urge to try "goto" in my C code, but having
>> written it, I have taken it out. It just doesn't make the code look more
>> elegant or robust. Unlike "break" or "return,"
On 2017-04-13, Rob Gaddi wrote:
> No, C doesn't support exception handling. As a result, handling error
> conditions in C is a huge pain for which (forward-only) goto is often,
> while not the only remedy, the least painful one.
Indeed. That is almost the
On 13 April 2017 at 19:38, Ian Kelly wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 11:25 AM, Mikhail V wrote:
>> On 13 April 2017 at 18:48, Ian Kelly wrote:
>>> On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 10:23 AM, Mikhail V wrote:
On Thursday, April 13, 2017 at 11:19:38 PM UTC+5:30, Ian wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 11:39 AM, Rustom Mody wrote:
> > My broader point (vive la Trump) was that if we learn to actively tolerate
> > people with views wildly far from ours, the world would be a better place.
>
> I fail to see
On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 11:39 AM, Rustom Mody wrote:
> My broader point (vive la Trump) was that if we learn to actively tolerate
> people with views wildly far from ours, the world would be a better place.
I fail to see how my comment "Functions and exceptions are
On 04/13/2017 08:26 AM, Marko Rauhamaa wrote:
Chris Angelico :
Personally, I can't remember the last time I yearned for "goto" in
Python, and the only times I've ever wished for it or used it in other
languages have been multi-loop breaks or "for...else" blocks. And
neither
On Thursday, April 13, 2017 at 10:56:53 PM UTC+5:30, Rob Gaddi wrote:
> On 04/13/2017 10:13 AM, Rustom Mody wrote:
> > On Thursday, April 13, 2017 at 10:19:33 PM UTC+5:30, Ian wrote:
> >> On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 10:23 AM, Mikhail V wrote:
> >>> Now I wonder, have we already collected *all* bells
On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 11:25 AM, Mikhail V wrote:
> On 13 April 2017 at 18:48, Ian Kelly wrote:
>> On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 10:23 AM, Mikhail V wrote:
>>> Now I wonder, have we already collected *all* bells and whistles of
On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 11:13 AM, Rustom Mody wrote:
> What to do??
> Ask Trump?
> [I guess we now need a Godwin 2.0 with :s/Hitler/Trump ]
Not even close. Whatever one's opinion may be of Trump, he hasn't
murdered millions of people.
--
On 04/13/2017 10:13 AM, Rustom Mody wrote:
On Thursday, April 13, 2017 at 10:19:33 PM UTC+5:30, Ian wrote:
On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 10:23 AM, Mikhail V wrote:
Now I wonder, have we already collected *all* bells and whistles of Python
in these two examples, or is there something else for
On 04/12/2017 04:42 PM, Mikhail V wrote:
> For me it looks clear and I'd say easy to comprehend,
> Main critic would be obviously that it is not
> a good, *scalable application*, but quite often I don't
> even have this in mind, and just want to express a
> step-by-step direct instructions.
I
On 13 April 2017 at 18:48, Ian Kelly wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 10:23 AM, Mikhail V wrote:
>> Now I wonder, have we already collected *all* bells and whistles of Python
>> in these two examples, or is there something else for expressing trivial
On 13/04/2017 16:03, Ian Kelly wrote:
On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 8:52 AM, bartc wrote:
On 13/04/2017 15:35, Chris Angelico wrote:
Personally, I can't remember the last time I yearned for "goto" in
Python, and the only times I've ever wished for it or used it in other
languages
On Thursday, April 13, 2017 at 10:19:33 PM UTC+5:30, Ian wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 10:23 AM, Mikhail V wrote:
> > Now I wonder, have we already collected *all* bells and whistles of Python
> > in these two examples, or is there something else for expressing trivial
> > thing.
>
>
On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 10:23 AM, Mikhail V wrote:
> Now I wonder, have we already collected *all* bells and whistles of Python
> in these two examples, or is there something else for expressing trivial
> thing.
Functions and exceptions are considered "bells and whistles"?
On 13 April 2017 at 02:17, Rob Gaddi wrote:
>
> def finder:
> for s in S:
> if s == 'i':
> return 'found on stage 1'
>
> S = S + ' hello world'
> for s in S:
> if s == 'd':
> return 'found on stage 2'
>
> raise ValueError('not found;
Chris Angelico :
> Personally, I can't remember the last time I yearned for "goto" in
> Python, and the only times I've ever wished for it or used it in other
> languages have been multi-loop breaks or "for...else" blocks. And
> neither is very frequent.
I have occasionally
On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 8:52 AM, bartc wrote:
> On 13/04/2017 15:35, Chris Angelico wrote:
>> Personally, I can't remember the last time I yearned for "goto" in
>> Python, and the only times I've ever wished for it or used it in other
>> languages have been multi-loop breaks or
On 13/04/2017 15:35, Chris Angelico wrote:
On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 9:31 PM, alister wrote:
I expect you could simulate most of these with a custom exception
for example break from nested loop:
class GoTo(Exception):
pass
try:
for i in range(100):
On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 9:31 PM, alister wrote:
> I expect you could simulate most of these with a custom exception
> for example break from nested loop:
>
> class GoTo(Exception):
> pass
>
> try:
> for i in range(100):
> print i
> for j in range
On Thu, 13 Apr 2017 01:42:01 +0200, Mikhail V wrote:
> On 12 April 2017 at 02:44, Nathan Ernst wrote:
>> goto is a misunderstood and much misaligned creature. It is a very
>> useful feature, but like nearly any programming construct can be
>> abused.
>>
>> Constructs like
On 04/12/2017 04:42 PM, Mikhail V wrote:
On 12 April 2017 at 02:44, Nathan Ernst wrote:
goto is a misunderstood and much misaligned creature. It is a very useful
feature, but like nearly any programming construct can be abused.
Constructs like 'break', 'continue' or
On 22/02/17 17:38, Peter Pearson wrote:
On Wed, 22 Feb 2017 22:33:31 +0530, Ganesh Pal wrote:
[snip]
I need suggestion on the if statement in the below code , all that I was
trying to do was to add a check i.e if any one of the functions return
True then break the loop.
end_time =
On Wed, 22 Feb 2017 22:33:31 +0530, Ganesh Pal wrote:
[snip]
> I need suggestion on the if statement in the below code , all that I was
> trying to do was to add a check i.e if any one of the functions return
> True then break the loop.
>
> end_time = time.time() + 300
> umount_completed
On Wed, 22 Feb 2017 22:33:31 +0530, Ganesh Pal wrote:
> Hello Friends,
>
> I need suggestion on the if statement in the below code , all that I
> was trying to do was to add a check i.e if any one of the functions
> return True then break the loop.
>
>
> end_time = time.time() + 300
>
On 04/05/2014 09:58 PM, Anthony Smith wrote:
Hi
I have a small project and I have been unable to get the following statement to
work. Any help would great.
User inputs can either self_sale_head which is a $ value,if a $ value is not
add a self.estimated_weight_hd is used to get the total
On 21 September 2013 07:57, Sam anasdah...@gmail.com wrote:
hi everybody i am just starting to learn python, i was writing a simple
i/o program but my print statement is acting weird. here is my code i want
to know why it prints this way. thank you
print(\nThe total amount required is ,
Remove both brackets in last line, You are creating a tuple in last
statement not making a function call.
2013/9/20 Sam anasdah...@gmail.com
hi everybody i am just starting to learn python, i was writing a simple
i/o program but my print statement is acting weird. here is my code i want
to
In 05bbf1a3-6480-48ee-8984-2482b90c7...@googlegroups.com Sam
anasdah...@gmail.com writes:
print(\nThe total amount required is , total )
OUTPUT
('\nThe total amount required is ', 3534)
In older versions of python (like the one you are using), 'print' is a
statement instead of a function.
On Sat, Sep 21, 2013 at 7:57 AM, Sam anasdah...@gmail.com wrote:
car=int(input(Lamborghini tune-up:))
print(\nThe total amount required is , total )
OUTPUT
('\nThe total amount required is ', 3534)
As others have said, this output indicates that you're running under a
Python 2.x interpreter.
On 20/9/2013 17:57, Sam wrote:
print(\nThe total amount required is , total )
('\nThe total amount required is ', 3534)
=== the problem is obviously on the last print statement that is supposed to
print the outut
Others have pointed out the version discrepancy. But I'll also ask what
On Sun, 10 Mar 2013 14:16:27 +, Joseph L. Casale wrote:
I have a switch statement composed using a dict:
switch = {
'a': func_a,
'b': func_b,
'c': func_c
}
switch.get(var, default)()
As a result of multiple functions per choice, it migrated to:
switch = {
switch = {
'A': functools.partial(spam, a),
'B': lambda b, c=c: ham(b, c),
'C': eggs,
}
switch[letter](b)
That's cool, never even thought to use lambdas.
functools.partial isn't always applicable, but when it is, you should
prefer it over lambda since it will be very
On 03/10/2013 10:16 AM, Joseph L. Casale wrote:
I have a switch statement composed using a dict:
switch = {
'a': func_a,
'b': func_b,
'c': func_c
}
switch.get(var, default)()
As a result of multiple functions per choice, it migrated to:
switch = {
'a': (func_a1, func_a2),
'b':
On Sun, Mar 10, 2013 at 8:42 PM, Mitya Sirenef msire...@lightbird.netwrote:
On 03/10/2013 10:16 AM, Joseph L. Casale wrote:
I have a switch statement composed using a dict:
switch = {
'a': func_a,
'b': func_b,
'c': func_c
}
switch.get(var, default)()
As a result of
On 3/10/2013 11:18 AM, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
On Sun, 10 Mar 2013 14:16:27 +, Joseph L. Casale wrote:
I have a switch statement composed using a dict:
switch = {
'a': func_a,
'b': func_b,
'c': func_c
}
switch.get(var, default)()
As a result of multiple functions per
Or could you do something like:
arguments_to_pass = [list of some sort]
switch.get(var, default)(*arguments_to_pass)
Stevens lambda suggestion was most appropriate. Within the switch, there
are functions called with none, or some variation of arguments. It was not
easy to pass them in after
On 23/01/2013 15:35, Jussi Piitulainen wrote:
Thomas Boell writes:
Using a keyword that has a well-understood meaning in just about
every other programming language on the planet *and even in
English*, redefining it to mean something completely different, and
then making the syntax look like
On Tue, 22 Jan 2013 17:28:35 -0800 (PST)
alex23 wuwe...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jan 23, 1:48 am, Thomas Boell tbo...@domain.invalid wrote:
I must say, that's bound to be confusing for anyone who knows any
language other than Python (or none, even). Syntax like that is an
accident waiting to
Thomas Boell writes:
Using a keyword that has a well-understood meaning in just about
every other programming language on the planet *and even in
English*, redefining it to mean something completely different, and
then making the syntax look like the original, well-understood
meaning --
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 8:35 AM, Jussi Piitulainen
jpiit...@ling.helsinki.fi wrote:
The feature isn't bad, it's just very, very badly named.
I believe it would read better - much better - if it was for/then
and while/then instead of for/else and while/else.
That's always been my opinion too.
1 - 100 of 396 matches
Mail list logo