Welcome to the New List and Migration Status

Welcome to the new "home" for development discussion around Fedora QA! The basic idea is to use this list for discussion around the development of: - AutoQA - Fedora Build Service - Blocker Tracking App - Any new QA tools that we end up creating I've been working on migration tasks and the fo

Problems with code reviews on reviewboard

Recently, we've been having some issues with code reviews on the reviewboard instance I set up. Petr was not able to create a review for a fedora-build-service patch and a review I set up is showing diff errors. I started digging into this yesterday, and it turns out to be a problem with the fedor

Blocker Tracking App Deadlines and Schedules for F19

As we start getting closer to the time where we're all busy testing Fedora 19, it's time to start looking at what we want to get wrapped up before then. Looking at the Fedora 19 schedule [1], we have: 2013-03-12: F19 Branch from Rawhide 2013-04-02: Feature Freeze [1] https://fedoraproject.org/

Re: Review Request 6: Fixing sync to work with new python-bugzilla and new FE naming convention

I did an alembic upgrade of the database with no issues. Thanks, Tim Flink ___ qa-devel mailing list qa-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/qa-devel

Re: Review Request 2: Initial Blocker Review Code

g instance available: https://209.132.184.132/blockerbugs Thanks, Tim Flink ___ qa-devel mailing list qa-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/qa-devel

Re: Review Request 2: Initial Blocker Review Code

32.184.132/blockerbugs Thanks, Tim Flink ___ qa-devel mailing list qa-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/qa-devel

Re: Review Request 8: Add Fedora 19 Milestones

> On Feb. 26, 2013, 7:15 p.m., Tim Flink wrote: > > Code looks good to me for the most part. I realize that we've talked about > > g versus session for storing this data before but I'm hitting some minor > > issues regarding the ability of the menu bars to updat

Re: Review Request 2: Initial Blocker Review Code

56704cd349e3ca88c866 > blockerbugs/__init__.py cae54ab562f8a17a4473aa0bc58a73dacf5225f9 > > Diff: http://reviewboard-tflink.rhcloud.com/r/2/diff/ > > > Testing > --- > > I've done quite a bit of local testing and there is a staging instance > available: https://209.132.184.132/blockerbugs > > > Thanks, > > Tim Flink > > ___ qa-devel mailing list qa-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/qa-devel

Re: Review Request 2: Initial Blocker Review Code

aging instance available: https://209.132.184.132/blockerbugs Thanks, Tim Flink ___ qa-devel mailing list qa-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/qa-devel

Re: Review Request 2: Initial Blocker Review Code

rbugs Thanks, Tim Flink ___ qa-devel mailing list qa-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/qa-devel

Re: Problems with code reviews on reviewboard

On Thu, 28 Feb 2013 16:15:29 -0700 Tim Flink wrote: > Recently, we've been having some issues with code reviews on the > reviewboard instance I set up. Petr was not able to create a review > for a fedora-build-service patch and a review I set up is showing diff > errors. >

Re: Review Request 2: Initial Blocker Review Code

blockerbugs/__init__.py cae54ab562f8a17a4473aa0bc58a73dacf5225f9 Diff: http://reviewboard-tflink.rhcloud.com/r/2/diff/ Testing --- I've done quite a bit of local testing and there is a staging instance available: https://209.132.184.132/blockerbugs Thanks, Tim

Re: Review Request 16: Initial Packaging Work

ave a staging instance set up in the cloud: https://209.132.184.164/blockerbugs/ Thanks, Tim Flink ___ qa-devel mailing list qa-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/qa-devel

Re: Review Request 16: Initial Packaging Work

-tflink.rhcloud.com/r/16/diff/ Testing --- I've done a bunch of local testing and have a staging instance set up in the cloud: https://209.132.184.164/blockerbugs/ Thanks, Tim Flink ___ qa-devel mailing list qa-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

AutoQA Going Down for Updates

The physical machine which hosts autoqa.fp.o and autoqa-stg.fp.o is going down for maintenance and thus, autoqa will be down for a little while. I'm starting to stop new jobs and will be bringing the hosts down shortly. I'll send out an update when things are back up. Tim signature.asc Descript

Re: AutoQA Going Down for Updates

On Thu, 14 Mar 2013 12:43:08 -0600 Tim Flink wrote: > The physical machine which hosts autoqa.fp.o and autoqa-stg.fp.o is > going down for maintenance and thus, autoqa will be down for a little > while. > > I'm starting to stop new jobs and will be bringing the hosts down

Re: Review Request 17: Implement Bugzilla Account Association

-tflink.rhcloud.com/r/17/#comment33> Can you stick a bit of text at the end of this which says: "Your Red Hat bugzilla password is used only to verify that you control the account which will be linked to your FAS account. Your password will NOT be stored anywhere in thi

Re: Review Request 16: Initial Packaging Work

aging instance set up in the cloud: https://209.132.184.164/blockerbugs/ Thanks, Tim Flink ___ qa-devel mailing list qa-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/qa-devel

New and Improved Blocker Tracking App Beta

This took a bit longer than I was hoping but we finally have a staging instance of the new blocker tracking app up and running: https://qa.stg.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/ There are still a few kinks to work out around syncing with bugzilla and on the app administration side of things but it is

Re: New and Improved Blocker Tracking App Beta

On Tue, 26 Mar 2013 05:05:01 -0400 (EDT) Jaroslav Reznik wrote: > > One more idea, the top left logo should be clickable and should > > redirect to the Home tab. It's customary for most projects. Filed as https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/369 > Also it would be nice to have "Currently

Re: Review Request 19: Rework Logging Mechanisms

t and will end up using the logger as a bodhi interface due to the order of args - either switch to named args here or change the order of args in the UpdateSync __init__ and make sure that it doesn't break anything - Tim Flink On April 3, 2013, 11:53 a.m

Re: Review Request 19: Rework Logging Mechanisms

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://reviewboard-tflink.rhcloud.com/r/19/ --- (Updated April 17, 2013, 5:18 p.m.) Status -- This change has been

Review Request 20: Rework Logging Mechanisms

roject.org/blockerbugs/ - no issues noticed thus far Thanks, Tim Flink ___ qa-devel mailing list qa-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/qa-devel

Re: Review Request 21: Milestone Update List Generates HTTP 500 Error

forgot that I filed the bug and neglected to fix it. - Tim Flink On April 22, 2013, 8:43 a.m., Martin Krizek wrote: > > --- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > http://reviewboard-tflink.rhcl

Review Request 22: Add Visible Link to IRC Meeting Prep

Diff: http://reviewboard-tflink.rhcloud.com/r/22/diff/ Testing --- Thanks, Tim Flink ___ qa-devel mailing list qa-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/qa-devel

Re: Review Request 18: Add cgit link to Main Page

o something more obvious than footer_ It took me a minute to realize that this was a new block and not just changing the existing footer block - Tim Flink On April 22, 2013, 8:47 a.m., Martin Krizek wrote: > > --- &g

Re: Review Request 22: Add Visible Link to IRC Meeting Prep

- blockerbugs/templates/milestone_base.html 304289eb0502f87399350a5c3501e75a8961e12f Diff: http://reviewboard-tflink.rhcloud.com/r/22/diff/ Testing --- Thanks, Tim Flink ___ qa-devel mailing list qa-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https

Blockerbugs - now with continuous integration

After stumbling on #385 on Friday, I'm getting tired of missing these little things which _should_ be caught by a proper automated test suite (which we have part of but it's far from complete). With that in mind, I requested a jenkins job for blockerbugs earlier today and we now have unit tests, p

Re: Review Request 24: Logo in Upper Left Corner Should be a Link to Main Index

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://reviewboard-tflink.rhcloud.com/r/24/#review29 --- Ship it! Looks good to me, please merge into develop - Tim

Re: Review Request 25: Change active milestone list on index to clickable links

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://reviewboard-tflink.rhcloud.com/r/25/#review31 --- Ship it! Looks good to me - Tim Flink On April 24, 2013

Finishing Migration from autoqa-devel to qa-devel

It's been a while since the qa-devel list was created and I'm planning to start the process of decomissioning autoqa-devel. I'm going to start looking for references to autoqa-devel on the various Fedora wikis and change the references to qa-devel. At the moment, I'm planning to put autoqa-devel

Re: Review Request 25: Change active milestone list on index to clickable links

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://reviewboard-tflink.rhcloud.com/r/25/ --- (Updated May 2, 2013, 4:56 a.m.) Status -- This change has been ma

Re: Review Request 23: Bugzilla Faults During Proposal are not logged, lead to http 500 errors

tead of swapping out the do_proposal method? Either way, I'd rather see one approach or the other - creating mock-ish objects that aren't actually used is not a good practice to get into - Tim Flink On April 30, 2013, 8:43

Downtime for AutoQA (nowish)

As usual, this is rather last minute but I'm in the process of bringing autoqa and autoqa-stg down for updates. I don't think there will be any problems, will send out an all-clear when I'm done. Tim signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ qa-dev

Re: Downtime for AutoQA (nowish)

On Wed, 8 May 2013 12:27:27 -0600 Tim Flink wrote: > As usual, this is rather last minute but I'm in the process of > bringing autoqa and autoqa-stg down for updates. > > I don't think there will be any problems, will send out an all-clear > when I'm done. Eve

Taskbot and Automation

I've not been talking about this a whole lot but I've been working on a slightly different take on test automation as of late. The system as a whole is very rough and nowhere near complete but I think it does demonstrate several of the ideas I'm interested in from a high level. I wrote several blo

Re: Taskbot and Automation

On Fri, 24 May 2013 10:02:19 -0600 Tim Flink wrote: > - move the code somewhere so that others can contribute > - migrate the proof-of-concept system to either autoqa-stg or fedora >cloud systems (95% of the setup is ansible-ized so migration isn't >too painful) >

Review Request 26: entries should be updated when component changes

nc.py 6e092aa35c04ec9a7a4b03653fddf2cef27e4ba1 blockerbugs/cli.py 5cfc306a9051555ad972fd05c627f906d3b2 Diff: http://reviewboard-tflink.rhcloud.com/r/26/diff/ Testing --- The changes are pretty minor and I've been testing them locally Thanks,

Re: Taskbot and Automation

On Tue, 28 May 2013 07:21:39 -0400 (EDT) Kamil Paral wrote: > > Before spending a bunch more time on this, I want to see what the > > general thoughts were on the approach. > > > > - Does the general concept make sense for Fedora? > > - Is this something we should pursue? > > I already commen

Re: Review Request 26: entries should be updated when component changes

I've been testing them locally Thanks, Tim Flink ___ qa-devel mailing list qa-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/qa-devel

Automation Tool Evaluation/Comparison

There have been a couple tooling suggestions for automation here as of late and I don't want people to think that we're ignoring them because we aren't. I'm working on taskbot as time permits because it's a relatively low priority for us until F19 final is released. I'm planning to do a more in de

Updated Blockerbugs Docs

I've been working to update the blockerbugs docs over the last day or so and just pushed my initial work. You can see the rendered output at: http://tflink.fedorapeople.org/blockerbugs/docs/ The updated docs are in the feature/documentation branch of the git repository. I'll merge it into develo

Re: f19 gcc 4.8.1 depcheck questions

On Sat, 08 Jun 2013 15:11:12 -0400 Rich Mattes wrote: > > Hi, > > I noticed during a yum upgrade today that gcc-4.8.1 hit stable, but a > rebuild of llvm/clang wasn't available yet so my upgrade failed. I > went and looked at the bodhi update for 4.8.1[1]: it passed with +3 > karma and got aut

AutoQA Downtime Today

AutoQA needs to be taken down for a bit today for updates on the infra machine hosting it. I'm going to stop the scheduler to start applying updates and will send out another mail when I'm done. Tim signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ qa-deve

Re: AutoQA Downtime Today

On Mon, 10 Jun 2013 09:54:25 -0600 Tim Flink wrote: > AutoQA needs to be taken down for a bit today for updates on the infra > machine hosting it. > > I'm going to stop the scheduler to start applying updates and will > send out another mail when I'm done. > >

Re: GSOC 2013 - Self Introduction - Blocker Tracking Application

On Tue, 11 Jun 2013 23:58:45 +0600 Ilgiz Islamgulov wrote: > Hello everyone, > > My name is Ilgiz Islamgulov and I'm a student at Ufa State Aviation > Technical University in Ufa, Russia. > > I'll be working on Blocker Tracking Application [blockerbugs]. The > Fedora Blocker Bug Tracking App is

Re: Review Request 27: fix setup bugs

the branch - Tim Flink On June 20, 2013, 10:07 p.m., Ilgiz Islamgulov wrote: > > --- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > http://reviewboard-tflink.rhcl

Re: Review Request 23: Bugzilla Faults During Proposal are not logged, lead to http 500 errors

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://reviewboard-tflink.rhcloud.com/r/23/#review35 --- Ship it! Looks good to me - Tim Flink On May 2, 2013, 10

Re: Review Request 29: PEP-8 fixes.

of code cleanup to do :-/ but this is a good start. - Tim Flink On June 21, 2013, 7:44 p.m., Ilgiz Islamgulov wrote: > > --- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > http://reviewboard-tflink.rhcl

Re: Review Request 31: Display flash messages in appropriate place

display flashed messages? How much testing did you do on this? If you've tested it, close the bug and merge to devel - Tim Flink On July 1, 2013, 9:40 a.m., Martin Krizek wrote: > > --- > This is an automatically generated e-

Re: Review Request 32: Tests for html template rendering

suspect are either a merge problem or your branch needs to be updated. - Tim Flink On July 2, 2013, 4:22 p.m., Ilgiz Islamgulov wrote: > > --- > This is an automatically generat

Upgrading or Replacing AutoQA

Apparently, I'm not paying enough attention to the F20 scheduling process because the branch date is coming up far faster than I ever expected (2013-08-06 is the currently listed date). I realize that isn't set in stone yet but I also think it would be naive to plan on that date moving back. AutoQ

Review Request 35: Fix http 500 error on milestone modification in admin interface

d the fix on my local instance, will be deploying to devel host shortly. Thanks, Tim Flink ___ qa-devel mailing list qa-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/qa-devel

Re: Review Request 35: Fix http 500 error on milestone modification in admin interface

57e Diff: http://reviewboard-tflink.rhcloud.com/r/35/diff/ Testing --- I've tested the fix on my local instance, will be deploying to devel host shortly. Thanks, Tim Flink ___ qa-devel mailing list qa-devel@lists.fedorapr

Re: Review Request 32: Tests for html template rendering

dhi without time restrictions) Overall looks good to me, feel free to push the code after fixing the last issue - no need for another round of review - Tim Flink On July 3, 2013, 2:50 p.m., Ilgiz Islamgulov wrote: > > --- > This is an

Re: Upgrading or Replacing AutoQA

On Mon, 8 Jul 2013 10:26:01 -0600 Tim Flink wrote: > If we rework the infra, I want to ansible-ize everything. The current > by-hand method of admin is crazy and way too much work to re-deploy or > even run updates on. I also want to tweak the db config a bit in the > hopes that we c

Re: Upgrading or Replacing AutoQA

On Tue, 9 Jul 2013 08:26:01 -0400 (EDT) Kamil Paral wrote: > I would simplify it as much as possible. We have only two tests now > that have some kind of impact - depcheck and upgradepath - and that's > just because of their bodhi integration. It's nice that we execute > some other tests... but I

Re: Review Request 39: Migrate from FAS to FAS-OpenID

asing like that but I'm suspecting that most of it would go away once a new python-fedora release is done - Tim Flink On July 16, 2013, 12:43 p.m., Martin Krizek wrote: > > --- > This is an automatically generated e-mail.

Re: Review Request 37: Fix sequences in alembic

and production? - Tim Flink On July 16, 2013, 12:43 p.m., Martin Krizek wrote: > > --- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > http://reviewboard-tflink.rhcl

Re: Review Request 36: improve update syncs

ouple of minor nits but overall it looks good. - Tim Flink On July 15, 2013, 5:18 p.m., Ilgiz Islamgulov wrote: > > --- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, vi

Re: Review Request 38: Add developer login

fas-openid code is already hotfixed into infra hosts and I'm planning to do the same to our dev host - Tim Flink On July 18, 2013, 9:35 a.m., Martin Krizek wrote: > > --- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply

Re: Review Request 37: Fix sequences in alembic

> On July 17, 2013, 2:45 p.m., Tim Flink wrote: > > Looks good to me, what all are we going to need to run on stg and > > production? > > Martin Krizek wrote: > I don't think we need to run this on existing installations. To me, this > is rather to p

Re: Review Request 39: Migrate from FAS to FAS-OpenID

> On July 17, 2013, 5:19 a.m., Tim Flink wrote: > > Don't python-openid-cla and python-openid-teams need to be added to the > > requirements.txt file? Does the python-fedora stuff really need to be added > > to site-packages by hand with the bump in requ

Re: AutoQA Testcase Stats

On Fri, 19 Jul 2013 08:56:48 -0600 Tim Flink wrote: > Note that these numbers reflect execution in staging autotest since I > rebuilt the clients (including the queued jobs that weren't run while > rebuilding), not pass/fail results and not from production. I was only > inte

Re: Proposal: AutoQA Infrastructure Upgrade

On Fri, 26 Jul 2013 12:23:33 -0600 Tim Flink wrote: > After looking at the jobstats on autoqa-stg over the last day or so > since I changed all of the clients to be fc18, I'm happy enough with > the completion rates to suggest that we upgrade production autoqa and > get rid of

Re: Review Request 40: basic RESTful API

ng the 'v0' in all the tests without indicating that the test class is only for 'v0' - the file names shouldn't be generic if the api version they work with is specific. Overall, I think it looks good. All the stuff I'm pointing out is minor stuff - Tim Flink On July 22,

Re: Review Request 36: improve update syncs

ed to change? Found a few other things, looks good functionally, though. I think most of this is minor stuff - Tim Flink On July 19, 2013, 7:05 p.m., Ilgiz Islamgulov wrote: > > --- > This is an automati

Re: Review Request 41: Login cleanup + redirect fix

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://reviewboard-tflink.rhcloud.com/r/41/#review58 --- Ship it! Looks good to me - Tim Flink On Aug. 1, 2013, 9

Re: Review Request 40: basic RESTful API

the request is received, anyways It's looking pretty good - I think you're planning to add a method for spin modification as we talked about on IRC which is one of my biggest concerns right now. - Tim Flink On Aug. 5, 2013, 10:15 a.m., Ilgiz Islamgulov wrote: > >

Re: Review Request 38: Add developer login

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://reviewboard-tflink.rhcloud.com/r/38/#review63 --- Ship it! Looks good to me - Tim Flink On Aug. 5, 2013, 1

Re: Review Request 40: basic RESTful API

;t need another review. Good work, I'm glad to see this getting done! - Tim Flink On Aug. 8, 2013, 2:38 p.m., Ilgiz Islamgulov wrote: > > --- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To repl

Re: Review Request 42: Indicate bugs that are needinfo

> On Aug. 15, 2013, 4:29 p.m., Tim Flink wrote: > > the sync crashed for me when I tried to run it, will put the tb in trac > > since I don't know how to do preformatted text in a review. > > > > On a side note, those css diffs make me want to migrate to foundat

Re: Review Request 42: Indicate bugs that are needinfo

ment111> using the main color here blends in too much. What do you think about using $fedoraPurple or the same yellow that the "new" indicator uses? Overall, I like the addition but I would like to see some more visual difference from the surrounding text - Tim Flink O

Re: Review Request 46: New admin interface and builds support

stfunc_bugmodel.py <http://reviewboard-tflink.rhcloud.com/r/46/#comment121> missing copyright header Some minor nits but overall, looks good to me. can you hold off on merging this into develop for just a bit, though? I'd like to do some more testing

Re: Review Request 42: Indicate bugs that are needinfo

Purple, 10%) or something that isn't that yellow or blue. still some nitpicking on the color :-/ - Tim Flink On Aug. 26, 2013, 11:28 a.m., Martin Krizek wrote: > > --- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To

Re: Review Request 46: New admin interface and builds support

> On Aug. 26, 2013, 1:35 p.m., Martin Krizek wrote: > > When trying to create new release I get: > > > > [view.py:757] 2013-08-26 14:34:04 ERROR Failed to create model > > Traceback (most recent call last): > > File > > "/home/mkrizek/devel/blockerbugs/env_blockerbugs/lib/python2.7/site-pac

Re: Review Request 48: Fix FAS openid auth

login and user/logout endpoints at first but using the decorator in flask_fas_openid makes a lot of sense to me. Looks good, please merge into develop - Tim Flink On Sept. 4, 2013, 7:06 p.m., Ilgiz Islamgulov wrote: > > --- &

Re: Review Request 49: fix selinux denials on python-bugzilla cookiefile write

ainst partner-bugzilla in stg Thanks, Tim Flink ___ qa-devel mailing list qa-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/qa-devel

Re: Review Request 49: fix selinux denials on python-bugzilla cookiefile write

la in stg Thanks, Tim Flink ___ qa-devel mailing list qa-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/qa-devel

Re: Review Request 49: fix selinux denials on python-bugzilla cookiefile write

ke sure the fix works - you can now do proposals against partner-bugzilla in stg Thanks, Tim Flink ___ qa-devel mailing list qa-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/qa-devel

Review Request 49: fix selinux denials on python-bugzilla cookiefile write

Makefile 292e7db86a207236b4bfa63ef96f5e58de797d58 Diff: http://reviewboard-tflink.rhcloud.com/r/49/diff/ Testing --- I've tested this locally and deployed it in staging to make sure the fix works - you can now do proposals against partner-bugzilla in stg Thanks, Tim

Re: Review Request 51: irc list sort order doesn't match html buglist

can get it tested - Tim Flink On Sept. 11, 2013, 12:42 p.m., Martin Krizek wrote: > > --- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > http://reviewboard-tflink.rhcl

Re: Review Request 52: Clean leftovers missed in reviews

arser but let's hold off on the user changes since ilgiz has already addressed those issues. I'd rather not be fixing that in multiple places at the same time - it's a great recipe for confusion and merge issues - Tim Flink On Sept. 13, 2013, 11:08 a.m.,

Re: Review Request 47: Remove extra messages during sync

rivial and shouldn't cause problems Thanks, Tim Flink ___ qa-devel mailing list qa-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/qa-devel

Re: Review Request 42: Indicate bugs that are needinfo

found an awesome solution to this yet. The best I've come up with is to change the on the first column to something that's effectively: I don't like it but I haven't come up with a better solution. Either way, it needs to be fixed before this code is done. - Tim Flink

Reviewboard Account Registration

In the last couple days, about 25 spam users have registered in our reviewboard instance. I've already deleted the accounts before they could do any damage but I've also disabled new user registration so the problem doesn't continue. I'm happy to grant new accounts to real people, though. If you'd

Re: Review Request 45: Improve asset management

when doing sync. tb added to trac ticket - Tim Flink On Aug. 29, 2013, 10:23 a.m., Martin Krizek wrote: > > --- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > http://reviewboard-tflink.rhcl

Re: Review Request 52: Clean leftovers missed in reviews

> On Sept. 20, 2013, 9:46 a.m., Martin Krizek wrote: > > blockerbugs/controllers/main.py, line 334 > > > > > > This really should be merged in develop as well as it would result in a > > traceback when one tries t

Re: Review Request 46: New admin interface and builds support

ink.rhcloud.com/r/46/#comment140> this needs a gpl header sass/admin_layout.scss <http://reviewboard-tflink.rhcloud.com/r/46/#comment139> this needs to be recompiled before merging into develop Overall, looks good. Please fix the last minor issues and get this merged into develop -

Re: Review Request 46: New admin interface and builds support

/46/#comment142> this shouldn't be added blockerbugs/cli.py <http://reviewboard-tflink.rhcloud.com/r/46/#comment143> this should be removed missed some minor issues - Tim Flink On Sept. 26, 2013, 6:44 p.m., Ilgiz

Re: Review Request 45: Improve asset management

> On Sept. 24, 2013, 3:44 p.m., Tim Flink wrote: > > I attempted to test this on an el6 machine, got a traceback when doing > > sync. tb added to trac ticket > > Martin Krizek wrote: > Yeah, python-webassets needs to be installed, it's missing in Requires >

AutoQA Downtime Today

With the scheduled maintenance for fedora infra, I'm going to take the opporunity to update the qa machines. The downtime shouldn't be very but there may be a delay in some test runs in autoqa. I'll send out another email when it's all done. Tim signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___

Re: AutoQA Downtime Today

On Wed, 2 Oct 2013 14:21:44 -0600 Tim Flink wrote: > With the scheduled maintenance for fedora infra, I'm going to take the > opporunity to update the qa machines. > > The downtime shouldn't be very but there may be a delay in some test > runs in autoqa. > > I

Re: AutoQA Downtime Today

On Wed, 2 Oct 2013 16:28:52 -0600 Tim Flink wrote: > On Wed, 2 Oct 2013 14:21:44 -0600 > Tim Flink wrote: > > > With the scheduled maintenance for fedora infra, I'm going to take > > the opporunity to update the qa machines. > > > > The downtime shouldn

Re: AutoQA Downtime Today

On Thu, 3 Oct 2013 10:04:15 -0600 Tim Flink wrote: > On Wed, 2 Oct 2013 16:28:52 -0600 > Tim Flink wrote: > > > On Wed, 2 Oct 2013 14:21:44 -0600 > > Tim Flink wrote: > > > > > With the scheduled maintenance for fedora infra, I'm going to take >

Re: Code Hosting, Development Tools and Open Source

On Wed, 09 Oct 2013 14:25:46 +1000 Nick Coghlan wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 10/09/2013 02:53 AM, Tim Flink wrote: > > If we're OK with non-open tools, Jira [4] is another option. They > > offer free hosted and self-hosted ve

Review Request 53: fix sync so that closed bugs don't remain on the buglist

292e7db86a207236b4bfa63ef96f5e58de797d58 .gitignore c5f8d92163a31685a35109eb4847315d9ebcd220 Diff: http://reviewboard-tflink.rhcloud.com/r/53/diff/ Testing --- Have tested on my local machine, will deploy to staging assuming that I can get access to it Thanks, Tim Flink

Re: Review Request 53: fix sync so that closed bugs don't remain on the buglist

to staging assuming that I can get access to it Thanks, Tim Flink ___ qa-devel mailing list qa-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/qa-devel

Re: Review Request 53: fix sync so that closed bugs don't remain on the buglist

ave checked it when I posted the review. - Tim --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://reviewboard-tflink.rhcloud.com/r/53/#review111 ---------

Re: Review Request 55: milestone_info uses hardcoded bugzilla url instead of using config value

ntroller. Overall, looks good other than my question about url munging vs. changing how the settings are done. Thoughts? - Tim Flink On Oct. 11, 2013, 11:01 a.m., Martin Krizek wrote: > > --- > This is an automatically genera

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   >