Dear List,
I'm updating the RasterBender plugin and need to use the gdalwarp and
gdal_translate command line tools from within Python. What is the
recommended way to run gdal command line tools from within a QGIS plugin ?
Here under Windows it works with :
subprocess.check_call(''C:\\OSGeo4W\\bi
> On Apr 29, 2016, at 10:24 AM, Thomas Endres wrote:
>
> Hi Larry,
>
> On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 10:30 PM, Larry Shaffer
> wrote:
> Hi Thomas,
>
> On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 10:54 AM, Thomas Endres
> wrote:
> HI All,
> 2) Ever since I can remember I have had the following appear in the 'Python
Sure, and in the ticket solutions are suggested.
Any special reason not to implement one?
All the best.
Il 29 aprile 2016 18:33:34 CEST, Richard Duivenvoorde ha
scritto:
>On 29-04-16 17:24, Jürgen E. Fischer wrote:
>>
>> Hi Paolo,
>>
>> On Fri, 29. Apr 2016 at 17:16:19 +0200, Paolo Cavallini w
On 29-04-16 17:24, Jürgen E. Fischer wrote:
>
> Hi Paolo,
>
> On Fri, 29. Apr 2016 at 17:16:19 +0200, Paolo Cavallini wrote:
>> IMVHO a page explaining why the dtd is not available is better than a 404.
>
> Not sure if validation tools would show that page - and those are probably one
> of the f
Hello all,
I'm working on a sync script for use with IntraMaps Roam for offline
editing. My QGIS version is 2.14.1 (Tested on Fedora 23, Ubuntu 14.04,
and Windows 7 x64). I'm using a standalone pyqgis script that creates
the connection to the postgis data source and the spatialite
datasource that
Hi Luigi
On 04/29/2016 05:32 PM, Luigi Pirelli wrote:
> IMHO would make sense to have, soon or later a DTD for project and QML
> (expecially QML)... otherwise we are reduce interoperability.
Do you have something specific in mind?
>
> we can remove it now, because it is not a reliable document.
IMHO would make sense to have, soon or later a DTD for project and QML
(expecially QML)... otherwise we are reduce interoperability.
we can remove it now, because it is not a reliable document... but
IMHO we would focus resources on that.
Luigi Pirelli
***
Hi Matthias,
On Fri, 29. Apr 2016 at 17:21:08 +0200, Matthias Kuhn wrote:
> Why don't we remove the link from the files?
Not sure. http://hub.qgis.org/issues/4408
Jürgen
--
Jürgen E. Fischer norBIT GmbH Tel. +49-4931-918175-31
Dipl.-Inf. (FH) Rheinstraße 13
Hi Paolo,
On Fri, 29. Apr 2016 at 17:16:19 +0200, Paolo Cavallini wrote:
> IMVHO a page explaining why the dtd is not available is better than a 404.
Not sure if validation tools would show that page - and those are probably one
of the few that hit that dead link.
Jürgen
--
Jürgen E. Fischer
Hi Larry,
On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 10:30 PM, Larry Shaffer
wrote:
> Hi Thomas,
>
> On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 10:54 AM, Thomas Endres
> wrote:
>
>> HI All,
>>
>> I have been using the nightly builds for quite some time with OS X
>> 10.11.4.
>>
>> Couple of questions regarding errors I am seeing in
On 04/29/2016 05:16 PM, Paolo Cavallini wrote:
> Il 29/04/2016 17:06, Jürgen E. Fischer ha scritto:
>
>> If we had a usable qgis.dtd, that should have been changed long ago.
>>
>> But as we don't there's not much point in changing the dead link to something
>> else that just fails for a different
Il 29/04/2016 17:06, Jürgen E. Fischer ha scritto:
> If we had a usable qgis.dtd, that should have been changed long ago.
>
> But as we don't there's not much point in changing the dead link to something
> else that just fails for a different reason.
IMVHO a page explaining why the dtd is not av
Hi Paolo,
On Fri, 29. Apr 2016 at 16:57:45 +0200, Paolo Cavallini wrote:
> I know the issue has been raised previously, but I still see the heading:
> http://mrcc.com/qgis.dtd' 'SYSTEM'>
> wich points nowhere. The solution seems trivial, why not implementing it?
If we had a usable qgis.dtd, that
Hi all,
I know the issue has been raised previously, but I still see the heading:
http://mrcc.com/qgis.dtd' 'SYSTEM'>
wich points nowhere. The solution seems trivial, why not implementing it?
All the best.
--
Paolo Cavallini - www.faunalia.eu
QGIS & PostGIS courses: http://www.faunalia.eu/training
Hi all,
Just announcing a newly submitted QEP regarding aggregate functions in
QGIS expressions. Please see full details at:
https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/issues/59
Regards,
Nyall
___
Qgis-developer mailing list
Qgis-developer@list
2016-04-29 10:05 GMT+02:00 Matthias Kuhn :
> I totally agree, I am happy with the git(hub) infrastructure and do not
> see a reason why a move should be considered.
>
> I'll be happy to look into an osgeo git repo when I start a new project.
>
> Matthias
>
I'm also happy with github, but I do se
I totally agree, I am happy with the git(hub) infrastructure and do not
see a reason why a move should be considered.
I'll be happy to look into an osgeo git repo when I start a new project.
Matthias
___
Qgis-developer mailing list
Qgis-developer@lists.
17 matches
Mail list logo
