Re: [Qgis-developer] QGIS on Mac with Qt5, PyQt5 and Py3

Hi Nyall, On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 10:58 PM, Nyall Dawson wrote: > > On 4 Jun 2016 6:52 AM, "Larry Shaffer" wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > Just a quick note... Continuing work I started at the hackfest in > Girona, I have successfully built and run

Re: [Qgis-developer] QGIS on Mac with Qt5, PyQt5 and Py3

On 4 Jun 2016 6:52 AM, "Larry Shaffer" wrote: > > Hi, > > Just a quick note... Continuing work I started at the hackfest in Girona, I have successfully built and run QGIS on Mac off of Homebrew dependencies of pyqt, sip, qwt, qwtpolar, qscintilla2 and qca specifically

[Qgis-developer] QGIS on Mac with Qt5, PyQt5 and Py3

Hi, Just a quick note... Continuing work I started at the hackfest in Girona, I have successfully built and run QGIS on Mac off of Homebrew dependencies of pyqt, sip, qwt, qwtpolar, qscintilla2 and qca specifically configured for Qt 5 and Python 3.

Re: [Qgis-developer] Travis status information

Thanks a lot ! On 03/06/2016 15:47, Matthias Kuhn wrote: > I have switched the travis builds to GCC so we are independent of the > availability of clang apt repositories for now. > > I have also updated most of the missing bindings and API docs that are > currently causing the tests to fail, the

Re: [Qgis-developer] Travis status information

I have switched the travis builds to GCC so we are independent of the availability of clang apt repositories for now. I have also updated most of the missing bindings and API docs that are currently causing the tests to fail, the missing ones should be fixed soon and we will be back up and

Re: [Qgis-developer] QtWebKit (Debian testing) future

On 06/03/2016 10:31 AM, Paolo Cavallini wrote: > Il 03/06/2016 10:14, Richard Duivenvoorde ha scritto: > >> Any hints we could give python dev's? > > Please start an howto where to accumulate tips and tricks for plugin > migration. > Thanks. > This is not related to migration. It's only

Re: [Qgis-developer] Fwd: Cannot install QGIS anymore on debian stretch.... gdal-abi-2-0-2 absent ...any workarounds please

On 06/03/2016 01:30 PM, Johan Van de Wauw wrote: > We have just had a gdal transition (to version 2.1). > > Gérard Vidal wrote: >> after an update/upgrade of my debian stretch QGIS got uninstalled and it >> is not any more possible to install it due to missing dependencies on >> gdal-abi-2-0-2

Re: [Qgis-developer] QtWebKit (Debian testing) future

On 03-06-16 11:26, Tom Chadwin wrote: > Richard Duivenvoorde wrote >> /me on Debian testing and finally QtWebKit is removed from Debian >> testing repo's if I'm correct. >> >> This brakes for me the (few) plugins which use QtWebKit. > > So I guess qgis2web's preview is broken? Yep, BUT: let's be

[Qgis-developer] Fwd: Cannot install QGIS anymore on debian stretch.... gdal-abi-2-0-2 absent ...any workarounds please

Hello Gérard, Forwarding your question to the debian gis mailing list where it is more appropriate. We have just had a gdal transition (to version 2.1). Kind Regards, Johan -- Forwarded message -- From: Gérard Vidal Date: Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 12:31 PM

Re: [Qgis-developer] (Yet again) SAGA support badly broken in QGIS

On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 3:09 PM, Bas Couwenberg wrote: > I notice a distinct lack of consideration for the SAGA LTR effort. > > That removes the need to incorporate SAGA into QGIS, and provides a stable > API for 3rd parties to work with. > > I suggest to support the LTR effort

Re: [Qgis-developer] About feature simplification rendering

Thank you very mutch Nathan and Alvaro! Now it's more clear to me, I think this is very important: If you have a postgis layer with $area expressions, you only can use local simplification Il 03/06/2016 12:28, A Huarte ha scritto: > Hi, a few days ago a related pull was merged: > >

[Qgis-developer] Cannot install QGIS anymore on debian stretch.... gdal-abi-2-0-2 absent ...any workarounds please

Hi all, after an update/upgrade of my debian stretch QGIS got uninstalled and it is not any more possible to install it due to missing dependencies on gdal-abi-2-0-2 gdal-abi-2-1-0 is virtual package provided by libgdal20 I am using the standard repo

Re: [Qgis-developer] About feature simplification rendering

Hi, a few days ago a related pull was merged: https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/pull/2900 As Nathan said, the simplification only runs in rendering tasks, but before this pull, the original geometry readed from a data source could be simplified when the "simplify" flag is defined in the 

Re: [Qgis-developer] About feature simplification rendering

Hey Roy, Simplification is only for display reasons. Editing will return the full geometry or else that would be bad. - Nathan On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 8:04 PM, roy roy wrote: > Hi, i've searched in the docs and the web and cannot find > this info, just because i'd like to

[Qgis-developer] About feature simplification rendering

Hi, i've searched in the docs and the web and cannot find this info, just because i'd like to be sure: Can the use of feature simplification (Option Rendering) affect in any way my geoprocessing workflow (e.g. using clip, difference etc...)? i ran some test and it seems it does not, i.e.

Re: [Qgis-developer] QtWebKit (Debian testing) future

Richard Duivenvoorde wrote > /me on Debian testing and finally QtWebKit is removed from Debian > testing repo's if I'm correct. > > This brakes for me the (few) plugins which use QtWebKit. So I guess qgis2web's preview is broken? -- View this message in context:

Re: [Qgis-developer] (Yet again) SAGA support badly broken in QGIS

+1 SAGA LTR :) Luigi Pirelli ** * Boundless QGIS Support/Development: lpirelli AT boundlessgeo DOT com * LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/luigipirelli * Stackexchange:

[Qgis-developer] Plugin [740] qgis2web approval notification.

Plugin qgis2web approval by pcav. The plugin version "[740] qgis2web 1.9.1" is now approved Link: http://plugins.qgis.org/plugins/qgis2web/ ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org List info:

Re: [Qgis-developer] How would I get the GRASS r.in.lidar and v.in.lidar programs to show up in the Processing Toolbox?

Hello, v.in.lidar and r.in.lidar will be included in QGIS 2.16. See: https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/blob/master/python/plugins/processing/algs/grass7/description/r.in.lidar.txt https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/blob/master/python/plugins/processing/algs/grass7/description/r.in.lidar.info.txt

Re: [Qgis-developer] QtWebKit (Debian testing) future

On 06/03/2016 10:14 AM, Richard Duivenvoorde wrote: > /me on Debian testing and finally QtWebKit is removed from Debian > testing repo's if I'm correct. You are correct. The WebKit support has been removed in python-qt4 (4.11.4+dfsg-2) which migrated to testing on May 31st.

Re: [Qgis-developer] QtWebKit (Debian testing) future

Il 03/06/2016 10:14, Richard Duivenvoorde ha scritto: > Any hints we could give python dev's? Please start an howto where to accumulate tips and tricks for plugin migration. Thanks. -- Paolo Cavallini - www.faunalia.eu QGIS & PostGIS courses: http://www.faunalia.eu/training.html

[Qgis-developer] QtWebKit (Debian testing) future

Hi Devs, /me on Debian testing and finally QtWebKit is removed from Debian testing repo's if I'm correct. This brakes for me the (few) plugins which use QtWebKit. Do we have a general upgrade plan for QtWebKit/Pyqt4 Debian users? I thought that the plugin-manager (the showing of the plugin

Re: [Qgis-developer] (Yet again) SAGA support badly broken in QGIS

On 06/03/2016 09:29 AM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: > On 06/03/2016 09:02 AM, Paolo Cavallini wrote: >> Il 02/06/2016 15:09, Bas Couwenberg ha scritto: >>> I notice a distinct lack of consideration for the SAGA LTR effort. >> >> From my side, I mentioned this as the second best option: > >

Re: [Qgis-developer] (Yet again) SAGA support badly broken in QGIS

On 06/03/2016 09:02 AM, Paolo Cavallini wrote: > Il 02/06/2016 15:09, Bas Couwenberg ha scritto: >> I notice a distinct lack of consideration for the SAGA LTR effort. > > From my side, I mentioned this as the second best option: Agreed. Unfortunately most of the this thread has been about

[Qgis-developer] Plugin [1021] CAIGOS PostGIS Konnektor approval notification.

Plugin CAIGOS PostGIS Konnektor approval by pcav. The plugin version "[1021] CAIGOS PostGIS Konnektor 0.1" is now approved Link: http://plugins.qgis.org/plugins/CaigosConnector/ ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org List info:

Re: [Qgis-developer] (Yet again) SAGA support badly broken in QGIS

Il 02/06/2016 15:09, Bas Couwenberg ha scritto: > I notice a distinct lack of consideration for the SAGA LTR effort. From my side, I mentioned this as the second best option: > * the best option would be for saga developers to adopt a more standard > approach, e.g. avoid mixing up bugfixes (in

[Qgis-developer] Plugin [998] Standard Deviational Ellipse approval notification.

Plugin Standard Deviational Ellipse approval by pcav. The plugin version "[998] Standard Deviational Ellipse 1.2" is now approved Link: http://plugins.qgis.org/plugins/SDEllipse/ ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org List info: