Hi Calvin,
This definitely sounds like the sort of thing you want to be doing in
the data provider and not in QGIS!
Maybe Fast Text Search would be of use. Problem is that I'm not sure if
it's included in the GeoPackage spec or QGIS' SQLite install, but it's
in the default pre-compiled
nt-Exupéry
-Original Message-
From: QGIS-Developer On
Behalf Of Jonathan Moules
Sent: 31 March 2021 14:21
To: QGIS Developer Mailing List
Subject: [QGIS-Developer] QGIS Docs: ReStructureText flavour?
Hi List,
What flavour is the RST behind the QGIS docs? There are quite a few
thin
Hi List,
What flavour is the RST behind the QGIS docs? There are quite a few
things in here that are syntax erroring all the parsers I'm trying and
aren't in the basic RST spec either
(https://docutils.sourceforge.io/docs/user/rst/cheatsheet.txt).
For example using ":ref:" for internal
> I agree that exposing sensitive data would be problematic but sharing
the username does not seem to be something too private. Your full name
for example also appears in this mailing list or as part of your twitter
account. So under which circumstances would it be problematic if your
name
re can be some centralized
discussion.
Regards,
Richard Duivenvoorde
On 7/27/20 1:42 PM, Jonathan Moules wrote:
Hi List,
The more I look at the current SVG icons, the more I'm thinking it really needs
some TLC (Tender Loving Care). As far as I can tell, icons are categorised by
the directory they're
Hi List,
The more I look at the current SVG icons, the more I'm thinking it
really needs some TLC (Tender Loving Care). As far as I can tell, icons
are categorised by the directory they're in, so if you want an icon to
appear in two categories, you put the icon in there twice... and so
something to consider - perhaps sort
out machines that have identical GetCapabilities responses and just
the DNS name varies.
I agree, the numbers probably wouldn't change significantly.
Thanks and greetings,
Andreas
On 2020-06-09 13:14, Jonathan Moules wrote:
Hi Andreas,
Sure, happy to shar
Hi Andreas,
Sure, happy to share.
There's a little on the About page: https://www.geoseer.net/about.php
and then scattered around blog posts (the ones with the "GeoSeer" tag
are probably best for that: https://www.geoseer.net/blog/?t=GeoSeer ),
but put simply - We scrape a lot of different
rhaps QGIS server can run processing models.
Greetings,
Andreas
On 2020-06-08 22:42, Jonathan Moules wrote:
Hi List,
Some of you may have seen my blog post on the OSGeo-Discuss list
about which mapping servers are the most deployed. For those who
haven't seen it, QGIS Server has about 60 public
Hi List,
Some of you may have seen my blog post on the OSGeo-Discuss list about
which mapping servers are the most deployed. For those who haven't seen
it, QGIS Server has about 60 public deployments (1% of all of them), and
it serves 11,924 datasets (0.5% of all public geospatial
Hi Bo,
Looking at the WAL docs for SQLite (https://www.sqlite.org/wal.html)
(what geopackage is built from) I see this:
"The WAL file exists for as long as any database connection has the
database open. Usually, the WAL file is deleted automatically when the
last connection to the database
Hi Nadia,
Just a random thought here, but I wonder if doing this exercise against
QGIS Desktop would be more worthwhile from a security perspective? There
are very few deployments of QGIS-Server but many many deployments of
Desktop.
For example, is it possible to compromise QGIS Desktop via
ted :-)
Regards,
Jorge Gustavo
On 01/02/20 21:25, Jonathan Moules wrote:
I can't comment on the security aspect, but at the very least there's a
bug in the WMS compliance. For the GetCapabilities URL it should be
returning an XML Service Exception (because it has an invalid SERVICE
value), not a H
I can't comment on the security aspect, but at the very least there's a
bug in the WMS compliance. For the GetCapabilities URL it should be
returning an XML Service Exception (because it has an invalid SERVICE
value), not a HTTP 500.
I.e., the same request to a (random) GeoServer box shows
Hi Patrick,
I can't comment on the core issue, but just a point for clarification -
I thought Swap memory usage was something the operating system dealt
with? Isn't it usually transparent to the application?
A quick search indicates that what GIMP calls swap is really a bespoke
folder for
Hi List,
Hopefully I can offer some insights into this as someone with some
experience in spatial service discovery (I run GeoSeer:
https:/www.geoseer.net - a search engine for spatial web services).
-
csw.geopole.org is what I believe is behind the search button. As it
stands right now,
+1 on not using Google Analytics to spy on users. You can analyse the
Apache logs using various tools pretty easily to discover things like
how people got to the web-pages, and which pages are most commonly
accessed, and even see where in the world folks are.
I can run the logs through one of
Ideas cannot be copyrighted and that's just fine - ideas are a dime a
dozen; everyone has them all the time. But few people ever implement them.
Which brings us to the crux of the issue - these were implemented so
ideally should not have been duplicated? And not once but twice for a
single
> * thumbs up is cheap, and does not necessarily reflect real interest.
I disagree. Yes a thumb-up is a "cheap", but the only people who find
the issue in the first place to thumb it are those it affects. For this
sort of thing Cheap is a virtue not a problem (I very much doubt there
are any
Hi Luca,
The first one sounds like a bug and I''d suggest reporting it to the
qgis bug tracker.
For clarity: Are we talking about the layer Name or the layer Title? The
Name is a unique ID for a layer; the vast majority of WxS servers don't
use spaces in their layer names, instead they use
This has been covered a few times on StackOverflow.
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/548029/how-much-overhead-does-ssl-impose
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/149274/http-vs-https-performance
Basically, the expensive part is creating the connection (handshaking).
After that, when using
if WMS clients should use bounding boxes at all, they seem to
be really, really unreliable. Or they should only use the top level
bounding box of the whole service. Many open questions ...
Andreas
On 2019-05-13 02:27, Jonathan Moules wrote:
Hi list,
Unless GeoServer has changed it of late, the wa
Hi list,
Unless GeoServer has changed it of late, the way they do BBOX definition is:
* Layer BBOXes are defined at layer creation time.
* Layer BBOXes are entered manually, though there is a button to
automatically calculate it from the data extent which automatically
fills in the manual
Hi List,
There seems to be some inconsistent ordering and usage of the buttons on
dialogs. Does QGIS have developer guidelines on this?
Largely it's fairly consistent but sometimes button orders seem
incongruous. Also the use of "Cancel" versus "Close".
For example, Raster > "Raster
GIS Server also allows POST requests, but I may
be wrong.
Andreas
Am 09.04.19 um 19:09 schrieb Jonathan Moules:
Hi Andreas,
Another problem you may hit - the link below is hitting it being
~2300 chars - URL's (and thus GET requests) cannot reliably be more
than about 2000 characters long. At
IS?
I appreciate the help,
Erik
On Tue, Apr 9, 2019 at 6:25 PM Jonathan Moules
wrote:
Hi Erik,
I think maybe there's a nomenclature problem here. I wasn't aware that any
Google services were available via WMS.
WMS is a specific specification, and if you're googling around using that
term you're
Hi Andreas,
Another problem you may hit - the link below is hitting it being ~2300
chars - URL's (and thus GET requests) cannot reliably be more than about
2000 characters long. At that point you need to shift over to POST
requests (and I think GetMap is GET only...).
Hi Erik,
I think maybe there's a nomenclature problem here. I wasn't aware that
any Google services were available via WMS.
WMS is a specific specification, and if you're googling around using
that term you're going to find results that aren't pertinent to what you
actually want to do
A quick google found this:
https://github.com/opengisch/QField/issues/300
Don't know if it helps.
Cheers,
Jonathan
On 2019-03-25 14:31, Piotr Bednarek wrote:
Hi
I have a problem with WFS-T. I'm creating map using OpenLayers 5.3,
Qgis-server 3.4 and postgis 9.6-2.4. The task is to get layer
t;
And I just downloaded gvSIG and uDig:
"uDig 2.0.0. (http://udig.refractions.net) Java/1.8.0_111"
"Mozilla/5.0 (gvSIG) like Gecko"
So it looks like only gvSIG does the Mozilla thing.
On 2019-02-24 23:25, Nyall Dawson wrote:
On Mon, 25 Feb 2019 at 09:05, Jonathan Moules
Hi Richard,
I don't think without more information it's clear precisely what QGIS
should change to help them?
Indeed, personally I'm still not sure what the current problem is for
them. I get that they have some over-users of their service and need to
curtail this (a very tricky problem),
It seems to me there are a few different aspects to this.
- The convention is to stick "Mozilla 5" into user-agents for browsers
because every other browser uses it. At this point they all pretend to
be each other -
Hi Lists,
I'm cross posting this to GeoServer-Users over from QGIS-Dev as the
current QGIS code seems to be trying to work around a GeoServer quirk
based on Nyall's code-comment snippet.
Is there something different QGIS can do to work around the stated issue
in a better way given I guess
Hi Richard,
I don't know about the QGIS side, but from the server side I'd agree
with your assessment.
The WCS 1.0 spec says that the server will use the interpolation method
specified in the getcapabilities (or if none is defined (as here), then
assume Nearest Neighbour) for alternative
I'd suggest based on Tom's post that the work should include some sort
of reliable way of testing the WFS client (and of course full test
coverage) - I don't know if GeoServer is Docker-happy these days, but
the default install in a VM should be sufficient for the task (it comes
with test
Hi Nyall,
Looking at this from another angle (and being aware I know nothing of
the QGIS code-base) - to me at least that would suggest that maybe it's
worth improving the crash dumps so that they're better able to be used
as a stand-alone debugging thing that doesn't require user
Hi,
Have you reported it to the bug tracker - https://hub.qgis.org/issues -
That's the best way to report this sort of behaviour. While I can see
why a dmp file would be useful, no program should be leaving GB of dump
files behind.
Maybe it should clean up when there are more than x number?
Hi Tim,
You may be better off asking the OSI - https://opensource.org/ - I'd guess this
is the sort of thing they can help with, or at least point you in the right
direction.
Cheers,
Jonathan
On Thu, 04 Aug 2016 10:15:16 +0100 Tim Suttont...@kartoza.com
wrote
Hi
Apologies if this
The second version of the installer now uses the version number in the
path.
I'd suggest paths using version numbers is a better idea anyway and should be
the default.
As well as avoiding these sorts of problems, they're also more understandable
to users - is "Essen" newer of older than
Hi Paulo,
Surely this can be enforced by having requirements for acceptance on the
official plugin repository. If a plugin doesn't fulfil all the requirements, it
doesn't get included.
Possible requirements (to give an idea):
- Brief description of plugin,
- Detailed explanation of plugin.
-
Hi Tim (and all),
Per the IRC meeting, I've come up with a possible questionnaire that we can
spam. Currently it's all text, but it can be converted easily enough. What
platform should we stick it on for the question/answers? I can do a free
surveymonkey unless someone has something better to
exactly which ones to use.
Cheers,
Jonathan
From: Trevor Wiens [mailto:tsw@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2015 6:09 PM
To: Jonathan Moules
Cc: Tim Sutton; QGIS Developer Mailing List
Subject: Re: [Qgis-developer] Proposed questions for QGIS Certification
questionnaire
Jonathan
Hi Trevor,
We never really discussed that during the meeting, though it’s a good question.
The meeting more went in an “assigning tasks” kind of direction, touching a few
questions here and there. I think one of the potential tasks was going to be
about covering that sort of question. It’s also
You can get to it via:
http://webchat.freenode.net/?channels=#qgis-certification
-Original Message-
From: qgis-developer-boun...@lists.osgeo.org
[mailto:qgis-developer-boun...@lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Robert Szczepanek
Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2015 2:08 PM
To: Tim Sutton;
I wonder, might it be worth adding a test for it as well? Now that QGIS has
unit tests, the more the merrier?
-Original Message-
From: qgis-developer-boun...@lists.osgeo.org
[mailto:qgis-developer-boun...@lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Richard
Duivenvoorde
Sent: Wednesday, January 07,
Hi Lene,
What’s the GDALINFO for the 122GB image? That will confirm (or debunk) some of
the theories posted here as to the cause. Figured it’s worth asking just in
case there’s another cause too.
Cheers,
Jonathan
From: qgis-developer-boun...@lists.osgeo.org
Hi,
I was wondering if there's been any progress with creating a 2.6.1 release to
fix the crash-and-data-destroying bug (http://hub.qgis.org/issues/11592)?
There have been a couple threads requesting it
(http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-developer/2014-November/035516.html -
Hi Roy,
I just did a quick one and it worked; Windows using the stand alone installed
version, 64bit I think.
Which transformation are you using? I tested polynomial 1.
That said, if it's repeatable, it's probably worth reporting as a bug anyway;
including the sample data and detailed info.
Hi Bernhard,
I believe it's this conversation:
http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-developer/2014-November/035492.html - and
this ticket: http://hub.qgis.org/issues/11592
---
I think this is a good test of the maturity of the QGIS project; a release has
been made which has a
Hi Steven,
Just a notion, and this is more of a “last ditch attempt” than anything else,
but I’m reasonably sure that the pyramids are created using GDAL’s gdaladdo.
So one possible option is to remove/rename gdaladdo.exe. In theory this would
disable the functionality.
I can’t test it myself
A couple of thoughts from a non-dev looking inwards:
Sorry I do not agree here: we had many cases of fixes breaking other stuff
Would not something like Unit Tests help ameliorate that? That's what they're
designed for isn't it? I realise the state of QGIS' unit test infrastructure
isn't
Personally I’d think there are two bugs here, at least from a user-interface
perspective, even if they’re not from a technical one:
a) Edits showing when editing was disabled (I’ve seen this one myself).
b)No warning that the edited features hadn’t been “finished” when saving
and/or
Hi,
Irrespective of which is the way to do it (I lean toward checking it when
there's a selection), I'd suggest that the behaviour should be consistent. So
either this default be changed, or the field calculator one be, otherwise you
end up with confused users.
Cheers,
Jonathan
-Original
Hi,
Is there an ETA on this? We're thinking of moving up to 2.6, but I can see this
hitting us if we do.
Thanks,
Jonathan
-Original Message-
From: qgis-developer-boun...@lists.osgeo.org
[mailto:qgis-developer-boun...@lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Paolo Cavallini
Sent: Saturday, November
Hi Sylvain,
I’m not seeing this. For me at least, using 2.2, 2.4, and 2.6, all exhibit the
same behaviour with showing SRID’s for layers that have geometry. All are
correctly showing the SRID as 8607 (Oracle’s version of WGS84).
Maybe it’s your connection options?
Cheers,
Jonathan
From:
Hi Larry,
At the risk of being a dissenting voice, is this really the message QGIS wants
to spread? That sponsorship is king? As an Open Source GIS project, I would
hope that its prowess lay in producing exceptional GI software rather than
finding sponsorship. The later is a means to an end.
Every single log line has the committer's GitHub name so it isn't anonymous.
I know, but that also includes the paid-for devs; my point was that if QGIS
wishes to highlight those paying for work with money, then highlighting those
paying for work with time seems fair too.
Other than that, I'm
Chiming in from the perspective of someone who was working for an occasional
feature “sponsor” until recently (mostly GeoServer, but also one or two QGIS),
we didn’t do it with the intent of getting our name in anything (be it commit
log, appendix, or even h1 on the project front-page). We did
?
Andreas
Am 04.08.2014 17:22, schrieb Goyo:
This works in master:
xmin(centroid($geometry))
ymin(centroid($geometry))
Goyo
2014-08-04 18:28 GMT+02:00 Jonathan Moules
jonathanmou...@warwickshire.gov.uk:
Hi list,
Quick question, how do you use the Field Calculator to get
Hi Otto,
You make some excellent points. Just to follow on one of them:
But usually customers and developers don't think about also spending
an additional
little amount to document the feature in the QGIS docs and training
material.
I think that's a QGIS problem. I know when I get quotes for
Except that self-evidently the current solution doesn't work well. Of the
three projects I listed, QGIS has by far the worst documentation; as Otto
noted, they've not even started updating for 2.4 yet.
Just looking now, not a single one of the QGIS Geoalgorithms that I've
ever looked at (which
Hi Paolo,
But is it working? I believe the point of an LTS is that each version is
more stable
than the last and that there are no new features which in turn means no
new bugs
The question is simple: maintaining a stable branch costs (developr
time|money).
If someone will put the
/algclasssification.txt
Thanks for your help
2014-07-09 14:03 GMT+02:00 Jonathan Moules
jonathanmou...@warwickshire.gov.uk:
Ok,
I've reported it to the tracker:
https://hub.qgis.org/issues/10854
Seems like quite a bad bug from a user-interface perspective.
Thanks,
Jonathan
On 9 July
Hi Andreas,
On 2 July 2014 08:40, Andreas Neumann a.neum...@carto.net wrote:
Hi,
In addition to the discussion around the selection tool I would like to
discuss a reduction of buttons in the navigation toolbar. I think it eats
way too much screen-space by default. I'd like to suggest the
It sounds like the PostGIS connection provider could use some optimisations.
The Oracle provider had/has a few which are being resolved (thanks
Jurgen!), but it does first require identifying what queries are being run
during what actions. If you have access, watch what queries are running on
You're right, sorry for the noise.
The fact that the dropdown is empty induced me in error: perhaps better
to fill it with the default value?
+1
Looks like it should be pre-populated with autogenerate (or at least,
selecting that option does nothing so I guess it's already selected).
--
I've seen a couple of references to a qgis-ux list, however it's not
linked to on maillists list of the website:
http://www.qgis.org/en/site/getinvolved/mailinglists.html#qgis-mailinglists
Might be worth adding. (I guess it's this one -
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-ux )
Cheers,
Hi Richard,
Thanks. I remembered there's a special issue tracker for the website but
couldn't remember where it was so went with this instead.
Regards,
Jonathan
On 26 February 2014 15:09, Richard Duivenvoorde rdmaili...@duif.net wrote:
On 26-02-14 15:07, Jonathan Moules wrote:
I've seen
Hi List,
Just an observation but the weekly builds -
http://qgis.org/downloads/weekly/ - don't seem to have built for the last
couple of weeks. Are they still meant to be getting built or has something
gone wrong?
They're a good way around the myriad issues I seem to perpetually have with
the
Excellent work, thanks guys.
Just a thought, but as part of the release process (I'm guessing there's a
big list of things to do somewhere) I'd suggest updating the Affected
Version on redmine to whatever the newest version is. There's no 2.2.0 on
there currently.
Cheers,
Jonathan
On 22
Why not? We're talking about a feature freezed period!? The nightly
build
is a snapshot what what will get release. Where do you see a difference?
I think it's a perception thing.
Nightly build in my mind always means bleeding edge may or may not work,
use at own risk. I'm aware that
the users that QGIS version 2.X is in feature freeze and therefore
is sufficiently stable to be tested by end users? This may increase the
number of testers.
As an end user that uses QGIS for production, this is the only time I work
with QGIS Master.
On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 2:17 PM, Jonathan
I posted this to the user list a couple of weeks ago but no interest. Maybe
the dev list has some thoughts?
Hi List,
I'm wondering if anyone uses the metadata fields for data in QGIS
(Layer Properties - Metadata)? I've been told that this is supposed to be
filled in manually.
I ask because
from pre-accessed tables?)
Cheers,
Jonathan
On 8 February 2014 17:45, Jürgen E. j...@norbit.de wrote:
Hi Jonathan,
On Tue, 04. Feb 2014 at 17:54:10 +, Jonathan Moules wrote:
The native Oracle provider has been in QGIS for quite a while (a
year?)
and is generally quite good
Hey Jürgen,
There's always an extent, but that not necessarily reflect an actual bbox,
but
just sets the available bounds, which are often set much bigger than the
actual
data. But the bounding box is determined after insertion of the layer
anyway.
Fair point, but for us it's
Hi,
QGIS already has access to tons of generalisation options via the grass
v.generalise tool
http://grass.osgeo.org/grass64/manuals/v.generalize.html
Split into four categeories - Generalisation, Smoothing, Displacement,
Network Generalisation.
Is there a reason those can't be used? I wonder
Hi Giuliano,
you're probably right, but I have never advised to develop a new
simplification algorithm :-)
I am a mathematical as a hobby, I have only met a little problem
with the RDP algorithm and I reported it, and I had fun writing an
algorithm for fun but no idea of proposing
Hi List,
The native Oracle provider has been in QGIS for quite a while (a year?) and
is generally quite good.
However there are still two fundamental issues that we have with it, both
as a result of the fact that Oracle doesn't store accurate spatial metadata:
a) Whenever I Connect to the Oracle
the
ConnectionString that each provider know to open.
I attach a short video to show the idea (~2.5 mb).
http://www.filedropper.com/GenericCadgisLoadingDialog
Best Regards
Alvaro
--
*De:* Jonathan Moules jonathanmou...@warwickshire.gov.uk
*Para:* Nathan Woodrow madman
Hi List,
This may be too late for 2.2 (some are features), but something that's
bugging me no end is the complete lack of consistency between all the
dialogs for the OGC services. Below I've created a somewhat exhaustive list
of differences-that-shouldn't-be between the way they behave - mostly
.
- Nathan
On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 8:03 PM, Jonathan Moules
jonathanmou...@warwickshire.gov.uk wrote:
Hi List,
This may be too late for 2.2 (some are features), but something that's
bugging me no end is the complete lack of consistency between all the
dialogs for the OGC services. Below I've
On 7 January 2014 08:04, Matthias Kuhn matthias.k...@gmx.ch wrote:
Is there a real problem we are trying to solve with this?
Users (even technical ones) have problems finding where plugins have
actually installed stuff - I've seen it first hand. By using a logical and
consistent approach, that
Hi,
I've gone through a small set of my bug reports - these ones appear like
they may be easy. However (a) I'm not a QGIS dev so don't know; (b) I don't
have tagging permissions anyway.
http://hub.qgis.org/issues/8899
http://hub.qgis.org/issues/8900
http://hub.qgis.org/issues/9196
I remember, I discussed another key website with Borys, which would be
shown in a frame in the plugin description page. This could be used to show
even pictures in a description. Or we could just embed the URL listed in
homepage.
If I'm understanding correctly, you're proposing that the
+1 to Anita's post. The vast majority of GIS users aren't programmers in my
experience (which is my masters and my current employment with 100+ people
who use GIS in some form). Simpler is almost always better.
It may not seem that way from mailing lists, but these are a self-selecting
group of
Hi Martin,
Just a minor thing, probably an accidental omission. Your list of
data-providers that don't work doen't include the Oracle native one but I
suspect probably should.
From a non-dev's perspective it looks quite promising. :-)
Cheers,
Jonathan
On 12 December 2013 12:14, Martin Dobias
I believe GeoServer (well, GeoWebCache) uses metatiling for that purpose
within its WMTS/TMS. My understanding is that rather than rendering a
single 256*256 pixel tile like it was asked to, it renders a grid of 4*4
(adjustable; but that's the default) of those tiles (so 1024*1024 pixels)
and then
Hi Richard,
For reference, I opened a ticket on this a couple of months ago -
http://hub.qgis.org/issues/8699 - and had similar findings to yourself
Cheers,
Jonathan
On 27 November 2013 08:31, Richard Duivenvoorde rdmaili...@duif.net wrote:
Hi,
while the idea of context help buttons in
Hi folks,
Couple of thoughts on the website:
1) - There doesn't seem to be a link to the weeklies, or at least not one I
can find on http://www.qgis.org/en/site/forusers/alldownloads.html
2) That same page has a link under QGIS testing which 404's -
It's fine for us that control the hardware we run stuff on but a lot of
people don't and have to go though a major process to get an update.
To that end, would it be possible to create an update that's more like a
patch of the sort that Windows, ArcGIS, most-games use, rather than (or
maybe
+1
I was going to ask if there were plans for something like this, but it's
great to see someone taking the initiative on it!
On 29 October 2013 22:21, Nyall Dawson nyall.daw...@gmail.com wrote:
Hey all,
I'm just scoping things out -- if I was to go through all the commits
which have hit
On the issue of which format to use, pandoc can translate between most
document formats it seems, including the ones specified by Alexander as
being used by QGIS. Project is here:
http://johnmacfarlane.net/pandoc/
The help should definitely be in a single format; ideally something that is
easily
Hi Paolo,
Looking at a Paletted GeoTiff on Windows 2.0.1, x64 and it works fine,
including all of the layer properties tabs.
Might it be a GDAL thing?
Jonathan
On 17 October 2013 08:44, Paolo Cavallini cavall...@faunalia.it wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all.
Hi Paolo,
According to this just-closed ticket, I think (some of?) this stuff has
been resolved in future standalone builds:
http://hub.qgis.org/issues/8627#change-45754
Jonathan
On 17 October 2013 17:22, Paolo Cavallini cavall...@faunalia.it wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash:
maintainance costs, for which it is always difficult to find funding.
We need more unit test, more code quality dashboards and much stricter
rules
relative to what code has to be accepted into master.
I think this is a matter of balance: a large part of QGIS success is due
to the huge
The stability of the current release is heavily influenced by
increasing the major version number. What I mean with this is, that
because for the next release only the minor number will increase, I
expect it to be to be more stable and not less. Regardless of testing.
Agreed, the new
It sounds good, but it's a false dichotomy - why can't you have both?
because of limited resources. if all the 1.000.000+ users of QGIS would
invest 1 euro
per year in it, this would be quite feasible.
All the best.
True, but that's back to my comment previously about what other projects
Assuming it's not already done, I'd suggest that requiring Unit Tests for
all new features should be mandatory for a Pull Request/patch to be
accepted into QGIS. In the long term that would hopefully help alleviate
the significant number of regressions that we're seeing in 2.0.
Jonathan
On 3
Hi Régis,
Windows x64 2.0.1-2 install here - the Oracle dialog works fine. I didn't
use the OSGEO installer but instead used the standalone one. Worth trying
that?
Cheers,
Jonathan
On 2 October 2013 08:47, Régis Haubourg regis.haubo...@eau-adour-garonne.fr
wrote:
Hi,
Oracle connection
This is probably better placed on the developer list (cc'd).
However I believe I read a message on there suggesting it was being ported
over.
Jonathan
On 3 October 2013 04:01, maning sambale emmanuel.samb...@gmail.com wrote:
Has anyone tried using QGIS 2.0 in USB Portable App [0]?
There are
1 - 100 of 111 matches
Mail list logo
