Re: [Qgis-developer] Announcing planned changes on the developer list

2016-03-15 Thread Jeff McKenna
I like the [WIP] announces as well, a great way for a power user to follow along development. Well done. -jeff On 2016-03-14 10:09 PM, Nathan Woodrow wrote: +1 to using WIP On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 11:56 am Nyall Dawson > wrote: On

Re: [Qgis-developer] Announcing planned changes on the developer list

2016-03-14 Thread Nathan Woodrow
+1 to using WIP On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 11:56 am Nyall Dawson wrote: > On 11 March 2016 at 21:52, Marco Hugentobler > wrote: > > On 11.03.2016 11:42, Nathan Woodrow wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > Cool. Yeah it's a tricky one. I guess the QEPs

Re: [Qgis-developer] Announcing planned changes on the developer list

2016-03-14 Thread Nyall Dawson
On 11 March 2016 at 21:52, Marco Hugentobler wrote: > On 11.03.2016 11:42, Nathan Woodrow wrote: > > Hi, > > Cool. Yeah it's a tricky one. I guess the QEPs help there for the massive > stuff, but yeah even then it's tricky. > > Maybe we just tag mails with

Re: [Qgis-developer] Announcing planned changes on the developer list

2016-03-11 Thread Marco Hugentobler
On 11.03.2016 11:42, Nathan Woodrow wrote: Hi, Cool. Yeah it's a tricky one. I guess the QEPs help there for the massive stuff, but yeah even then it's tricky. Maybe we just tag mails with [FEATURE] like PRs then we can search then out? +1. There is a lot of traffic on the list, so a

Re: [Qgis-developer] Announcing planned changes on the developer list

2016-03-11 Thread Neumann, Andreas
Hi, I would also think in case someone creates a QEP, that an announcement of the QEP in the dev mailinglist would help, because not everyone checks all the repositories every day ... Anyway - it would be great if devs and customers could inform each other better about their plans - which

Re: [Qgis-developer] Announcing planned changes on the developer list

2016-03-11 Thread Nathan Woodrow
Hi, Cool. Yeah it's a tricky one. I guess the QEPs help there for the massive stuff, but yeah even then it's tricky. Maybe we just tag mails with [FEATURE] like PRs then we can search then out? - Nathan On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 8:41 PM, Neumann, Andreas wrote: > Hi

Re: [Qgis-developer] Announcing planned changes on the developer list

2016-03-11 Thread Neumann, Andreas
Hi Nathan, There wasn't any list. The list was just a proposal. The list would have the advantage that one could have a good overview without having to dig through the e-mail archive. Imagine you, as a developer or a customer of a developer, are absent 2-3 weeks. In that case you probably

Re: [Qgis-developer] Announcing planned changes on the developer list

2016-03-11 Thread Nathan Woodrow
Hi Marco, Good to hear. I wasn't even aware there was a list? Was it published some place? Regards, Nathan On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 8:14 PM, Marco Hugentobler < marco.hugentob...@sourcepole.ch> wrote: > Der developers > > During the last PSC meeting ( >

[Qgis-developer] Announcing planned changes on the developer list

2016-03-11 Thread Marco Hugentobler
Der developers During the last PSC meeting (https://docs.google.com/document/d/1arzcgoU0NErm8yiqDvCeasFUdr9zt-8JUx15f3ivTdw/edit?pref=2=1), Andreas brought up the topic how to improve coordination between developers, avoiding two devs doing the same thing at the same time. After a short