Hi Adrian,
am very sorry to read your news! You have done a great job and I was very happy
to see some movement and new hardware developments! My plan was to wait still
the SD project is ready and than make my old QL working again which anyhow
needs some repair ...
In general as I see it,
Dilwyn Jones wrote:
Before I reinvent the wheel and OCR my Easyptr manual to use on my
eBook reader, has anyone else already done this?
The Easyptr commands are the hardest syntax to remember of all the
BASIC extensions, I think!
After reading this I checked in my usual directories and found
Adrian Ives wrote:
I have sent the most recent sources to Peter Graf just a few minutes ago.
The code may be placed in the public domain, but it is up to Peter how
he wishes to move forward with it. I regret that I cannot offer any
support with the drivers as I am moving on to other projects,
Before I reinvent the wheel and OCR my Easyptr manual to use on my
eBook reader, has anyone else already done this?
The Easyptr commands are the hardest syntax to remember of all the
BASIC extensions, I think!
After reading this I checked in my usual directories and found
nothing, thus I
Adrian Ives wrote:
I have sent the most recent sources to Peter Graf just a few minutes ago.
The code may be placed in the public domain, but it is up to Peter how
he wishes to move forward with it. I regret that I cannot offer any
support with the drivers as I am moving on to other
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 12:55 AM, Wolfgang Lenerz
w...@scp-paulet-lenerz.com wrote:
Hi,
If I create a REPeat loop thus:
100 Frame=0 : Keypress=0
110 REPEAT loop
120 a$=INKEY$
130 Frame=Frame+1
140 IF a$ THEN Keypress=Keypress+1
150 AT 0,0 : PRINT Frame, Keypress
160 END REPeat
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 6:39 AM, Marcel Kilgus ql-us...@mail.kilgus.net wrote:
Adrian Ives wrote:
I have sent the most recent sources to Peter Graf just a few minutes ago.
The code may be placed in the public domain, but it is up to Peter how
he wishes to move forward with it. I regret that I
Dave Park wrote:
That being said, it's still a wrong behavior in the sense that
INKEY$ is not like INPUT but is more like KEYROW - both should
instantaneously check if a key is pressed and report if so.
Unlike KEYROW INKEY$ does NOT check the current keyboard status, it
just gets the next byte
Dave Park wrote:
Of course, no idea if any hardware development for the QL could ever
be commercially successfully nowadays, but it might have made for a
nice KickStarter project to gauge real interest.
Having worked it out myself for my own projects, I know they'd never
be commercially
I think the key advantage for an SD-card project is something Urs
already said years ago, that it might appeal to computer collectors.
These are not terribly interested in the QL per se but might pay
something if it enables them to transfer files to one of their
collector items without too much
10 matches
Mail list logo
