Re: [Ql-Users] Merry Christmas with SMSQ/E

Hi Norman, On 31 December 2017 at 19:43, Norman Dunbar via Ql-Users < ql-users@lists.q-v-d.com> wrote: > Happy New Year one and all. > > I started pcb design a while back too. I use Fritzing and/or Kicad for > mine. Manually routing a pcb can seriously use up a good few hours of your > life! But

Re: [Ql-Users] Merry Christmas with SMSQ/E

Happy New Year one and all. I started pcb design a while back too. I use Fritzing and/or Kicad for mine. Manually routing a pcb can seriously use up a good few hours of your life! But it's [still] fun. I will probably live to regret this but, let me know how/where to get the DISA source and I

Re: [Ql-Users] Merry Christmas with SMSQ/E

On 30/12/2017 16:10, Marcel Kilgus via Ql-Users wrote: pjwitte via Ql-Users wrote: Thanks, Marcel. Yes, I thought you might enjoy this little holiday from "industrial" programming ;) Oh well, I'm already swamped with non-industrial work, I have so many ideas and projects on what to do that I

Re: [Ql-Users] Merry Christmas with SMSQ/E

pjwitte via Ql-Users wrote: > Thanks, Marcel. Yes, I thought you might enjoy this little holiday > from "industrial" programming ;) Oh well, I'm already swamped with non-industrial work, I have so many ideas and projects on what to do that I hardly ever manage to finish anything :-( I even

Re: [Ql-Users] Merry Christmas with SMSQ/E

Thanks, Marcel. Yes, I thought you might enjoy this little holiday from "industrial" programming ;) BTW, no criticism was ever intended of the creators of either SMSQ/E or DISA! Bugs are a fact of life, and not even Nature is imune (My brain is full of them, for starters - and thats not the

Re: [Ql-Users] Merry Christmas with SMSQ/E

pjwitte via Ql-Users wrote: > If you want a really miserable Christmas, you could try the following > - without saving your work first: > > 1 x% = 32000 > 2 y% = x% > 3 z% = 1600 > 4 t  = x% * y% * z%: REMark Kabm!!! > 5 PRINT "-- Im dead!" Nice find and, as usual, good repro, thanks. As

Re: [Ql-Users] Merry Christmas with SMSQ/E

Hi, yes, that part of SMSQ/e probably hasn't been touched for ages. Wolfgang On 28/12/2017 13:44, Bob Spelten via Ql-Users wrote: Op Thu, 28 Dec 2017 07:43:13 +0100 schreef Wolf via Ql-Users : Hi, yes that's a bug. Somehow the return stack gets

Re: [Ql-Users] Merry Christmas with SMSQ/E

Op Thu, 28 Dec 2017 07:43:13 +0100 schreef Wolf via Ql-Users : Hi, yes that's a bug. Somehow the return stack gets confused/overwitten (stack overflow!), causing a jump to a strange address where you then will get an illegal instruction error. I've checcked that,

Re: [Ql-Users] Merry Christmas with SMSQ/E

Yup, hence my original message... Wolfgang On 28/12/2017 13:16, Jan Bredenbeek via Ql-Users wrote: On 28 December 2017 at 13:10, Wolf via Ql-Users wrote: Hi, ok, ok, but I didn't even use the word "odd"! :) In any case, if you jump to an odd location (whether

Re: [Ql-Users] Merry Christmas with SMSQ/E

On 28 December 2017 at 13:10, Wolf via Ql-Users wrote: > Hi, > > ok, ok, but I didn't even use the word "odd"! > :) In any case, if you jump to an odd location (whether strange or not even) on a QL you will usually be in big trouble... Jan. -- *Jan Bredenbeek* |

Re: [Ql-Users] Merry Christmas with SMSQ/E

Hi, ok, ok, but I didn't even use the word "odd"! Wolfgang On 28/12/2017 13:03, Jan Bredenbeek via Ql-Users wrote: On 28 December 2017 at 12:59, Wolf via Ql-Users wrote: Hi, To my mind, a "jump to a strange address" is not an address error which would give rise

Re: [Ql-Users] Merry Christmas with SMSQ/E

On 28 December 2017 at 12:59, Wolf via Ql-Users wrote: > > Hi, > > To my mind, a "jump to a strange address" is not an address error which > would give rise to that exception. He he that's a language thing :). 'Odd' in English can mean 'strange' but also 'not even'.

Re: [Ql-Users] Merry Christmas with SMSQ/E

Hi, To my mind, a "jump to a strange address" is not an address error which would give rise to that exception. Wolfgang On 28/12/2017 12:32, Jan Bredenbeek via Ql-Users wrote: On 28 December 2017 at 07:43, Wolf via Ql-Users wrote: Hi, yes that's a bug. Somehow

Re: [Ql-Users] Merry Christmas with SMSQ/E

On 28 December 2017 at 07:43, Wolf via Ql-Users wrote: > Hi, > yes that's a bug. > > Somehow the return stack gets confused/overwitten (stack overflow!), > causing a jump to a strange address where you then will get an illegal > instruction error. > > > I've checcked

Re: [Ql-Users] Merry Christmas with SMSQ/E

Hi, yes that's a bug. Somehow the return stack gets confused/overwitten (stack overflow!), causing a jump to a strange address where you then will get an illegal instruction error. I've checcked that, under SMSQmulator this isn't due to the replacemnt FP routines, which it isn't.

Re: [Ql-Users] Merry Christmas with SMSQ/E

Doesn't crash here but ends up in QMon signalling an Address error ;) Tobias > Am 27.12.2017 um 17:20 schrieb François Van Emelen via Ql-Users > : > > Op 26/12/2017 om 18:31 schreef pjwitte via Ql-Users: >> If you want a really miserable Christmas, you could try

Re: [Ql-Users] Merry Christmas with SMSQ/E

Op 26/12/2017 om 18:31 schreef pjwitte via Ql-Users: If you want a really miserable Christmas, you could try the following - without saving your work first: 1 x% = 32000 2 y% = x% 3 z% = 1600 4 t  = x% * y% * z%: REMark Kabm!!! 5 PRINT "-- Im dead!" The above crashes SMSQ/E 3.32 on QPC2

[Ql-Users] Merry Christmas with SMSQ/E

If you want a really miserable Christmas, you could try the following - without saving your work first: 1 x% = 32000 2 y% = x% 3 z% = 1600 4 t  = x% * y% * z%: REMark Kabm!!! 5 PRINT "-- Im dead!" The above crashes SMSQ/E 3.32 on QPC2 and SMSQmulator! Even the four-finger reset wont work.