In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], John Gilpin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
Is there a convention to follow as regards where the reply goes? Sometimes I
get replies at the top of the original email, sometimes individual comments
interspersed in the Original message and sometimes at the bottom. Frequently
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Malcolm Cadman wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], John Gilpin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
Is there a convention to follow as regards where the reply goes? Sometimes I
get replies at the top of the original email, sometimes individual comments
- Original Message -
From: Tony Firshman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, February 24, 2007 10:21 PM
Subject: Re: [ql-users] Comment from the Traditional QUANTA Committee
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dennis S wrote:
John,
In Outlook Tools
- Original Message -
From: Tony Firshman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, February 24, 2007 4:21 PM
Subject: Re: [ql-users] Comment from the Traditional QUANTA
Committee
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dennis S wrote:
John,
In Outlook Tools
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Robert Newson wrote:
Tony Firshman wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dennis S wrote:
John,
In Outlook Tools Menu click:
Options, Send, Mail Sending Format, Plain Text settings:
Tick the box; Indent the original text
- Original Message -
From: Wolfgang Lenerz
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 23, 2007 7:16 AM
Subject: Re: [ql-users] Comment from the Traditional QUANTA Committee
gwicks wrote :
Sorry, John, but you are missing the point. In this case Quanta should
not
have needed
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
gwicks wrote:
The USB project was a good example of this. It concerns a major need of the
QL community, it was not expensive and it involves an established trader
with a proven track record. As it happens Tony Firshman has intervened
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dennis S wrote:
John,
In Outlook Tools Menu click:
Options, Send, Mail Sending Format, Plain Text settings:
Tick the box; Indent the original text when replying or
forwarding.
Viola,
Denny
Forwarding? Does that mean 'replying' too?
...
Tony wrote -
===
Forwarding? Does that mean 'replying' too?
... and is the default a '' character?
When I last looked (in OE) I think it mentioned the term 'quote text
in-line'.
==
Message Auto Options in OE are -
reply, reply all and forward.
Related
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
John Gilpin wrote:
- Original Message -
From: gwicks [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2007 7:20 PM
Subject: Re: [ql-users] Comment from the Traditional QUANTA Committee
- Original Message
- Original Message -
From: Wolfgang Lenerz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 23, 2007 7:16 AM
Subject: Re: [ql-users] Comment from the Traditional QUANTA Committee
gwicks wrote :
Sorry, John, but you are missing the point. In this case Quanta should
.
- Original Message -
From: Tony Firshman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 23, 2007 8:45 AM
Subject: Re: [ql-users] Comment from the Traditional QUANTA Committee
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
John Gilpin wrote:
- Original Message
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
John Gilpin wrote:
Thanks for the advice Tony,
Are you suggesting that I just leave out the brackets? Like this, or do I
have to set up something else in OE if so what?
Yes indeed. I have long since removed OE, but it *does* default the way
you
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], John Gilpin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
- Original Message -
From: Wolfgang Lenerz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 23, 2007 7:16 AM
Subject: Re: [ql-users] Comment from the Traditional QUANTA Committee
gwicks wrote :
Sorry
Hi,
To be fair about this discussion - see John's reply to my question about
whether Quanta could buy out the copyright on QMAC
Duncan
___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
- Original Message -
From: John Gilpin
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2007 7:29 PM
Subject: Re: [ql-users] Comment from the Traditional QUANTA Committee
{The point as I see it is that NO ONE who wanted some QUANTA money bothered
to pick up the phone!! You
- Original Message -
From: gwicks [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2007 7:20 PM
Subject: Re: [ql-users] Comment from the Traditional QUANTA Committee
- Original Message -
From: John Gilpin
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2007 6:48 PM
Subject: Re: [ql-users] Comment from the Traditional QUANTA Committee
In a message dated 19/02/2007 21:32:58 GMT Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
chat line comment
- Original Message -
From: John Gilpin
To: ql-users [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 19, 2007 9:32 PM
Subject: [ql-users] Comment from the Traditional QUANTA Committee
What my Audited Accounts do tell me is that QUANTA still has an Accumulated
Fund of over £12,000 (all will
I have let my Quanta membership lapse so I am talking as an outsider at the
moment. I see no earthly reason for Quanta to keep 12,000 BPD (23,000 USD) in a
bank account. Funding a suitable free QL OS on the software side and a Goldfire
type device on the hardware side would be a good investment
- Original Message -
From: gwicks [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2007 1:11 PM
Subject: Re: [ql-users] Comment from the Traditional QUANTA Committee
- Original Message -
From: John Gilpin
To: ql-users [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday
- Original Message -
From: John Gilpin
To: ql-users [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 19, 2007 9:32 PM
Subject: [ql-users] Comment from the Traditional QUANTA Committee
Over the past few months officers of the QUANTA Committee have monitored
the ql-users list (as they do) and,
22 matches
Mail list logo
