On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 4:01 AM, Peter wrote:
>
> How to get connected to the CPU bus is always the biggest problem with the
> original QL, as using extension bus makes things big and ugly.
>
> Using ROM slot takes away write access. And simulating writes with address
> lines is not something one
On 15 Sep 2013 at 17:29, Mark Martin wrote:
> Having a full fledge ethernet interface without the socket limitations of
> the WIZnet type of chips is an intriguing notion. I wonder if it will have
> any impact on the amount of work the get a working uIP type stack -- uIP
> doing things like packet
On Sun, Sep 15, 2013 at 10:56 AM, Peter Graf wrote:
>
> For joined forces between QL and Q68, this device might be of interest.
> If someone wants to build a QL ethernet card from it, I can send him the
> corresponding sheet of the Q68 schematics. I have tested the CP2200 on
> packet level there.
Petri Pellinen wrote:
> Mark, if you are interested I have a prototype board for the original QL
> that runs TCP/IP. [snip]
As you mention the original QL, I looked into the datasheet of the
ethernet controller I am using for the Q68, which is the CP2200.
To my surprise, it is 5V tolerant, and it
Mark, if you are interested I have a prototype board for the original QL
that runs TCP/IP. Due to time constraints with my company I have not been
able to work on it for the past year. It uses a chip that has the TCP/IP
stack embedded so there is no need to implement that part on the QL. Before
wor
Mark Martin wrote:
>>> Could it be licensed under an open source license?
>> GPL planned.
>
> That's hopeful. What can I do to encourage or support that?
Thank you. Unless you are a very familiar with drivers, C language and
networking, owning a native hardware with ethernet - I have no idea wha
On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 4:29 PM, Peter Graf wrote:
> > Could it be licensed under an open source license?
>
> GPL planned.
>
That's hopeful. What can I do to encourage or support that?
>
> > If the answer is no, I may be motivated to start an open project if I
> could
> > find help answering t
Mark Martin wrote:
> In what state does QLwIP exist today?
Undocumented and untouched for many years. Requiring QDOS Classic.
> Could it be licensed under an open source license?
GPL planned.
> If the answer is no, I may be motivated to start an open project if I could
> find help answering th
In what state does QLwIP exist today? Could it be licensed under an open
source license?
If the answer is no, I may be motivated to start an open project if I could
find help answering the question of hardware support. To my knowledge, no
known ethernet capable hardware support exists for any netw
Hi,
had to re-compile all QLwIP stuff after a harddisk crash.
Just checking if it still works... If someone is still online,
please send me a private reply (I have subscription turned off).
Thanks, Peter
___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.
10 matches
Mail list logo