Re: [Ql-Users] QLwIP

2013-09-16 Thread Mark Martin
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 4:01 AM, Peter wrote: > > How to get connected to the CPU bus is always the biggest problem with the > original QL, as using extension bus makes things big and ugly. > > Using ROM slot takes away write access. And simulating writes with address > lines is not something one

Re: [Ql-Users] QLwIP

2013-09-16 Thread Peter
On 15 Sep 2013 at 17:29, Mark Martin wrote: > Having a full fledge ethernet interface without the socket limitations of > the WIZnet type of chips is an intriguing notion. I wonder if it will have > any impact on the amount of work the get a working uIP type stack -- uIP > doing things like packet

Re: [Ql-Users] QLwIP

2013-09-15 Thread Mark Martin
On Sun, Sep 15, 2013 at 10:56 AM, Peter Graf wrote: > > For joined forces between QL and Q68, this device might be of interest. > If someone wants to build a QL ethernet card from it, I can send him the > corresponding sheet of the Q68 schematics. I have tested the CP2200 on > packet level there.

Re: [Ql-Users] QLwIP

2013-09-15 Thread Peter Graf
Petri Pellinen wrote: > Mark, if you are interested I have a prototype board for the original QL > that runs TCP/IP. [snip] As you mention the original QL, I looked into the datasheet of the ethernet controller I am using for the Q68, which is the CP2200. To my surprise, it is 5V tolerant, and it

Re: [Ql-Users] QLwIP

2013-09-15 Thread Petri Pellinen
Mark, if you are interested I have a prototype board for the original QL that runs TCP/IP. Due to time constraints with my company I have not been able to work on it for the past year. It uses a chip that has the TCP/IP stack embedded so there is no need to implement that part on the QL. Before wor

Re: [Ql-Users] QLwIP

2013-09-15 Thread Peter Graf
Mark Martin wrote: >>> Could it be licensed under an open source license? >> GPL planned. > > That's hopeful. What can I do to encourage or support that? Thank you. Unless you are a very familiar with drivers, C language and networking, owning a native hardware with ethernet - I have no idea wha

Re: [Ql-Users] QLwIP

2013-09-14 Thread Mark Martin
On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 4:29 PM, Peter Graf wrote: > > Could it be licensed under an open source license? > > GPL planned. > That's hopeful. What can I do to encourage or support that? > > > If the answer is no, I may be motivated to start an open project if I > could > > find help answering t

Re: [Ql-Users] QLwIP

2013-09-14 Thread Peter Graf
Mark Martin wrote: > In what state does QLwIP exist today? Undocumented and untouched for many years. Requiring QDOS Classic. > Could it be licensed under an open source license? GPL planned. > If the answer is no, I may be motivated to start an open project if I could > find help answering th

[Ql-Users] QLwIP

2013-09-14 Thread Mark Martin
In what state does QLwIP exist today? Could it be licensed under an open source license? If the answer is no, I may be motivated to start an open project if I could find help answering the question of hardware support. To my knowledge, no known ethernet capable hardware support exists for any netw

[Ql-Users] QLwIP Test

2007-09-28 Thread pgraf
Hi, had to re-compile all QLwIP stuff after a harddisk crash. Just checking if it still works... If someone is still online, please send me a private reply (I have subscription turned off). Thanks, Peter ___ QL-Users Mailing List http://www.q-v-d.demon.