In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], John Gilpin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
Is there a convention to follow as regards where the reply goes? Sometimes I
get replies at the top of the original email, sometimes individual comments
interspersed in the Original message and sometimes at the bottom. Frequently
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Malcolm Cadman wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], John Gilpin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
Is there a convention to follow as regards where the reply goes? Sometimes I
get replies at the top of the original email, sometimes individual comments
- Original Message -
From: Tony Firshman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, February 24, 2007 10:21 PM
Subject: Re: [ql-users] Comment from the Traditional QUANTA Committee
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dennis S wrote:
John,
In Outlook Tools
- Original Message -
From: Tony Firshman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, February 24, 2007 4:21 PM
Subject: Re: [ql-users] Comment from the Traditional QUANTA
Committee
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dennis S wrote:
John,
In Outlook Tools
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Robert Newson wrote:
Tony Firshman wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dennis S wrote:
John,
In Outlook Tools Menu click:
Options, Send, Mail Sending Format, Plain Text settings:
Tick the box; Indent the original text
- Original Message -
From: Wolfgang Lenerz
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 23, 2007 7:16 AM
Subject: Re: [ql-users] Comment from the Traditional QUANTA Committee
gwicks wrote :
Sorry, John, but you are missing the point. In this case Quanta should
not
have needed
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
gwicks wrote:
The USB project was a good example of this. It concerns a major need of the
QL community, it was not expensive and it involves an established trader
with a proven track record. As it happens Tony Firshman has intervened
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dennis S wrote:
John,
In Outlook Tools Menu click:
Options, Send, Mail Sending Format, Plain Text settings:
Tick the box; Indent the original text when replying or
forwarding.
Viola,
Denny
Forwarding? Does that mean 'replying' too?
...
Tony wrote -
===
Forwarding? Does that mean 'replying' too?
... and is the default a '' character?
When I last looked (in OE) I think it mentioned the term 'quote text
in-line'.
==
Message Auto Options in OE are -
reply, reply all and forward.
Related
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
John Gilpin wrote:
- Original Message -
From: gwicks [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2007 7:20 PM
Subject: Re: [ql-users] Comment from the Traditional QUANTA Committee
- Original Message
- Original Message -
From: Wolfgang Lenerz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 23, 2007 7:16 AM
Subject: Re: [ql-users] Comment from the Traditional QUANTA Committee
gwicks wrote :
Sorry, John, but you are missing the point. In this case Quanta should
.
- Original Message -
From: Tony Firshman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 23, 2007 8:45 AM
Subject: Re: [ql-users] Comment from the Traditional QUANTA Committee
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
John Gilpin wrote:
- Original Message
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
John Gilpin wrote:
Thanks for the advice Tony,
Are you suggesting that I just leave out the brackets? Like this, or do I
have to set up something else in OE if so what?
Yes indeed. I have long since removed OE, but it *does* default the way
you
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], John Gilpin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
- Original Message -
From: Wolfgang Lenerz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 23, 2007 7:16 AM
Subject: Re: [ql-users] Comment from the Traditional QUANTA Committee
gwicks wrote :
Sorry
Hi,
To be fair about this discussion - see John's reply to my question about
whether Quanta could buy out the copyright on QMAC
Duncan
___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
- Original Message -
From: John Gilpin
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2007 7:29 PM
Subject: Re: [ql-users] Comment from the Traditional QUANTA Committee
{The point as I see it is that NO ONE who wanted some QUANTA money bothered
to pick up the phone!! You
- Original Message -
From: gwicks [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2007 7:20 PM
Subject: Re: [ql-users] Comment from the Traditional QUANTA Committee
- Original Message -
From: John Gilpin
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2007 6:48 PM
Subject: Re: [ql-users] Comment from the Traditional QUANTA Committee
In a message dated 19/02/2007 21:32:58 GMT Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
chat line comment
- Original Message -
From: John Gilpin
To: ql-users [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 19, 2007 9:32 PM
Subject: [ql-users] Comment from the Traditional QUANTA Committee
What my Audited Accounts do tell me is that QUANTA still has an Accumulated
Fund of over £12,000 (all
:32 PM
Subject: [ql-users] Comment from the Traditional QUANTA Committee
What my Audited Accounts do tell me is that QUANTA still has an Accumulated
Fund of over ?12,000 (all will be disclosed in the next issue of QUANTA
Magazine) and we have a committee who are prepared to listen to specific
- Original Message -
From: gwicks [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2007 1:11 PM
Subject: Re: [ql-users] Comment from the Traditional QUANTA Committee
- Original Message -
From: John Gilpin
To: ql-users [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday
- Original Message -
From: John Gilpin
To: ql-users [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 19, 2007 9:32 PM
Subject: [ql-users] Comment from the Traditional QUANTA Committee
Over the past few months officers of the QUANTA Committee have monitored
the ql-users list (as they do
Over the past few months officers of the QUANTA Committee have monitored the
ql-users list (as they do) and, from time to time have discussed its content.
They have recently been referred to by a known radical terrorist as
traditionalists (Which was what the membership voted for) but that
23 matches
Mail list logo
