In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>> Umm ... not the "tick tock" ... :-)
>
>Strange. Maybe your message too the long way around :o)
>I suspect there's some data in the message headers we can use to find
>out - but I'm not all that clued up on th
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Umm ... not the "tick tock" ... :-)
Strange. Maybe your message too the long way around :o)
I suspect there's some data in the message headers we can use to find out - but
I'm not all that clued up on that part of emailing
> CD's / DVD's / Downloads / Magazines,
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>> Where has Demon been hiding your email for the last month? It seems you
>> need a new ISP!
>
>Nothing wrong with Demon, I've been using them for years and years and
>years. I suspect Malcolm's clock is wrong
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Where has Demon been hiding your email for the last month? It seems you
> need a new ISP!
Nothing wrong with Demon, I've been using them for years and years and years. I
suspect Malcolm's clock is wrong as a number of his posts have ended up in the
'ages ago' category
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, David
McCann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
>On Mon, 2007-02-19 at 19:21 +, Malcolm Cadman wrote:
>> I am not sure how free Linux really is ... all those downloads from
>the
>> internet, all the compiling time if you are in to that side of it,
>all
>> the magazin
On Mon, 2007-02-19 at 19:21 +, Malcolm Cadman wrote:
> I am not sure how free Linux really is ... all those downloads from the
> internet, all the compiling time if you are in to that side of it, all
> the magazines to buy, all the applications to acquire ...
Where has Demon been hiding your
On 19 Feb 2007, at 19:21, Malcolm Cadman wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, David
> McCann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
>
>> On Fri, 2007-02-16 at 17:47 +, Malcolm Cadman wrote:
>>> David, you should raise more issues about the Q60 on this list.
>>> No need to wait 2 years again ... :-(.
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, David
McCann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
>On Fri, 2007-02-16 at 17:47 +, Malcolm Cadman wrote:
>> David, you should raise more issues about the Q60 on this list.
>> No need to wait 2 years again ... :-(.
>
>I don't have any Q60 issues any more. When no one could
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Norman at Dunbar-it.co.uk wrote:
>
> > Steady Peter, steady :o)
>
> Shouldn't your reminder better go to the one who started this "myriad
> programmers", "personal note" and "talk is cheap" stuff? o:-)
>
Actually, I meant to put 'steady everyone'. Apologies for 'pick
So when are you going to include George Gwilt's changes which enable SMSQE to
be assembled with QMAC or Gwass?
This will open up SMQE to other improvements which are needed.
On Tuesday 20 February 2007 09:00, Wolfgang Lenerz wrote:
> On 20 Feb 2007 at 8:02, Roy wood wrote:
> > SMSQ/E is an open
> The 10 Euro fee to TT ended a while ago and we reduced the price
If that's the case, the licence on the official SMSQ/E web site should be
updated to current version.
Daniele
___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
Norman at Dunbar-it.co.uk wrote:
> Steady Peter, steady :o)
Shouldn't your reminder better go to the one who started this "myriad
programmers", "personal note" and "talk is cheap" stuff? o:-)
[Native TCP/IP & Ethernet]
> At present I have absolutely no idea what the current status of said
> pr
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Quite informative to see the SMSQ/E "registrar" shed some light on his
> attitude regarding the importance of native OS support for TCP/IP and
> ethernet. And a confirmation that I'd only get reasonable opportunities
> for major QL hardware again, if the slow and pain
Wolfgang Lenerz wrote:
> pgraf at q40.de wrote:
> > The "registrar" can at any time accept changes/additions/modifications
> > which are not distributed in source, but which may be essential. So
> > the SMSQ/E license does of course NOT provide this liberty. Instead, a
> > developer would depend o
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Daniele Terdina
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
>> It is, in this respect just the same as LINUX. Peter can be a reseller
>> and give it away for free if he wants. We will not stop hi,
>
>If I understand the licence correctly, resellers have to pay 10 euros to TT,
>and I
> It is, in this respect just the same as LINUX. Peter can be a reseller
> and give it away for free if he wants. We will not stop hi,
If I understand the licence correctly, resellers have to pay 10 euros to TT,
and I'm not sure whether there's also a fee for GD2 or other components, so
reseller c
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> The "registrar" can at any time accept changes/additions/modifications
> which are not distributed in source, but which may be essential. So the
> SMSQ/E license does of course NOT provide this liberty. Instead, a
> developer would depend on the mood of the registrar.
Wolfgang Lenerz wrote:
> Actually, the licence is a bit different:
>
> In a nutshell, and without this affecting the licence at all:
>
> Liberties :
> You can get the source code, I mean, heck it's on the website...
The "registrar" can at any time accept changes/additions/modifications
which a
On 20 Feb 2007 at 9:19, Tony Firshman wrote:
> > Mark Swift
> That is interesting. Isn't he the QDOS Classic man?
Idon't know - he gave persimsion to use his code to re/set the Qx0
cachemodes in SMSQ/E
Wolfgang
___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Wolfgang Lenerz wrote:
>
> On the other hand, SMSQ/E HAS progressed, thanks to Marcel, of course, but
> not only him:
>
> Bruno Coativy
> Fabrizio Diversi
> Phoebus Dokos
> George Gwilt
> Jerome Grimbert
> John Hall
> Marcel Kilgus
> Mark Swift
Tha
On 20 Feb 2007 at 8:02, Roy wood wrote:
> SMSQ/E is an open O/S. Anyone can have the code and anyone can make
> changes to it so long as they
> a) submit them to Wolfgang for vetting
> b) ensure that the changes do not adversely affect other parts of the
> O/S
> c) can be made compatible with all
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
>Duncan wrote:
>
>> Do you have any othe projects else up your sleeve?
>
>Not absolutely impossible. But nothing major can happen until there's a
>decent free QL OS. All reasonable ways I have to implement OS level code
>for new hardware invo
At 23:01 18/02/2007 -0500, you wrote:
>David Tubbs wrote:
NO I DID NOT ! ! ! ! ! !
> > At 19:30 15/02/2007 +, you wrote:
> >
> >
> >>>Then there's the lack of USB and printer support.
> >>
> >>But just a provocative thought. Have you ever tried to connect a USB only
> >>laptop to a parall
On Sat, 2007-02-17 at 15:24 +0100, Bob Spelten wrote:
> When I searched for the latest version of DBAS I got version 2.13 from the
> Quanta librarian (Dec 2002) who told me YOU were the one that last
> tinkered with it.
> Does this mean you lost your own commented source code?
Not guilty! I ne
Where do i sign ?
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 16 February 2007 09:28 >>>
Neil Riley wrote:
> GoMMC, a RomDisq on steroids but with the opportunity to
> remove the mem card, excellent.
>
> Once again, Id buy one if developed for the QL.
How would it sound if a SD/MMC device for SuperGoldCard, Q40 and
David Tubbs wrote:
> At 19:30 15/02/2007 +, you wrote:
>
>
>>>Then there's the lack of USB and printer support.
>>
>>But just a provocative thought. Have you ever tried to connect a USB only
>>laptop to a parallel printer? PC World don't know the answer to that one,
EBAY can get you the ans
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Dilwyn Jones
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
>> I know that Dilwyn Jones has put most of the available documentation
>> on
>> his web site, which is easy to access.
>>
>> http://homepages.tersco.net/dilwyn.jones/index.html
>Errr, slight typo:
>http://homepages.tesco.net
> I know that Dilwyn Jones has put most of the available documentation
> on
> his web site, which is easy to access.
>
> http://homepages.tersco.net/dilwyn.jones/index.html
Errr, slight typo:
http://homepages.tesco.net/dilwyn.jones/index.html
The documentation is actually on the third of my 3 sit
Op Fri, 16 Feb 2007 17:58:22 +0100 schreef David McCann
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> One of the many reasons I have for preferring SuperBasic to XBasic is
> the availability of dbas. But this is another project which got
> abandoned. I may be out of date, but the last time I looked the version
> suppl
At 19:30 15/02/2007 +, you wrote:
> > Then there's the lack of USB and printer support.
>
>But just a provocative thought. Have you ever tried to connect a USB only
>laptop to a parallel printer? PC World don't know the answer to that one,
>but I do mainly because of my QL experience of lookin
- Original Message -
From: "Roy wood" <>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2007 11:56 PM
Subject: Re: [ql-users] Hardware and software - new horizons
>>But just a provocative thought. Have you ever tried to connect a USB only
>>lapt
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, David
McCann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
>On Thu, 2007-02-15 at 23:02 +0100, Peter Graf wrote:
>> I don't think Richard gave up UQLX. Some other QL wheels also need to be
>> turned, so there may be different priorities. Usually, if you email him,
>> he sends you mor
On Thu, 2007-02-15 at 23:02 +0100, Peter Graf wrote:
> I don't think Richard gave up UQLX. Some other QL wheels also need to be
> turned, so there may be different priorities. Usually, if you email him,
> he sends you more recent code.
Then why is the old, uncompilable version still on his website,
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Peter Graf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
>David McCann wrote:
>
>> The QL no longer has enough users to make commercial products viable,
>> nor to produce enough programmers to support open-source products.
>
>True, but why does nobody seem to see that it's possible to
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Roy wood
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
>In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, gwicks
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
>>Those of us who went to the Sinclair show in Norwich a couple of years ago
>>had a very strong impression that the Spectrum has not moved on to the same
>>ext
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
>Neil Riley wrote:
>
>> GoMMC, a RomDisq on steroids but with the opportunity to
>> remove the mem card, excellent.
>>
>> Once again, Id buy one if developed for the QL.
>
>How would it sound if a SD/MMC device for SuperGoldCard, Q40 and Q60
Duncan wrote:
> Do you have any othe projects else up your sleeve?
Not absolutely impossible. But nothing major can happen until there's a
decent free QL OS. All reasonable ways I have to implement OS level code
for new hardware involve re-using free software and getting help from
persons that
In a message dated 16/02/2007 09:29:17 GMT Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
> How would it sound if a SD/MMC device for SuperGoldCard, Q40 and Q60 had
> already been prototyped and a free software to access it was already
> written?
> Peter
Do you have any othe projects else
In a message dated 16/02/2007 09:49:30 GMT Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
That would sound brilliant - I for one would want to offer it for sale !!
& I would want to buy one
Duncan
___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.c
On Fri, 16 Feb 2007 09:28:51 -, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Neil Riley wrote:
>
>> GoMMC, a RomDisq on steroids but with the opportunity to
>> remove the mem card, excellent.
>>
>> Once again, Id buy one if developed for the QL.
>
> How would it sound if a SD/MMC device for SuperGoldCard, Q40
Neil Riley wrote:
> GoMMC, a RomDisq on steroids but with the opportunity to
> remove the mem card, excellent.
>
> Once again, Id buy one if developed for the QL.
How would it sound if a SD/MMC device for SuperGoldCard, Q40 and Q60 had
already been prototyped and a free software to access it wa
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, gwicks
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
>Those of us who went to the Sinclair show in Norwich a couple of years ago
>had a very strong impression that the Spectrum has not moved on to the same
>extent as the QL. We saw stall after stall selling Spectrum hardware and
>soft
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
gwicks wrote:
>> Then there's the lack of USB and printer support.
>
> But just a provocative thought. Have you ever tried to connect a USB only
> laptop to a parallel printer? PC World don't know the answer to that one,
> but I do mainly because o
David McCann wrote:
> The QL no longer has enough users to make commercial products viable,
> nor to produce enough programmers to support open-source products.
True, but why does nobody seem to see that it's possible to get help
from friendly open source folks outside the QL scene? There is good
- Original Message -
From: "David McCann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2007 4:53 PM
Subject: [ql-users] Hardware and software - new horizons
> To keep an old computer going you need a reasonable user-base and a
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Rick Chagouri-Brindle
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
>Malcolm Cadman wrote:
>>
>>
>> Both old and new users are stimulated by something new.
>>
>> Repeating a list that I gave earlier - probably 3 item ranges will be
>> suited :
>>
>> 1 - £50 to £100 a card of some ty
I've been following the debate in a rather detached way since all I use
now is QemuLator running SuperBasic (nicer than XBasic and I have a lot
of existing software), the Editor (friendlier than Emacs), Abacus (for
one spreadsheet I can't be bothered to convert), and (occasionally)
QMaths.
To keep
GoMMC, a RomDisq on steroids but with the opportunity to
remove the mem card, excellent.
Once again, Id buy one if developed for the QL.
Neil
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 15 February 2007 12:58 >>>
Hi,
To stimulate the debate further.
I still believe that new hardware stimulates new software, whi
Malcolm Cadman wrote:
>
>
> Both old and new users are stimulated by something new.
>
> Repeating a list that I gave earlier - probably 3 item ranges will be
> suited :
>
> 1 - £50 to £100 a card of some type, probably modular too, that most
> people would have an interest in to add to their e
Hi,
To stimulate the debate further.
I still believe that new hardware stimulates new software, which all
goes together to create activity and interest.
The QL with the original QDOS and the newer SMSQ/E has an OS that is
still interesting and capable of development.
The form factor of the or
50 matches
Mail list logo
