Hi all,
Does anybody know of any Prowess font that have th euro symbol?
If not, is there a font editor around?
Wolfgang
-
www.wlenerz.com
On 12 Sep 2001, at 20:50, Peter Graf wrote:
Just in case you refer to the MOVEP instruction:
No, it's the instruction that disables external interrupts.
The 68060 has no MOVEP. Just read the docs on your support disks, and use
the MOVEP-emulation software. All the crashes you reported to
On 13 Sep 2001, at 22:28, Thierry Godefroy wrote:
I wonder what this instruction is as none of the beta-testers had
reported any crash so far...
I thought you were gone for a long time, so didn't send you this
info already. The offending instruction is:
INIT_SCHD MOVE.B#1,$FF10
Hi all,
I've recently had some time to play around with my all new Q60.
I'm very happy with it, it is a nifty beast.
This also gave me the opportunity to test the CD driver. Indeed, I (of
course) waznted to get my usual setup also going on the Q60. Sp I
copied my QPC QXL.WIN fimle to a CD
On 5 Sep 2001, at 8:04, Dilwyn Jones wrote:
I've recently tried out a few CD-R burning programs. Although many
Windows programs like Nero have the facility to burn raw images, some
use various filename extensions, so an image created for one may not
necessarily show up in the files lists of
Thanks to Peter Claus for their fast answer.
So it has to be a raw image.
I presume there is no way to burn that under Windows, unless
anybody knows better?
Wolfgang
-
www.wlenerz.com
Hi all,
Despite my attempts, Echelon didn't get me (yet?).
Has anybody tried to use Thierry's CDRom driver?
More specifically, has anybody got it to work with a QXL.WIN file?
I've got a Q60 now, and it would be SO nice to use a CDRom with
a disk image to get everything to the Q60.
So far, I
On 1 Aug 2001, at 15:58, Dilwyn Jones wrote:
All the more reason to email etc from QDOS or SMSQ/E I suppose, as
we're (almost) completely virus proof (ask Geoff Wicks about the
almost in relation to his QXL).
??? A tale worth telling?
Wolfgang
-
www.wlenerz.com
On 31 Jul 2001, at 12:33, Richard Zidlicky wrote:
Aehm.. can't help not to mention that all of this has been implemented
OpenSource more than 15 years ago and worked perfectly until Bill's
(not any on this list) blessings reached us.
Kit's software is relatively moderate yet, I have seen
On 18 Jul 2001, at 14:37, P Witte wrote:
In fact I have
heard it before, namely in the demo version of QPC2: When you try to
save a file (writing to media has been disabled in the demo) you get
a buzz instead.
Ummm, if I remember correctly, yhis was due tothe QPC demo version not
On 18 Jul 2001, at 17:42, Marcel Kilgus wrote:
That shouldn't be your problem here.
No, that's exactly what it is. If a disc write fails for whatever
reason it can't give back any errors because the write call has
already returned to the application. Therefore the sound.
But the problem
On 18 Jul 2001, at 17:42, Marcel Kilgus wrote:
Wolfgang Lenerz wrote:
In fact I have heard it before, namely in the demo version of
QPC2: When you try to save a file (writing to media has been
disabled in the demo) you get a buzz instead.
Ummm, if I remember correctly, yhis was due
On 12 Jul 2001, at 19:28, Malcolm Cadman wrote:
WIN_REMV 2 - declares 'WIN2_' to be removeable
or WIN_REMV 2,1
WIN_REMV 2,0 - 'WIN_2' is no longer removeable !
I haven't tried the latter information about Removeables, myself.
Perhaps someone has ?
Actually, I someytimes use this
On 30 Jun 2001, at 13:33, Marcel Kilgus wrote:
QPC v2.03 together with SMSQ/E v2.99 is now available from the usual
places.
Ins't this great service?
Wolfgang
-
www.wlenerz.com
On 13 Jun 2001, at 11:45, FrançoisVan Emelen wrote:
I've just done it and this version ofCol_obj is O.K.
Thanks
François Van Emelen
Phew
Wolfgang
On 11 Jun 2001, at 22:42, FrançoisVan Emelen wrote:
Hi,
It crashes with the usual qlib message window:
Job xx Col line 510 Q_LIB error 18
Array not DIMned
Data :512 1384 1 Stack:5000 852
'xx' = Job number.
Thanks for that fine utility.
I think I corrected that mistake some time
On 10 Jun 2001, at 21:23, Peter Graf wrote:
BTW if you want to run a QDOS application while using Linux on a Q60, you
can use a special version of UQLX. Unlike emulators on a PC it can run QDOS
programs native on the 68060, which is of course a lot faster.
Does that run QDOS classic or
On 11 Jun 2001, at 15:02, FrançoisVan Emelen wrote:
COL_obj works fine (even in mode 4) if you avoid pressing R,G,B (for red,
green, blue).
Errm, why? What happens then?
Wolfgang
On 9 Jun 2001, at 21:00, Peter Graf wrote:
Wolfgang Lenerz wrote:
Well, to put some oil on the fire (...) what is the ENORMOUS
advantage QPC has over the Q60?
You can buy it.
(Sorry Peter, I couldn't resits that one).
Wolfgang
In the meantime I couldn't resist to build
On 8 Jun 2001, at 18:45, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just imagine: booting 10 seconds, dialing in and getting your emails.
Easier than walking to your mail-box. I am tired of booting Linux.
I had a dream...
Wolfgang
On 7 Jun 2001, at 23:26, Bojan Kotur wrote:
This mailing list is all great and everything but wouldn't it be
better (and making less net traffic) if the list master just set
up a bulletin board like UBB or similar? That way we could
avoid having to recieve tons of mail every day and still
On 8 Jun 2001, at 17:04, Dilwyn Jones wrote:
Once soql is complete, I daresay we can banish OE and other 2 letter
words from this list.
Even... QL ?
Wolfgang
On 29 May 2001, at 21:42, Darren Branagh wrote:
>You said it !! Tony Firshman always says I get bigger
>each time he sees me.
Perhaps Tony is shrinking
Wolfgang
On 24 May 2001, at 18:23, Geoff Wicks wrote:
( explanation about a Mr Evans.)
Alright, thanks, must have been quite a sight.
Don't politicians expect that sort of thing? Didn't Billy Boy Gates
also get creamed once in Belgium? Did it ever happen to clive
sinclair ?( ha, back OT).
On 23 May 2001, at 8:37, Dilwyn Jones wrote:
The ironic thing is that this incident seems to have ENHANCED John
Prescott's reputation as a straight-talking no-nonsense down to earth
politician. The sad part of it all was that everyone concentrated on
Prescott and Evans, and little mention
On 17 May 2001, at 13:31, Richard Zidlicky wrote:
the problem is a bit more than simply QPC x86 code against m68k.
SMSQ is written in 68000 assembly and even rewriting it to make
use of 68020-60 arithmetic would be a major task, not to mention
the lack of suitable assembler for it.
So a
On 12 May 2001, at 21:41, Thierry Godefroy wrote:
I can confirm this as I just acquired a Q60 from Peter
Hey, this is favoritism - can I buy one, too?
Wolfgang
On 11 May 2001, at 8:17, Norman Dunbar wrote:
PS. I've heard of Chicken Supreme but never Toad Supreme :o) :o)
That's because your not french - here, we eat them...
Wolfgang
On 11 May 2001, at 23:06, Phoebus Dokos wrote:
Anyone know of a way to print characters on the screen without the
character's paper affecting the channel / background?
Use OVER#channel,0
Wolfgang
On 30 Apr 2001, at 8:45, Norman Dunbar wrote:
I can't believe I've been away all weekend, and when I come back to work, no
messages on this list ?
Never fear, Wolfgang's here
(ahem)
Wolfgang
On 25 Apr 2001, at 21:51, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's a patch (Basic program) for SMSQ/E 2.98, you can get it from
q40.de/os.html .
Thanks a lot, I'm getting this now!
Wolfgang
On 1 Apr 2001, at 20:22, Geoff Wicks wrote:
Most of the (PD) PC translation programs I have seen are not much more
sophisticated than this, and I remain pretty cynical of all translation
software.
I can't really say that that kind of software gives a bad translation...
because that would
On 28 Mar 2001, at 23:11, FranoisVan Emelen wrote:
Well, I really can't tell. I'm not a programmer; my skills are unfortunately
limited to some Sbasic.
What I know about SCR_LIM and SCR_YLIM is this:
If launch the procedure below in QD with F10 (Sbas/QD thing), you will see a
black window
On 24 Mar 2001, at 11:12, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You may be right that you cannot trust Windoze or some of its programs.
But what is a "trusted" SMSQ/E browser worth, if the data flows on the
basis of QPC and the underlying "untrusted" M$ Windoze?
1 - I trust QOC
2 - I trust Windows, at
On 23 Mar 2001, at 19:57, Mills wrote:
Please could you tell me why you want the source code?
Sure, it'll be a bit longwinded, though.
Most people on this list have access to a PC, are another machine
(UnixBox) which already has Intrernet progs, else they wouldn't be
on this list. I, for
On 22 Mar 2001, at 16:46, Marcel Kilgus wrote:
I though you're speaking of data accesses.
The problem, as I'e encountered it, is as follows: You start a
QLiberated job. It hangs. Then you look at it with Jmon. You notice
that it hangs in an infinite loop, at some instrcution which says:
On 20 Mar 2001, at 18:31, Mills wrote:
Dear QLers
Would people be prepared to pay for HB and if so how much, or would
you only use it if was freeware? Would it need certain features before
you would be prepared to buy it? As CSS1/CSS2/XSL are unlikely to be
implemented, does this
On 20 Mar 2001, at 19:00, Marcel Kilgus wrote:
That's right but shouldn't pose a problem to QPC.
Marcel
Oh, but it does: a jmp then give a wrong address error.
Wolfgang
On 20 Mar 2001, at 22:20, Peter Graf wrote:
128 MB RAM / 60 GB for example. But it wouldn't make sense.
And let us pray that it never will
Wolfgang
On 20 Mar 2001, at 19:48, Geoff Wicks wrote:
I have not come across this problem in practice, but is it something which
only affects older (or badly written) QL-Liberated programs? Could it be
something to do with the original basic? For example assuming that system
variables begin at
On 19 Mar 2001, at 0:30, Q Branch wrote:
On another tack it seems I was wasting my time looking for faults with Q
40 with regards to some of the problems with QLiberated programs. The
same problems can occur on QPC 2 so the fault must lie somewhere in the
colour drivers themselves. Now all
On 17 Mar 2001, at 5:35, Ian Pizer wrote:
re Text87 problem: You asked a good question. I had set High Colour but if
I set QL Colour
the problem is solved! What does that mean?
IIRC, text 87 writes directly to the screen. Since the screen layout,
when using high colour mode, is totally
On 13 Mar 2001, at 16:52, Malcolm Cadman wrote:
I guess even QLingons :-)
The QLingons just uncloaked Captain !
That's a nice one! :-))
Wolfgang
On 13 Mar 2001, at 19:11, FranoisVan Emelen wrote:
No problems here with Windows 98.
Here I use QPC2 under win 98 SE. (or QXL). Both have this
problem.
Wolfgang
On 13 Mar 2001, at 16:20, Dave Westbury wrote:
On the topic of a QL web browser, with so many going over to QPC2 ;-( , isn't it
only going to be Q40/60, GF and maybe SGC+SuperHermes users that would have any
real interest? I could understand the interest in a mail program using Jon's
TCP/IP
On 13 Mar 2001, at 16:21, Norman Dunbar wrote:
The (in)famous cloaking device then ?
Yup!
Wolfgang
On 13 Mar 2001, at 8:44, Christopher Cave wrote:
In-Reply-To: 3AADD745.29568.3C11E@localhost
Wolfgang
Yes but, as your message implied, it was just the SBASIC job that crashed.
The rest of the system appeared to carry on O.K.
Oh yes, the rest of the system carries on OK.
Thanks for
On 13 Mar 2001, at 16:03, Norman Dunbar wrote:
Cloaking ???
Please explain to a thick Jock !!
Surely it means his website is run by Klingons
(using a QL of, course, to stay on topic).
Wolfgang
Hello all
I seemto have a curious problem is SMSQE Sbasic:
Writing out the following lines:
10 def proc a(b,c%)
20 end def a
and then:
Qsave ram1_p
followed by QLrun ram1_p
crashes the copy of the basic interpreter.
Can anyone repeat this?
Wolfgang
On 5 Mar 2001, at 20:41, Geoff Wicks wrote:
Woe unto you, sinful QL-ers! Repent of your evil ways! The end is at hand!
All right, all right, I'm throwing the PC away already...
Is that enough atonement?
Wolfgang
On 26 Feb 2001, at 15:00, Dave Westbury wrote:
That is just task waiting on pointer (ie. suspended), and if no movement or
pointer action in certain time pop up a bubble. Nice feature though.
Actually, this feature was introduced by FiFi
(Sorry, couldn't resist that).
Wolfgang
On 24 Feb 2001, at 12:23, Dave Westbury wrote:
Chicken and egg situation: If latest QDOS PTR_GEN (v1.71?) did return IOP.RPTR
for an Event (bits 24-31 set in event vector), how would you send one? You need
SMS.SEVT which is only in SMSQ 2.71+ (the only way to prevent ERR.NC return?).
I
On 6 Feb 2001, at 22:38, Peter Graf wrote:
Roy Wood wrote:
Oh and Marcel, beware of adding a MMU facility to QPC 2 until we have
found out why the Q 40 has so many problems with some Qliberated code.
Actually, I don't think that this is the MMU facility. I have had the same
problems under
On 6 Feb 2001, at 22:40, Peter Graf wrote:
BTW I have used the same case for a Q60. (Thanks to Keith.) Possible, but
it means a lot of tinkering since Tony Firshman has not yet developed a Q60
Mini-Backplane ;-)))
Knowing Tony, it won't be long in coming
Does that mean the Q60 will
On 6 Feb 2001, at 21:45, Dilwyn Jones wrote:
On the other hand, if you don't want to hear Tony, access his site
with soql and QLynx...
Where can I get them? Please?
Wolfgang
On 4 Feb 2001, at 10:36, Peter Graf wrote:
> Of course the QL is a platform. It is not true that the QL is restricted to
> QDOS. I can run a different operating system on it, not only QDOS. The
> interfaces to the hardware are defined and accessible.
All right, then QPC must be a platform as
On 3 Feb 2001, at 16:15, Peter Graf wrote:
I wasn't talking about what QPC *could* do if it was *changed*. You called
QPC a platform all by itself, and I think it is not. Because IIRC the only
thing that can be run are =68008 coded SMSQ/E applications.
Right, then QL, then, isn't a
On 3 Feb 2001, at 2:08, Peter Graf wrote:
The size of problems depends not only on development itself.
After I developed a program, I need a stack of disks or some Webspace.
But what after I developed a mainboard?
See the difference? Dealing with the production+service issue might have
On 2 Feb 2001, at 9:37, Wolfgang Lenerz wrote:
On 2 Feb 2001, at 8:21, Norman Dunbar wrote:
It could also have been a contradiction in terms, especially if I said
'working PC' !!
Well yes, but nobody would have believed it, anyway
Wolfgang
On 3 Feb 2001, at 2:05, Peter Graf wrote:
No, I don't think that graphic driver problems are rare.
But graphics drivers with QPC are - and that's what was being
discussed. QPC presumes (and rightly so) that you have a running
and functioning Windows machine.
IIRC QPC has not. For
On 1 Feb 2001, at 20:06, Geoff Wicks wrote:
The point I wanted to make is that we are a "Broad Church" in the QL
Community. That is, we embrace a wide range of people and opinions. To
survive we have to have a high degree of tolerance. We need both QPC and the
Q40 as well as those people
On 1 Feb 2001, at 21:04, Peter Graf wrote:
Wolfgang wrote:
There are a lot of reasons why a M$ Windows PC is not a QL system. One of
them you have given yourself: It would have to behave like a QL! When I
need minutes to boot the machine and my emulator crashes because of a
Windows
On 1 Feb 2001, at 8:47, Timothy Swenson wrote:
1] I prefer pure QL platform. The Q40 gives me this. Plus buying it helps to
support the QL hardware community.
Yes of course, that's why I want a Q60 when it comes out!
2] My wife mostly uses the PC. Getting her off to use QPC would be a
On 2 Feb 2001, at 8:21, Norman Dunbar wrote:
It could also have been a contradiction in terms, especially if I said
'working PC' !!
Well yes, but nobody would have believed it, anyway
Wolfgang
On 31 Jan 2001, at 16:41, Marcel Kilgus wrote:
It also crashes more easily, like "JMON 0" crashes straight out back
into Windoze.
Couldn't say so. Works just fine.
Same here : no problem!
Wolfgang
Wolfgang
On 31 Jan 2001, at 23:24, Peter Graf wrote:
Yes with QPC+PC (+ necessarily M$ Windows!) you get a PC! But when you say
"also" a PC you imply that you get a QL system when you buy such a PC.
I feel that real QL style hardware users seem to become a minority on this
list, but at this point
101 - 166 of 166 matches
Mail list logo
