In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Timothy Swenson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
>On Mar 8, 7:40pm, Malcolm Cadman wrote:
>> I agree that programming on the QL is in fatc quite a joy - once you
>> have made the effort to learn how to do it.
>
>Programming on the PC (either in Windows or Linux) is easi
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Bill Waugh
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
>Malcolm Cadman wrote:
>>
>> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Bill Waugh
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
>
>> >Nothing personnel Malcolm
>>
>> No problem ... no offensive taken at all.
>>
>> A good discussion, unfortuneatly too
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Bill Waugh
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
>Tony Firshman wrote:
>>
>> BTW my uncle had a farm in Rhydlewis, nr Llandysul, and I spent many
>> happy hours as a youngster on his tractor. He was a rocket engineer most
>> of the time in Aberporth. An interesting man (8-)
01 21:07
À : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Objet : Re: SV: [ql-users] Nut cutlets - NO QL
On Mar 8, 7:40pm, Malcolm Cadman wrote:
> I agree that programming on the QL is in fatc quite a joy - once you
> have made the effort to learn how to do it.
Programming on the PC (either in Windows or Linux) is
Tony Firshman wrote:
>
> BTW my uncle had a farm in Rhydlewis, nr Llandysul, and I spent many
> happy hours as a youngster on his tractor. He was a rocket engineer most
> of the time in Aberporth. An interesting man (8-)#
>
Wicked
Can't help wondering Tony, did he have any sheds (left) (;-)
All
Malcolm Cadman wrote:
>
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Bill Waugh
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
> >Nothing personnel Malcolm
>
> No problem ... no offensive taken at all.
>
> A good discussion, unfortuneatly too OT for the QL list to pursue for
> long :-)
>
> --
> Malcolm Cadman
What a gen
:07
Til: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Emne: Re: SV: [ql-users] Nut cutlets - NO QL
On Mar 8, 7:40pm, Malcolm Cadman wrote:
> I agree that programming on the QL is in fatc quite a joy - once you
> have made the effort to learn how to do it.
Programming on the PC (either in Windows or Linux) is easie
>> At least your downloaded SMSQ/E stuff is extremely unlikely to
suffer
>> virus infection! (there...back on topic!)
>
>Mr. Jones, may I remind you that on 25th April 1998 in Selston Parish
Hall
>in the County of Nottinghamshire you did wilfully and with malice
>aforethought infect my QXL with a
--
Dilwyn Jones
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.soft.net.uk/dj/index.html
-Original Message-
From: Timothy Swenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 07 March 2001 21:42
Subject: Re: SV: [ql-users] Nut cutlets - NO QL
>On Mar 7, 9:30pm
On Mar 8, 7:40pm, Malcolm Cadman wrote:
> I agree that programming on the QL is in fatc quite a joy - once you
> have made the effort to learn how to do it.
Programming on the PC (either in Windows or Linux) is easier from the aspect
that there is more documentation, more tools, and more people.
- Original Message -
From: Dilwyn Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> At least your downloaded SMSQ/E stuff is extremely unlikely to suffer
> virus infection! (there...back on topic!)
Mr. Jones, may I remind you that on 25th April 1998 in Selston Parish Hall
in the County of Nottinghamshire y
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Norman Dunbar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
>At the risk of severe flaming :
Why :-)
>I am basically (no pun intended) a programmer at heart.
>I like to program.
>On the QL, programming is fun because yoy know how to get close to the
>hardware - if you want to - and
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Bill Waugh
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
>Malcolm Cadman wrote:
>>
>> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Darren Branagh
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
>> >Hi All,
>> >
>> >By Now, you all will have noticed my absence at the Hove Show -
>> >unfortunately this couldn't be h
On Mar 7, 9:30pm, Dilwyn Jones wrote:
> Not necessarily - you can compile procedures with QLib or make a Turbo
> task into a keyword if you want, for example. In addition to named
> procedures in S*BASIC of course.
I know Qlib will create extensions, but I don't think TURBO will create an
exten
>I'm more concerned about vaccinated animals becoming carriers.
>But enough of this non Ql subject, I've got a stack of interesting
SMSQE
>stuff that I've downloaded but haven't had time to use yet - soon
>though
>
>All the best - Bill
At least your downloaded SMSQ/E stuff is extremely u
>
>And do you know what I like most about it? If something doesn't
>exist, you can EASILY write a new keyword that'll do what you
>want, with all the speed of machine code.
>
>Ok, so admittedly, you have to know machine code for this, but
>still, the QL machine code is not so difficult.
Not neces
>By the way, the joy programming a PC is exactly the same as
programming a
>Ql.
Hmmm, you're obviously not using QBasic on the PC then!
>I have been thinking of uppgrading to QPC2...
>
>Arvid Borretzen
Go for QPC2, I've been using it for a while. If you want to use
SMSQ/E, you won't go far wron
Wolfgang Lenerz wrote:
>
> On 6 Mar 2001, at 21:31, Bill Waugh wrote:
>
> >
> > Hope this doesn't sound like "my drifts are bigger than yours"
> No, but let's keep it at that (you get my drift?)
>
> > 4. Why don't they vaccinate
> > fact - it is a LIVE vaccine
> > fact - some animals vacci
> >Ok, so admittedly, you have to know machine code for this, but
> >still, the QL machine code is not so difficult.
> Yes indeed. My first foray into m/c was the 6502 with all sorts of
> weird addressing modes that I never fully understood.
It was my lecturer's uncertainty in the indirect modes
On Wed, 7 Mar 2001 at 14:27:22, Wolfgang Lenerz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
(Ref: <3AA6454A.23640.131A7C1@localhost>)
>On 7 Mar 2001, at 10:06, Tony Firshman wrote:
>
>
>> QL basic for instance is very much part of me now.
>> and what a good basic it is.
>Oh yes.
>And do you know what I like
Norman Dunbar wrote:
> Of course, the advantage on the QL is that I CAN program in assembler if I
> choose, while on the PC, I can't.
Better don't start it. It's horrible ;-)
> (I can almost hear Marcel saying "why not?"
No, I don't :)
Marcel
On 7 Mar 2001, at 9:26, Norman Dunbar wrote:
> At the risk of severe flaming :
(snip)
> (Ducks and runs !) *
... into my shelter, because I happen to think just the same!
Wolfgang
On 7 Mar 2001, at 10:06, Tony Firshman wrote:
> QL basic for instance is very much part of me now.
> and what a good basic it is.
Oh yes.
And do you know what I like most about it? If something doesn't
exist, you can EASILY write a new keyword that'll do what you
want, with all the speed
On 7 Mar 2001, at 9:56, Tony Firshman wrote:
> Ah yes - that is exactly what I was trying to say in my last msg.
> You said it more clearly (8-)#
>
No, yours was just as clear, I just hadn't read it when I replied...
Wolfgang
Ps:
How does this topic relate to the QL? easy, we Qllers don't p
Hi,
here is my rant on the subject.
> Sorry Malcolm, but whatever do you mean. F&M is a virus that is
> prevalent in some parts of the world where animal welfare is NOT viewed
> with the same degree of concern as it is here by public and farmers.
sincererly, I was really impressed by the swift
On Wed, 7 Mar 2001 at 10:22:39, Wolfgang Lenerz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
(Ref: <3AA60BEF.9244.5192BE@localhost>)
>On 6 Mar 2001, at 21:31, Bill Waugh wrote:
>
>>
>> Hope this doesn't sound like "my drifts are bigger than yours"
> No, but let's keep it at that (you get my drift?)
>
>
>> 4.
On Wed, 7 Mar 2001 at 10:22:39, Wolfgang Lenerz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
(Ref: <3AA60BEF.32483.5192C7@localhost>)
>On 6 Mar 2001, at 23:01, Arvid Borretzen wrote:
>
>
>> By the way, the joy programming a PC is exactly the same as programming a
>> Ql.
>Personally, I don't agree. I prefer program
: SV: [ql-users] Nut cutlets - NO QL
On 6 Mar 2001, at 23:01, Arvid Borretzen wrote:
> By the way, the joy programming a PC is exactly the same as programming a
> Ql.
Personally, I don't agree. I prefer programming on the QL.
Wolfgang
On 6 Mar 2001, at 23:01, Arvid Borretzen wrote:
> By the way, the joy programming a PC is exactly the same as programming a
> Ql.
Personally, I don't agree. I prefer programming on the QL.
Wolfgang
On 6 Mar 2001, at 21:31, Bill Waugh wrote:
>
> Hope this doesn't sound like "my drifts are bigger than yours"
No, but let's keep it at that (you get my drift?)
> 4. Why don't they vaccinate
> fact - it is a LIVE vaccine
> fact - some animals vaccinated would become carriers
> fact - susc
Tony Firshman makes some magical things to make me read
} >
} >4. Why don't they vaccinate
} >fact - it is a LIVE vaccine
} >fact - some animals vaccinated would become carriers
} >fact - susceptible wild animals that weren't vaccinated would become
} >infected
} >fact - the vaccine covers one str
On Tue, 6 Mar 2001 at 21:31:05, Bill Waugh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
(Ref: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
>2. There are too few abattoirs
>fact - the 1967 outbreak resulted in over 2000 cases and we had lots
>more abattoirs then
but all the outbreaks in 1967 were in a confined area.
>From the map th
:31
Til: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Emne: [ql-users] Nut cutlets - NO QL
Malcolm Cadman wrote:
>
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Darren Branagh
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
> >Hi All,
> >
> >By Now, you all will have noticed my absence at the Hove Show -
> >
Malcolm Cadman wrote:
>
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Darren Branagh
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
> >Hi All,
> >
> >By Now, you all will have noticed my absence at the Hove Show -
> >unfortunately this couldn't be helped for two reasons..
> >
> >Firstly, I was seriously snowed in!! About 10-1
35 matches
Mail list logo
