Wolfgang Lenerz wrote:
On 24 Oct 2002, at 14:20, Norman Dunbar wrote:
PS. Well, it has been quite here over the last couple of days - is anybody
out there ?
I think the usual answer is :no, there isn't...
Wolfgang
-
www.wlenerz.com
Wrong, I am. But there isn't much
--- François Van Emelen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Of course, this isn't very important for most of
you,I know, but my
programming skills are limited to Sbasi, so I really
need those
Toolkits/Extensions.
And now, back to listening mode for a while, I
suppose.
François Van Emelen
Speaking of Sbasic... Wouldn't it be nice to avoid 'word clashes' by
following some kind of convention?
Interesting. I've been thinking about the same thing recently. And not just confined
to clashing toolkits. By extending SBASIC in an uncontrolled manner you run the risk
of older programs
??? 25/10/2002 9:34:47 ??, ?/? [EMAIL PROTECTED] ??:
Speaking of Sbasic... Wouldn't it be nice to avoid 'word clashes' by
following some kind of convention?
Interesting. I've been thinking about the same thing recently. And not just confined
to clashing toolkits. By extending
SBASIC
A solution would be to have a core set of commands always present in the
system and others loaded as independant modules to meet local requirement.
Old extensions present only for compatibility would also became a module
(toolkit ?) to avoid usage in future.
But we need someone/somewhere an
What is needed is some way to load toolkits locally to a particular
instance of SBasic rather than as system wide global settings. As to
whether anyone could think of a way to enhance SBasic to achieve this is
another matter.
Dave
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL
On Fri, 25 Oct 2002, ZN wrote:
I would still lean towards the 68SZ328.
Can it support:
A simple expansion interface?
Some kind of expandable flash area?
What roughly would be the cost of such a system, and the design period? I
understand the issue with it being a BGA, as I have had to
Marcel Kilgus wrote:
Dave Walker wrote:
What is needed is some way to load toolkits locally to a particular
instance of SBasic rather than as system wide global settings. As to
whether anyone could think of a way to enhance SBasic to achieve this is
another matter.
Easy: just lrespr it
Claude Mourier 00 wrote:
A solution would be to have a core set of commands always present in the
system and others loaded as independant modules to meet local requirement.
Old extensions present only for compatibility would also became a module
(toolkit ?) to avoid usage in future.
But we need
On Fri, 25 Oct 2002 at 13:54:45, François Van Emelen wrote:
(ref: [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Speaking of Sbasic... Wouldn't it be nice to avoid 'word clashes' by
following some kind of convention?
An example to illustrate this?
I've just discovered W. Lenerz' ARRAY_BIN. Nice extension, but
unuseable.
C'mon you guys, who's going to buy this thing? Enthusiasts like you will use
existing solutions. The rest of us, who are now using PCs for their day to day
computing retain an occasional interest and are best served by cheap emulators
that will run on the relatively cheap hardware that is
On 26/10/02 at 00:31 Stephen Meech wrote:
C'mon you guys, who's going to buy this thing? Enthusiasts like you will
use existing solutions. The rest of us, who are now using PCs for their
day to day computing retain an occasional interest and are best served
by cheap emulators that will run
François Van Emelen wrote:
Easy: just lrespr it within the particular SBASIC instance. The
This isn't a solution for the 'words clashes', I'm afraid.
Of course. I didn't say it is.
Marcel
13 matches
Mail list logo
