As part of the ongoing QUANTA Website improvements and in an effort to
make it easier for ALL QLers to get in touch with ALL members of the
QUANTA Committee, a new email address has been added which points
directly to the committee email list.
As has been requested on a number of occasions
As an example of my email earlier, I am grateful to Dilwyn Jones (all of
them!) for bring my attention to John Taylor's observation of the
unfortunate error which occurred in the March edition of the QUANTA
Magazine Volume 28 Issue 2 where the account's Income and Expenditure
account has been
There is very little we can do to correct this error in time for the
AGM except that the eMag versions have now been corrected (which has
delayed their despatching to those members who have opted to take
their Magazine in this format). Extra copies of these documents will
be made available at
Dilwyn Jones wrote:
There is very little we can do to correct this error in time for
the
AGM except that the eMag versions have now been corrected (which
has
delayed their despatching to those members who have opted to take
their Magazine in this format). Extra copies of these documents
will
On 22/03/2011 12:52, John Gilpin wrote:
out 6 years, hoping that a person would volunteer to take on this very
exacting role - literally jumped into the deep end early in February
and (with a little assistance) produced a very creditable issue, only
to find that she had so much material left
How come, I am recieving all mails in double, except those from you.
Yours
Klaus
- Original Message -
From: Dilwyn Jones dil...@evans1511.fsnet.co.uk
To: ql-us...@q-v-d.com
Sent: Monday, March 21, 2011 3:34 PM
Subject: Re: [Ql-Users] Quanta AGM
Two people independently proofread QL
Please use
committee@qua...@org.uk
Sorry John, but that is not a proper email address.
I tried the suffix dotorgdotuk, I hope that works.
John Taylor.
___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
John Gilpin wrote:
Please use
committee@qua...@org.uk
for All
communications intended for any member of the QUANTA Committee where
a
guaranteed response is required.
This should read
On 22 Mar 2011, at 12:11, John Gilpin wrote:
Please use
committee@qua...@org.uk
for All
communications intended for any member of the QUANTA Committee where a
guaranteed response is required.
Do
On 22 Mar 2011, at 13:04, Rich Mellor wrote:
There is more of an issue here - as one of the resolutions will be to approve
the accounts, the balance sheet HAS to be circulated to members before the
AGM - it will need to be posted unfortunately, to those members who normally
receive a
On 22/03/2011 14:51, gdgqler wrote:
On 22 Mar 2011, at 13:04, Rich Mellor wrote:
There is more of an issue here - as one of the resolutions will be to approve
the accounts, the balance sheet HAS to be circulated to members before the AGM
- it will need to be posted unfortunately, to those
On 22 Mar 2011, at 14:59, Rich Mellor wrote:
On 22/03/2011 14:51, gdgqler wrote:
On 22 Mar 2011, at 13:04, Rich Mellor wrote:
There is more of an issue here - as one of the resolutions will be to
approve the accounts, the balance sheet HAS to be circulated to members
before the AGM - it
On 22/03/2011 15:13, gdgqler wrote:
On 22 Mar 2011, at 14:59, Rich Mellor wrote:
On 22/03/2011 14:51, gdgqler wrote:
On 22 Mar 2011, at 13:04, Rich Mellor wrote:
There is more of an issue here - as one of the resolutions will be to approve
the accounts, the balance sheet HAS to be
On 22 Mar 2011, at 15:17, Rich Mellor wrote:
I do tend to agree with this point, as it does allow for the dismissal of
directors - however, the constitution is silent, and this should form part of
the discussion about the constitution at the AGM.
Clause 8.13 of the QUANTA Constitution
Rich Mellor wrote:
Wouldn't it be nice if you could vote against MPs in a national
election?
It doesn't matter who you vote for or against in national elections.
A government always gets in ;-)
Dilwyn Jones
___
QL-Users Mailing List
At 15:26 22/03/2011 +, you wrote:
Wouldn't it be nice if you could vote against MPs in a national election?
You can, it's called tactical voting
I am unlikely to see the agenda for the AGM, is there an item :-
When and in which brewery to hild the next piss0up
Number 6 is not a proper resolution as you cannot vote for a generalisation.
It is ambiguous. It must be a properly defined motion, eg Increase Membership
Fees to £20
Whatever is proposed you must be able to say Ay or Nay to it.
Number 7 is also ambiguous.
If you wish to replace the constitution
--
From: Rich Mellor r...@rwapservices.co.uk
Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2011 3:17 PM
To: ql-us...@q-v-d.com
Subject: Re: [Ql-Users] QUANTA Magazine Error.
Wouldn't it be nice if you could vote against MPs in a national election?
One part of
I have had it pointed out to me by people who use my personal or QUANTA
email addresses (rather than the ql-users list - which I do not monitor
continually!!) That my email earlier today with the QUANTA Committee
email address, that my typos are getting much worse. I understand that a
number
A Quanta member has sent the committee some suggestions for amending the
constitution to provide for the situation where an AGM is inquorate.
I raised this question at the 2008 AGM and John Mason said that proxy votes
count towards a quorum. (The quotation comes from the minutes of the
On 22 Mar 2011, at 16:57, Geoff Wicks wrote:
A Quanta member has sent the committee some suggestions for amending the
constitution to provide for the situation where an AGM is inquorate.
I raised this question at the 2008 AGM and John Mason said that proxy votes
count towards a quorum.
At 18:43 22/03/2011 +, you wrote:
This is more or less my opinion, but some people apparently argue that a
proxy is a pseudo-presence.
One of the arguments used by those in favour of counting proxies as part
of the quorum is that some companies use this in their members and
shareholders
On 22 Mar 2011, at 18:43, Geoff Wicks wrote:
--
From: John Taylor j_taylo...@btinternet.com
Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2011 6:18 PM
To: ql-us...@q-v-d.com
Subject: Re: [Ql-Users] Quorums
On 22 Mar 2011, at 16:57, Geoff Wicks wrote:
A
On 22/03/2011 20:25, John Taylor wrote:
On 22 Mar 2011, at 18:43, Geoff Wicks wrote:
--
From: John Taylorj_taylo...@btinternet.com
Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2011 6:18 PM
To:ql-us...@q-v-d.com
Subject: Re: [Ql-Users] Quorums
On 22 Mar 2011, at
To add my two penneth for what its worth, I am reminded of the film 12 Angry
Men with amongst others Henry Fonda, and his influence and process on a jury
where a significant decision is swayed and reversed by argument, proxy has no
real input to that situation.
To ask a question as a
25 matches
Mail list logo
