Re: [Ql-Users] QUANTA Survey

2010-02-18 Thread David Tubbs
It all seems thoroughly Quantesque, Still, if it will hardly matter if the results are published as widely as the last one. At 18:20 17/02/2010 +, you wrote: On Wednesday 17 Feb 2010 17:27:09 Derek Stewart wrote: I selected option 1, which I took to be; I Strongly Agree I will be

Re: [Ql-Users] QUANTA Survey

2010-02-17 Thread gdgqler
On 16 Feb 2010, at 21:52, Derek Stewart wrote: Just done the Survey on my Ubuntu box, all seems to go fine. The only thing I could see wrong was the scale of 1-5 was missing, I selected 1 as strongly agree Hm!! I thought that 5 was strongly agree. George

Re: [Ql-Users] QUANTA Survey

2010-02-17 Thread Stephen
On 17/02/2010 15:44, gdgqler wrote: On 16 Feb 2010, at 21:52, Derek Stewart wrote: Just done the Survey on my Ubuntu box, all seems to go fine. The only thing I could see wrong was the scale of 1-5 was missing, I selected 1 as strongly agree Hm!! I thought that 5 was strongly agree.

Re: [Ql-Users] QUANTA Survey

2010-02-17 Thread Bob Spelten
Op Tue, 16 Feb 2010 16:09:54 +0100 schreef John Gilpin thegilp...@btinternet.com: Please spend a few minutes filling in the survey (no personal details are required) This will enable QUANTA to better support its members and the QL fraternity as a whole. Looking through the questionnaire a

Re: [Ql-Users] QUANTA Survey

2010-02-17 Thread Tony Firshman
Bob Spelten wrote: Op Tue, 16 Feb 2010 16:09:54 +0100 schreef John Gilpin thegilp...@btinternet.com: snip Looking through the list for the second time I could not find this item again and may have submitted the incomplete survey by mistake, so please ignore. How can they ignore it? They

Re: [Ql-Users] QUANTA Survey

2010-02-17 Thread gdgqler
On 17 Feb 2010, at 16:17, Tony Firshman wrote: That combined with the invalid question that does not define 1-5 means I think that the survey will have to be started again I reckon. At least you can tell how many strong feelings there were. 3 = don't care. 1,5 = I strongly something. 2,3

Re: [Ql-Users] QUANTA Survey

2010-02-17 Thread Tony Firshman
gdgqler wrote: On 17 Feb 2010, at 16:17, Tony Firshman wrote: That combined with the invalid question that does not define 1-5 means I think that the survey will have to be started again I reckon. At least you can tell how many strong feelings there were. 3 = don't care. 1,5 = I

Re: [Ql-Users] QUANTA Survey

2010-02-17 Thread Derek Stewart
I selected option 1, which I took to be; I Strongly Agree I will be introducing the wrong information in the survey now. The Survey should of been proof read before being published. Derek Tony Firshman wrote: gdgqler wrote: On 17 Feb 2010, at 16:17, Tony Firshman wrote: That combined

Re: [Ql-Users] QUANTA Survey

2010-02-17 Thread John Southern
On Wednesday 17 Feb 2010 17:27:09 Derek Stewart wrote: I selected option 1, which I took to be; I Strongly Agree I will be introducing the wrong information in the survey now. The Survey should of been proof read before being published. That was all my fault. When testing the survey I did

Re: [Ql-Users] QUANTA Survey

2010-02-16 Thread Rich Mellor
John Gilpin wrote: This is a World Wide call to ALL QLers QUANTA has just made its 2010 Survey live at:- http://quanta.nikad.net//index.php?sid=88977lang=en http://quanta.nikad.net/index.php?sid=88977lang=en Please spend a few minutes filling in the survey (no personal details are

Re: [Ql-Users] QUANTA Survey

2010-02-16 Thread Rich Mellor
John Gilpin wrote: This is a World Wide call to ALL QLers QUANTA has just made its 2010 Survey live at:- http://quanta.nikad.net//index.php?sid=88977lang=en http://quanta.nikad.net/index.php?sid=88977lang=en Please spend a few minutes filling in the survey (no personal details are

Re: [Ql-Users] QUANTA Survey

2010-02-16 Thread Dilwyn Jones
Not sure what the 4 questions are at the bottom of the second page - Qjump / Sandy / Datel ? -- Rich Mellor RWAP Services I think this was meant to imply 'any other hardware by these companies not covered elsewhere in this question' Pity really, the question ended up with some specifics (e.g.

Re: [Ql-Users] QUANTA Survey

2010-02-16 Thread Tony Firshman
John Gilpin wrote: This is a World Wide call to ALL QLers QUANTA has just made its 2010 Survey live at:- http://quanta.nikad.net//index.php?sid=88977lang=en http://quanta.nikad.net/index.php?sid=88977lang=en Please spend a few minutes filling in the survey (no personal details are

Re: [Ql-Users] QUANTA Survey

2010-02-16 Thread Derek Stewart
Just done the Survey on my Ubuntu box, all seems to go fine. The only thing I could see wrong was the scale of 1-5 was missing, I selected 1 as strongly agree Derek Tony Firshman wrote: John Gilpin wrote: This is a World Wide call to ALL QLers QUANTA has just made its 2010 Survey live

Re: [Ql-Users] QUANTA Survey

2010-02-16 Thread Tony Firshman
Derek Stewart wrote: Just done the Survey on my Ubuntu box, all seems to go fine. The only thing I could see wrong was the scale of 1-5 was missing, I selected 1 as strongly agree Exactly why the answers to this question are not usable. I took '1' as strongly disagree! Also as the survey

Re: [Ql-Users] QUANTA Survey

2010-02-16 Thread Tony Firshman
Tony Firshman wrote: Derek Stewart wrote: Just done the Survey on my Ubuntu box, all seems to go fine. The only thing I could see wrong was the scale of 1-5 was missing, I selected 1 as strongly agree Exactly why the answers to this question are not usable. I took '1' as strongly disagree!