Re: General mail/dial-up question

1999-05-16 Thread Peter van Dijk
On Wed, May 12, 1999 at 10:20:58AM -0500, Wade wrote: Duh... That's what I started out thinking, and I let someone convince me that 25 was bi-directional and handled both on a LAN. Excuse me while I go Snipe hunting. :) -Original Message- From: Peter van Dijk [mailto:[EMAIL

qmail Digest 16 May 1999 10:00:01 -0000 Issue 642

1999-05-16 Thread qmail-digest-help
qmail Digest 16 May 1999 10:00:01 - Issue 642 Topics (messages 25633 through 25637): Qmail -ERR this users has no $HOME/Maildir 25633 by: "New Hope Hostmaster" [EMAIL PROTECTED] 25635 by: "Dan Poynor" [EMAIL PROTECTED] Problems with SMTPD 25634 by: "Durham, Kenneth

Re: Q: Is it possible to bind 2 diffrent qmail instances on 2 diffrent network interfaces

1999-05-16 Thread Peter van Dijk
On Thu, May 13, 1999 at 03:35:08AM -, D. J. Bernstein wrote: Connected to 199.246.67.190 but my name was rejected./Remote host said: 501 HELO requires a valid host name as operand: 'web1.cheetahmail.com' rejected from www.cheetahmail.com remote address [206.132.30.31]: Host name does

Re: Qmail -ERR this users has no $HOME/Maildir

1999-05-16 Thread Dan Peterson
On Sat, May 15, 1999 at 11:10:38AM -0600, New Hope Hostmaster wrote: I've finally got the checkpasswd authorization to work, but not it's not finding the $Home/Maildir. I have put a Maildir in all the placing I think it may look, using the qmail-makedir whatever command, but still no luck.

Re: Strange problem with header of outoing mails

1999-05-16 Thread Stefan Paletta
Kaspar Landsberg wrote/schrieb/scribsit: This looks pretty messed up. First, there is "From [EMAIL PROTECTED]" and "Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]". At least the return path should be "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" because that´s my mail address. "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" does not exist! (Btw, "Ukl" is my

RE: setting relay clients

1999-05-16 Thread Jari Tenhunen
After playing around with different configurations I found out that selective relay using tcp-wrappers works fine with RH5.2 but not with RH6.0. However, it's weird that I can't find the reason why RH6.0 isn't compatible with setenv. I installed RH5.2 tcp-wrappers rpm on a RH6.0 box but

Re: Strange problem with header of outoing mails

1999-05-16 Thread Kaspar Landsberg
Hi, On Sun, May 16, 1999 at 07:23:49PM +0200, Stefan Paletta wrote: | Try leaving out the -f option to preline. Your uucp uplink needs a From | line, I suppose. hmm, now i get this: --- cut here --- From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun May 16 21:06:03 1999 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Envelope-to:

qmail deployment / global address books

1999-05-16 Thread d. divine
This may be off the wall for this mailing list but it's the information I'm lacking to deploy qmail. It also seems to be the least referenced item on the net. Deploying qmail as an alternative to the traditional Novell or Microsoft solutions what tools are available to centrally create and

Re: IP in qmail-popup's argument

1999-05-16 Thread Anand Buddhdev
On Fri, May 14, 1999 at 10:24:13AM -0500, Mate Wierdl wrote: From the source, it appears that the "hostname" is not given any special treatment. It is simply used to create qmail-popup's initial greeting. So you should be able to use a hostname, an IP address, or any string. I tried it with a

Re: Q: Is it possible to bind 2 diffrent qmail instances on 2 diffrent network interfaces

1999-05-16 Thread Anand Buddhdev
On Sun, May 16, 1999 at 12:24:05PM +0200, Peter van Dijk wrote: That server is violating RFC 1123, section 5.2.5. You can easily work around the problem by putting www.cheetahmail.com into control/helohost. (I'm considering changing the default HELO in qmail-remote in qmail 2.0 to use