not at all.
You just want to check for mail, before you send mail.
-Original Message-
From: Paul Gilmore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, October 02, 1999 5:33 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Auth. SMTP-after-POP
Of course you might have to send _your
Of course you might have to send _yourself_ a message so that you are
guaranteed to always have mail to receive. *wink*
- Original Message -
>From: Eric Dahnke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Sure just put fetchmail or your pop application before serialmail in
> your ppp/ip-up scripts.
>
> - Eric
Greetings to everyone
How can I make qmail stop receiving large mails.
Thanks
Oct 2 00:52:18 ult qmail: 938825538.614975 delivery 13: deferral:
Unable_to_open_.qmail:_access_denied._(#4.3.0)/
Oct 2 00:52:18 ult qmail: 938825538.615167 status: local 0/10 remote
0/20
This is what I get in my logs. Is 4.3.0 error a read execution
permission error?
Scott Schwartz w
Darren Foo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| I get this error: qmail-inject: fatal: read error.
It's too bad that it doesn't print useful context with error messages,
but you can probably find out where it is failing by running
qmail-inject and /usr/lib/sendmail under ``truss -f''.
On Fri, 1 Oct 1999, Darren Foo wrote:
> I assume /var/qmail/bin/sendmail the same as qmail-inject. Everytime I
No, they're slightly different. I haven't yet been buggered enough to be
motivated into looking what the differences are, but there are some
differences in addition to different
I'm running qmail on a solaris box. For some reason users other than
root can't send mail. I followed the INSTALL.ids file but to no avail.
Also, I've setup qmail twice on FreeBSD boxes with no problems at all.
The only thing I noticed that was weird was that the solaris box doesn't
have a
On Fri, 1 Oct 1999 14:01:16 -0500 (EST) Chris Hardie wrote:
> Hi. We're having some problems with qmail and majordomo. I've read the
> FAQs on using the two together, the docs on majordomo-inject, the man
> pages for qmail-inject and qmail-header, and I still don't quite know what
> to do.
H
The problem is your first line in tcp.smtp.cdb. Remove the :deny. You
want to allow the connections but NOT set the RELAYCLIENT environment
variable which is the default behaviour.
On Fri, 1 Oct 1999, Ed Weinberg wrote:
> I am trying to run qmail on my firewall. Until now we were picking up
>
I am trying to run qmail on my firewall. Until now we were picking up
the mail by pop using fetchmail.
qmail on the sending machine tells me that the firewall started to
respond, then dropped. When I telnet from inside the firewall to port
25 it works fine.
When I telnet to port 25 from outs
Sure just put fetchmail or your pop application before serialmail in
your ppp/ip-up scripts.
- Eric
Andreas Fiedler escribió:
>
> Hi,
>
> I have a problem with sending mail (of course :-)
>
> My new provider uses SMTP-after-POP. This means I have to receive Mail via POP
> before I can send o
Hi,
I have a problem with sending mail (of course :-)
My new provider uses SMTP-after-POP. This means I have to receive Mail via POP
before I can send outgoing mail. The provider uses it to reduce spammers.
Is there any way I can realize that with Qmail/serialmail? I didn't find a
authenticatio
I didn't think I'd evoke such a response. Here goes...
I'm happy with my inetd service and tcpserver for my qmail-smtp. I'm running a
few low-load services through inetd and it's doing fine. Perhaps if pop3 or
imap become a larger load when I deploy web based email, I'll run them with
tcpserver
On Fri, Oct 01, 1999 at 11:39:06AM -0700, Johannes Erdfelt wrote:
> Also, the fact qmail's binaries are so light weight, it would take ALOT
> of connections to effectively do that. They'd probably run out of port
> space on the IP they're attacking from before it really started to
> seriously affe
On Fri, 1 Oct 1999 12:58:15 -0600 in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Bruce Guenter
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It also goes against "the UNIX way" -- each task does one small and
> easily definable task. Why else have programs like "sort" or "uniq"?
> Why not build those into "ls" as well? Oh, and "cat".
On Fri, Oct 01, 1999 at 11:54:25AM -0700, Johannes Erdfelt wrote:
> Umm, you mostly reinvented inetd. Why not add the features you want to
> inetd instead of reimplenting inetd in tcpserver?
>
> Seriously, there's reasons for using either program. The point I'm
> trying to make is, for 90% of the
Hi. We're having some problems with qmail and majordomo. I've read the
FAQs on using the two together, the docs on majordomo-inject, the man
pages for qmail-inject and qmail-header, and I still don't quite know what
to do.
The problem occurs when a message sent to a mailing list bounces on one
On Fri, Oct 01, 1999 at 02:39:44PM -0400, David Harris wrote:
> I use tcpserver for qmail - that only makes sense to me because of the load
> issues.
>
> But about the other services? I'd perhaps like to use tcpserver for them too..
> and I've heard that others have had success with this. But I d
On Fri, Oct 01, 1999, David Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Bruce Guenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] write:
> > And what happens when somebody tries to actively attack your system?
> > With these limits, I expect that a remote user could make your system
> > run out of FDs in a few minutes,
> But about the other services? I'd perhaps like to use tcpserver for them
too..
> and I've heard that others have had success with this. But I don't like
the
> idea of a whole bunch of programs all configured with command line
directives
> running in the background just for these rarely used serv
Dave Kitabjian wrote:
> Please pardon my ignorance just for a moment, and permit a question that
> may have a very simple answer...
>
> What is "virtual" about a "virtualdomain"?
>
> We host many domains on a single qmail POP server, and they are all very
> real. Their MX records all point to
Bruce Guenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] write:
> And what happens when somebody tries to actively attack your system?
> With these limits, I expect that a remote user could make your system
> run out of FDs in a few minutes, not to mention memory. With a limit of
> 1, I could probably open
On Fri, Oct 01, 1999, Bruce Guenter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 01, 1999 at 11:09:10AM -0700, Johannes Erdfelt wrote:
> > Both work for me fine. I dunno what people's big gripes against inetd
> > are. It works damn well for almost every service that doesn't have high
> > loads. In 99%
I assume /var/qmail/bin/sendmail the same as qmail-inject. Everytime I
try to send from my forms I the the following error. I've tried to read
the error report mail but I don't receive any.
qmail-inject: fatal: read error qmail-inject:
fatal: read error ions have
On Fri, Oct 01, 1999 at 11:09:10AM -0700, Johannes Erdfelt wrote:
> Both work for me fine. I dunno what people's big gripes against inetd
> are. It works damn well for almost every service that doesn't have high
> loads. In 99% of people's cases who use mail, then won't get more than
> 40 hits a s
On Fri, Oct 01, 1999, Markus Stumpf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 01, 1999 at 05:26:38PM +0100, Fred Backman wrote:
> > * inetd is unreliable under high loads. It cuts off service for 10 minutes
> > if it receives ``too many'' connections in 1 minute.
> > * inetd does not provide effect
On Fri, Oct 01, 1999 at 05:26:38PM +0100, Fred Backman wrote:
> * inetd is unreliable under high loads. It cuts off service for 10 minutes
> if it receives ``too many'' connections in 1 minute.
> * inetd does not provide effective resource management. It will happily use
> up all your memory if yo
On Fri, Oct 01, 1999 at 05:26:38PM +0100, Fred Backman wrote:
> I'm reading the web page about ucspi-tcp and see the last three lines which
> say:
>
> * inetd is unreliable under high loads. It cuts off service for 10 minutes
> if it receives ``too many'' connections in 1 minute.
In its default
I'm reading the web page about ucspi-tcp and see the last three lines which
say:
* inetd is unreliable under high loads. It cuts off service for 10 minutes
if it receives ``too many'' connections in 1 minute.
* inetd does not provide effective resource management. It will happily use
up all your
Fyi, from mail.nac.net:
tempest:/var/log/mail$ zcat maillog.0.gz |grep smtpd | grep " ok " | wc -l
111001
tempest:/var/log/mail$ zcat maillog.0.gz | grep smtpd | grep "BOUNCEMAIL" | wc -l
100
You must be aimed at for spam more often then we are.
On Fri, 1 Oct 1999, Peter Green
Please pardon my ignorance just for a moment, and permit a question that
may have a very simple answer...
What is "virtual" about a "virtualdomain"?
We host many domains on a single qmail POP server, and they are all very
real. Their MX records all point to that server and for all intents and
On Fri, 1 Oct 1999, Markus Stumpf wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 20, 1999 at 04:24:06PM -0400, David Harris wrote:
> > > I'll run this for a few days and let the list know what I find.
>
> While we're on some statistics:
I'll throw mine in, especially since I'm really happy with RBL:
day tcpcont
Another odd problem I just noticed..MS Outlook users do not receive
bulletins. Netscape/pine(pop3 enabled)/Eudora all receive them fine.
--
Stephen Comoletti
Systems Administrator
Delanet, Inc. http://www.delanet.com
ph: (302) 326-5800 fax: (302) 326-5802
Zbigniew Baniewski wrote:
> I'm using
I'm using the "popbull" extension, and I'm having some problems - for no
apparent reason the bulletin, send to all users, can be read only by
several users, and not by all. I cannot find any difference between the
accounts, that are receiving the bulletins, and the ones, that are
ignoring them. Po
"jarrid jeeby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>2. Correct a problem I have with local to local deliveries where the rcpt
>to: field is only a the account name. ie. Mail to "joe" gets delivered as
>"[EMAIL PROTECTED]". I'd like it to be delivered to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]",
>else fix my setup to allo
Tony Wade <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Oct 1 12:56:30 thanatos qmail: 938775390.588017 delivery 69: deferral:
>/bin/sh:_/bin/autorespond:_No_such_file_or_directory/
>
>Any Idea where i have gone wrong ?
Is /bin/autorespond a script? If so, what does the first line say?
Apparently it points to t
Hello I am using qmHandle and Mate's old RPMs. To delete messages I now stop
qmail and restart it after deletion.
Would it be sufficient to pause (STOP) qmail instead and send an CONT
afterwards?
Regards
Mirko
--
mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
privat: http://sites.inka.de/picard
commerce: http:/
I have sorted the problem myself now. Sorry for
being too eager sending this post.
(The problem turned out to be
non-qmail).
Hi all
I have downloaded the Autoresponder and seem to be having a spot of trouble
with it.
my Qmail lives in /var/qmail/
I compiled the autoresponder on a RedHat 6 server and then copied it to a
Jurix Server.
My alias file looks like this
|autorespond 1 5 /var/qmail/alias/AUTORESPOND
I've got another problem on my Solaris machine
(5.7), and this time I get a "Aack child crashed" when I try to send to local
users. Below is the trace output (truss) of qmail-lspawn. Please can anyone
advice what this might be? There is no .qmail file so that can't be
it.
officesun2{root}#
qmail Digest 1 Oct 1999 10:00:01 - Issue 776
Topics (messages 31077 through 31120):
qmail-send single threaded
31077 by: Van Liedekerke Franky
31085 by: Dave Sill
31086 by: B. Engineer
31089 by: Dave Sill
31090 by: David Harris
Filter mail from
41 matches
Mail list logo
