Re: Building very large Qmail instalations...

2000-07-01 Thread Greg Cope
Brett Randall wrote: Well...I have a little 2c to chuck in as well I have just finished designing a system (and implementing it) for our corporation that allows distributed e-mail across a city, with hundreds, possibly thousands, of different locations either dialing up or being

virtual user

2000-07-01 Thread Kimberly Vher
i have a virtual domain barkada.com in my qmail machine. then i want to make a virtual user with that domain. there is a user kaibigan but i did not activate nery as a user in the machine. but i want it like this if somebody send to [EMAIL PROTECTED] the email will automatically send

qmail Digest 1 Jul 2000 10:00:00 -0000 Issue 1049

2000-07-01 Thread qmail-digest-help
qmail Digest 1 Jul 2000 10:00:00 - Issue 1049 Topics (messages 43952 through 43999): too many files 43952 by: Kimberly Vher 43984 by: Dave Sill Re: sending mail outside local domain 43953 by: Andrew Richards Re: delivery 43954 by: Andrew Richards clean

Can't find my log file

2000-07-01 Thread Lou Hevly
Greetings: Sorry to ask so basic a question, but after installing qmail successfully following LWQ, I'm unable to find my log file. `ps` shows that multilog is being invoked: qmaill 541 0.0 1.1 1092 356 ? S14:42 0:00 /usr/local/bin/multilog t /var/log/qmail qmaill 542

Bounce questions

2000-07-01 Thread Ian Layton
Thank you for all the comments I received about my previous question. I am now needing to make a program that will analyses bounced messages from Qmail and be able to distinguish between hard (permanent bounces) and soft (temporary) bounces. Is there any standard out there on how to recognize

Help! :(

2000-07-01 Thread Andy Coates
Hi, I've been playing with dot-forward, and now my whole qmail system doesn't want to deliver messages. I don't know if they're related, or whether something else is wrong - but no one is getting any mail!?!? Basically I installed the dot-forward package and set this at my /var/qmail/rc: exec

Re: virtual user

2000-07-01 Thread Juan E Suris
i have a virtual domain barkada.com in my qmail machine. then i want to make a virtual user with that domain. there is a user kaibigan but i did not activate nery as a user in the machine. but i want it like this if somebody send to [EMAIL PROTECTED] the email will automatically send to

Re: qmail-ldap file permissions

2000-07-01 Thread clemensF
prashant: can some one tell me what file permissions are required for 1 ~Home/Maildir 2Maildir 3 cur 4 new 5 tmp 700. the 'x' bit lets programs search a directory. clemens

Re: two questions

2000-07-01 Thread clemensF
Clifford Thurber: #!/bin/sh exec /usr/local/bin/setuidgid qmaill /usr/local/bin/multilog t /var/log/qmail exec setuidgid qmaill multilog t !tai64nlocal /var/log/qmail ...would make multilog pipe safe loggs (loggs that were safely closed) through tai64nlocal automatically, so that these

very slow delivery

2000-07-01 Thread Mirko Koenig
hi i'm running qmail and first there were no problems. but after a while qmail is getting very slow. now the delivery and sending of messages takes 20 min. i write a message eg. in pine send it and then have to wait up to 20 min till its delivered. if i recieve mail with fetchmail it takes also

Re: qmailq problem

2000-07-01 Thread clemensF
Ben Beuchler: And is there a particular reason so many people neglect to look at their logs when trying to research a problem? good question, actually. the loggs give very good and simple diagnostics, it must have something to do with the way information is identified. we have the time

Re: qmailq problem

2000-07-01 Thread Steffan Hoeke
On Sat, Jul 01, 2000 at 06:10:38PM +0200, clemensF wrote: Ben Beuchler: And is there a particular reason so many people neglect to look at their logs when trying to research a problem? [snipped a bit] number. then there's definitly the need to make sense of the long-term queue-id of

Re: Help! :(

2000-07-01 Thread Steffan Hoeke
On Sat, Jul 01, 2000 at 02:49:35PM +0100, Andy Coates wrote: Hi, I've been playing with dot-forward, and now my whole qmail system doesn't want to deliver messages. I don't know if they're related, or whether something else is wrong - but no one is getting any mail!?!? Basically I

Re: Help! :(

2000-07-01 Thread Andy Coates
- Original Message - From: "Steffan Hoeke" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, July 01, 2000 5:14 PM Subject: Re: Help! :( On Sat, Jul 01, 2000 at 02:49:35PM +0100, Andy Coates wrote: Hi, I've been playing with dot-forward, and now my whole qmail system

Re: Can't find my log file

2000-07-01 Thread Steffan Hoeke
On Sat, Jul 01, 2000 at 12:12:26PM +0100, Lou Hevly wrote: Greetings: Sorry to ask so basic a question, but after installing qmail successfully following LWQ, I'm unable to find my log file. `ps` shows that multilog is being invoked: qmaill 541 0.0 1.1 1092 356 ? S14:42

Re: Help! :(

2000-07-01 Thread Steffan Hoeke
On Sat, Jul 01, 2000 at 05:35:26PM +0100, Andy Coates wrote: - Original Message - From: "Steffan Hoeke" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, July 01, 2000 5:14 PM Subject: Re: Help! :( On Sat, Jul 01, 2000 at 02:49:35PM +0100, Andy Coates wrote: Hi,

[ira@scso.com: Re: digest version?]

2000-07-01 Thread Steffan Hoeke
By request ... - Forwarded message from Ira Abramov [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Date: Sat, 1 Jul 2000 20:16:54 +0300 (IDT) From: Ira Abramov [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Steffan Hoeke [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: digest version? On Sat, 1 Jul 2000, Steffan Hoeke wrote: On Sat, Jul 01, 2000 at

Re: Help! :(

2000-07-01 Thread Andy Coates
- Original Message - From: "Steffan Hoeke" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, July 01, 2000 5:54 PM Subject: Re: Help! :( On Sat, Jul 01, 2000 at 05:35:26PM +0100, Andy Coates wrote: - Original Message - From: "Steffan Hoeke" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To:

Re: Help! :(

2000-07-01 Thread Steffan Hoeke
On Sat, Jul 01, 2000 at 06:27:26PM +0100, Andy Coates wrote: - Original Message - From: "Steffan Hoeke" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, July 01, 2000 5:54 PM Subject: Re: Help! :( On Sat, Jul 01, 2000 at 05:35:26PM +0100, Andy Coates wrote: -

Unable to fork (WAS Help! :( )

2000-07-01 Thread Andy Coates
On Sat, Jul 01, 2000 at 02:49:35PM +0100, Andy Coates wrote: Hi, [Snipped another bit] I'm also a bit curious why there's a in your rc file The is what was in the /var/qmail/boot example files, I used /var/qmail/boot/maildir for my RC. Ok, i'm just

Re: very slow delivery

2000-07-01 Thread Magnus Bodin
On Sat, Jul 01, 2000 at 05:09:47PM +0200, Mirko Koenig wrote: now the delivery and sending of messages takes 20 min. i write a message eg. in pine send it and then have to wait up to 20 min till its delivered. check the permissions of "/var/qmail/queue/lock/trigger" # ls -l

URGENT!!! HELP!!! HP-UX fault

2000-07-01 Thread Kvazimodo
Hello ppl! I have HP-UX web1 B.11.00 U 9000/800 610339382 unlimited-user license my qmail start script runs Ok, but qmail stops. When I restart qmail deamon manualy it keeps runing. here is what I run: #!/sbin/sh # # /etc/rc*.d/S**qmail - Start/Stop the qmail daemon #

Emend LWQ? was Re: Can't find my log file

2000-07-01 Thread Lou Hevly
At 18:42 01/07/00 +0200, Steffan Hoeke wrote: On Sat, Jul 01, 2000 at 12:12:26PM +0100, Lou Hevly wrote: Sorry to ask so basic a question, but after installing qmail successfully following LWQ, I'm unable to find my log file. `ps` shows that multilog is being invoked... snip "All of

Dot-forward did not work suddenly

2000-07-01 Thread Edward Tsang
Hi there, I just migrated from sendmail to qmail. We are using qmail 1.03 and vchkpw from inter7. Before migration, the dot-forward can successfully read those .forward file and forward mail properly. However, now the dot-forward will not process those .forward anymore. If I use .qmail

The most secure POP server

2000-07-01 Thread Roberto Samarone Araújo (RSA)
Hi , I'm installing the Qmail so , I would like to know the most secure POP server to install and that doesn't have problems with Maildir . Roberto Samarone Araujo

Re: The most secure POP server

2000-07-01 Thread Irwan Hadi
At 10:58 PM 7/1/00 -0300, RSA wrote: Hi , I'm installing the Qmail so , I would like to know the most secure POP server to install and that doesn't have problems with Maildir . how' bout qmail-pop3d ?

RE: The most secure POP server

2000-07-01 Thread Brett Randall
I'm installing the Qmail so , I would like to know the most secure POP server to install and that doesn't have problems with Maildir . how' bout qmail-pop3d ? I was thinking of suggesting that one but it isn't very secure... Brett ManagerInterPlanetary Solutionshttp://ipsware.com/

RE: The most secure POP server

2000-07-01 Thread Irwan Hadi
At 11:59 AM 7/2/00 +1000, Brett Randall wrote: I'm installing the Qmail so , I would like to know the most secure POP server to install and that doesn't have problems with Maildir . how' bout qmail-pop3d ? I was thinking of suggesting that one but it isn't very secure... can you

RE: The most secure POP server

2000-07-01 Thread amir
Irwan Hadi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: At 11:59 AM 7/2/00 +1000, Brett Randall wrote: I'm installing the Qmail so , I would like to know the most secure POP server to install and that doesn't have problems with Maildir . how' bout qmail-pop3d ? I was thinking of suggesting that one

RE: The most secure POP server

2000-07-01 Thread Dave Granath
I thought that qmail-pop3d still passed it's passwords in the clear??? If it does and the server is not inside a firewall anyone outside could snoop your connection requests etc... Irwan Hadi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: At 11:59 AM 7/2/00 +1000, Brett Randall wrote: I'm installing the Qmail

Re: The most secure POP server

2000-07-01 Thread Adam McKenna
On Sat, Jul 01, 2000 at 08:34:18PM -0600, Irwan Hadi wrote: At 11:59 AM 7/2/00 +1000, Brett Randall wrote: I'm installing the Qmail so , I would like to know the most secure POP server to install and that doesn't have problems with Maildir . how' bout qmail-pop3d ? I was

RE: The most secure POP server

2000-07-01 Thread Brett Randall
Ok, here's the deal: qmail-pop3d is NOT secure, nor are most other standard POP3 daemons. POP passwords are sent in cleartext and are not encrypted. They can be viewed by people snooping a connection (although this is not as easy as it sounds). A way of fixing this insecurity is to use SSL,

Re: The most secure POP server

2000-07-01 Thread Brian D. Winters
On Sun, Jul 02, 2000 at 02:56:18AM +, amir wrote: How do you plan on using SSL with POP? I know that SSL and IMAP work nicely together, but SSL and POP, never heard about that... maybe some SSL proxying techniques??? It works exactly the same as SSL and IMAP. You can encapsulate any TCP

Re: The most secure POP server

2000-07-01 Thread Adam McKenna
On Sun, Jul 02, 2000 at 01:23:20PM +1000, Brett Randall wrote: Ok, here's the deal: qmail-pop3d is NOT secure, nor are most other standard POP3 daemons. POP passwords are sent in cleartext and are not encrypted. They can be viewed by people snooping a connection (although this is not as

Re: The most secure POP server

2000-07-01 Thread Adam McKenna
On Sat, Jul 01, 2000 at 10:58:17PM -0300, Roberto Samarone Araújo (RSA) wrote: Hi , I'm installing the Qmail so , I would like to know the most secure POP server to install and that doesn't have problems with Maildir . Roberto Samarone

Re: The most secure POP server

2000-07-01 Thread Mark Mentovai
Brian D. Winters wrote: It works exactly the same as SSL and IMAP. You can encapsulate any TCP connection in an SSL tunnel. This includes IMAP, POP3, telnet, or even ssh or another SSL session, although the last two are pretty pointless. Some servers have built in support for SSL, or you can

RE: The most secure POP server

2000-07-01 Thread Brett Randall
Nice cover. So when you said "I was thinking of suggesting THAT ONE but IT isn't very secure", you were actually talking about the POP3 protocol and not qmail-pop3d specifically? If that's the case then why did you reply at all, and in such an ambiguous way? You certainly didn't answer

Re: The most secure POP server

2000-07-01 Thread asantos
From: Brett Randall [EMAIL PROTECTED] I was thinking of suggesting that one but it isn't very secure... Ah, these guys can't take a joke :) However, again we find ourselves with the language problem. When Roberto Samarone Araujo says "secure", possibly he is associating the word "secure" in a

Limit email file seize for some users

2000-07-01 Thread qmail
Hi I would like to limit some of my users to file seizes not above 1 MB How do I implement that. Thanks Jacob

Re: Limit email file seize for some users

2000-07-01 Thread Steffan Hoeke
On Sun, Jul 02, 2000 at 09:47:45AM +0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi I would like to limit some of my users to file seizes not above 1 MB How do I implement that. man qmail-smtpd: databytes Maximum number of bytes allowed in a message, or 0 for no