On 02-Feb-2001 Administrator wrote:
The ISP in question (WebCentral) is located in Australia and is part
of the OzEmail group of companies (I am led to believe). They say they
have 30,000 domains registered at their site so that's 30,000 domains
full of users who are not going to get e-mail
Hello,
Am working on setting up qmail on our servers for our clients to use.
Everything seems to be working very well and much cleaner than what
sendmail did :-)
Anyways, trying to do a few changes in the POP3 part of the system.
We would like to allow, for example, the pop account of
Hi ...
Excuse me ...
I've nothing else from splogger or syslog in /var/log/messages
concerning mail so I look in /var/log/maillog !
Feb 2 09:47:21 yoda sendmail[6665]: JAA06665: from=bob, size=46,
class=0, pri=30046, nrcpts=1,
msgid=[EMAIL PROTECTED], relay=bob@localhost
Feb 2 09:47:21 yoda
Hi all:
I just experienced the weirdest thing... or at least something that I
certainly didn't expect to see in an Unix box. Let me explain:
1) I have a Red Hat Linux 6.2 as a mail server, with the 2.2.17 kernel
and qmail 1.03. It's been working great for months, as one could
I was wondering if anyone here might know of an addon for qmail that will
let me block an email address... This also needs to work with vpopmail...
any help would be appreciated. Thanx.
I've been fsking with qmail for a week now trying to get it to deliver
locally. I've read every piece of documentation available, yet, when I
use qmail-inject or qmail-local. Nothing shows up in the user's
mailboxes (i.e. /root/Mailbox). When I send email by telneting to port
25 on the mail
Ryan,
Read INSTALL.alias, inparticular the section that starts
* root. Under qmail, root never receives mail.
HTH
Peter
Peter Farmer
Systems Engineer
blueyonder
ICQ - 55297879
- Original Message -
From: "Ryan Marsh" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February
In the previous episode (01.02.2001), Matthew Patterson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
On Thu, 01 Feb 2001, KIM wrote:
Hi to all,
How can i block a specific email address in qmail?
echo "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
/var/qmail/control/badmailfrom
echo "@another.domain.name" /var/qmail/control/badmailfrom
Hi,
Can anyone tell me what is the CORRECT way to do this...
I have a qmail server in my DMZ which accepts email and
using SMTPROUTES passes emails on to my internal qmail server.
This works fine EXCEPT, if I send an email to an incorrect address
on the internet, I don't get a bounced email
Hi,
I just read this: http://cr.yp.to/im2000.html
nice, very very nice...
--
Pedro Melo Cunha - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Novis - Dir. Rede - ISP - Infraes. Portal http://www.novis.pt/
Ed. Atrium Saldanha - Pa. Dq. Saldanha, 1 - 7 / 1050-094 Lisboa
tel: +351 21 0104340 - Fax: +351 21 0104301
Can anyone tell me what is the CORRECT way to do this...
I have a qmail server in my DMZ which accepts email and
using SMTPROUTES passes emails on to my internal qmail server.
This works fine EXCEPT, if I send an email to an incorrect address on the internet,
I don't get a bounced email back
qmail Digest 2 Feb 2001 11:00:01 - Issue 1263
Topics (messages 56457 through 56526):
retr problem
56457 by: pratibha
Re: qmtp and spammers.
56458 by: Faried Nawaz
Security issue: SMTP and qmail
56459 by: Marcus Korte
56461 by: Peter van Dijk
56479
hy
i want to build a list based on sql to sync with other databases...
my problem is that i don't know what to do with the hash field in the
subscriber table, any way to figure out what to fill in there ?
thx
thomas
Hi Andr,
I have emailed you a bounced message...
The main problem I think is this:
ezmlm-send: fatal: I don't distribute bounce messages (#5.7.2)
Ken
-Original Message-
From: OK 2 NET - Andr Paulsberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 02 February 2001 10:50
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I am about to use smtproute to route some email
to another email server. Does using smtproute log any
messages when used?
Steve Woolley
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
there are two way to run smtpd of qmail.( inet or tcpserver+daemontool)
when i run smtpd on tcpserver+daemoontool (introduced from qmail with life)
how much merits do i have ?
thank you.
Make sure you either handle identd or *reject* port 113 connects on
the outside IP, or outside mail will take a long time.
Things are starting to work, (like pieces of TEST.deliver and TEST.receive) but they
are
^really^ slow. Even local tests in TEST.deliver. It takes about 5-10 minutes
Peter van Dijk wrote:
On Thu, Feb 01, 2001 at 08:38:00PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I have a user asking about the [EMAIL PROTECTED] addressing
scheme. I guess this would allow the user to pass foobar as a argument
to procmail, etc. It works in sendmail.. Is this implemented
I'm looking for info and have an offer to make - We have Netsaint running
here to monitor servers / services (plug - http://www.netsaint.org/) and
we wrote a very small plugin to check the queue of mail messages sitting
on the servers.
I would be happy to provide this to anyone looking to do a
Paulo Jan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
3) Some minutes later I decide to restart qmail again. qmail-qstat says
that there are around 250 messages in the queue, of which 140 (more or
less) are unprocessed. I restart qmail and everything goes fine... for a
few seconds, after which the box
Michel Boucey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've nothing else from splogger or syslog in /var/log/messages
concerning mail so I look in /var/log/maillog !
Feb 2 09:47:21 yoda sendmail[6665]: JAA06665: from=bob, size=46,
class=0, pri=30046, nrcpts=1,
msgid=[EMAIL PROTECTED],
Mike Jackson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for the response. First, the users are all virtual so they can't
create their own aliases. I could create aliases for them, but I would
have to create one for each and every foobar style argument.
Nope. `man dot-qmail` for details. Hint:
How much ram do you have on that box.
How many concurrent qmail-remotes have you configured to run?
What is your MAX_TASKS setting (and related settings) in your kernel?
Link.
At 10:40 AM 2/2/01 +0100, Paulo Jan wrote:
Hi all:
I just experienced the weirdest thing... or at least
is there a way to block out ALL outgoing mail but 2 email addresses by
smtp. thanks. this is another question from the smtp. i dont have the
execute command availabel because for security reasons. so i dont know how
i will use the qmail-inject to send mail. please help. thanks.
--
Chris McCoy
Charles Cazabon wrote:
Mike Jackson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for the response. First, the users are all virtual so they can't
create their own aliases. I could create aliases for them, but I would
have to create one for each and every foobar style argument.
Nope. `man
Mike Jackson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Charles Cazabon wrote:
it might be "~vdomains/.qmail-foonet-default"
I understand what you are talking about. The .qmail-default works for
addresses containing minus signs, not plus signs. That's what I am talking
about :-))
You can change this.
Now, what I'd like to know is: what happened? I certainly didn't expect
to see this in two pieces of software as robust as qmail and Linux, and
I usually perform the above operation (stop outgoing mail, do whatever,
start qmail-send again) without any problems. I don't think that
All-
I'm new to Qmail and installing it for the first time. I have a 'server'
install RedHat 6.2 linux box.
I have read everything I could find but have run into a glitch. I am
installing exactly like the "Life with qmail" document says to and am at
step 2.7. I went to test the build by
Paulo Jan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, I asked mostly because I didn't know what the "VM:
do_try_to_free_pages_failed_for qmail-remote" message meant, but since
then I've been informed that it more or less stand for "out of memory".
As for my server, it's a Pentium III with 128 Mb.
Matt Simonsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm new to Qmail and installing it for the first time. I have a 'server'
install RedHat 6.2 linux box.
[...]
Well, I added the line it said to to the end of my initab which looks like
this:
[...]
When I do a "kill -HUP 1" then ps all I get is
I'd say - it would certainly help with the load placed upon mail
administrators and network infrastructure. I would imagine this would also
be a more secure way to send receive mail, as right now, the way the mail
passes from server to server leaves a number of doors open for attack.
Anyway,
All of you are right !
It was a double misconfiguration :
- sendmail wasn't backup to sendmail.bak ...
- sendmail_path of php3.ini was set to default, i.e. to sendmail ...
That's works fine now ... thank you.
Cordialement,
Michel Boucey Administrateur Systme
Socit Norm@net +33 2 31 27 13
You're right I'll cope "RTF Man page" to the whiteboard 20 times. Sorry.
Matt
-Original Message-
From: Charles Cazabon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 02, 2001 7:59 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Qmail setup, svscan glitch
Matt Simonsen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I am using qmail with the svscan method of
supervising the processes. I would also like to use
qmailanalog to do some stats/analysis. Under the
old "inetd" method of process management. The
qmail logs were under /var/log/qmail, now they
are stored under /var/service/qmail/log/main. This
is not a
Steve Woolley wrote:
I am using qmail with the svscan method of
supervising the processes. I would also like to use
qmailanalog to do some stats/analysis. Under the
old "inetd" method of process management. The
qmail logs were under /var/log/qmail, now they
are stored under
* Mike Jackson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010202 11:58]:
Is there some preprocessor that I am should run this through?
or maybe some type of awk statement?
Or should I be looking in a totally different place for my logs?
Tai64nlocal works for me.
Maybe for you, but not for qmailanalog. It still
I apologize but I am unfamiliar with what you mean by
Tai64nlocal
Is this a command line option for multilog or something else?
- Original Message -
From: "Mike Jackson" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: "Steve Woolley" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 02, 2001 11:53
Moin Felix!
Das selbe habe ich auch gedacht.
I think you hit the head on the nail - since writing the email - in which I
realized how many mistakes I made (i.e. dist vs. *nix flavor, shell, etc) in
explaining my question - I have tried out two more linux dists and didn't
like them for a number
Steve Woolley wrote:
Hi Steve,
I am using qmail with the svscan method of
supervising the processes. I would also like to use
qmailanalog to do some stats/analysis. Under the
old "inetd" method of process management. The
qmail logs were under /var/log/qmail, now they
are stored under
Hi all !!!
I am using alias in qmail for redirection of email. I was wondering which
are the valid characters that I can use for .qmail-XX . Are "!" and "$"
valid characters ?
Can you tell me which characters I can use?
Thanks in advance,
Alan Rubin
On Fri, Feb 02, 2001 at 04:36:53PM +0100, Paulo Jan wrote:
You may have your concurrency limits set too high for the resources of the
box. But you've posted no useful information with your report, so we can
only guess.
Well, I asked mostly because I didn't know what the "VM:
Setup is Solaris 7 and qmail + big todo + big concurrency
What's going wrong here ?
Thanks for Answer!
2001-02-02 18:31:10.045668500 status: local 0/250 remote 6/400
2001-02-02 18:31:10.626628500 status: local 0/250 remote 5/400
2001-02-02 18:31:10.988526500 status: local 0/250 remote 6/400
Michael Maier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Setup is Solaris 7 and qmail + big todo + big concurrency
What's going wrong here ?
Thanks for Answer!
You asked this yesterday. Do you think the answer is different today?
In my responses to you yesterday, I *twice* asked if you'd tried
turning off
On Sat, Feb 03, 2001 at 11:48:51AM -0600, tim wrote:
#
We need a little more information
--
Justin Bell
Dave Sill wrote:
You asked this yesterday. Do you think the answer is different today?
Yes, may depend on You!
In my responses to you yesterday, I *twice* asked if you'd tried
turning off qmail-send during the injection of your mass of
messages. You never answered that question.
Yes I
This may not be the best place to ask, but I'm looking
for more info on AutoTURN and the hello protocol.
I have two machines, west my mailhub, and east, a workstation.
west gets external mail and puts it into a maildir
in /var/qmail/autoturn.
On east, I use fetchmail to poll west and forward
On Fri, Feb 02, 2001 at 08:00:38PM +0100, Michael Maier wrote:
# What in my Situation is exactly.
# The Messages are out of the todo queue. They should be sent out. But that
# is too slow because
# there are just so few qmail-remote Processes!!! They don't come up like
# on Linux.
# Just about
Michael Maier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What in my Situation is exactly. The Messages are out of the todo queue.
They should be sent out. But that is too slow because there are just so few
qmail-remote Processes!!!
[...]
Because the queue Directory is overloaded there are too many fsyncs.
On Fri, Feb 02, 2001 at 08:00:38PM +0100, Michael Maier wrote:
Dave Sill wrote:
You asked this yesterday. Do you think the answer is different today?
Yes, may depend on You!
In my responses to you yesterday, I *twice* asked if you'd tried
turning off qmail-send during the injection
http://www.ornl.gov/its/archives/mailing-lists/qmail/1999/12/msg00465.html
This here exactly describes the Situation!
--
Michael..
I heard that the 15k rpm drives from Seagate have a difficult time under
some RAID cards?
Is this still true?
Joe
- Original Message -
From: "Charles Cazabon" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 02, 2001 1:25 PM
Subject: Re: qmail speed solaris
Michael
Michael Maier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.ornl.gov/its/archives/mailing-lists/qmail/1999/12/msg00465.html
This here exactly describes the Situation!
Please stop yelling!
OK, so now the question is where the new messages to be processed are
coming from. If they're bounces or other
Hello for everybody,
I accompany that list the plenty time and I see that he/she always has patch
for Qmail, not that it is bad, on the contrary it is good to know that a
real community exists if pawning so that he continues developing this great
MTA.
Is my question been anybody he knows if he
* karith [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
there are two way to run smtpd of qmail.( inet or
tcpserver+daemontool)
Add xinetd. You did read "B.3. ucspi-tcp"?
when i run smtpd on tcpserver+daemoontool (introduced from qmail with
life) how much merits do i have ?
AC+9, WC+9, STR+6
--
Robin
I have other users on the sytem. Mail sent to them bounces too. What's the
simplest way to configure delivery from outside (SMTP) to a local user?
Regards,
-ryan
The three great virtues of programming are laziness, impatience, and hubris,
but bigotry makes the open-source world go round.
-
You must have a misconfiguration, please show the (unedited) output of
/var/qmail/bin/qmail-showctl
-Original Message-
From: Ryan Marsh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 02, 2001 3:44 PM
To: Peter Farmer; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Qmail won't deliver locally.
I
I'd like to thank you guys in advance for helping me with this. Please note
that if you check up on ryanmarsh.com it's DNS is in the process of being
migrated. The DNS on my network shows it being hosted by me (so in this
case, for all intents and purposes it is). The DNS host registered with
I created .qmail-default in /home/ryan. The file says "./Mailbox". But still
I get bounced mail
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Sorry, no mailbox here by that name.
Regards,
-ryan
The three great virtues of programming are laziness, impatience, and hubris,
but bigotry makes the open-source world go round.
On Fri, Feb 02, 2001 at 01:42:43PM -0800, Ryan Marsh wrote:
virtualdomains:
Virtual domain: butterflysoft.org:ryan
Mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] will be controlled by ~ryan/.qmail-whoever or
~ryan/.qmail-default. Does at least one of these files exist?
Chris
On Fri, Feb 02, 2001 at 07:00:24AM -0500, Steve Woolley wrote:
I am about to use smtproute to route some email
to another email server. Does using smtproute log any
messages when used?
no, but you might add some logging to qmail-remote.c between these
lines:
if (relayhost) {
i =
Even more wierd, why is qmail 0wnZ0rIng :-) the files in my home. here is
ls -la /home/ryan
drwx--3 501 nofiles 4096 Feb 2 07:50 .
drwxr-xr-x5 root root 4096 Dec 20 16:04 ..
-rw---1 ryan qmail 71 Dec 19 10:15 .bash_history
-rw-r--r--1
Ok, so I deleted the user's home and recreated it and now everything works
fine. I have no idea why everything got so messed up. Why would qmail chgrp
the files?
Regards,
-ryan
The three great virtues of programming are laziness, impatience, and hubris,
but bigotry makes the open-source world
Hejsan,
The second prerelease of oMail-webmail 0.95 is ready to be downloaded!
Main changes since last release in Novemeber 2000:
* important bugfix in omail-prefs.pl (cut'n'paste error)
* update from german lang file [mz]
* little bugfix with timestamp conversion [Alan
On Fri, Feb 02, 2001 at 03:03:42PM -0800, Ryan Marsh wrote:
Why would qmail chgrp the files?
It didn't.
Chris
After I got this email on the list I sent an email to sendmail.org
asking for some supporting material to their website's claim of
sendmail powering "the vast majority" of email servers. They replied
with the mail that I'm including below as their response.
Seems to me that sendmail.org has
66 matches
Mail list logo
