On Sun, 3 Jun 2001, George Xu wrote:
I use qmail+mysql system in SunOS.I want to filter a special mail
address or subject or content when qmail server receiver all mail.
Make procmail your MDA, and set up a global procmailrc file that does
whatever you like with the mail. As long as the
On Mon, 4 Jun 2001, george wrote:
1. I want to know how to process when qmail received a not exist user
qmail will automatically return a failure message to the originator if the
local recipient does not exist.
2. About quota ,when user mail sizes execd max quota size,qmail how
to
On Sun, 3 Jun 2001, Peter van Dijk wrote:
Furthermore, Alan Brown's activities are not illegal - the ORBS
relaytester runs in The Netherlands, where this is not illegal by any
law.
Maybe in Netherlands is not illegal, but in Netherlands even euthanasia
is legal by any law, in other countries
Hi Everone.
Here's my next experiment and wondering if this is possible
Everyone knows that we can connect to smtp server directly using telnet or
simple socket connection script.
Can I do the same for qmqp server or qmtpd server.
If yes, is this better way to speed up the sending mail.
If
where can found exit code explain ?
Thank you.
qmail Digest 4 Jun 2001 10:00:01 - Issue 1385
Topics (messages 63405 through 63432):
Re: ORBS, and RFC-ignorant blacklists
63405 by: Piotr Kasztelowicz
63406 by: Peter van Dijk
63430 by: Piotr Kasztelowicz
Re: smtp on a specific IP
63407 by: Ross Davis
Roger Arnold wrote:
Hello George,
Love to explain, that is, when you provide more information...
Are you talking about compiling Qmail or something else?
Regards
Roger
george wrote:
where can found exit code explain ?
Thank you.
arnie [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Love to explain, that is, when you provide more information...
Are you talking about compiling Qmail or something else?
I assume he means program deliveries in .qmail files.
For this the answer is man qmail-command
Regards, Frank
george [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I use qmail+mysql system in SunOS.I want to filter a special mail
address or subject
or content when qmail server receiver all mail.
Qmail-Scanner may be the right thing for you. Have a look at
http://qmail-scanner.sourceforge.net/
Regards, Frank
Hi,
I have multiple lines of this when I do a ps ax
/var/qmail/bin/qmail-popup foo.com /home/vpopmail/bin/vchkpw
/var/qmail/bin/qmail-pop3 Maildir
They seems to be there for a long time. I never seen that many of such
lines previously.
Is there anything wrong??
Also, I uses supervise to
Hi all,
I've created a mailing list about qmail for French speaking users.
See http://qmail.free.fr/ for the instructions.
Cheers,
Dj.
Hello
All,
Apologies in advance
for this question, I have trawled the archives and the variousweb pages
but no joy.
The problem is my
qmail box responds v.slowly to smtp request, taking an average of 100 secs for a
connection to be made. I am running qmail on a redhat 7.0
box.
I have
On Sun, 3 Jun 2001, Russell Nelson wrote:
Sure. You may *wish* to do something about it, but it's not required.
While those 10,000 spam messages are sitting in your queue (on
average, 434 per directory; a reasonable size for a directory on ufs
or e2fs), new emails will continue to be
How do I stop spamers from sending mail to my domain and then disappearing
before the msg can be returned to the sender, all the messages are to a
random and invalid mailbox at my domain. I thought qmail would ignore any
incoming mail that does have a valid Mailbox/Maildir. I have set qmail as
On Mon, Jun 04, 2001 at 12:13:56PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The problem is my qmail box responds v.slowly to smtp request, taking an
average of 100 secs for a connection to be made. I am running qmail on a
redhat 7.0 box.
Oh no, once more THE qmail-FAQ. If you really traveeled the
Pavel Kankovsky writes:
Perhaps I should have been more specific: when I said ``clogged'' I meant
the queue had run out of disk space and no new messages could be injected.
(To make things better, it was even impossible to inject bounces.)
Oh, well, a full disk always requires immediate
I have problem with the errata setting (from remote-server?) of To:
field in Reply msg.
Physical name of my qmail server is terri1.te.astro.it but mail domain
is astrte.te.astro.it (record CNAME in dns)
Many users (but not all!!!) of my organization send our msgs like
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (setting
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Apologies in advance for this question, I have trawled the archives and the
various web pages but no joy.
The problem is my qmail box responds v.slowly to smtp request, taking an
average of 100 secs for a connection to be made. I am running qmail on a
redhat
Newbieportal writes:
Everyone knows that we can connect to smtp server directly using telnet or
simple socket connection script.
Can I do the same for qmqp server or qmtpd server.
Not using telnet. At least, not without counting every character you
type before you type it and adding
Apologies Henning,
I am using tcpserver. Qmail is set up according to life with qmail. Its nice
to see civility is not dead thou!
-Original Message-
From: Henning Brauer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 04 June 2001 12:52
To:
Subject: Re: Slow smtp response
On Mon, Jun 04, 2001 at
Alright already.
I dont make the rules i just tend to obey them. Sometimes. :-)
As requested:
Apologies in advance for this question, I have trawled the archives and
the
various web pages but no joy.
The problem is my qmail box responds v.slowly to smtp request, taking an
average of
I have 2 e450s (with very large hardware RAID5 arrays) that I want to
setup in a replicated/failover environment. These boxes will primarily
be a backend for smtp/pop3. Is there a clean way to do this without
investing $40k in Veritas's clustering/replication software? Can NFS
failover cleanly
On Mon, Jun 04, 2001 at 08:03:37AM -0400, Russell Nelson wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[snip Jonathan's confidential message]
I know exactly what your problem is, but I can't tell you, because I'm
not sure that you addressed the question to me. Please re-send your
message without any
On Mon, Jun 04, 2001 at 09:17:28AM +0200, Piotr Kasztelowicz wrote:
On Sun, 3 Jun 2001, Peter van Dijk wrote:
Furthermore, Alan Brown's activities are not illegal - the ORBS
relaytester runs in The Netherlands, where this is not illegal by any
law.
Maybe in Netherlands is not illegal,
Sometimes we are given Orders from On High. This has started me thinking though.
Maybe
there is away to stop the disclaimer being attached under certain conditions. If the
software adding the disclaimer permits the monkey^H^H^H^H^H^H admin to define who the
local users are so that they don't
David Means [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Charles Cazabon wrote:
Eduardo Gargiulo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I had installed qmail and it's running ok. All the examples says to add
a line in /etc/inetd.conf to run qmail-smtpd, but I don't know how to
configure it in xinetd. Where can
George Xu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1. I want to know how to process when qmail received a not exist user in
qmail server. which program to process, is qmail-send ?
whether original sender can receiver a notic mail?
I'm afraid I have to guess at what you meant here. When qmail receives a
Charles Sprickman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm getting tons of these log entries whenever I send mail:
[...]
May 25 18:49:19 bigpoop qmail: 990830959.662255 delivery 801: deferral:
qmail-remote_crashed./
[...]
It was rough combining these, but the most trouble was in smtpd, not
Has anyone had any experience of customers having
problems sending mail through qmaill using formmail etc?
Since we changed from sendmail to qmail there has
been a few people saying they have the mails generated by their scripts rejected
by the mail server
Any help?
Gordon McDowall
Charles Cazabon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
tcpserver does much more than this;
One additional thing: It doesn't have to run as root when the service
doesn't require it.
Regards, Frank
Jon Rust [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm getting these in my syslog:
.../kernel: pid 93400 (qmail-qfilter), uid 82: exited on signal 11
segfault? Is signal 11 a segmentation violation on your OS?
I was getting LOTS of them, and I thought it was related to my filter
attempting to reject
Lye On Siong Johnny [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have multiple lines of this when I do a ps ax
/var/qmail/bin/qmail-popup foo.com /home/vpopmail/bin/vchkpw
/var/qmail/bin/qmail-pop3 Maildir
They seems to be there for a long time. I never seen that many of such
lines previously.
Is there
Alastair Rundlett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How do I stop spamers from sending mail to my domain and then disappearing
before the msg can be returned to the sender, all the messages are to a
random and invalid mailbox at my domain.
This happens to everyone; it's not a problem. qmail will
On Mon, Jun 04, 2001 at 09:17:50AM +0200, Piotr Kasztelowicz allegedly wrote:
On Sun, 3 Jun 2001, Peter van Dijk wrote:
Furthermore, Alan Brown's activities are not illegal - the ORBS
relaytester runs in The Netherlands, where this is not illegal by any
law.
Maybe in Netherlands is
Su 04 Jun 2001 08:22:59 -0600, Charles Cazabon ha scritto:
David Means [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Charles Cazabon wrote:
Eduardo Gargiulo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I had installed qmail and it's running ok. All the examples
says to add
a line in /etc/inetd.conf to run
Massimo Quintini [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Physical name of my qmail server is terri1.te.astro.it but mail domain
is astrte.te.astro.it (record CNAME in dns)
Bad idea. See below.
In the reply of msg the To: field contains [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and not [EMAIL PROTECTED] Why???
The mail
Gordon McDowall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Has anyone had any experience of customers having problems sending mail
through qmaill using formmail etc?
Only if their scripts are broken, or use very odd sendmail-specific
commandline options.
Since we changed from sendmail to qmail there has been
Gordon McDowall [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Since we changed from sendmail to qmail there has been a few people saying they have
the mails
generated by their scripts rejected by the mail server
Possibly you don't allow the webserver to relay.
Regards, Frank
Charles Cazabon writes:
Another possibility (given that you're running on PC hardware) is hardware
problems; it's worked fine for years does not mean there wasn't a latent
problem all along.
Yep; in fact it's worked fine for years and now doesn't is probably
a very good indication of a
We ran into a misconfiguration on one machine where svscan had been
added by one person to rc.sysinit and inittab by another, so two copies
of svscan were being started.
I realise that this is a misconfiguration, but wouldn't it be possible
for svscan to add a 'lock' file to the services
* Russell Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010604 14:06]:
Newbieportal writes:
Everyone knows that we can connect to smtp server directly using telnet or
simple socket connection script.
Can I do the same for qmqp server or qmtpd server.
Not using telnet. At least, not without counting every
No, checked that, I guess I will need to look at their scripts in greater
detail
- Original Message -
From: Frank Tegtmeyer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 04, 2001 3:53 PM
Subject: Re: qmail and cgi
Gordon McDowall [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Since we
Michael T\. Babcock [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I realise that this is a misconfiguration, but wouldn't it be possible
for svscan to add a 'lock' file to the services directory so it only
starts once?
setlock -n /path/to/lockfile svscan /service
URL:http://cr.yp.to/daemontools/setlock.html
Thnx Charles
So where I could find these patches you talking about?
Why don't you use them ?
There are patches to change this if you like, but I don't use them.
I had over 200 msg's bounced to postmaster this over weekend to invalid
mailboxes. What happens when this reaches thousands ?
+-- On Jun 4, Paul Jarc said:
Michael T\. Babcock [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I realise that this is a misconfiguration, but wouldn't it be possible
for svscan to add a 'lock' file to the services directory so it only
starts once?
setlock -n /path/to/lockfile svscan /service
On Mon, Jun 04, 2001 at 08:36:26AM -0600, Charles Cazabon wrote:
Jon Rust [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm getting these in my syslog:
.../kernel: pid 93400 (qmail-qfilter), uid 82: exited on signal 11
segfault? Is signal 11 a segmentation violation on your OS?
Yes. (FreeBSD
Alastair Rundlett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
re: patches to qmail-smtpd to do local-part verfication
There are patches to change this if you like, but I don't use them.
So where I could find these patches you talking about?
See either qmail.org or the qmail mailing list archives; that's
Jon Rust [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Jun 04, 2001 at 08:36:26AM -0600, Charles Cazabon wrote:
Is this happening whenever any process injects mail? Or only when qmail-smtpd
(and possibly qmail-qmtpd and qmail-qmqpd) inject mail? If the latter, are
you running with memory limits on
Title: big-concurrency patch
I'm having problems applying this patch. I can't find any documentation for it, and the patch file itself seems to be rather chopped up. I did my best to put it into appropriate patch files, but when I run patch -p1 big-concurrency.patch it asks me what file I
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
You sent the following message to a mailing list that I'm subscribed
to. You also sent a copy directly to me. I don't want an extra copy.
If you respond to a message of mine, please respect the
Mail-Followup-To header field. If you respond to a message sent by
someone else,
Mark Douglas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm having problems applying this patch. I can't find any documentation for
it, and the patch file itself seems to be rather chopped up. I did my best
to put it into appropriate patch files, but when I run patch -p1
big-concurrency.patch it asks me what
Title: RE: big-concurrency patch
I've tried all kinds of -p options, and left it out, and it doesn't help.
Also, as for it not being the standard big-concurrency patch, would you tell me which one is? Even the one right on qmail's home site is that same patch muddled in with the e-mail.
Johan Almqvist writes:
BTW: Why is there still no link to my qmail page on www.qmail.org?
Laziness.
--
-russ nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://russnelson.com
Crynwr sells support for free software | PGPok | Microsoft rivets everything.
521 Pleasant Valley Rd. | +1 315 268 1925 voice | Linux
Michael T. Babcock([EMAIL PROTECTED])@2001.06.04 11:11:59 +:
We ran into a misconfiguration on one machine where svscan had been
added by one person to rc.sysinit and inittab by another, so two copies
of svscan were being started.
I realise that this is a misconfiguration, but wouldn't
Hello,
I discussed XINETD on my web page intensively. Look at:
http://www.fehcom.de/qmail_en.html
cheers.
eh.
At 16:58 2.6.2001 -0300, Eduardo Gargiulo wrote:
Hi all.
I had installed qmail and it's running ok.
All the examples says to add a line in /etc/inetd.conf to run
qmail-smtpd, but I
Mark Douglas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've tried all kinds of -p options, and left it out, and it doesn't help.
Also, as for it not being the standard big-concurrency patch, would you tell
me which one is? Even the one right on qmail's home site is that same patch
muddled in with the
to put it into appropriate patch files, but when I run patch -p1
big-concurrency.patch it asks me what file I want to patch.
Strictly speaking, it's /possible/ that your version of patch is getting
screwed up by the email header. Try removing everything above the first
'diff' line. Then
Charles:
I believe your points are valid. But I'm just stuborn, I suppose :)
So stuborn as a matter of fact, that I patched qmail-smptd this weekend
to read a new control file which I called ipaddrallowed. In which I can
put things like 192.168. or a full IP addr. If the source address of
Besides, ORBS is dead!
http://www.orbs.org/
Or, is that the wrong site?
David
Mark wrote:
On Mon, Jun 04, 2001 at 09:17:50AM +0200, Piotr Kasztelowicz allegedly wrote:
On Sun, 3 Jun 2001, Peter van Dijk wrote:
Furthermore, Alan Brown's activities are not illegal - the ORBS
Title: RE: big-concurrency patch
No, I can make this patch cleanly on a linux based system no problem, but when I try the same approach on the solaris system, it doesn't work. Was the test you're doing from a solaris system? At this point I'm just kind of wondering what the problem is with
On Thu, 31 May 2001, Dave Sill wrote:
Cary [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
However, when I try to check the mail that was sent, it has not been
delivered. I use bin/qmail-qstat to look a the queue, and it is growing
bigger and bigger:
---results of bin/qmail-qstat---
messages in queue: 138
according to the mail I recieved when I signed up, I can request a copy of
message 12345 by sending mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Where do I find these numbers by which to request a message, or groups of
messages?
Thank you.
Cary Mathews
Abilene Christian University
ACM Chair
| Education
On Mon, Jun 04, 2001 at 05:14:00PM -0400, Mark Douglas allegedly wrote:
No, I can make this patch cleanly on a linux based system no problem, but
when I try the same approach on the solaris system, it doesn't work. Was the
test you're doing from a solaris system? At this point I'm just kind of
tcpserver does much more than this; in particular, the ability to arbitrarily
set environment variables on a per-IP or per-hostname basis is particularly
valuable in controlling certain aspects of qmail's behaviour.
Historical note: that functionality used to be available in
a separate
I have set up a qmail system (RedHat linux 7.1, kernel 2.4.5, xinetd, qmail 1.03 RPMs, U of Wash pop3 and imap, etc.). with a domain name of sbcacademy.org (machine name mail.sbcacademy.org) with the following configuration files:
=== start /var/qmail/control/rcpthosts
localhost
David Means [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I believe your points are valid. But I'm just stuborn, I suppose :)
Perhaps. More importantly, you're re-inventing the wheel, possibly with bugs.
So stuborn as a matter of fact, that I patched qmail-smptd this weekend
to read a new control file which
Mark Douglas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No, I can make this patch cleanly on a linux based system no problem, but
when I try the same approach on the solaris system, it doesn't work. Was the
test you're doing from a solaris system?
Nope, Linux. Perhaps the version of patch which Sun ships is
Alastair Rundlett wrote:
Thnx Charles
So where I could find these patches you talking about?
Why don't you use them ?
There are patches to change this if you like, but I don't use them.
I had over 200 msg's bounced to postmaster this over weekend to invalid
mailboxes. What
what you want to do is allow all incoming connections (i.e. don't have
your /etc/hosts.allow /etc/hosts.deny setup to drop all miscellaneous
smtp connections) on port 25. if you only set RELAYCLIENT for the ip's
you want, qmail will handle rejecing the emails.
make sense?
On Mon, 4 Jun 2001,
On Mon, Jun 04, 2001 at 03:11:36PM -0700, Ashe Coutts wrote:
I have set up a qmail system (RedHat linux 7.1, kernel 2.4.5, xinetd,
qmail 1.03 RPMs, U of Wash pop3 and imap, etc.). with a domain name of
sbcacademy.org (machine name mail.sbcacademy.org) with the following
configuration
On Mon, Jun 04, 2001 at 04:25:58PM -0600, Charles Cazabon wrote:
Mark Douglas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No, I can make this patch cleanly on a linux based system no problem, but
when I try the same approach on the solaris system, it doesn't work. Was the
test you're doing from a solaris
It's also in tcp-env
Scott Schwartz wrote:
tcpserver does much more than this; in particular, the ability to arbitrarily
set environment variables on a per-IP or per-hostname basis is particularly
valuable in controlling certain aspects of qmail's behaviour.
Historical note: that
Title: RE: big-concurrency patch
What operating system are you compiling on? maybe
you want to try another version of patch from ftp.gnu.org. Because the same thing happened
to me when i compiled on solaris 8 and using another version of patch
helped.
Hope it works for you
Paul
-
Title: RE: big-concurrency patch
Sorry, maybe you are in the wrong directory? you
should not be in the qmail-1.03 dir. because the patch specifies the path
already "qmail-1.03/file-to-patch". so if you are in the qmail dir , do a "cd
.." and try the patch again. if it still can't work then
Charles Cazabon wrote:
{ snip }
That way, I can have only my domain in rcpthosts, but allow my other clients
access.
You're misunderstanding the purpose of rcpthosts. It's only supposed to
contain the domains for which you act as either a primary or backup mail
exchanger.
I don't
Cary [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
according to the mail I recieved when I signed up, I can request a copy of
message 12345 by sending mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Where do I find these numbers by which to request a message, or groups of
messages?
In the envelope sender, typically recorded by
Ashe Coutts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The system works but will not receive mail from outside the select few I
list in the /etc/hosts.allow file.
Others have replied with correct information as well, but this is the crux of
your problem. To receive mail from the net at large, you have to
Thank you your reply.
But I want to know whether I specify return a failure message to the originator if the
user quota size has exceed .
ÔÚ 2001-06-04 00:02:00 ÄúдµÀ£º
On Mon, 4 Jun 2001, george wrote:
1. I want to know how to process when qmail received a not exist user
qmail will
hi-
i think that someone posted earlier today regarding sporadic sig 11's on
freebsd 4.2-RELEASE while running qmail-qfilter.
interestingly, i just installed qmail-qfilter earlier today on the same
release of freebsd, and i'm getting the same thing:
Jun 4 19:46:03 mx1 /kernel: pid 64541
hi,
Are there any other way to implement virtual domain apart from using vpopmail?
or is it true that if having virtual domain, then the log in name will be
the full email address since that's the only way to differentiate the accounts?
Thanks
Johnny
Lye On Siong Johnny writes:
Are there any other way to implement virtual domain apart from using vpopmail?
There are many ways. qmail is in effect a tool for sending and
receiving email. You can use it in many different ways, vpopmail
being just one of them. You could use vmailmgr
On Mon, 4 Jun 2001, Alex Pennace wrote:
Can you please get over this? The evidence you posted last year was
flawed, it did not link ORBS to a few probes from Romania. You have no
proof that ORBS is somehow worse than any other list of IPs.
1) My host was by me secured (qmail+tcpserver with
On Mon, Jun 04, 2001 at 05:06:52PM -0400, David Means wrote:
Besides, ORBS is dead!
http://www.orbs.org/
Or, is that the wrong site?
That is the right site, and ORBS is indeed currently dead.
Greetz, Peter.
83 matches
Mail list logo
