I what exactly has happened to the three (5-2) messages that have been
processed?
5 total in queue:
3 of these are pre-processed and scheduled for delivery
2 of these are not pre-processed
When I type qmail-qread and see something like these hypothetical results:
where I read a description of the deferral strategy (or, as I like to call it,
the curve thingy). I do not seem to find it in the dist, or on a few sites.
Would somebody please give me a pointer?
Thanks in advance,
:) Lyndon
qmail *is* instant messaging ;)
On Sat, 23 Oct 1999, Todd A. Jacobs wrote:
On Fri, 22 Oct 1999, Eric Dahnke wrote:
I understand the pros and cons of each, but am interested in knowing if
there is anyone on this list who thinks instant messaging has a chance
of upseating smtp.
This is
Yes - too bad there is a plethora of UN*X "admins" out there who don't know the
-m -k /etc/skel options exist... there is no substitute for experience, but
(insert your man page viewer here) is a good start.
:) Lyndon
On Thu, 21 Oct 1999, Russell Nelson wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I don't use qmail-analog, but the important numbers are here - this is a single
machine that ran at full load for half the day, then sat idle for the other half...
I'm making some changes in the coming week that I'm sure will push me well over
600,000 per machine per day, and I have new
Forgive me if the two posts from Eric were not related:
saturating a T1:
Todd presents a good formula, but this is not taking into account anything but the
message size. As Stan mentions, email size is not a good indicator of total network
traffic - even if you are only in
I have seen it - I'm not sure exactly what fixed it, but it was definitely
in my /var/qmail/control... I think I made rcpthosts and locals as the
same, but I also had to kill all qmail procs and restart them.
:) Lyndon
-Original Message-
From: Glenn Crownover [mailto:[EMAIL
If Qmail did it "the same way", it would make Qmail more
acceptable to users.
Ouch - even that one is beyond me ;)
If qmail did anything the same way as other MTA's --- well, I'm not so sure
I can express it. We're here because qmail doesn't do anything like other
MTA's - it's one of
--
notice how the Reply-To: picked up default domain, but Mail-Reply-To: and
Mail-Followup-To didn't? This is just for curiosity's sake - I have no
desire to force the RT:, MRT:, or MFT: fields to pick up a default domain...
:) Lyndon Griffin
No, I just re-ran the test, only delivering to the local machine this time
(taking sendmail out of the picture)... Same thing happens, so it must be
qmail that is doing this.
Is that Sendmail I smell or did I step in something?
-Dave
But some important parts are really missing. What's the licence for
daemontools? For rblsmtpd? For qmail-analog? Am I allowed to
start my syslogd or rc5des client under supervise if I haven't
installed qmail?
These aren't anything to do with qmail. They're all seperate programs by
othy L. Mayo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 15, 1999 10:44 AM
To: Josh Pennell
Cc: Lyndon Griffin; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Kurt's Closet on qmail
qmail works just fine under inetd. It is just that Dan and most people on
this list will no longer support you if you h
Not really... qmail out of the box doesn't support inetd. There are
configuration changes you have to make *on your own* to get it to
work, and
the web site doesn't support or explain these changes. (I'm sure that if
you wanted to support inetd stuff on this list, no-one else here
would
-
every message on this list. Not only that, new users have also gone back
and read every message that was ever posted.
Seems pretty shaky to me, but I've carried this torch enough for one day.
Cheers,
:) Lyndon Griffin
in which I hold qmail users.
Is everything clear now?
Sounds good, and in a way, I guess we should all be flattered. Remember the
warm fuzzies? I get them from reading something, not from inferring it on
my own. Thanks,
:) Lyndon Griffin
(oops - meant this to go to the list - Sorry, Peter)
My understanding of the problem was that QMail didn't do an MX lookup - it
did an ANY lookup. That's why QMail has trouble, but other MTA's don't.
Can anyone speak to the validity of this assumption?
:) Lyndon Griffin
-Original
of QMail) the patch may depend on.
Of course, if somebody knows of a site already doing this, that URL is
welcome, and I may withdraw my offer.
Thanks in advance,
:) Lyndon Griffin
http://www.bsd4us.org
make
things better, hence the reason for starting this thread.
-Original Message-
From: Vince Vielhaber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 10, 1999 3:47 AM
To: Lyndon Griffin
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Patches revisited
On Fri, 10 Sep 1999, Lyndon Griffin
:31 AM
To: QMail List
Subject: RE: Patches revisited
Lyndon Griffin writes:
Yeah, I went back, now that you mention it, and I see a lot of
work has been
done since I wrote it off as a dead-loss for information
months ago. No
offense, Russ, but the presentation of information
What do you want animated gifs and sound?
- eric
Apparently, you neglected to read my previous post. Simply having a link to
the list archive is not helpful.
Lyndon Griffin escribió:
From the presentation of information perspective, the site is
not all that
good. Technically
: 0x800420CD
There - no SSL being used.
:) Lyndon Griffin
Systems Engineer
||| Naviant |||
*** Press any key to continue, or any other key to quit. ***
-Original Message-
From: Adam D . McKenna [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 09, 1999 2:28 PM
To: Cyril
do you have your MANPATH environment variable set to include /var/qmail/man?
-Original Message-
From: Edward Castillo-Jakosalem [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 09, 1999 3:59 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: man pages?
Good day to all!
I am just
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Have you got some vmstat/iostat figures?
Here's iostat and vmstat from a box currently cranking out:
I'm not ashamed to say I have no clue what these mean...
/home/lgriffin/$ iostat 5
tty dad0 fd0 sd2
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Is there a recommended platform for running QMail - hardware and
software? I'm looking at needing to push out up to 3mm emails a day,
and -so far- I'm not seeing the performance that I think I should be.
Thanks in advance,
:) Lyndon Griffin
: recommended pltform?
Lyndon Griffin writes:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Is there a recommended platform for running QMail - hardware and
software? I'm looking at needing to push out up to 3mm emails a
day,
and -so far- I'm not seeing the performance that I
Subject: Re: question on big-todo patch
Lyndon Griffin writes:
I just installed the big-todo patch on one of my servers, and
am running a
mailing of around 350k names. I am frequently getting the
following error:
find: cannot open queue/todo/117188: No such file or directory
find
?
Thanks,
:) Lyndon Griffin
Systems Engineer
||| Naviant |||
100 buckets of bits on the bus
100 buckets of bits
Take one down, short it to ground
FF buckets of bits on the bus
FF buckets of bits on the bus
FF buckets of bits
Take one down, short
Patch is still needed... it should be noted that this isn't a patch
specifically for AOL, but AOL is the most common (and first, I think) to
illuminate this 'bug' in the qmail code.
:) Lyndon Griffin
Systems Engineer
||| Naviant |||
*** This message is made with 100% recycled bytes
28 matches
Mail list logo
