Re: Qmail in a DMZ

2001-02-02 Thread OK 2 NET - André Paulsberg
Can anyone tell me what is the CORRECT way to do this... I have a qmail server in my DMZ which accepts email and using SMTPROUTES passes emails on to my internal qmail server. This works fine EXCEPT, if I send an email to an incorrect address on the internet, I don't get a bounced email back

Re: bcc sucks

2001-01-25 Thread OK 2 NET - André Paulsberg
I'm trying to make a Perl program that is called by the .qmail file for a single account but recieves messages for several extension addresses. To clarify, a single account, bob, will be recieving for bob-john, bob-jill, etc. This program is supposed to database certain parts of the message,

Please stop sending me your virus infected files!

2001-01-16 Thread OK 2 NET - André Paulsberg
Even though the message is in norwegian, you will recognize that it's a QMAILSCANNER virus warning, and I've gotten 6 more last hour. Please disinfect your computer and / or temporarly stop sending mail. MVH Andr PaulsbergIDG New Media Support Informasjon fra

Re: ENOUGH WITH THE FRIGGIN VIRII WARNINGS!

2001-01-16 Thread OK 2 NET - André Paulsberg
Hey, it took 30 minuttes for my message to go trough! When I sent the message NOONE had complained, later when the list catched up several warning-messages came. Complain to the "fill in the blank" person who sent this virus :( MVH Andr Paulsberg

Re: bounce mail allways double bounces because the 'to' in the envelope is empty?

2001-01-16 Thread OK 2 NET - André Paulsberg
--- Hi. This is the qmail-send program at tuxar.com. I tried to deliver a bounce message to this address, but the bounce bounced! @tuxar.com: Sorry, no mailbox here by that name. vpopmail (#5.1.1) --- Below this line is the original bounce. Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12560 invoked

Re: speed of machines

2001-01-11 Thread OK 2 NET - André Paulsberg
Please remove your "extras" when sending to this mailinglist, no matter how plesent it looks or feels your mail gets is 10 times bigger. You are not paying for more than 1 copy of this message in bandwith, but the nice guys that offer their bandwidth to give you and others the shared knowledge

Re: relaying by domain

2001-01-03 Thread OK 2 NET - André Paulsberg
Sorry for putting this on the list if it has already been answered however I checked the archives and failed to get an answer to it and although I have read 5.4 in the FAQ it does not help me much. I am using tcpserver and I have set up qmail and done relaying as instructed in the FAQ

Re: ORBS helps hackers to break into srevers

2000-11-20 Thread OK 2 NET - André Paulsberg
Qmail is one MTA only, which suports and propagates ORBS "moral" and technical thus availablility to connect with qmail platform to ORBS and reject mail from listed by ORBS hosts. Neither sendmail nor postfix is interested with ORBS anty-spam system and don't support ORBS. The ORBS system

Re: Return receipt [T2000103100V0]

2000-11-03 Thread OK 2 NET - André Paulsberg
I know it. But my question it's another. I'm going try explain better. I have try these. I have send a email with netscape comunnicator 4.61 and i have put "Request return receipt" to on. I have send these email over a SMTP SENDMAIL server, and when i received this email, i have been

Re: Return receipt

2000-10-31 Thread OK 2 NET - André Paulsberg
Qmail doesn't support "return receipt". Any solution for this?. I'm pretty sure you are confusing "Reply-To:" with "Return-Path:", "Return-Path:" also known as envelope sender is used as the return address/receipt on "all" mailservers including QMAIL. "Reply-To:" is used by E-Mail clients when

Re: terminate spamming

2000-10-12 Thread OK 2 NET - André Paulsberg
I run qmail on a linux server and there's a hard spamming through it. In my server there are four domain (three are virtuals). I set the rcpthosts file with the names of my domains (one per row). The problem is that now users of my domains can't send out mails. I know that one possible

Re: SPAM is not a big deal if you are getting only SPAM

2000-10-04 Thread OK 2 NET - André Paulsberg
SPAM is not a big deal if you are getting only SPAM. It is much worse when you are getting thousands and thousands of failure messages. This is exactly what happened to me: some smart guy has a huge list of emails addresses which are intended to be his spam victims. Tousands of them are not

Re: SPAM is not a big deal if you are getting only SPAM

2000-10-04 Thread OK 2 NET - André Paulsberg
You can only purge them automaticly, I'm not sure that's to smart. The best is to reject based on envelope sender or recipient, that way you can tell the "offening" server that you rejected the message. (This is done throug the files control/badmailfrom and control/badrcptto.) badrcptto

Re: Open relay test.

2000-09-04 Thread OK 2 NET - André Paulsberg
I imagine that more than one person on this list has spoken to ORBS about their misleading relay test? How many people have ended up on the ORBS list simply because their qmail installations accepted emails with "%" or "!" in the To: field? NO ONE! ORBS tester requires the E-Mail to reach

Re: Interesting MAPS issue

2000-08-17 Thread OK 2 NET - André Paulsberg
[root@mail:~]# nslookup rbl.maps.vix.com Server: ns1.supplyguys.net Address: 205.247.132.3 *** smtp.supplyguys.net can't find rbl.maps.vix.com: Non-existent host/domain and I get the same response if I lookup DUL. Makes no sense. You are using NSLOOKUP to find a A, CNAME or PTR record

Re: mail sendmail

2000-08-16 Thread OK 2 NET - André Paulsberg
I am running qmail on my system but i am getting sendmail messages in the log here's part of the log [cut] Aug 16 11:05:19 mail2 sendmail[9695]: LAA09693: [EMAIL PROTECTED], ctladdr=root (0/1), delay=00:00:01, xdelay=00:00:01, mailer=esmtp, relay=mail.conde-dev.com. [206.136.72.122],

Re: legit mail being blocked because of relay methods

2000-08-10 Thread OK 2 NET - André Paulsberg
3. The mailserver then contacts teh first server on teh list, says "here's an e-mail message", along with a list of addresses (usually 20 or so). Sometimes all those addresses are on that server, somtimes not. I've never seen I mailing list do this, it not only sounds stupid - it is stupid.

Re: orbs.org accuses qmail of mailbomb relaying!

2000-07-24 Thread OK 2 NET - André Paulsberg
Argh. Get that misconception *out your head*. People who disallow ORBS to scan them get listed as *untestable*, not as *open relays*. ORBS doesn't block. Are these records in relays.orbs.org? How can you say that ORBS doesn't block them, then? Oh, I see, ORBS made up their own semantics

Re: orbs.org accuses qmail of mailbomb relaying!

2000-07-24 Thread OK 2 NET - André Paulsberg
Never has the policies of ORBS have ANYTHING directly to do with SPAM, it is an validated Open Relay database which for obvious reason also contains those who deny/decive ORBS testing by blocking it. In other words, it's a good place to go to find open relays, in order to abuse them. Put

Re: orbs.org accuses qmail of mailbomb relaying!

2000-07-24 Thread OK 2 NET - André Paulsberg
But when the system doesn't relay and has never relayed, constantly *retesting* it and dumping that mail in the postmaster's mailbox seems wrong. Sure, it's not that much spam, but when you have a number of hosts with mail setups like that, it starts slowly adding up. And of course, their

Re: Bandwidth sucking

2000-06-15 Thread OK 2 NET - André Paulsberg
My question now is: what's going on? Since the SMTP connection never ends, I don't really know what the heck are they trying to send me; plus, it would have needed to be something really *big*, since the incoming bandwidth usage was on 96 Kbytes/sec. for the whole weekend; you do the math.

Re: Blocking of Mail Domain for a specific users

2000-06-09 Thread OK 2 NET - André Paulsberg
I want to block incoming of mails from few domains for few users (POP and SMTP both) only. If i put these domain in the badmailfrom file it blocks for all the users. The other, easier way is to just put the email addresses in badmailfrom. I.e. instead of putting domain.com in badmailfrom,

Re: Blocking of Mail Domain for a specific users

2000-06-09 Thread OK 2 NET - André Paulsberg
Thanks for the info, i checked it for the POP users it is working fine. I want to know how it can be done for SMTP users. Kindly suggest. Could you please explain how you identify the users, is it only done by their address or is it done by IP. The only method I can think of @ the top of my

Re: Blocking of Mail Domain for a specific users

2000-06-08 Thread OK 2 NET - André Paulsberg
I want to block incoming of mails from few domains for few users (POP and SMTP both) only. If i put these domain in the badmailfrom file it blocks for all the users. kindly suggest how it can be done for individuall users. You'll need to make a short script, and add it into these users

Re: Does someone knows what is this about?

2000-06-06 Thread OK 2 NET - André Paulsberg
What a mail admin chooses to do with is ORBS information is up to him, and he may ignore some or all listings ORBS give out for "admin refused". How can I set up my filters to just use "really open relay" info from ORBS and throw away "admin refused" unknows? You have seen the other zone

Re: Does someone knows what is this about?

2000-06-06 Thread OK 2 NET - André Paulsberg
AFAIK all mailserver are required to have an A record, they are also required to have an RDNS matching "this" A record. This A record then becomes one of the possible domains to reach the mailserver, which RFC 822 requires to have a postmaster@domain (domain being RDNS). Where do you see

Re: Does someone knows what is this about?

2000-06-06 Thread OK 2 NET - André Paulsberg
This seems like a weak excuse, all your interfaces should have matching RDNS to their main A records and it's sufficient to set this up once! Who shall fill in control/locals, should the reverse (outside my control) change? You, because you choose the mailservers hostname/domain. Just