Al Sparks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Note the error unable to start qmail-smtpd/run: ex. Note also, that
tcpserver is not started in any of this.
When I manually run /service/qmail-smtpd/run tcpserver does start.
/service/qmail-smtpd/run, which was taken from Life with qmail, has
the
--- Charles Cazabon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The first line of the script is wrong and is not from Life with qmail.
Then, the only ex in the script is part of exec. Are you sure you
don't have some nonprintable characters in there?
Charles
The thing of it is, I stared and stared at that
On 07 Aug 2001 12:43:23 -0700, Al Sparks wrote:
When I manually run /service/qmail-smtpd/run tcpserver does start.
/service/qmail-smtpd/run, which was taken from Life with qmail, has
the following in it:
**
ILDUID=`id -u qmaild`
Right here is your problem.. If you notice ILDUID is not a
Pablo Buenaventura [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For which way could I know if daemontools is installed
already?
If you've got /usr/local/bin/supervise, you've probably got
daemontools. On Red Hat, you could check for an RPM:
rpm -qa | grep daemontools
What supervise qmail-send, supervise
rohrbach@WM:datasink[~]6% ls -l /usr/local/bin/(sv*|multilog)
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel - 22076 Mar 12 21:45 /usr/local/bin/multilog*
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel - 11740 Mar 12 21:45 /usr/local/bin/svc*
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel - 9372 Mar 12 21:45 /usr/local/bin/svok*
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Mike Jackson wrote:
Hi,
Box is Mandrake 8.0 final, kernel 2.4.3-20mdk. I get the following
error when trying to compile daemontools. It also happened to me on a
Redhat 7.1 box. I think it's something gcc version 2.96 2731
related. Somebody please help me
info [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've tried but I'm still having the same problem, plus qmail-send dosen't
start now after reboot
You need to provide better information. After you rebooted, and before
manually starting anything, show us the output of:
`ps auxw | grep svscan`
`ps auxw |
Vern Hart [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yesterday, Ben Beuchler wrote:
I recommend whoever it is that is doing the lovely qmail shirts (I'll be
ordering mine shortly!) should do one that says "What Do The Logs
Say?(tm)". I know I would buy one...
I did a little research to find the true
On Wed, 27 Sep 2000, Dave Sill wrote:
ad annoying? If so, I could set up http://lwq.sill.org to redirect to
http://web.infoave.net/~dsill/lwq. In fact, I think I'll do that
anyway[1]. Unfortunately, sill.org sits on a 28.8K dialup, so I can't
serve LWQ (in volume) directly. Maybe someday
On Mon, 25 Sep 2000, Stephen Bosch wrote:
On Mon, 25 Sep 2000 16:33:21 +0200, "Frans Haarman" wrote:
I see constant disk activity when using daemontools to
monitor qmail.
All together now...
"What do the logs say?"TM
Logs?!? What are logs?!? ;)
All is now well. It turns out that
I recommend whoever it is that is doing the lovely qmail shirts (I'll be
ordering mine shortly!) should do one that says "What Do The Logs
Say?(tm)". I know I would buy one...
where to order, where - please ...
==
Alexander Jernejcic
Today, Dave Kitabjian wrote:
Do my eyes deceive me or are you really finally printing and selling
one
of the qmail tshirts?
http://www.cafepress.com/qmail0a/
Yeah. I signed up at the cafepress site.
All four variations are there:
http://www.cafepress.com/qmail0a/
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I recommend whoever it is that is doing the lovely qmail shirts (I'll be
ordering mine shortly!) should do one that says "What Do The Logs
Say?(tm)". I know I would buy one...
where to order, where - please ...
http://vern.com/tshirts/qmail/
-Dave
Ben Beuchler [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I haven't even ordered one myself. Their tshirt selection leaves
something to be desired. The only have one color, white, and they
don't have anything over XL.
Eh? The page I'm looking at quotes 2x, 3x and 4x sizes for $3 more.
-Matt
On Tue, Sep 26, 2000 at 12:25:37PM -0700, Matt Brown wrote:
Ben Beuchler [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I haven't even ordered one myself. Their tshirt selection leaves
something to be desired. The only have one color, white, and they
don't have anything over XL.
Eh? The page I'm
Yesterday, Ben Beuchler wrote:
I recommend whoever it is that is doing the lovely qmail shirts (I'll be
ordering mine shortly!) should do one that says "What Do The Logs
Say?(tm)". I know I would buy one...
I did a little research to find the true attribution of this phrase.
The first
What Do The Logs Say?(tm)
-- Dave Sill, Life with qmail
Thoughts? Objections? Contentions?
The LWQ URL?
Regards.
On Tue, Sep 26, 2000 at 02:21:39PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thoughts? Objections? Contentions?
The LWQ URL?
He mentioned that. http://lwq.w3.to redirects to the current home of
LWQ.
Ben
--
Ben Beuchler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MAILER-DAEMON
On Mon, 25 Sep 2000, Frans Haarman wrote:
I see constant disk activity when using daemontools to
monitor qmail.
Is this bad for my hd ? Someone told me changes
of my disks dying with constat disk activity are
much higher!
Funny you mentioned that. I just noticed the same thing! The HD
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Funny you mentioned that. I just noticed the same thing! The HD activity
light blips every one or two seconds. I restarted the box without loading
svscan (which loads dnscache, tinydns and qmail) - all is quiet.
svscan polls the service directory every five seconds.
"Frans Haarman" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I see constant disk activity when using daemontools to
monitor qmail.
Is this bad for my hd ?
Yeah, the same way running your car's engine is bad for it. If you
want your disk drive to last forever, you'll need to power it off. :-)
Someone told me
I see constant disk activity when using daemontools to
monitor qmail.
I don't.
Get yourself a real operating system where the disk cache actually
works. svscan does read-only accesses to /services or wherever you
configured it to look. If that touches your disk each time, your OS
sucks or
On Mon, 25 Sep 2000 16:33:21 +0200, "Frans Haarman" wrote:
I see constant disk activity when using daemontools to
monitor qmail.
It is possible that the programs being spawned are exiting, in which
case supervise will start another copy. This could be due to any
number of things. For
On Mon, 25 Sep 2000, Felix von Leitner wrote:
I see constant disk activity when using daemontools to
monitor qmail.
I don't.
Get yourself a real operating system where the disk cache actually
works. svscan does read-only accesses to /services or wherever you
configured it to look.
On Mon, Sep 25, 2000 at 04:33:21PM +0200,
Frans Haarman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I see constant disk activity when using daemontools to
monitor qmail.
Is this bad for my hd ? Someone told me changes
of my disks dying with constat disk activity are
much higher!
If they are making noise
On Mon, 25 Sep 2000, Felix von Leitner wrote:
I see constant disk activity when using daemontools to
monitor qmail.
I don't.
Get yourself a real operating system where the disk cache actually
works. svscan does read-only accesses to /services or wherever you
configured it to look.
Andy Bradford wrote:
On Mon, 25 Sep 2000 16:33:21 +0200, "Frans Haarman" wrote:
I see constant disk activity when using daemontools to
monitor qmail.
It is possible that the programs being spawned are exiting, in which
case supervise will start another copy. This could be due to
On Mon, Sep 25, 2000 at 03:49:14PM -0600, Stephen Bosch wrote:
*sounds familiar*
Okay... my turn!
All together now...
"What do the logs say?"TM
(svscan ails silently... =) )
I recommend whoever it is that is doing the lovely qmail shirts (I'll be
ordering mine shortly!) should do
* Frans Haarman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Should I start using daemontools ?
Absolutely. You'll probably like multilog, too. And while you're at it,
also install ucspi-tcp. Basically, install everything written by DJ
Bernstein - the man is a living programming marvel.
--
Robin S. Socha
QBA [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've just installed daemontools on my linux. But I didn't find any
documentacion within it.
See:
ftp://koobera.math.uic.edu/www/daemontools.html
And to be honest with you I don't know what is this program about.
I thought that it is for qmail to better working
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm just curious if daemontools works under linux (my question
may occur to you stupid but I'd like to have certainty because
I read that it is only for unix).
Linux is functionally UNIX. It's only not-UNIX in a legal or genetic
sense.
And BTW what do I gain (or rather
On Tue, Sep 05, 2000 at 09:13:14PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I'm just curious if daemontools works under linux (my question
may occur to you stupid but I'd like to have certainty because
I read that it is only for unix). And BTW what do I gain (or rather
my linux) from having
Searching google for "upgrading daemontools", I found this:
http://cr.yp.to/daemontools/upgrade.html
Dunno how much that will help you, but good luck. :)
Chad
-Original Message-
From: Mike Perks [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 06, 2000 11:57 AM
To: Qmail Mail List
On Thu, 02 Mar 2000 16:33:11 -0500,
clifford thurber [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
C I am installing the daemontools package and reading the docs. I was
C wondering if anyone is using this to monitor other services besides
C qmail and if so anyone had any recomendations on configurations.
I'm
Grier Ellis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
First, let me say thanks to Dave for _Life with qmail_!
You're welcome, as is everyone else who's taken the time to thank me
for it. (I don't always have the time to "welcome" everyone who thanks
me.)
But (oh, here comes the good part :-):,
There's always
net@ncal verio com [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
So I was in this situation for about three days, when this morning I
found an error log being echoed to the console non-stop, every second.
The error was:
Feb 17 21:03:45 www kernel: scsi0: MEDIUM ERROR on channel 0, id 0, lun
0, CDB: Read (10)
Jeremy Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
So I'm using multilog and qmailanalog. I did some searching on the mail
list and found some scripts that do the hex conversion, etc, but I'm
seeing somewhat strange results anyway. All my time signatures change
each time I run the logs through the
Jeremy Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I now have time stamps, so really all I need to do is call tai64nfrac
through matchup, right?
Works For Me (tm). :)
--
Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) URL:http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/
Frederik Lindberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
What do you do with fd5 (man matchup)?
if [ -s qlog.deferred ] ; then
cat qlog.deferred "$1" | tai64nfrac | matchup qlog 5 qlog.deferred
else
tai64nfrac "$1" | matchup qlog 5 qlog.deferred
fi
--
Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Jeremy Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
cat tmp | tai64n | ./tai64n2time | /usr/local/qmailanalog/bin/matchup |
As Russ Allbery pointed out, you should be timestamping the log
entries at the time they occur. But I couldn't let the egregious use
of "cat" go by...
cat file | prog ...
is
Ok, this part I don't understand. I'm using the t option, yet in my long
I see no timestamp at all. Tmp is just a sample output from multilog.
Are you saying that tai64n should be used at logging? Perhaps you could
give me an example that would better clarify this for me.
Thanks
-jeremy
Jeremy Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Ok, this part I don't understand. I'm using the t option, yet in my
long I see no timestamp at all. Tmp is just a sample output from
multilog.
What does your multilog command line look like? Order of actions is
significant.
--
Russ Allbery ([EMAIL
At 12:47 AM 27/1/2000 +0100, you wrote:
At 03:22 PM 26/1/2000 -0800, Bill Rogers wrote:
Installing qmail and thought it would be a breeze just
to install daemontools and use old scripts. WRONG.
Could someone point me to some standard qmail-* scripts
using daemontools .61
I wouldn't call them
At 03:22 PM 26/1/2000 -0800, Bill Rogers wrote:
Installing qmail and thought it would be a breeze just
to install daemontools and use old scripts. WRONG.
Could someone point me to some standard qmail-* scripts
using daemontools .61
I wouldn't call them 'standard', but I've been working on
some
LWQ has some very handy examples of how to use daemontools:
http://Web.InfoAve.Net/~dsill/lwq.html
jon
At 12:47 AM +0100 1/27/00, Vincent Schonau wrote:
At 03:22 PM 26/1/2000 -0800, Bill Rogers wrote:
Installing qmail and thought it would be a breeze just
to install daemontools and use old
On Fri, Dec 31, 1999 at 10:37:43AM +0100, Van Liedekerke Franky wrote:
No. You have to pass the logs through some type of filter which converts
the hex timestamps into decimal. Strip out the leading "@4" from the
timestamp, then convert the next 15 digits into decimal, and it'll give
you the
Here's a quick hack:
#!/usr/local/bin/perl
while () {
if (my($s,$t,$rest)=/^\@.(\w{15})(\w{8})(.*)/) {
$s = hex($s);
$t = hex($t); $t =~ s/500$//;
$_ = "$s.$t$rest\n";
}
} continue {
print;
}
"B. Engineer" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi:
I have moved over to deamontools 0.61 but cannot logging to work
as DJB intended.
...
and I have made a directory/file called ./log/run that has
exec setuidgid qmaill /local/bin/multilog t s9900 n20 /var/log/qmail
but when I run
Derek Harkness [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there any real advantage to upgrading to daemontools = 0.60? I'm
using 0.53 now which is working great.
0.61 is "better" than 0.53, but, as you say, 0.53 works great. If you
have 0.53 installed, configured, and running, I wouldn't recommend
switching
On Thu, Sep 30, 1999 at 11:01:10AM -0400, Dave Sill wrote:
One downside to 0.61 is that its tai65n timestamps are incompatible
with qmailanalog.
Just for info: I use the following to make 0.61 work with qmailanalog-0.70:
(
test -f pending cat pending
(
cd
Patrick Berry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
daemontools have moved up a version. Since LWQ is written for use
with 0.53 and I found it easier to grab an rpm of daeomontools, but
still do the regular qmail source install.
Daemontools 0.53 is still available from koobera using the link in
LWQ:
"Timothy L. Mayo" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's at ftp://koobera.math.uic.edu/www/daemontools/daemontools-0.53.tar.gz
You will most likely need to use an FTP tool instead of a web browser to
see it.
No, I've downloaded it with IE 5 and Navigator 4.61. Some browsers
have trouble navigating
I think you should read the man page for svscan and multilog. Then
you will come up with a better setup.
Mate
I believe your run files are messed up. Please post them.
On Thu, 2 Sep 1999, Tim Hunter wrote:
Has anyone successfully gotten daemontools 0.6x working perfectly with qmail?
I was able to make it mostly work, I think. I get it up and running, all
my processes start and log but it doesn't
At 02:49 PM 9/2/99 -0400, you wrote:
I believe your run files are messed up. Please post them.
from /etc/rc.d/init.d/qmail
echo -n "Starting qmail: qmail-send"
supervise /var/qmail/supervise/send | setuidgid qmaill multilog
/var/log/qmail
echo -n " qmail-smtpd"
supervise
Tim Hunter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
from /var/qmail/supervise/send/run
#!/bin/sh
# Using daemontools for logging
# Using control/defaultdelivery from qmail-local to deliver messages by default
exec env - PATH="/var/qmail/bin:$PATH" \
qmail-start "`cat /var/qmail/control/defaultdelivery`" |
hanging around in a binary RPM on Mate W.'s site... either it's OK or
Dan doesn't care enough...
Well, Dan is not the software police. In any case, I have not been
able to find any notes on mess822's distribution. Where is it?
Mate
On Fri, 20 Aug 1999, Greg Hudson wrote:
the daemontools binaries are included, they are, like all DJB
software other than Qmail itself, under PD (not GPL).
Public domain would mean you can do anything you want with it. You
can't; in particular, you are not allowed to distribute
On Fri, 20 Aug 1999, Russell Nelson wrote:
Other products are in the public domain (e.g. cdb or checkpassword).
And other products are simply copyrighted with NO permission to
redistribute granted at all (e.g. mess822, or libtai).
umm, isn't libtai part of the cyclog package as it is? and
I just extend the fairly clearly described qmail license to the other
djb products: a binary distribution which installs the same as if it
was compiled (unpatched) from the tarball, and it behaves the same can be
distributed w/o getting djb's personal permission.
I do not see any problem Kevin
the daemontools binaries are included, they are, like all DJB
software other than Qmail itself, under PD (not GPL).
Public domain would mean you can do anything you want with it. You
can't; in particular, you are not allowed to distribute derivative
works other than precompiled var-qmail
Kevin Waterson writes:
Ira Abramov wrote:
readme files in the packages or on DJB's site. Russ? could there be a
little note about licensing on qmail.org? it's very confusing to a lot of
people, especially now that GPL is in the news, it should be strictly
mentioned on the page
For *qmail*. See the Subject of this message.
Yeah, sorry about that.
Some of the reasoning in my message remains valid (lack of a license
is not an indication of public domain status), but of course the
specific facts were irrelevant.
Ira Abramov [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
the daemontools binaries are included, they are, like all DJB software
other than Qmail itself, under PD (not GPL).
I'm fairly sure that Dan's software is not in the public domain. It
requires a specific and explicit statement by the author to place
Ira Abramov wrote:
readme files in the packages or on DJB's site. Russ? could there be a
little note about licensing on qmail.org? it's very confusing to a lot of
people, especially now that GPL is in the news, it should be strictly
mentioned on the page that Qmail and friends are not.
This
Chris Garrigues writes:
Where do I dig up info on daemontools? I can't find any links on either
www.qmail.org or djb's qmail page.
See, that's the problem with your kind of people -- you just don't
look *hard* enough (and while you're at it, don't look at the
last-modified date on the page
From: Russell Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 14 May 1999 14:15:58 -
See, that's the problem with your kind of people -- you just don't
look *hard* enough (and while you're at it, don't look at the
last-modified date on the page either).
How could I have been so stupid. You'd think
"Chris Garrigues" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Where do I dig up info on daemontools? I can't find any links on either
www.qmail.org or djb's qmail page.
See http://Web.InfoAve.Net/~dsill/lwq.html#daemontools
-Dave
Thanks. That did the trick.
--George
On Sat, 27 Mar 1999, Keith Burdis wrote:
On Thu 1999-03-25 (14:45), [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi there,
I know it's a little bit off the topic of this list. Please accept my
apology here. I just try to find out anybody out there has ever tried this
On Thu 1999-03-25 (14:45), [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi there,
I know it's a little bit off the topic of this list. Please accept my
apology here. I just try to find out anybody out there has ever tried this
combination before.
Here is the script to start the daemon:
#! /bin/sh
70 matches
Mail list logo
