Re: RES: [qmailadmin] QmailAdmin 1.2.0 (final) released as stable

2004-01-30 Thread Eero Volotinen
Tom Collins wrote: On Jan 29, 2004, at 6:07 PM, Piotr M. Pierzak wrote: I have the same problem Slackware 9.1 with GNU Make 3.80 Start with a fresh copy. `touch Makefile.in` and then try to build. If that doesn't work, start again, `touch *` and then try to build. How about repack

RES: RES: [qmailadmin] QmailAdmin 1.2.0 (final) released as stable

2004-01-30 Thread Orlando Gentil
janeiro de 2004 00:44 Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Assunto: Re: RES: [qmailadmin] QmailAdmin 1.2.0 (final) released as stable On Jan 29, 2004, at 6:07 PM, Piotr M. Pierzak wrote: I have the same problem Slackware 9.1 with GNU Make 3.80 Start with a fresh copy. `touch Makefile.in` and then try to build

Re: RES: [qmailadmin] QmailAdmin 1.2.0 (final) released as stable

2004-01-30 Thread Tom Collins
On Jan 30, 2004, at 12:44 AM, Eero Volotinen wrote: Tom Collins wrote: On Jan 29, 2004, at 6:07 PM, Piotr M. Pierzak wrote: I have the same problem Slackware 9.1 with GNU Make 3.80 Start with a fresh copy. `touch Makefile.in` and then try to build. If that doesn't work, start again, `touch *`

Re: [qmailadmin] QmailAdmin 1.2.0 (final) released as stable

2004-01-30 Thread Oden Eriksson
fredagen den 30 januari 2004 15.54 skrev Tom Collins: On Jan 30, 2004, at 5:03 AM, Orlando Gentil wrote: qmailadmin.c:38:21: vlimits.h: Arquivo ou diretorio nao encontrado ==Just a note ==qmailadmin.c:38:21: vlimits.h: File or Dir not found== qmailadmin.c:73: error: storage size of `Limits'

RE: [qmailadmin] QmailAdmin 1.2.0 (final) released as stable

2004-01-29 Thread Ulrik S. Kofod
Tom Collins wrote: http://qmailadmin.sf.net/ This is it! The first stable release since June 2002, the culmination of a long development cycle. snip I get an error when making 1.2.0 stable: make cd . \ /bin/sh /usr/src/mail/qmailadmin-1.2.0/missing --run automake --gnu Makefile

RE: [qmailadmin] QmailAdmin 1.2.0 (final) released as stable

2004-01-29 Thread qmailadmin
Ulrik S. Kofod wrote: Tom Collins wrote: http://qmailadmin.sf.net/ This is it! The first stable release since June 2002, the culmination of a long development cycle. snip I get an error when making 1.2.0 stable: make cd . \ /bin/sh /usr/src/mail/qmailadmin-1.2.0/missing --run

Re: [qmailadmin] QmailAdmin 1.2.0 (final) released as stable

2004-01-29 Thread Oden Eriksson
torsdagen den 29 januari 2004 08.47 skrev [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Tom Collins wrote: http://qmailadmin.sf.net/ This is it! The first stable release since June 2002, the culmination of a long development cycle. snip I get an error when making 1.2.0 stable: make cd . \ /bin/sh

Re: [qmailadmin] QmailAdmin 1.2.0 (final) released as stable

2004-01-29 Thread Oden Eriksson
torsdagen den 29 januari 2004 11.11 skrev [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Oden Eriksson wrote: torsdagen den 29 januari 2004 08.47 skrev [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Tom Collins wrote: http://qmailadmin.sf.net/ This is it! The first stable release since June 2002, the culmination of a long development

Re: [qmailadmin] QmailAdmin 1.2.0 (final) released as stable

2004-01-29 Thread Tom Collins
On Jan 29, 2004, at 12:47 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I get an error when making 1.2.0 stable: make cd . \ /bin/sh /usr/src/mail/qmailadmin-1.2.0/missing --run automake --gnu Makefile aclocal.m4: 95: `AM_PROG_INSTALL' is obsolete; use `AC_PROG_INSTALL' aclocal.m4: 96: `AM_PROG_INSTALL' is

RE: [qmailadmin] QmailAdmin 1.2.0 (final) released as stable

2004-01-29 Thread qmailadmin
Tom Collins wrote: On Jan 29, 2004, at 12:47 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I get an error when making 1.2.0 stable: make cd . \ /bin/sh /usr/src/mail/qmailadmin-1.2.0/missing --run automake --gnu Makefile aclocal.m4: 95: `AM_PROG_INSTALL' is obsolete; use `AC_PROG_INSTALL' aclocal.m4: 96:

RE: [qmailadmin] QmailAdmin 1.2.0 (final) released as stable

2004-01-29 Thread Ulrik S. Kofod
Well i tried it all. 1. With the same steps as always I get the errors as stated above. 2. With the suggestions from Ulrik S. Kofod I have succes! 3. With the suggestion from Tom to touch all I have succes! 4. With the suggestion from Tom to only touch Makefile.in I have succes! 5. With the

RE: [qmailadmin] QmailAdmin 1.2.0 (final) released as stable

2004-01-29 Thread qmailadmin
Ulrik S. Kofod wrote: Well i tried it all. 1. With the same steps as always I get the errors as stated above. 2. With the suggestions from Ulrik S. Kofod I have succes! 3. With the suggestion from Tom to touch all I have succes! 4. With the suggestion from Tom to only touch Makefile.in I

Re: [qmailadmin] QmailAdmin 1.2.0 (final) released as stable

2004-01-29 Thread Ken Jones
On Thursday 29 January 2004 9:29 am, Ulrik S. Kofod wrote: Well i tried it all. 1. With the same steps as always I get the errors as stated above. 2. With the suggestions from Ulrik S. Kofod I have succes! 3. With the suggestion from Tom to touch all I have succes! 4. With the

Re: [qmailadmin] QmailAdmin 1.2.0 (final) released as stable

2004-01-29 Thread Tom Collins
On Jan 29, 2004, at 9:30 AM, Ken Jones wrote: I used to do this before releasing a tar ball, to avoid any timing issues 1) ./configure 2) make (gets those errors) 3) make distclean then tar it up Then the next person to untar and configure won't get the messages. It's a timestamp issue on

Re: [qmailadmin] QmailAdmin 1.2.0 (final) released as stable

2004-01-29 Thread TigerPaw
- Original Message - From: Tom Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2004 12:58 AM Subject: [qmailadmin] QmailAdmin 1.2.0 (final) released as stable http://qmailadmin.sf.net/ This is it! The first stable release since June

Re: [qmailadmin] QmailAdmin 1.2.0 (final) released as stable

2004-01-29 Thread TigerPaw
- Original Message - From: TigerPaw [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2004 1:39 PM Subject: Re: [qmailadmin] QmailAdmin 1.2.0 (final) released as stable - Original Message - From: Tom Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED

RES: [qmailadmin] QmailAdmin 1.2.0 (final) released as stable

2004-01-29 Thread Orlando Gentil
Makefile:289: *** missing separator. Stop. Orlando -Mensagem original- De: Tom Collins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Enviada em: quinta-feira, 29 de janeiro de 2004 14:29 Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Assunto: Re: [qmailadmin] QmailAdmin 1.2.0 (final) released as stable On Jan 29, 2004, at 9

Re: RES: [qmailadmin] QmailAdmin 1.2.0 (final) released as stable

2004-01-29 Thread Piotr M. Pierzak
Uytkownik Orlando Gentil napisa: Hi all, I tried all steps. Combined or alone, but all ways gave me the same following error (for all combinations I used a fresh copy of qmaladmin-1.2) [EMAIL PROTECTED] qmailadmin-1.2.0]# make Makefile:289: *** faltando o separador. Pare. in English: [EMAIL

Re: RES: [qmailadmin] QmailAdmin 1.2.0 (final) released as stable

2004-01-29 Thread Tom Collins
On Jan 29, 2004, at 6:07 PM, Piotr M. Pierzak wrote: I have the same problem Slackware 9.1 with GNU Make 3.80 Start with a fresh copy. `touch Makefile.in` and then try to build. If that doesn't work, start again, `touch *` and then try to build. -- Tom Collins - [EMAIL PROTECTED] QmailAdmin:

[qmailadmin] QmailAdmin 1.2.0 (final) released as stable

2004-01-28 Thread Tom Collins
http://qmailadmin.sf.net/ This is it! The first stable release since June 2002, the culmination of a long development cycle. Note that this version of QmailAdmin requires version 5.4.0 of Vpopmail (currently in release-candidate status). It also includes a bugfix over 1.2.0-rc3 related to

RE: [qmailadmin] QmailAdmin 1.2.0 (final) released as stable

2004-01-28 Thread Don Walters
- Ability for postmaster to modify user quotas. Is it possible for system admins (i.e. me) to put a limit on the maximum space the postmaster can assign to an individual user? _ Check out the new MSN 9 Dial-up — fast reliable

RE: [qmailadmin] QmailAdmin 1.2.0 (final) released as stable

2004-01-28 Thread Ulrik S. Kofod
- Ability for postmaster to modify user quotas. Is it possible for system admins (i.e. me) to put a limit on the maximum space the postmaster can assign to an individual user? Shouldn't that be done in vqadmin ?