Hello folks!
I recently upgraded from an ancient QmailToaster to the latest
version, migrating to a new machine in the process. qtp-backup, qtp-
newmodel, and qtp-restore are *wonderful*. :)
Unfortunately, I now see an error every time I run simscanmk -g:
'LibClamAV Error: cl_cvdhead:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi All,
I'm currently running qmail on an old compaq dl 380 1st generation
server.
It's for a small factory with about 20 email accounts and runs basically
everything except the MS-SQL server.
I was looking at getting a used Dell Power Edge 2650 or 2850.
Does
Hmmm.. maybe I don't need a new server. But I want one!
My current server specs are 2 x 800mhz P3, 2gb RAM, 4x18gb RAID5 scsi2.
The I/O throughput on the RAID isn't the fastest. Backups take a long time,
because we use IMAP and use the server for mail storage.
Backup Start Time:
I attempted an update (via qtp-newmodel) last night, which errored
out on the spamassassin package (per earlier messages on the list). I
didn't think this would be a problem and had no reason to believe
this would affect the server. There were a few other packages that
were updated via
Quoting Roxanne Sandesara [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I need help to troubleshoot and correct this. Where can I find details
on /why/ an attempt to send a message is soft-rejected? qmlog
submission shows the following:
03-28 09:27:19 connect(): No such file or directory
There's your repetative
I would suggest:
http://outlet.us.dell.com/
Pick up a refurbished Dell 1950. They have dual hot-swappable power
supplies and hot-swappable RAID1 (make sure you get one with a RAID
controller) drives. If happen to find dual-CPUs, or even quad-core CPUs
in your price range, don't be afraid to
Mark Burlingame wrote:
Hmmm.. maybe I don't need a new server. But I want one!
Quite a bit of truth here. ;)
My current server specs are 2 x 800mhz P3, 2gb RAM, 4x18gb RAID5 scsi2.
The I/O throughput on the RAID isn't the fastest. Backups take a long time,
because we use IMAP and use the
The problem seems to come and go, with no rhyme or reason I can
figure out thus far.
There is nothing in qmlog send between 09:08 and 09:31, so nothing to
correspond with the connect() error below.
The SMTP log for the same approximate timeframe shows the following:
2008-03-28
Yes, you need it for more recent toaster versions (I don't recall when it
first came into play). I don't think it would hurt with older versions.
Put it in every line in your tcp.smtp file, rebuild the cdb, and see if that
doesn't fix things up.
Roxanne Sandesara wrote:
No. What I have is:
Hi All,
Just got a complaint from a client--someone tried to send them an email
and they got a 5.5.4 (5.5.3) invalid message content error.
Was this a SPAM or virus hit from SPAMD or CLAMD?
TIA,
--Duncan
-
OK. I've added that. Thus far, it does appear to have worked, but I
can't be sure if that's just the usual 'come and go' of this problem
or an actual honest-to-goodness solution.
On my own, personal toaster server, which I only installed a month
ago, fresh, this value was not added to the
Roxanne Sandesara wrote:
OK. I've added that. Thus far, it does appear to have worked, but I
can't be sure if that's just the usual 'come and go' of this problem or
an actual honest-to-goodness solution.
The later. IIRC the reason it appeared to be intermittent would be that it
only applies to
I've had to remove that rule, whatever it may apply do. No one was
able to send email. Not one of the email clients in-house (Outlook,
Entourage, or Mac Mail) could send with that enabled. Once I removed
it, everyone was fine.
But now I'm getting reports from users of emails that are not
The messages that are not coming through (that I can confirm were
sent) appear to be bouncing back and forth between the sender's mail
server(s) and ours:
cat /var/log/qmail/smtp/current | tai64nlocal | grep senders-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | more
2008-03-28 14:52:12.420736500 CHKUSER accepted
Roxanne Sandesara wrote:
The messages that are not coming through (that I can confirm were
sent) appear to be bouncing back and forth between the sender's mail
server(s) and ours:
What does top show during these times? Is clam taking all the CPU?
It's the most frequent customer at the top, along with the sa-learn
and spamd processes. But it's not just pegged at the top and staying
there.
On Mar 28, 2008, at 4:44 PM, Jake Vickers wrote:
Roxanne Sandesara wrote:
The messages that are not coming through (that I can confirm were
sent)
Roxanne Sandesara wrote:
It's the most frequent customer at the top, along with the sa-learn
and spamd processes. But it's not just pegged at the top and staying
there.
Are you getting any errors in the clam or spamd logs?
For giggles, try manually rebuilding and reinstalling clamav, then do
Jake --
Is there a way that I can poke and prod at the sandbox functions of
qtp such that it would agree to rebuild each of the relevant packages
and then apply them? Or is that wishful thinking on my part?
Roxanne
FYI: No errors in either clamd or spamd logs. But a lot more positive
You can run the qtp-build-sandbox command from the command line. This will
build the old style sandbox, not unionfs. Then you can chroot to the sandbox
and do whatever trips your trigger (for the most part). ;) Whatever you do
inside of the chroot'd tree will not touch the running server. You can
19 matches
Mail list logo
