Re: [qmailtoaster] Spamdyke

2009-09-28 Thread Aleksander Podsiadly
W dniu 28.09.2009 07:51, Aleksander Podsiadly pisze: [...] Check configuration of DNS on your server. Probably your server can't resolve name from IP. Example from smtp log: 2009-09-28 11:34:17.730211500 spamdyke[2778]: DENIED_RDNS_MISSING from: moon...@gmail.com to: wie...@maximumlist.com

Re: [qmailtoaster] Spamdyke

2009-09-28 Thread Eric Shubert
Aleksander Podsiadly wrote: W dniu 28.09.2009 06:02, Maxwell Smart pisze: I think this is what your looking for (/var/log/qmail/smtp/). Even with this origin IP in the whitelist_ip it doesn't work, or in the whitelist_rdns. @40004abf75d32e6d5294 spamdyke[19048]: DENIED_RDNS_MISSING

[qmailtoaster] re: mail is looping

2009-09-28 Thread Maxwell Smart
I have one account that if I send an e mail to it bounces with this error. mail is looping Other accounts to this same domain are fine, and the user of the account can send and receive mail. What could cause this and how is it remedied.

Re: [qmailtoaster] Spamdyke

2009-09-28 Thread Maxwell Smart
I have done some testing and found that it does not resolve as expected. If I change my option in my named.conf file to recursion yes; it then works. From what I have read I don't want to have it set up that way. What is reason not to have recursion set to yes? Aleksander Podsiadly wrote:

[qmailtoaster] queue not porcessed

2009-09-28 Thread Lucian Cristian
-toaster-0.53.324-1.3.6 spamassassin-toaster-3.2.5-1.3.17 maildrop-toaster-2.0.3-1.3.8 vqadmin-toaster-2.3.4-1.3.6 maildrop-toaster-devel-2.0.3-1.3.8 Regards Lucian __ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 4465 (20090928) __ The message

Re: [qmailtoaster] Spamdyke

2009-09-28 Thread Bharath Chari
Eric Shubert wrote: Aleksander Podsiadly wrote: 8-- my test [a...@alexia ~]$ host 207.115.36.143 143.36.115.207.in-addr.arpa domain name pointer nlpi129.sbcis.sbc.com. [a...@alexia ~]$ host -t mx yother.com yother.com mail is handled by 10 mail.yother.com. [a...@alexia ~]$ host mail.yother.com

Re: [qmailtoaster] queue not porcessed

2009-09-28 Thread Jake Vickers
Lucian Cristian wrote: Hi everyone I have problems with the queue on to different systems, the queue will not be processed as soon as possible, there is some lag, if a do a qmailqtl restart the mails will be processed if not I have to wait a random time I've read about qmail silly syndrome

Re: [qmailtoaster] queue not porcessed

2009-09-28 Thread Maxwell Smart
Any ideas what caused this yet? Jake Vickers wrote: Lucian Cristian wrote: Hi everyone I have problems with the queue on to different systems, the queue will not be processed as soon as possible, there is some lag, if a do a qmailqtl restart the mails will be processed if not I have to wait

Re: [qmailtoaster] queue not porcessed

2009-09-28 Thread Lucian Cristian
, and packages. To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com __ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 4465 (20090928) __ The message

Re: [qmailtoaster] Spamdyke

2009-09-28 Thread Maxwell Smart
Bharath Chari wrote: Eric Shubert wrote: Aleksander Podsiadly wrote: 8-- my test [a...@alexia ~]$ host 207.115.36.143 143.36.115.207.in-addr.arpa domain name pointer nlpi129.sbcis.sbc.com. [a...@alexia ~]$ host -t mx yother.com yother.com mail is handled by 10 mail.yother.com.

Re: [qmailtoaster] queue not porcessed

2009-09-28 Thread Lucian Cristian
...@qmailtoaster.com __ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 4465 (20090928) __ The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. http://www.eset.com __ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database

Re: [qmailtoaster] queue not porcessed

2009-09-28 Thread Maxwell Smart
For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com __ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 4465 (20090928) __ The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. http://www.eset.com __ Information from

Re: [qmailtoaster] queue not porcessed

2009-09-28 Thread Jake Vickers
Maxwell Smart wrote: Any ideas what caused this yet? Some suspicions and we're investigating further. - Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group (www.vickersconsulting.com) Vickers Consulting

Re: [qmailtoaster] Spamdyke

2009-09-28 Thread Aleksander Podsiadly
W dniu 28.09.2009 19:18, Maxwell Smart pisze: [...] What is reason not to have recursion set to yes? Security! -- Pozdrawiam / Regards, Aleksander Podsiadły mail: a...@westside.kielce.pl jid: a...@jabber.westside.kielce.pl ICQ: 201121279 gg: 9150578

Re: [qmailtoaster] Spamdyke

2009-09-28 Thread Maxwell Smart
That's what I thought. I think I have a couple of things I need to sort out with my DNS. I may have to separate my DNS server from my web/mail server even though it's only a slave server. Aleksander Podsiadly wrote: W dniu 28.09.2009 19:18, Maxwell Smart pisze: [...] What is reason not to

Re: [qmailtoaster] Spamdyke

2009-09-28 Thread Aleksander Podsiadly
W dniu 28.09.2009 16:31, Eric Shubert pisze: I concur. Presuming you have 127.0.0.1 as the first line in your /etc/resolv.conf, what does # dig @127.0.0.1 -x 207.115.36.143 give you? You should use whatever nameserver address is listed first in your toaster's /etc/resolv.conf file. I have

Re: [qmailtoaster] Spamdyke

2009-09-28 Thread Aleksander Podsiadly
W dniu 28.09.2009 19:46, Maxwell Smart pisze: [...] I may have to separate my DNS server from my web/mail server even though it's only a slave server. What for? I have all services on one server and all works fine. -- Pozdrawiam / Regards, Aleksander Podsiadły mail:

Re: [qmailtoaster] Spamdyke

2009-09-28 Thread Maxwell Smart
OK, that's what I want to do. I have just heard and read it's not a good idea. I have been running it that way and it's been working fine. I am just trying to implement the caching nameserver. I don't really need to go through this exercise, since it worked just fine before and I could easily

Re: [qmailtoaster] queue not porcessed

2009-09-28 Thread Eric Shubert
We're guessing here, but it's possible that qmail didn't terminate successfully (or cleanly) when the update was actually done. qtp-newmodel presently simply waits 5 seconds then displays the result of qmailctl stat. Does anyone happen to remember seeing anything other than 'not running',

Re: [qmailtoaster] Spamdyke

2009-09-28 Thread Aleksander Podsiadly
W dniu 28.09.2009 20:10, Maxwell Smart pisze: [...] Are you running a caching nameserver on yours? Yes I am. package: caching-nameserver FIles from /etc: /etc/named.caching-nameserver.conf /etc/named.conf /etc/named.rfc1912.zones -- Pozdrawiam / Regards, Aleksander Podsiadły mail:

Re: [qmailtoaster] Spamdyke

2009-09-28 Thread Maxwell Smart
What are the options in your named.conf file? Aleksander Podsiadly wrote: W dniu 28.09.2009 20:10, Maxwell Smart pisze: [...] Are you running a caching nameserver on yours? Yes I am. package: caching-nameserver FIles from /etc: /etc/named.caching-nameserver.conf /etc/named.conf

Re: [qmailtoaster] Spamdyke

2009-09-28 Thread Eric Shubert
Aleksander Podsiadly wrote: W dniu 28.09.2009 16:31, Eric Shubert pisze: I concur. Presuming you have 127.0.0.1 as the first line in your /etc/resolv.conf, what does # dig @127.0.0.1 -x 207.115.36.143 give you? You should use whatever nameserver address is listed first in your toaster's

Re: [qmailtoaster] Spamdyke

2009-09-28 Thread Aleksander Podsiadly
W dniu 28.09.2009 20:22, Maxwell Smart pisze: What are the options in your named.conf file? Standard options from caching name server. This file was unchanged many years. Only my server and secondary DNS can read all recursive. No one more. 8-- /etc/named.conf -

Re: [qmailtoaster] Spamdyke

2009-09-28 Thread Aleksander Podsiadly
W dniu 28.09.2009 20:37, Eric Shubert pisze: Alexsander, Max is trying to configure bind to be both authoritative secondary and caching nameserver on his toaster host. Can you help him with that? It's trivial when you know it, but prone to error when you don't. ;) As for myself, I'm don't

Re: [qmailtoaster] Spamdyke

2009-09-28 Thread Eric Shubert
Aleksander Podsiadly wrote: W dniu 28.09.2009 20:37, Eric Shubert pisze: Alexsander, Max is trying to configure bind to be both authoritative secondary and caching nameserver on his toaster host. Can you help him with that? It's trivial when you know it, but prone to error when you don't.

Re: [qmailtoaster] Spamdyke

2009-09-28 Thread Maxwell Smart
I agree to a certain point to. Originally my question was why doesn't Spamdyke allow those addresses in my whitelist's Even if I have the pacbell address in the whitelist. According to the documentation this should allow these through the filter, regardless of my DNS configuration. Eric

[qmailtoaster] re: mail is looping

2009-09-28 Thread Maxwell Smart
Eric, Any ideas on this? I have deleted the account and still get the same message. I have one account that if I send an e mail to it bounces with this error. mail is looping Other accounts to this same domain are fine, and the user of the account can send and receive mail. What could cause

Re: [qmailtoaster] re: mail is looping

2009-09-28 Thread Jake Vickers
Maxwell Smart wrote: Eric, Any ideas on this? I have deleted the account and still get the same message. I have one account that if I send an e mail to it bounces with this error. mail is looping Other accounts to this same domain are fine, and the user of the account can send and receive

Re: [qmailtoaster] re: mail is looping

2009-09-28 Thread Maxwell Smart
There is no directory or .qmail file. I created a new user i...@examplec.com and when I send a message to that account it comes back with the looping message to the account that was deleted. CJ Jake Vickers wrote: Maxwell Smart wrote: Eric, Any ideas on this? I have deleted the account and

Re: [qmailtoaster] Spamdyke

2009-09-28 Thread Eric Shubert
No, spamdyke uses DNS extensively, so broken DNS leads to broken spamdyke. Maxwell Smart wrote: I agree to a certain point to. Originally my question was why doesn't Spamdyke allow those addresses in my whitelist's Even if I have the pacbell address in the whitelist. According to the

Re: [qmailtoaster] re: mail is looping

2009-09-28 Thread Jake Vickers
Maxwell Smart wrote: There is no directory or .qmail file. I created a new user i...@examplec.com and when I send a message to that account it comes back with the looping message to the account that was deleted. If there is no directory how is it supposed to deliver mail?

Re: [qmailtoaster] Spamdyke

2009-09-28 Thread Aleksander Podsiadly
W dniu 28.09.2009 21:33, Maxwell Smart pisze: I agree to a certain point to. Originally my question was why doesn't Spamdyke allow those addresses in my whitelist's Even if I have the pacbell address in the whitelist. According to the documentation this should allow these through the filter,

Re: [qmailtoaster] re: mail is looping

2009-09-28 Thread Eric Shubert
I'm sorry Max, but you're not providing enough information for me to even hazard a guess. Maxwell Smart wrote: There is no directory or .qmail file. I created a new user i...@examplec.com and when I send a message to that account it comes back with the looping message to the account that was

Re: [qmailtoaster] re: mail is looping

2009-09-28 Thread Maxwell Smart
I am sending it to the account that I just created (i...@example.com) and it's showing the address (maill...@example.com) that no longer exists in the header. Hi. This is the qmail-send program at laetitia.area510.net. I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver your message to the following addresses.

Re: [qmailtoaster] Spamdyke

2009-09-28 Thread Eric Shubert
That is explained quite thoroughly in the documentation. Maxwell Smart wrote: Yes, but doesn't it process the whitelist first? Eric Shubert wrote: No, spamdyke uses DNS extensively, so broken DNS leads to broken spamdyke. Maxwell Smart wrote: I agree to a certain point to. Originally my

Re: [qmailtoaster] re: mail is looping

2009-09-28 Thread Jake Vickers
Maxwell Smart wrote: I am sending it to the account that I just created (i...@example.com) and it's showing the address (maill...@example.com) that no longer exists in the header. Hi. This is the qmail-send program at laetitia.area510.net. I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver your message to the

Re: [qmailtoaster] Spamdyke

2009-09-28 Thread Maxwell Smart
OK, I'll go through it in more detail. Once I get the DNS working the way I want. I am sure it's blatantly apparent and simple. Thanks for all your help and time. Eric Shubert wrote: That is explained quite thoroughly in the documentation. Maxwell Smart wrote: Yes, but doesn't it process

Re: [qmailtoaster] re: mail is looping

2009-09-28 Thread Maxwell Smart
I sent an e mail to maill...@example.com. It was returned with permanent errors maill...@example.com mail is looping I then deleted the account and added a new account i...@example.com Now, when I send a message to i...@example.com it comes back with a message in the header. Hi. This is the

Re: [qmailtoaster] re: mail is looping

2009-09-28 Thread Maxwell Smart
Jake Vickers wrote: Maxwell Smart wrote: I am sending it to the account that I just created (i...@example.com) and it's showing the address (maill...@example.com) that no longer exists in the header. Hi. This is the qmail-send program at laetitia.area510.net. I'm afraid I wasn't able to

Re: [qmailtoaster] Spamdyke

2009-09-28 Thread Maxwell Smart
Yes, but doesn't it process the whitelist first? Eric Shubert wrote: No, spamdyke uses DNS extensively, so broken DNS leads to broken spamdyke. Maxwell Smart wrote: I agree to a certain point to. Originally my question was why doesn't Spamdyke allow those addresses in my whitelist's Even

Re: [qmailtoaster] re: mail is looping

2009-09-28 Thread Eric Shubert
You need to be more specific, including how you did what. Maxwell Smart wrote: I sent an e mail to maill...@example.com. It was returned with permanent errors maill...@example.com mail is looping I then deleted the account and added a new account i...@example.com Now, when I send a message

Re: [qmailtoaster] queue not porcessed

2009-09-28 Thread Lucian Cristian
it was a clean shutdown in my case, I don't know what happened, anyway now it's ok Regards Lucian Eric Shubert wrote: We're guessing here, but it's possible that qmail didn't terminate successfully (or cleanly) when the update was actually done. qtp-newmodel presently simply waits 5 seconds

Re: [qmailtoaster] re: mail is looping

2009-09-28 Thread Maxwell Smart
I figured it out. There was a forward that was causing the message below. This does not explain why it started looping to begin with. Luckily the account that started looping to begin with was relatively new and not much grief in deleting it and re creating it. This is where the forward was

Re: [qmailtoaster] Spamdyke

2009-09-28 Thread Maxwell Smart
I have been reading until my eyes bleed, but it's nice to have someone to bounce a question off from time to time. Especially when you think you finally understand what's going on only to find you're still in the dark. DNS on it's own is enough to keep anyone occupied full time and never really

Re: [qmailtoaster] queue not porcessed

2009-09-28 Thread Eric Shubert
Thanks Lucian. We still don't know for sure how the queues became borked. Nothing in that area has changed that we know of. At any rate, if anyone experiences delayed deliveries after an update, the thing to do would be to stop qmail and run the queue_repair.py tool. It would be helpful if

Re: [qmailtoaster] queue not porcessed

2009-09-28 Thread Lucian Cristian
I don't have it anymore, but socket file trigger from queue/lock was missing and permissions on some files Lucian Eric Shubert wrote: Thanks Lucian. We still don't know for sure how the queues became borked. Nothing in that area has changed that we know of. At any rate, if anyone

Re: [qmailtoaster] queue not porcessed

2009-09-28 Thread Maxwell Smart
Is the queue_repair logged? If so I can forward it to you. Tell me what file you want. Eric Shubert wrote: Thanks Lucian. We still don't know for sure how the queues became borked. Nothing in that area has changed that we know of. At any rate, if anyone experiences delayed deliveries

Re: [qmailtoaster] queue not porcessed

2009-09-28 Thread Eric Shubert
No, it simply sends output to the terminal. I suppose that a customized version for QTP which would tee off a log file automatically would be nice. That would be pretty simple to do with a script wrapper. Would anyone like to take a shot at writing a qtp-queue-repair script that would do

Re: [qmailtoaster] queue not porcessed

2009-09-28 Thread Jake Vickers
Lucian Cristian wrote: I don't have it anymore, but socket file trigger from queue/lock was missing and permissions on some files Same here on one I fixed for someone this morning. No such file or directory: queue/lock/trigger I'll look at the last changes in the spec file a little more in

Re: [qmailtoaster] queue not porcessed

2009-09-28 Thread Eric Shubert
Jake Vickers wrote: Lucian Cristian wrote: I don't have it anymore, but socket file trigger from queue/lock was missing and permissions on some files Same here on one I fixed for someone this morning. No such file or directory: queue/lock/trigger I'll look at the last changes in the spec

[qmailtoaster] log archives (organized by date)

2009-09-28 Thread mailing
How can I change the logging archive from @40004ab8c72813286564.s to filename.month.day.year.log ? Thanks , Manny

Re: [qmailtoaster] log archives (organized by date)

2009-09-28 Thread Jake Vickers
mailing wrote: How can I change the logging archive from @40004ab8c72813286564.s to filename.month.day.year.log ? Thanks , Manny If you install Qmailtoaster-Plus (http://qtp.qmailtoaster.com) then you can just: qmlog smtp or qmlog send Or whatever log you're wanting to view. If you