Yes I have since evidences thats why I'm looking for solution.
Amit
At Sunday, 15-08-2010 on 5:30 Eric Shubert wrote:
Have you seen evidence of such, or are you speculating?
--
-Eric 'shubes'
Amit Dalia wrote:
> This might be the bad solution but my basic concern is that I don't
want
> any ot
But I am using horde groupware webmail not squirrelmail...
Do you know the setting require in horde config to enable authentication.
Thanks,
Suhag Desai.
-Original Message-
From: Eric Shubert [mailto:e...@shubes.net]
Sent: Sunday, August 15, 2010 9:08 AM
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaste
On 8/14/2010 10:56 PM, Jake Vickers wrote:
On 08/14/2010 11:42 PM, David Milholen wrote:
I dont like answering my self but just wanted to post an update on
this.
I retried the backup/restore and all seemed to be restored perfectly
this time.
Accept vqadmin is broke when viewing domains. It w
On 08/14/2010 11:42 PM, David Milholen wrote:
I dont like answering my self but just wanted to post an update on this.
I retried the backup/restore and all seemed to be restored perfectly
this time.
Accept vqadmin is broke when viewing domains. It will only see one
which is the most recent on
I dont like answering my self but just wanted to post an update on this.
I retried the backup/restore and all seemed to be restored perfectly
this time.
Accept vqadmin is broke when viewing domains. It will only see one which
is the most recent one
I submitted.
The other domains have been wit
Aha, so it *is* RELAYCLIENT that's causing your problem.
For squirrelmail (webmail), you'll need to get rid of the 127.: line in
your tcp.smtp file, and add lines to SM configuration to make it
authenticate. Here's what I think you need to add in
/etc/squirrelmail/config_local.php:
$smtpServ
Which client pgm are you testing with?
I'm guessing here, but perhaps the RELAYCLIENT parameter is bypassing
authentication, thus the message isn't authenticated, thus it isn't
scanned. IOW, RELAYCLIENT *might* bypass scanning regardless. That is
not consistent with the fact that you say attac
Thanks Eric, Amit and Jack...
My Mail scanning is also working started. I have posted file setting in
previous mail.
But what about the user who send the mail through web based, as still SA and
simscan is not able to detect mail which are sent through web based ???
Many Thanks,
Suhag.
-Orig
Hi,
Please find below tcp.smtp file.
I always done qmailctl cdb after any change made in tcp.smtp. Please
remember my attachment scanning is working ok.
[r...@spd ~]# cat /etc/tcprules.d/tcp.smtp
127.:allow,RELAYCLIENT="",QMAILQUEUE="/var/qmail/bin/simscan",DKSIGN="/var/q
mail/control/domainkeys/
Have you seen evidence of such, or are you speculating?
--
-Eric 'shubes'
Amit Dalia wrote:
This might be the bad solution but my basic concern is that I don't want
any other email id or any other email server should be able to send mail
by just using my server as Smart Host.
For example: right
Last time I notified intensive dictionary attack on mail servers from
many IP's. For example:
Aug 14 10:19:21 srv vpopmail[4345]: vchkpw-smtp: vpopmail user not found
admin@:68.115.208.106
Aug 14 12:19:49 srv vpopmail[26126]: vchkpw-smtp: vpopmail user not
found mickey@:69.178.165.154
Aug 14 14:29:
from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
signature database 5367 (20100814) __
The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
http://www.eset.com
-
Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers C
admin working properly (once again).
It's been broken for quite some time.
I wrote the fix to qmailtoaster-devel list, please check there
Regards
Lucian
__ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature
database 5367 (20100814) __
The message was check
This might be the bad solution but my basic concern is that I don't
want any other email id or any other email server should be able to
send mail by just using my server as Smart Host.
For example: right now from current QMT configuration any email id
assume a...@xyz.com can send mail from my serve
I don't know of a way to do this with QMT (which isn't to say it can't
be done).
I understand your concern, but this restriction doesn't sit well with
me. I think it's a bad solution to the problem you're trying to address.
I think it would be better to change compromised passwords. Also be su
Hi Eric,
I don't think so eMPF can do this. Basically it should not allow
other user to send mail or it should do some thing like google smart
host i.e. from id in headers should automatically replace by
authenticated email id while delivering mail to reciepient.
If this patch is done then it can
Amit Dalia wrote:
Hi Everyone,
How do I restrict use of my server as a Smart Host? I don't want any
other domain which is not hosted on my QMT server should able to send
mail using authentication from my QMT i.e. From Email Id and
Authentication Email Id should be same. And if both are diffe
Hi Everyone,
How do I restrict use of my server as a Smart Host? I don't want any
other domain which is not hosted on my QMT server should able to send
mail using authentication from my QMT i.e. From Email Id and
Authentication Email Id should be same. And if both are different
then it should not
Good going on the LDAP build, Amit.
Please post this question on the (upstream) vpopmail list (see
http://www.inter7.com/index.php?page=vpopmail). The people there, Matt
Brookings in particular, are the most knowledgeable about this.
It'd be nice if we could get vqadmin working properly (once
Hi Everyone,
I had just compiled and installed vpopmail 5.5.0 with LDAP support from
source package. Now when I'm trying to install vqadmin it is giving error.
I'm installing vqadmin from source package.
1) Output of "./configure --enable-cgibindir=/var/www/cgi-bin
--enable-qmaildir=/var/qmail --e
20 matches
Mail list logo
