RE: [qmailtoaster] Re: clamav patch update issue

2019-06-18 Thread Biju Jose | WHITES Systems
Check the repo from where you are updating clamav. Best regards Biju Jose From: ChandranManikandan [mailto:kand...@gmail.com] Sent: 19 June 2019 10:52 To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Subject: [qmailtoaster] Re: clamav patch update issue Hi Friends, Anyone facing the similar

[qmailtoaster] Re: clamav patch update issue

2019-06-18 Thread ChandranManikandan
Hi Friends, Anyone facing the similar issue? I have tried to update clamav with the below commands, after preparing it was struck the screen then i do ctl c then i run freshclam command it showing latest one. but the email was not going then i do simcontrol file clam=no, then it was going. Could

Re: [qmailtoaster] TLS reason: 503_MAIL_first_(#5.5.1)

2019-06-18 Thread Remo Mattei
Hi Rajesh, I was using the TLS in the spamdyke.conf and I just removed it and it working just fine. You maybe facing different issues. Remo > On Jun 18, 2019, at 9:16 AM, Rajesh M <24x7ser...@24x7server.net> wrote: > > remo > > Were you facing the same issue ? > > Could you please explai

Re: [qmailtoaster] TLS reason: 503_MAIL_first_(#5.5.1)

2019-06-18 Thread Rajesh M
remo Were you facing the same issue ? Could you please explain in detail the exact steps you followed thanks, rajesh - Original Message - From: r...@mattei.org [mailto:r...@mattei.org] To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Sent: Tue, 18 Jun 2019 09:13:26 -0700 Subject: I just tested o

Re: [qmailtoaster] TLS reason: 503_MAIL_first_(#5.5.1)

2019-06-18 Thread remo
I just tested on mine I recalled you do not have to restart the service and it works just fine > Il giorno 18 giu 2019, alle ore 09:01, Rajesh M <24x7ser...@24x7server.net> > ha scritto: > > hello > > it does not work > > i get the same error. > > auth: (unknown) encryption: (none) reason: 5

Re: [qmailtoaster] TLS reason: 503_MAIL_first_(#5.5.1)

2019-06-18 Thread Rajesh M
hello it does not work i get the same error. auth: (unknown) encryption: (none) reason: 503_MAIL_first_(#5.5.1) rajesh - Original Message - From: Eric Broch [mailto:ebr...@whitehorsetc.com] To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Sent: Tue, 18 Jun 2019 09:25:59 -0600 Subject: yes, t

Re: [qmailtoaster] TLS reason: 503_MAIL_first_(#5.5.1)

2019-06-18 Thread Eric Broch
yes, tls-level=none On 6/18/2019 9:19 AM, Rajesh M wrote: tls-level=smtp ? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com

Re: [qmailtoaster] TLS reason: 503_MAIL_first_(#5.5.1)

2019-06-18 Thread Rajesh M
eric should i comment the line in the spamdyke.conf tls-level=smtp ? #tls-certificate-file=/var/qmail/control/servercert.pem tls-level=smtp also please do note that this issue is occurring only for emails received from one single external domain. rajesh - Original Message - From: Eri

Re: [qmailtoaster] TLS reason: 503_MAIL_first_(#5.5.1)

2019-06-18 Thread Eric Broch
In /etc/spamdyke/spamdyke.conf set 'tls-level' to 'none'. tls-level=none allow qmail to do the tls and see if it works. On 6/18/2019 9:07 AM, Rajesh M wrote: eric in the spamdyke.conf i can see this tls-certificate-file=/var/qmail/control/servercert.pem also i am using the /var/qmail/contro

RE: [qmailtoaster] SMTP configuration

2019-06-18 Thread CarlC Internet Services Service Desk
Ah, so it’s not a setting I can set as I’m running 1.03-2.1 [production]. I can wait for the 1.03-3.1 to make it into production, then set it up. To me, I’ve warned all clients to NEVER EVER use port 25 [instead, use 465/587 with the proper TLS turned on], so this is not a super critical patc

Re: [qmailtoaster] TLS reason: 503_MAIL_first_(#5.5.1)

2019-06-18 Thread Rajesh M
eric in the spamdyke.conf i can see this tls-certificate-file=/var/qmail/control/servercert.pem also i am using the /var/qmail/control/servercert.pem for domain key signing of outgoing emails. rajesh - Original Message - From: Eric Broch [mailto:ebr...@whitehorsetc.com] To: qmailtoaster

Re: [qmailtoaster] TLS reason: 503_MAIL_first_(#5.5.1)

2019-06-18 Thread Eric Broch
So you have spamdyke doing the TLS? On 6/18/2019 8:38 AM, Rajesh M wrote: Hi ISSUE 1 all of a sudden we are receiving error on one of our servers for one specific sender domain (sending from microsoft server) the sender domain is not able to send emails to the recepient domain on our server.

[qmailtoaster] TLS reason: 503_MAIL_first_(#5.5.1)

2019-06-18 Thread Rajesh M
Hi ISSUE 1 all of a sudden we are receiving error on one of our servers for one specific sender domain (sending from microsoft server) the sender domain is not able to send emails to the recepient domain on our server. The email bounces with the following error encryption: TLS reason: 503_MAIL_

Re: [qmailtoaster] SMTP configuration

2019-06-18 Thread Eric Broch
What about the most recent qmail (1.03-3.1) package in the development tree. It has a patch that forces encryption before authentication. On 6/18/2019 6:46 AM, CarlC Internet Services Service Desk wrote: I have my own OpenVAS server to test my Qmail server for security. One of the things I get

[qmailtoaster] Re: Answer - Re: [qmailtoaster] New QMT7 but no mysql in php

2019-06-18 Thread Eric Broch
Would adding php-mysql to the dependencies in the install script resolve this? On 6/18/2019 7:36 AM, Jeff Koch wrote: OK - I found out what appears to be the problem. The stock QMT7 does not have all the php extension modules installed in /usr/lib64/php/modules and they are not referenced by

[qmailtoaster] SMTP configuration

2019-06-18 Thread CarlC Internet Services Service Desk
I have my own OpenVAS server to test my Qmail server for security. One of the things I get as a “medium” warning is “The remote host is running SMTP server that allows cleartext logins over unencrypted connections.” It’s saying we allow LOGIN and PLAIN for SMTP while supporting the “STARTTLS”

Re: [qmailtoaster] sslv3 alert handshake failure

2019-06-18 Thread Angus McIntyre
Thanks Eric The problem, as far as I can tell, isn't compatibility with other older software. It's that my existing library is too ancient to even pull down the 101e version. I've bitten the bullet and started to build a new toaster, which is something I should have done long ago anyway. O