[qmailtoaster] Re: QMT to QMT smtp encryption

2009-11-09 Thread Eric Shubert
Aleksander Podsiadly wrote: W dniu 09.11.2009 05:52, Eric Shubert pisze: I've posted a message on the spamdyke list requesting that spamdyke add a mail message header with pertinent information, including whether or not TLS was used. We'll see how that goes. Good idea, Alexsander. I was

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: QMT to QMT smtp encryption

2009-11-09 Thread Aleksander Podsiadly
W dniu 09.11.2009 15:39, Eric Shubert pisze: [...] Alexsander, are you subscribed to the spamdyke list? Please consider doing so. Thanks again. I'm on to many forums and lists. :) Forums and lists related to local government, government, FOSS, OSSEC, security, qmailtoaster, LUG, wikipedia

[qmailtoaster] Re: QMT to QMT smtp encryption

2009-11-09 Thread Eric Shubert
Aleksander Podsiadly wrote: W dniu 09.11.2009 15:39, Eric Shubert pisze: [...] Alexsander, are you subscribed to the spamdyke list? Please consider doing so. Thanks again. I'm on to many forums and lists. :) Forums and lists related to local government, government, FOSS, OSSEC, security,

[qmailtoaster] Re: QMT to QMT smtp encryption

2009-11-08 Thread Eric Shubert
Aleksander Podsiadly wrote: W dniu 07.11.2009 21:21, Aleksander Podsiadly pisze: Now I find [...] Sorry for ma English, should be ,,found''. :| I don't think you need to apologize for your English, Aleksander. There are many High School graduates in the USA whose English is worse than

[qmailtoaster] Re: QMT to QMT smtp encryption

2009-11-08 Thread Eric Shubert
Aleksander Podsiadly wrote: W dniu 07.11.2009 21:09, Aleksander Podsiadly pisze: W dniu 07.11.2009 20:44, Eric Shubert pisze: I still wonder about what spamdyke would do then. I don't know if spamdyke writes this information at all, or if qmail-smtp does it. Is it possible that perhaps

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: QMT to QMT smtp encryption

2009-11-08 Thread Aleksander Podsiadly
W dniu 09.11.2009 05:52, Eric Shubert pisze: I've posted a message on the spamdyke list requesting that spamdyke add a mail message header with pertinent information, including whether or not TLS was used. We'll see how that goes. Good idea, Alexsander. I was thinking about it and I come

[qmailtoaster] Re: QMT to QMT smtp encryption

2009-11-07 Thread Eric Shubert
Aleksander Podsiadly wrote: W dniu 06.11.2009 18:39, Jake Vickers pisze: I'll update the patch before too long, but those 3 fixes do not imply anything to do with logging. It may be that logging was added, but notes were not made. We'll see. The problem is more complicated. I applied this

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: QMT to QMT smtp encryption

2009-11-07 Thread Aleksander Podsiadly
W dniu 07.11.2009 20:14, Eric Shubert pisze: Not that it would fix QMT's encryption, but I wonder what happens with spamdyke handling TLS. Of course, this would do nothing for outbound email. Are you observing this breakage on the outbound or inbound side, or only when QMT is used on both

[qmailtoaster] Re: QMT to QMT smtp encryption

2009-11-07 Thread Eric Shubert
Aleksander Podsiadly wrote: W dniu 07.11.2009 20:14, Eric Shubert pisze: Not that it would fix QMT's encryption, but I wonder what happens with spamdyke handling TLS. Of course, this would do nothing for outbound email. Are you observing this breakage on the outbound or inbound side, or

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: QMT to QMT smtp encryption

2009-11-07 Thread Aleksander Podsiadly
W dniu 07.11.2009 20:44, Eric Shubert pisze: I still wonder about what spamdyke would do then. I don't know if spamdyke writes this information at all, or if qmail-smtp does it. Is it possible that perhaps spamdyke is doing TLS, so qmail-smtp doesn't see it? When spamdyke does TLS, it passes

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: QMT to QMT smtp encryption

2009-11-07 Thread Aleksander Podsiadly
W dniu 07.11.2009 21:21, Aleksander Podsiadly pisze: Now I find [...] Sorry for ma English, should be ,,found''. :| -- Pozdrawiam / Regards, Aleksander Podsiadły mail: a...@westside.kielce.pl jid: a...@jabber.westside.kielce.pl ICQ: 201121279 gg: 9150578