Giuseppe mandami un messaggio privato poi ci sentiamo al tel. Ciao
--
Mandato da iPhone
> On giovedì, nov 10, 2022 at 09:33, Giuseppe Perna (mailto:gpe...@srlsigea.eu)> wrote:
> Hello everybody,
> I would like to update my version of qmailtoaster with due caution ;-) these
> are the installed
Hello everybody,
I would like to update my version of qmailtoaster with due caution ;-)
these are the installed versions:
# cat /etc/redhat-release
CentOS release 5.8 (Final)
# rpm -qa mysql
mysql-5.0.95-1.el5_7.1
# rpm -qa httpd
httpd-2.2.3-65.el5.centos
# spamdyke -v
spamdyke
]
Sent: Friday, April 07, 2017 10:59 AM
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Upgrade qmailtoaster to CentOS 7
Eric,
That list looks good, except:
/etc/spamassassin should be /etc/mail/spamassassin, unless it's
different on CentOS7.
I'm unsure as to the MariaDB
?
Thanks,
Rick
-Original Message-
From: Sean Murphy [mailto:sean.mur...@mobilcom.net]
Sent: Friday, April 07, 2017 10:59 AM
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Upgrade qmailtoaster to CentOS 7
Eric,
That list looks good, except:
/etc/spamassassin should
1) From looking at the install docs, I think rsync is included when QMT
is installed, but it is not part of default install as I just checked.
2) I will make the necessary adjustments when ready.
3) Suppose we'll find out, as I haven't found anything regarding this
admin pass.
Thanks again,
: [qmailtoaster] Upgrade qmailtoaster to CentOS 7
Eric,
That list looks good, except:
/etc/spamassassin should be /etc/mail/spamassassin, unless it's different on
CentOS7.
I'm unsure as to the MariaDB admin password on the current machine as my
predecessor set it up.
I will poke around my docs and see if I
1) I think I install rsync when QMT is installed, maybe its done by
default on minimal install, not sure.
2) Yes for spamassassin rsync from /etc/mail/spamassassin to
/etc/spamassassin this changed with QMT on CentOS 6
3) I suppose that the admin password does not have to be the same. I
Message-
From: Sean Murphy [mailto:sean.mur...@mobilcom.net]
Sent: Friday, April 07, 2017 10:59 AM
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Upgrade qmailtoaster to CentOS 7
Eric,
That list looks good, except:
/etc/spamassassin should be /etc/mail/spamassassin, unless
Eric,
That list looks good, except:
/etc/spamassassin should be /etc/mail/spamassassin, unless it's
different on CentOS7.
I'm unsure as to the MariaDB admin password on the current machine as my
predecessor set it up.
I will poke around my docs and see if I can find anything. And, I
Hi Sean,
Off the top of my head I do the following:
On the QMT/COS7 Install make the MariaDB admin password the same as on
your old machine.
1) Install rsync on both machines
2) Make ssh work without password
# How to make the below rsync ssh command work without a password
# exec
Good day all,
I've finally acquired a "new" machine to house our current install of
the toaster, installed CentOS 7 and ran all available updates, and
rounded up the preparatory files for the install. I will most likely
install qmailtoaster and take it on a test drive before migrating our
hi
centos 5
qmailtoaster
i had installed dovecot 1.2 using the dovecot-1.2.11-3_108.src.rpm
now i wish to upgrade the same to version 2 from qtp repository
should i remove the existing dovecot and then install version 2 or
directly upgrade the same -- if so what is the command.
i read the
Hi All,
This is my first post on QmailToaster mailing list. I have upgraded
qmail toaster on my mail server running on CentOS 4.5 version to latest
release of QmailToaster using instructions posted on
http://wiki.qmailtoaster.com/index.php/Upgrade.sh_script. After
successful upgrade I have
Mahipal Singh wrote:
Hi All,
This is my first post on QmailToaster mailing list. I have upgraded
qmail toaster on my mail server running on CentOS 4.5 version to
latest release of QmailToaster using instructions posted on
http://wiki.qmailtoaster.com/index.php/Upgrade.sh_script. After
Hi Jack,
I have compared the logs and only change I can see in SMTP. I can send
email from in mail client and webmail and there is no pending email in
local queue checked using qmHandle. The only issue I am facing right now
is when I try to receive email my mail client says no new message but
Mahipal Singh wrote:
Hi Jack,
I have compared the logs and only change I can see in SMTP. I can send
email from in mail client and webmail and there is no pending email in
local queue checked using qmHandle. The only issue I am facing right
now is when I try to receive email my mail client
Hi Jake,
We use IMAP mail protocol in our setup and I don't see anything in IMAP4
logs:
@40004ab777ab1d6f166c tcpserver: status: 0/400
@40004ab777ab20913a14 tcpserver: status: 1/400
@40004ab777ab209462ac tcpserver: pid 32583 from 10.10.13.69
@40004ab777ab209b119c tcpserver: ok
Mahipal Singh wrote:
Hi Jake,
We use IMAP mail protocol in our setup and I don't see anything in
IMAP4 logs:
@40004ab777ab1d6f166c tcpserver: status: 0/400
@40004ab777ab20913a14 tcpserver: status: 1/400
@40004ab777ab209462ac tcpserver: pid 32583 from 10.10.13.69
Restart qmail service is only option to access new messages on the
server and this is happening with all emails sent from local or remote.
Thanks
Mahipal
Jake Vickers wrote:
Mahipal Singh wrote:
Hi Jake,
We use IMAP mail protocol in our setup and I don't see anything in
IMAP4 logs:
Mahipal Singh wrote:
Restart qmail service is only option to access new messages on the
server and this is happening with all emails sent from local or remote.
Are the services running?
qmailctl stat
Yes, All services are up and running, till the time I am forced to
restart qmail service to access incoming email.
authlib: up (pid 6483) 96 seconds
clamd: up (pid 6429) 96 seconds
imap4: up (pid 6478) 96 seconds
imap4-ssl: up (pid 6485) 96 seconds
pop3: up (pid 6453) 96 seconds
pop3-ssl: up
Mahipal Singh wrote:
Yes, All services are up and running, till the time I am forced to
restart qmail service to access incoming email.
Do the messages show in webmail?
It would be helpful if you could send us more of your logs. When you cut
your logs to what you thin may be important, you
It seems re installation of qmailtoaster RPM has done the trick now I am
able to send and receive email at the same time from local as well as
remote. Jake I really appreciate your
support and time devoted to resolve the issue. Thanks again for your
kind support.
Jake Vickers wrote:
Mahipal
Mahipal Singh wrote:
Hi All,
This is my first post on QmailToaster mailing list. I have upgraded
qmail toaster on my mail server running on CentOS 4.5 version to latest
release of QmailToaster using instructions posted on
http://wiki.qmailtoaster.com/index.php/Upgrade.sh_script. After
Message-
From: news [mailto:n...@ger.gmane.org] On Behalf Of Eric Shubert
Sent: Wednesday, April 01, 2009 6:24 PM
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] upgrade toaster
Just think of CentOS as a more mature, more stable Fedora. That's really
what it is.
Glen Vickers
Please disregard, I double checked my path and it was messed up.. its
working now.
-Original Message-
From: Glen Vickers [mailto:ldwra...@xmission.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 02, 2009 10:59 AM
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: RE: [qmailtoaster] upgrade toaster
./qtp
Just a simple quick question. Is there an easy way, using the scripts y'all
wrote, to upgrade a toaster install for FR6? I'm having problems with the
5.5.4 chkuser again after a reboot of the server and now I can't send out
any email through either squirrelmail or outlook client, both inside and
Glen Vickers wrote:
Just a simple quick question. Is there an easy way, using the scripts
y’all wrote, to upgrade a toaster install for FR6? I’m having problems
with the 5.5.4 chkuser again after a reboot of the server and now I
can’t send out any email through either squirrelmail or outlook
Shubert e...@shubes.net
Sent: Wednesday, April 01, 2009 4:07 PM
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] upgrade toaster
Glen Vickers wrote:
Just a simple quick question. Is there an easy way, using the scripts
y’all wrote, to upgrade a toaster install for FR6? I’m having
I installed perl-5.8.8-15.el5_2.1 again (happened to be the same version
you have) and now I get :
START
Executing(--clean): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.66524
+ umask 022
+ cd /usr/src/redhat/BUILD
+ rm -rf Mail-SpamAssassin-3.2.5
+ exit 0
Installing spamassassin-toaster-3.2.5-1.3.15 in the
rpm doesn't recognize things that are installed via CPAN, because
they're not reflected in rpm's database.
Use yum and the rpmforge repo to install them, and you'll be good to go.
Be sure to use a fresh sandbox after you've installed anything.
P.S. I'm a little surprised that qtp-newmodel
Adding them manually through rpmforge did the job.
However, a new problem turns up now. I can receive SMTP connections from
most hosts, but when I try from an internal host, I get a timeout.
What happens :
telnet 192.168.1.138 110
Trying 192.168.1.138...
Connected to local.vpn.home
The default toaster firewall is a little over zealous (or retarded,
depending on your perspective).
You need to add a rule to your firewall.sh script to allow local
traffic, like so:
# shubes 5/16/06 - accept packets from local nets
iptables -A INPUT -s 192.168.1.0/255.255.255.0 -j ACCEPT
I can connect just fine, but it takes about 30 seconds for the greeting
220 brussels3.firstlinknetworks.com - Welcome to Qmail Toaster Ver. 1.3
SMTP Server ESMTP to show up on SMTP.
On POP3, it shows right away.
Could it have something to do with the blacklist in
/var/qmail/control/blacklists
Yeah. I'd get rid of the last 2 you have listed (for various reasons).
Wim Godden wrote:
I can connect just fine, but it takes about 30 seconds for the greeting
220 brussels3.firstlinknetworks.com - Welcome to Qmail Toaster Ver. 1.3
SMTP Server ESMTP to show up on SMTP.
On POP3, it shows
Thanks for the quick reply, but the problem wasn't resolved by updating
the CPAN bundle.
I'm running CentOS 5.2 (i386). Previous runs of qtp-newmodel ran without
a glitch.
I have :
ExtUtils::MakeMaker 6.48
and :
cpan[2] install Bundle::CPAN
Test::Harness is up to date (3.16).
The problem is *caused* by updating the CPAN bundle. You need a pre-6.44
version of MakeMaker for it to work.
Wim Godden wrote:
Thanks for the quick reply, but the problem wasn't resolved by updating
the CPAN bundle.
I'm running CentOS 5.2 (i386). Previous runs of qtp-newmodel ran without
a
Eric,
Is there some way to go back to pre-6.44 ?
Or is there a patch that I can use to upgrade my system on 6.48 ?
Kind regards,
Wim
Eric Shubert wrote:
The problem is *caused* by updating the CPAN bundle. You need a
pre-6.44 version of MakeMaker for it to work.
Wim Godden wrote:
Thanks
Download and reinstall the perl binary rpm that corresponds to your
present version (mine is perl-5.8.8-15.el5_2.1), using the
--replacefiles option:
# rpm --replacefiles -Uvh perl-5.8.8.*.i386.rpm
Wim Godden wrote:
Eric,
Is there some way to go back to pre-6.44 ?
Or is there a patch that I
Odd thing : I just download and installed MakeMaker 6.43, but I still
get the same error :
Checking if your kit is complete...
Looks good
'ENABLE_SSL' is not a known MakeMaker parameter name.
'SYSCONFDIR' is not a known MakeMaker parameter name.
Writing Makefile for Mail::SpamAssassin
Makefile
No, you'll need the whole perl package. There are other interdependent
modules in the perl package, you can't necessarily just pick the one
file. That, and I'm not sure that 6.43 is quite old enough. 6.44 was
just the first version we noticed the problem with. It might have been
introduced
An upgrade of spamassassin using qtp-newmodel fails (using small union) :
Building squirrelmail-toaster-1.4.17-1.3.12 ...
Installing squirrelmail-toaster-1.4.17-1.3.12 in the sandbox ...
Building spamassassin-toaster-3.2.5-1.3.15 ...
qtp-build-rpms - rpmbuild failed for
Wim Godden wrote:
An upgrade of spamassassin using qtp-newmodel fails (using small union) :
Building squirrelmail-toaster-1.4.17-1.3.12 ...
Installing squirrelmail-toaster-1.4.17-1.3.12 in the sandbox ...
Building spamassassin-toaster-3.2.5-1.3.15 ...
qtp-build-rpms - rpmbuild failed for
Eduardo Henrique Albergone wrote:
checking how to run the C++ preprocessor... /lib/cpp
configure: error: C++ preprocessor /lib/cpp fails sanity check
Your problem is here. Make sure you have all the deps installed.
Eric Shubert wrote:
Anil Aliyan wrote:
Dear Jake,
I am currently running the last versions of all the packages of Qmail
Toaster. Now i want to upgrade to the newly uploaded rpms uploaded on
the qmailtoaster website on 02/20/2009.
CAN I UPGRADE DIRECTLY on the current installation? or is
I am using Fedora Core 5.
Regards,
Anil Aliyan
- Original Message -
From: Jake Vickers j...@qmailtoaster.com
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com; acali...@gnvfc.net
Sent: Friday, February 27, 2009 5:35 PM
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Upgrade to the Latest RPMs
Eric Shubert wrote
Anil Aliyan wrote:
I am using Fedora Core 5.
You would do better upgrading your distro to one that is currently
supported or at least has been supported in the last couple years. Then
use the backup and restore scripts in the QTP package to move your QMT
data to the new server.
Jake Vickers wrote:
Anil Aliyan wrote:
I am using Fedora Core 5.
You would do better upgrading your distro to one that is currently
supported or at least has been supported in the last couple years. Then
use the backup and restore scripts in the QTP package to move your QMT
data to the
Dear Jake,
I am currently running the last versions of all the packages of Qmail Toaster.
Now i want to upgrade to the newly uploaded rpms uploaded on the qmailtoaster
website on 02/20/2009.
CAN I UPGRADE DIRECTLY on the current installation? or is there any specific
procedure i need to
Anil Aliyan wrote:
Dear Jake,
I am currently running the last versions of all the packages of Qmail
Toaster. Now i want to upgrade to the newly uploaded rpms uploaded on
the qmailtoaster website on 02/20/2009.
CAN I UPGRADE DIRECTLY on the current installation? or is there any
specific
Harry Zink wrote:
Ditto here - same x86_64 architecture
qtp-whatami v0.3
DISTRO=CentOS
OSVER=4.6
QTARCH=x86_64
BUILD_DIST=cnt4064
BUILD_DIR=/usr/src/redhat
Would be awesome if qtp whatami would actually also provide kernel version.
That's an excellent suggestion Harry, with the addition
I'm trying to understand what happened here. Read below.
Harry Zink wrote:
More data:
Sandbox has been built successfully!
qtp-newmodel - installing perl-Net-SMTP ...
Loading protectbase plugin
Setting up Install Process
Setting up repositories
rpmforge 100%
On Aug 12, 2008, at 9:33 AM, Eric Shubert wrote:
Did you select a fresh sandbox when you re-ran at this point? If you
installed the perl-HTML-Parser-3.56 but did not use a fresh sandbox,
the old
version would still have been in the sandbox. :(
I redid fresh sandboxes every time I ran it.
Harry Zink wrote:
On Aug 12, 2008, at 9:33 AM, Eric Shubert wrote:
Did you select a fresh sandbox when you re-ran at this point? If you
installed the perl-HTML-Parser-3.56 but did not use a fresh sandbox,
the old
version would still have been in the sandbox. :(
I redid fresh sandboxes
On Aug 12, 2008, at 10:08 AM, Eric Shubert wrote:
Harry Zink wrote:
On Aug 12, 2008, at 9:33 AM, Eric Shubert wrote:
Did you select a fresh sandbox when you re-ran at this point? If you
installed the perl-HTML-Parser-3.56 but did not use a fresh sandbox,
the old
version would still have
Harry Zink wrote:
On Aug 12, 2008, at 10:08 AM, Eric Shubert wrote:
Harry Zink wrote:
On Aug 12, 2008, at 9:33 AM, Eric Shubert wrote:
Did you select a fresh sandbox when you re-ran at this point? If you
installed the perl-HTML-Parser-3.56 but did not use a fresh sandbox,
the old
On Aug 12, 2008, at 10:58 AM, Eric Shubert wrote:
f you'd've simply not selected it, you'd've gotten no errors. ;)
LOL
I'd like to nail this one (once again, so it seems).
You say this is the version you're running. Please post the results
of:
# rpm -q zlib
# yum info zlib
That might
Harry Zink wrote:
On Aug 12, 2008, at 10:58 AM, Eric Shubert wrote:
f you'd've simply not selected it, you'd've gotten no errors. ;)
LOL
I'd like to nail this one (once again, so it seems).
You say this is the version you're running. Please post the results of:
# rpm -q zlib
#
On Aug 12, 2008, at 11:58 AM, Eric Shubert wrote:
Sure looks that way. Don't know how you managed that.
Neither do it - it's pretty much been a pain vanilla QMT box since
inception.
I'd try
# rpm -e zlib-1.2.1.2-1.2
to remove it.
Here we go again:
rpm -e zlib-1.2.1.2-1.2
error:
On Aug 12, 2008, at 11:58 AM, Eric Shubert wrote:
I'd try
# rpm -e zlib-1.2.1.2-1.2
Yep, that did it -- all's back to being well in QMT land (well, until
the next updates roll around :-)
-
QmailToaster hosted by:
]
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Sent: Monday, August 11, 2008 8:44 AM
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] QMAILtoaster upgrade fails
Lastly, here's the current status:
This is not going away:
supervise: fatal: unable to start clamd/run: file does not exist
supervise: fatal: unable to start log/run: file
Final summary - I did the updates manually - removed and deinstalled
clamav and spamassassin, and then reinstalled from the rpm's left
behind from the prior attempts.
Restart qmailtoaster - works!
-
QmailToaster
Anil,
Thanks for your help.
In both cases, the run files were absent - it appears that somehow the
perl dependencies hell has stopped the qtp-newmodel script from
properly creating those and executing through the end, even after I
had the dependencies fixed.
Harry
On Aug 10, 2008, at
*From:* James Ecker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*Sent:* Saturday, August 09, 2008 4:54 PM
*To:* qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
*Subject:* RE: [qmailtoaster] QMAILtoaster upgrade fails
The distro is Centos
just been using linked.
I’m chasing the elusive pizza…
-P
From: James Ecker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, August 09, 2008 4:54 PM
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: RE: [qmailtoaster] QMAILtoaster upgrade fails
The distro is Centos 5.2 x86_64 kernel-2.6.18
Toaster 1.3
More data:
Sandbox has been built successfully!
qtp-newmodel - installing perl-Net-SMTP ...
Loading protectbase plugin
Setting up Install Process
Setting up repositories
rpmforge 100% |=| 1.1 kB
00:00
update100%
Lastly, here's the current status:
This is not going away:
supervise: fatal: unable to start clamd/run: file does not exist
supervise: fatal: unable to start log/run: file does not exist
There is no appropriate 'run' file inside /var/qmail/supervise/clamd/
qmailctl stat shows:
authlib: up
I have installed qmailtoaster-plus sucessfully, but when I run qtp-newmodel I
receive the following error message chroot: cannot run command
`qtp-build-rpms': No such file or directory. Does anyone have any ideas?
_
Get Windows
James Ecker wrote:
I have installed qmailtoaster-plus sucessfully, but when I run
qtp-newmodel I receive the following error message chroot: cannot run
command `qtp-build-rpms': No such file or directory. Does anyone have
any ideas?
The distro is Centos 5.2 x86_64 kernel-2.6.18
Toaster 1.3
Linked sandbox seemed to work thank you.
Date: Sat, 9 Aug 2008 11:51:35 -0700 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To:
qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] QMAILtoaster
upgrade fails James Ecker wrote: I have
_
From: James Ecker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, August 09, 2008 11:18 AM
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: [qmailtoaster] QMAILtoaster upgrade fails
I have installed qmailtoaster-plus sucessfully, but when I run qtp-newmodel
I receive the following
, August 09, 2008 4:54 PM
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: RE: [qmailtoaster] QMAILtoaster upgrade fails
The distro is Centos 5.2 x86_64 kernel-2.6.18
Toaster 1.3
Linked sandbox seemed to work thank you.
Date: Sat, 9 Aug 2008 11:51:35 -0700
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED
hello all I would like to upgrade to the lastest clamav. What is the
procedure for upgrading just the clamav on centos 5
here is what I have done so far.
Downloaded the src.rpm
rpmbuild --rebuild --with cnt50 clamav.x.x.x.x.src.rpm
Then when I go to install it it tells me that I
Sweet so I just need to shut down with qmailctl stop
and then do an
rpm -e clamav.x.x.x.x
Correct
thanks
q
On Fri, 2008-06-06 at 09:03 -0700, Erik A. Espinoza wrote:
Hey Kyle,
Before building the new clamav, the old clamav has to be removed.
Building the new clamav while the
I went through this a few weeks ago and the best way (I was told)
was to install the qmail toaster plus package, and then use the new
model upgrade script.
Worked great for me.
d
On 6-Jun-08, at 12:12 PM, Kyle Quillen wrote:
Sweet so I just need to shut down with qmailctl stop
and
Hi there,
Is there a recommended method for updating an existing toaster that has:
- Older qtp-plus (prior to repo)
- Spamdyke (3.01) that was a manual install
My hopes are to get my qtp plus onto the repo. So I can add and
install, but I am not sure if this may mess something up since the old
dnk wrote:
Hi there,
Is there a recommended method for updating an existing toaster that has:
- Older qtp-plus (prior to repo)
- Spamdyke (3.01) that was a manual install
My hopes are to get my qtp plus onto the repo. So I can add and
install, but I am not sure if this may mess something up
Jake Vickers wrote:
dnk wrote:
Hi there,
Is there a recommended method for updating an existing toaster that has:
- Older qtp-plus (prior to repo)
- Spamdyke (3.01) that was a manual install
My hopes are to get my qtp plus onto the repo. So I can add and
install, but I am not sure if
On 2008.05.07, at 20:38, Jake Vickers wrote:
dnk wrote:
Hi there,
Is there a recommended method for updating an existing toaster that
has:
- Older qtp-plus (prior to repo)
- Spamdyke (3.01) that was a manual install
My hopes are to get my qtp plus onto the repo. So I can add and
]
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Sent: Wednesday, April 9, 2008 4:59:59 PM
Subject: RE: [qmailtoaster] upgrade question
Not easier...'bout the same. Some modules are just not on cpan - that is
the issue. Up until I did the upgrade for qmt, I have always used cpan as
well.
You also do
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.79533 (%install)
Jack D. Martin, Jr.
- Original Message
From: Eric Shubert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Sent: Tuesday, April 8, 2008 12:27:28 PM
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] upgrade question
What error
.79533 (%install)
Jack D. Martin, Jr.
- Original Message
From: Eric Shubert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Sent: Tuesday, April 8, 2008 12:27:28 PM
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] upgrade question
What error (specifically) do you get with .14
Oilton, OK 74052
(918) 862-1065
(918) 605-9552 cellular
- Original Message
From: Eric Shubert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Sent: Wednesday, April 9, 2008 11:40:53 AM
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] upgrade question
H. I presume this is the version I posted
Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 2008 12:27 PM
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] upgrade question
This is the rpm that you attached last week, yes. Here are the logs
starting where you said to start:
Installing /var/tmp/spamassassin-toaster-root
Shubert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Sent: Wednesday, April 9, 2008 11:40:53 AM
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] upgrade question
H. I presume this is the version I posted to the list, right?
If so, please post more of the contents at the end of build-recent.log
: Eric Shubert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Sent: Wednesday, April 9, 2008 3:30:37 PM
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] upgrade question
I did a little more testing, and it appears that the problematic parameter
to the %makeinstall command isn't needed at all. I remove
]
P.O. Box 278
Oilton, OK 74052
(918) 862-1065
(918) 605-9552 cellular
- Original Message
From: Eric Shubert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Sent: Wednesday, April 9, 2008 3:30:37 PM
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] upgrade question
I did a little more
: [qmailtoaster] upgrade question
Before I do it - I am upgrading my perl modules just to see if that could
possibly be the problem.
Jack D. Martin, Jr.
Magic Wireless Internet Service Provider, LLC [EMAIL PROTECTED]
P.O. Box 278 Oilton, OK 74052
(918) 862-1065
(918) 605-9552 cellular
- Original
PROTECTED]
P.O. Box 278
Oilton, OK 74052
(918) 862-1065
(918) 605-9552 cellular
- Original Message
From: Helmut Fritz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Sent: Wednesday, April 9, 2008 4:10:35 PM
Subject: RE: [qmailtoaster] upgrade question
Jack,
I highly suggest
-
From: Jack Martin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 2008 2:26 PM
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] upgrade question
Most of my modules are installed using CPAN, so I am not going to un-install
and re-install them. I have started using
In case i want to upgrade packages to a new version one by one, is it enough
just to do:
rpm -Uvh /usr/src/$BDIR/RPMS/$ARCH/package-name-*.rpm per package?
Is there a procedure for an upgrade that gives minimum down time?
Thank you
Igor Smitran wrote:
In case i want to upgrade packages to a new version one by one, is it
enough just to do:
rpm -Uvh /usr/src/$BDIR/RPMS/$ARCH/package-name-*.rpm per package?
Short answer, no.
Is there a procedure for an upgrade that gives minimum down time?
Thank you
Using the
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] upgrade question
Igor Smitran wrote:
In case i want to upgrade packages to a new version one by one, is it
enough just to do:
rpm -Uvh /usr/src/$BDIR/RPMS/$ARCH/package-name-*.rpm per package?
Short answer, no.
Is there a procedure
if your changes are rolled out yet?
-Original Message-
From: Eric Shubert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 08, 2008 8:52 AM
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] upgrade question
Igor Smitran wrote:
In case i want to upgrade packages
: [qmailtoaster] upgrade question
I just did a complete upgrade with qtp-mewmodel (found as part of qtp-plus
package). Once we got the spamassassin things straight it worked great. If
all the fixes are not in there you will need to do a copied sandbox (unless
your system can do a unionfs sandbox
-list@qmailtoaster.com
Sent: Tuesday, April 8, 2008 11:27:24 AM
Subject: RE: [qmailtoaster] upgrade question
I just did a complete upgrade with qtp-mewmodel (found as part of qtp-plus
package). Once we got the spamassassin things straight it worked great. If
all the fixes
You don't have any comments on my questions?
Istvan Köpe wrote:
Hello,
I have two Qmailtoaster servers running on Centos 4.3 x86_64. I would
like install on them to Centos 5.1.
Now I have two questions:
Based on your experience is there a difference in performance between
x86_64 and i386
just my opinion.
- as long as CentOS still provide update for version 4, I am not planning
an upgrade to version 5.
- if your server hardware is x86_64 capable why not using x86_64 version
You don't have any comments on my questions?
Istvan Köpe wrote:
Hello,
I have two Qmailtoaster servers
Hello,
I have two Qmailtoaster servers running on Centos 4.3 x86_64. I would
like install on them to Centos 5.1.
Now I have two questions:
Based on your experience is there a difference in performance between
x86_64 and i386 Centos distributions? Or is there any other sensible
difference
I receive this error when trying to run qtp-newmodel on my server:
Installing control-panel-toaster-0.5-1.3.4 in the sandbox ...
error: Failed dependencies:
vpopmail-toaster = 5.4.17 is needed by
send-emails-toaster-0.5-1.3.4.noarch
vpopmail-toaster is included in the update packages.
1 - 100 of 285 matches
Mail list logo
