Re: [qmailtoaster] Updated packages

Gilbert T. Gutierrez, Jr. wrote: I did not mean to come off the way that I was interpreted Jake I think you are doing a great job and I wish I had better programming skills and/or time to help you on this community project. I was trying to get a feel as to why there are so many package up

Re: [qmailtoaster] Updated packages

I did not mean to come off the way that I was interpreted Jake I think you are doing a great job and I wish I had better programming skills and/or time to help you on this community project. I was trying to get a feel as to why there are so many package updates and why you did not hold of

Re: [qmailtoaster] Updated packages

Gilbert T. Gutierrez, Jr. wrote: My 2 cents... With the exception of ClamAV and Spamassasin rule sets, why is Qmailtoaster updated so much? I know I have not updated most of the applications on my toaster for 1.5 years (My last hardware migration). On a small setup, I am sure it is a lot ea

Re: [qmailtoaster] Updated packages

Jake Vickers wrote: Released a new version of all packages today. Updated ClamAV to 0.95.2. Updated Squirrelmail to 1.4.19 and courier-authlib to 0.62.2. Added Mandriva 2009 support. Also added Fedora 11 and Fedora 11 x86_64 support. ClamAV is a bugfix update and Squirrelmail is a security updat

Re: [qmailtoaster] Updated packages

My 2 cents... With the exception of ClamAV and Spamassasin rule sets, why is Qmailtoaster updated so much? I know I have not updated most of the applications on my toaster for 1.5 years (My last hardware migration). On a small setup, I am sure it is a lot easier to perform regular updates, b

Re: [qmailtoaster] UPDATED PACKAGES: simscan-toaster, isoqlog-toaster, clamav-toaster, spamassassin-toaster, qmail-toaster

> >>> first, I remove spamassassin (according qmailtoaster web) rpm -e >>> spamassassin-toaster >>> then I install spamassasin rpm -Uvh spamassasin-toaster-* >>> then I upgrade simscan rpm -Uvh simscan-toaster-* >>> >>> but I wonder why SA version is diff. when I check the header?? >>> see below..

Re: [qmailtoaster] UPDATED PACKAGES: simscan-toaster, isoqlog-toaster, clamav-toaster, spamassassin-toaster, qmail-toaster

>> first, I remove spamassassin (according qmailtoaster web) rpm -e >> spamassassin-toaster >> then I install spamassasin rpm -Uvh spamassasin-toaster-* >> then I upgrade simscan rpm -Uvh simscan-toaster-* >> >> but I wonder why SA version is diff. when I check the header?? >> see below.. >> >> Re

Re: [qmailtoaster] UPDATED PACKAGES: simscan-toaster, isoqlog-toaster, clamav-toaster, spamassassin-toaster, qmail-toaster

PakOgah wrote: >> Hi Quinn, >> >> Nice work. Please submit tickets to >> http://devel.qmailtoaster.com/flyspray/ so that this can actually be >> implemented. >> >> Thanks, >> Erik > > Hi Quinn/Erik, > > I dont is this also a bug or I did something wrong when upgrading > spamassasin dan simscan to

Re: [qmailtoaster] UPDATED PACKAGES: simscan-toaster, isoqlog-toaster, clamav-toaster, spamassassin-toaster, qmail-toaster

> Hi Quinn, > > Nice work. Please submit tickets to > http://devel.qmailtoaster.com/flyspray/ so that this can actually be > implemented. > > Thanks, > Erik Hi Quinn/Erik, I dont is this also a bug or I did something wrong when upgrading spamassasin dan simscan to latest version first, I remove

Re: [qmailtoaster] UPDATED PACKAGES: simscan-toaster, isoqlog-toaster, clamav-toaster, spamassassin-toaster, qmail-toaster

On Thu, 29 Mar 2007 09:09:50 -0700, Erik A. Espinoza wrote: > Nice work. Please submit tickets to > http://devel.qmailtoaster.com/flyspray/ so that this can actually be > implemented. Done. I've added each thing to a separate task so whoever does them can feel the joy of clicking the "Fixed" chec

Re: [qmailtoaster] UPDATED PACKAGES: simscan-toaster, isoqlog-toaster, clamav-toaster, spamassassin-toaster, qmail-toaster

Hi Quinn, Nice work. Please submit tickets to http://devel.qmailtoaster.com/flyspray/ so that this can actually be implemented. Thanks, Erik On 3/28/07, Quinn Comendant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Wed, 7 Mar 2007 12:05:19 -0800, Erik A. Espinoza wrote: > qmail-toaster (added bigdns patch, li

Re: [qmailtoaster] UPDATED PACKAGES: simscan-toaster, isoqlog-toaster, clamav-toaster, spamassassin-toaster, qmail-toaster

On Wed, 7 Mar 2007 12:05:19 -0800, Erik A. Espinoza wrote: > qmail-toaster (added bigdns patch, linefeed patch) Which is the linefeed patch? Add details to: http://wiki.qmailtoaster.com/index.php/Patches_included_with_QmailToaster > spamassassin-toaster (Upgraded to 3.1.8, Marked > local.cf/v310.

Re: [qmailtoaster] UPDATED PACKAGES: simscan-toaster, isoqlog-toaster, clamav-toaster, spamassassin-toaster, qmail-toaster

Erik A. Espinoza wrote: > Greetings, > > I have moved the following packages from devel to the main site: > simscan-toaster, isoqlog-toaster, clamav-toaster, > spamassassin-toaster, qmail-toaster > > The ChangeLog is as follows: > simscan-toaster (Changed tcp.smtp defaults exempting rbl checks on

Re: [qmailtoaster] UPDATED PACKAGES: clamav-toaster, squirrelmail-toaster, simscan-toaster, maildrop-toaster, courier-authlib-toaster, courier-imap-toaster

I have an implementation which is using clamav 0.90rc2 and when I accidentally unpluged the server clamav was complayning of : * ERROR: Socket file /tmp/clamd exists. Either remove it, or configure a different one. * I tried it again and it was the same ! So if you don't have power issues

Re: [qmailtoaster] UPDATED PACKAGES: clamav-toaster, squirrelmail-toaster, simscan-toaster, maildrop-toaster, courier-authlib-toaster, courier-imap-toaster

However, if you use qtp-newmodel with qtp-build-rpms v0.2.3 (qmailtoaster-plus-0.2.3-1.3.5 or later), the "--define 'spambox 1'" parameter will be used unconditionally for qmailadmin-toaster, so you should be sure to upgrade to the latest maildrop-toaster if you upgrade qmailadmin-toaster using qtp

Re: [qmailtoaster] UPDATED PACKAGES: clamav-toaster, squirrelmail-toaster, simscan-toaster, maildrop-toaster, courier-authlib-toaster, courier-imap-toaster

No. On 1/10/07, slamp slamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Since there is now a new maildrop package which i assume has the mailfilter spam support, should the qmailadmin be modified so it defaults with --define 'spambox 1'? On 1/10/07, slamp slamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I meant safe* > > >

Re: [qmailtoaster] UPDATED PACKAGES: clamav-toaster, squirrelmail-toaster, simscan-toaster, maildrop-toaster, courier-authlib-toaster, courier-imap-toaster

Yes. On 1/10/07, slamp slamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I guess its same to assume that clamav 0.90rc2 is stable? On 1/10/07, Eric Shubes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thanks a bunch. Those are great enhancements! > > Erik Espinoza wrote: > > Done. > > > > On 1/10/07, Erik Espinoza <[EMAIL PROT

Re: [qmailtoaster] UPDATED PACKAGES: clamav-toaster, squirrelmail-toaster, simscan-toaster, maildrop-toaster, courier-authlib-toaster, courier-imap-toaster

Since there is now a new maildrop package which i assume has the mailfilter spam support, should the qmailadmin be modified so it defaults with --define 'spambox 1'? On 1/10/07, slamp slamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I meant safe* On 1/10/07, slamp slamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I guess

Re: [qmailtoaster] UPDATED PACKAGES: clamav-toaster, squirrelmail-toaster, simscan-toaster, maildrop-toaster, courier-authlib-toaster, courier-imap-toaster

I meant safe* On 1/10/07, slamp slamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I guess its same to assume that clamav 0.90rc2 is stable? On 1/10/07, Eric Shubes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Thanks a bunch. Those are great enhancements! > > Erik Espinoza wrote: > > Done. > > > > On 1/10/07, Erik Espinoza <

Re: [qmailtoaster] UPDATED PACKAGES: clamav-toaster, squirrelmail-toaster, simscan-toaster, maildrop-toaster, courier-authlib-toaster, courier-imap-toaster

I guess its same to assume that clamav 0.90rc2 is stable? On 1/10/07, Eric Shubes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Thanks a bunch. Those are great enhancements! Erik Espinoza wrote: > Done. > > On 1/10/07, Erik Espinoza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I'll put the latest, 1.3.10, which will not build

Re: [qmailtoaster] UPDATED PACKAGES: clamav-toaster, squirrelmail-toaster, simscan-toaster, maildrop-toaster, courier-authlib-toaster, courier-imap-toaster

Thanks a bunch. Those are great enhancements! Erik Espinoza wrote: > Done. > > On 1/10/07, Erik Espinoza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I'll put the latest, 1.3.10, which will not build with srs support by >> default. >> >> On 1/10/07, Eric Shubes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > Erik Espinoza wrot

Re: [qmailtoaster] UPDATED PACKAGES: clamav-toaster, squirrelmail-toaster, simscan-toaster, maildrop-toaster, courier-authlib-toaster, courier-imap-toaster

Done. On 1/10/07, Erik Espinoza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I'll put the latest, 1.3.10, which will not build with srs support by default. On 1/10/07, Eric Shubes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Erik Espinoza wrote: > > Greetings, > > > > The following packages (clamav-toaster, squirrelmail-toaster

Re: [qmailtoaster] UPDATED PACKAGES: clamav-toaster, squirrelmail-toaster, simscan-toaster, maildrop-toaster, courier-authlib-toaster, courier-imap-toaster

I'll put the latest, 1.3.10, which will not build with srs support by default. On 1/10/07, Eric Shubes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Erik Espinoza wrote: > Greetings, > > The following packages (clamav-toaster, squirrelmail-toaster, > simscan-toaster, maildrop-toaster, courier-authlib-toaster, > co

Re: [qmailtoaster] UPDATED PACKAGES: clamav-toaster, squirrelmail-toaster, simscan-toaster, maildrop-toaster, courier-authlib-toaster, courier-imap-toaster

Erik Espinoza wrote: > Greetings, > > The following packages (clamav-toaster, squirrelmail-toaster, > simscan-toaster, maildrop-toaster, courier-authlib-toaster, > courier-imap-toaster) have graduated from devel to the main site. > > I will be moving the new qmail-toaster and libsrs2-toaster in a

Re: [qmailtoaster] updated packages broke my qmail install

Luckily I do have a backup. I also had the older packages before the upgrade and re-installed the whole thing over and restored my backup. So all is up and running now. Not sure what happen but when I was going through the upgrade I didn't see any errors. Thanks for your help. On 6/12/06, Nick Hemm

Re: [qmailtoaster] updated packages broke my qmail install

Ing-Long Eric Kuo (DraconPern) wrote: It seems to have worked. At least I got the test mail I sent just now. Now, the problem is notifying everyone who has sent an email and notifying them that they need resend it again. There's a time stamp in the log file. How do I convert that to an actual

Re: [qmailtoaster] updated packages broke my qmail install

" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2006 12:44 AM Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] updated packages broke my qmail install I just noticed something in the update.sh script (I've been working on all day) which could be your problem. There's an errant "exit 0"

Re: [qmailtoaster] updated packages broke my qmail install

ssage - From: "Eric "Shubes"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2006 12:44 AM Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] updated packages broke my qmail install I just noticed something in the update.sh script (I've been working on all day) which could be you

Re: [qmailtoaster] updated packages broke my qmail install

AP! -Eric - Original Message - From: "Ing-Long Eric Kuo (DraconPern)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Monday, June 12, 2006 11:25 PM Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] updated packages broke my qmail install I am having problems with the update script also. First, I had to manu

Re: [qmailtoaster] updated packages broke my qmail install

Just to add, this is on a dual pIII. I noticed that the compiler switches are specifiying P4 optimizations. -Eric - Original Message - From: "Nick Hemmesch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2006 12:27 AM Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] updated package

Re: [qmailtoaster] updated packages broke my qmail install

ting files in /var/qmail/control look ok. -Eric - Original Message - From: "Nick Hemmesch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2006 12:27 AM Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] updated packages broke my qmail install Hi Eric, What distro are you using? What do your log

Re: [qmailtoaster] updated packages broke my qmail install

; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Monday, June 12, 2006 9:13 PM Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] updated packages broke my qmail install Hi, Did you verify that all the packages were build and installed properly? Please do: rpm -qa | grep toaster | sort > rpm-list.txt And send ot to me rig

Re: [qmailtoaster] updated packages broke my qmail install

t;installed, I can no longer receive any email. >> >> -Eric >> >> - Original Message ----- >> From: "Nick Hemmesch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> To: >> Sent: Monday, June 12, 2006 9:13 PM >> Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] updated package

Re: [qmailtoaster] updated packages broke my qmail install

From: "Nick Hemmesch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Monday, June 12, 2006 9:13 PM Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] updated packages broke my qmail install Hi, Did you verify that all the packages were build and installed properly? Please do: rpm -qa | grep toaster | sort &g

Re: [qmailtoaster] updated packages broke my qmail install

: Sent: Monday, June 12, 2006 9:13 PM Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] updated packages broke my qmail install Hi, Did you verify that all the packages were build and installed properly? Please do: rpm -qa | grep toaster | sort > rpm-list.txt And send ot to me right away. Regards, Nick I hav

Re: [qmailtoaster] updated packages broke my qmail install

Hi, If this is a production server, did you do a backup before running the upgrade script. If it is a production server & no backup: set sshd_conf to permit root login, add "sshd : ALL" to hosts.allow and send the root password and ip address for the server to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and I will take a

Re: [qmailtoaster] updated packages broke my qmail install

Here it is Nick,[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# rpm -qa | grep toaster | sort > rpm-list.txt[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# cat rpm-list.txtautorespond-toaster-2.0.4-1.3.1clamav-toaster-0.88.2-1.3.1control-panel-toaster-0.5-1.3.1 courier-authlib-toaster-0.58-1.3.1courier-imap-toaster-4.1.1-1.3.2daemontools-toaster-0.7

Re: [qmailtoaster] updated packages broke my qmail install

Hi, Did you verify that all the packages were build and installed properly? Please do: rpm -qa | grep toaster | sort > rpm-list.txt And send ot to me right away. Regards, Nick > I have centos 4.3. I used the upgrade script and hit yes for every > package. > I can't send/receive any e-mails. P

Re: [qmailtoaster] Updated packages

Steve Huff wrote: > 1) am i correct in my understanding that Qmail-Toaster 1.2 doesn't > include a dspam RPM? if so, has anyone had any luck with finding one > that works, or do i need to build my own? I don't know of any rpm for dspam. I thought about doing one but haven't had any spare time fo

Re: [qmailtoaster] Updated packages

On May 2, 2006, at 10:27 AM, Lee R. Copp wrote: Feedback and comments are welcome as well. ok, i've got some :) 1) am i correct in my understanding that Qmail-Toaster 1.2 doesn't include a dspam RPM? if so, has anyone had any luck with finding one that works, or do i need to build my ow

Re: [qmailtoaster] Updated packages

Nick Hemmesch wrote: > Can I link to this page on our website? Sure...:) Feedback and comments are welcome as well. -- Lee R. Copp Project Engineer (EE/ME) http://www.michsci.com/ - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted

Re: [qmailtoaster] Updated packages

Hi Lee, Can I link to this page on our website? Regards, Nick > Marco Cordeiro wrote: >> If not , anyone have a guide to add DSPAM to toaster ?? > > http://mail.michscimfd.com/dspam/ > -- > Lee R. Copp > Project Engineer (EE/ME) > http://www.michsci.com/ > >

Re: [qmailtoaster] Updated packages

Marco Cordeiro wrote: > If not , anyone have a guide to add DSPAM to toaster ?? http://mail.michscimfd.com/dspam/ -- Lee R. Copp Project Engineer (EE/ME) http://www.michsci.com/ - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted

Re: [qmailtoaster] Updated packages

Anyone got a detailed instruction as how to upgrade or is there a scrip tthat does all the grunt work?Thanks.On 4/29/06, dg < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:On 4/28/06, Nick Hemmesch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi all,...Vpopmail is now current. You may have to reinstall courier-imap since itbuilds agai

Re: [qmailtoaster] Updated packages

On 4/28/06, Nick Hemmesch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi all,...Vpopmail is now current. You may have to reinstall courier-imap since itbuilds against the vpopmail library files clarification requested for idiots like me:by "reinstall courier-imap" do you mean my previously compiled courier-imap

RE: [qmailtoaster] Updated packages

BTW, I forget to say thanks to Erik once more ;-)) -Original Message- From: Marco Cordeiro [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: sexta-feira, 28 de abril de 2006 15:02 To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Subject: RE: [qmailtoaster] Updated packages Nick , are you thinking to add DSPAM to

Re: [qmailtoaster] Updated packages

On Fri, Apr 28, 2006 at 11:45:14AM -0500, Nick Hemmesch wrote: > >> I placed updated packages up for download today. All of the changes I > >> wanted in qmail are not included yet, domainkeys and remote-auth. I am > >> working on both of those features. I found that eMPF is still in beta, BTW, thi

RE: [qmailtoaster] Updated packages

] Sent: sexta-feira, 28 de abril de 2006 13:48 To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Updated packages Hi Nigel, It does provide sendmail-command for Mandriva, smtp_daemon for SuSE amd smtpdaemon for Redhat distros. Regards, Nick > Awww man, I just installed all t

Re: [qmailtoaster] Updated packages

On Fri, Apr 28, 2006 at 11:47:43AM -0500, Nick Hemmesch wrote: > Hi Nigel, > > It does provide sendmail-command for Mandriva, smtp_daemon for SuSE amd > smtpdaemon for Redhat distros. Great thanks. I just with they could all get along and agree to use the same thing. Regards Nigel -- www.myoldc

Re: [qmailtoaster] Updated packages

Hi Nigel, It does provide sendmail-command for Mandriva, smtp_daemon for SuSE amd smtpdaemon for Redhat distros. Regards, Nick > Awww man, I just installed all this stuff on Monday! > > Has qmail-toaster been updated so that it "Provides sendmail-command" ? > This is needed for Mandrake 2006 si

Re: [qmailtoaster] Updated packages

> Awww man, I just installed all this stuff on Monday! > > Has qmail-toaster been updated so that it "Provides sendmail-command" ? > This is needed for Mandrake 2006 since mail readers now require > "sendmail-command". > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] SPECS]# rpm -q --requires mutt > sendmail-command > > Than

Re: [qmailtoaster] Updated packages

Reed" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Friday, April 28, 2006 11:52 AM Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Updated packages Awww man, I just installed all this stuff on Monday! Has qmail-toaster been updated so that it "Provides sendmail-command" ? This is needed for Mandrake 2

Re: [qmailtoaster] Updated packages

Awww man, I just installed all this stuff on Monday! Has qmail-toaster been updated so that it "Provides sendmail-command" ? This is needed for Mandrake 2006 since mail readers now require "sendmail-command". [EMAIL PROTECTED] SPECS]# rpm -q --requires mutt sendmail-command Thanks, Nigel On Fr