Eric Shubes wrote:
Warren (mailing lists) wrote:
Eric Shubes wrote:
Thanks for using the Trac system, David. It appears that after submitting
(or changing) a ticket, the screen doesn't come back (stays waiting),
although the update does take. I'm guessing that's why there are 5
tickets
David J. wrote:
Dear Eric,
I've been tried to run the qtp-newmodel script to upgrade my
qmailtoaster. But I gave me the following error. I had run over to file
at line 357: still cannot guess what's the script failed on doing.
Could you gave me some clues ??
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]#
David J. wrote:
- Original Message - From: Eric Shubes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Sent: Monday, February 05, 2007 10:17 PM
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Upgrade through qtp-newmodel Error
If your toaster is running live, I can get a fix committed
Hi ES,
Without looking at the code in much detail, I can tell that the problem lies
with version numbering. This routine assumes (erroneously) that packages
have a version number that conforms to n.n.n-n.n.n format. While this is
true for toaster packages, it's not true for other packages such
Erik Espinoza wrote:
Hi ES,
Without looking at the code in much detail, I can tell that the
problem lies
with version numbering. This routine assumes (erroneously) that packages
have a version number that conforms to n.n.n-n.n.n format. While this is
true for toaster packages, it's not
Hey ES,
Is there a specific version of zlib I can check for in qtp-newmodel (i.e. if
zlib ?.?.?-?.? or better is installed, don't bother with the toaster
version), so that it only asks for the toaster version when necessary?
Execute this: rpm -q --queryformat %{name}-%{version}\n zlib
Should
Erik Espinoza wrote:
Hey ES,
Is there a specific version of zlib I can check for in qtp-newmodel
(i.e. if
zlib ?.?.?-?.? or better is installed, don't bother with the toaster
version), so that it only asks for the toaster version when necessary?
Execute this: rpm -q --queryformat
Correct.
On 2/5/07, Eric Shubes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Erik Espinoza wrote:
Hey ES,
Is there a specific version of zlib I can check for in qtp-newmodel
(i.e. if
zlib ?.?.?-?.? or better is installed, don't bother with the toaster
version), so that it only asks for the toaster version
Eric Shubes wrote:
Thanks for using the Trac system, David. It appears that after submitting
(or changing) a ticket, the screen doesn't come back (stays waiting),
although the update does take. I'm guessing that's why there are 5 tickets
you created for this. ;) No problem. I'll have to Trac
Warren (mailing lists) wrote:
Eric Shubes wrote:
Thanks for using the Trac system, David. It appears that after submitting
(or changing) a ticket, the screen doesn't come back (stays waiting),
although the update does take. I'm guessing that's why there are 5
tickets
you created for this.
appreciate your concern over my problem.
Regards,
David J.
- Original Message -
From: Eric Shubes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Sent: Tuesday, February 06, 2007 12:31 AM
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Upgrade through qtp-newmodel Error
Thanks for using the Trac
@qmailtoaster.com
Sent: Tuesday, February 06, 2007 12:44 AM
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Upgrade through qtp-newmodel Error
Hi ES,
Without looking at the code in much detail, I can tell that the problem
lies
with version numbering. This routine assumes (erroneously) that packages
have a version
- Original Message -
From: Eric Shubes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Sent: Tuesday, February 06, 2007 12:56 AM
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Upgrade through qtp-newmodel Error
Erik Espinoza wrote:
I'd be careful of running this command, as you can be left
David J. wrote:
- Original Message - From: Eric Shubes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Sent: Tuesday, February 06, 2007 12:56 AM
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Upgrade through qtp-newmodel Error
Erik Espinoza wrote:
I'd be careful of running this command
, 2007 12:56 AM
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Upgrade through qtp-newmodel Error
Erik Espinoza wrote:
I'd be careful of running this command, as you can be left with a broken
system.
Eric Shubes wrote:
That's why I asked if he was running live. ;)
Now that I think of it though, rpmbuild might
Eric Shubes wrote:
That's why I asked if he was running live. ;)
Now that I think of it though, rpmbuild might not work without it.
EGADS!
I suppose that it could always be yum'd back though, no?
When zlib is not available, rpmbuild, rpm and yum cannot be executed.
that was I encountered
16 matches
Mail list logo
