Hi all,
im experiencing some problem while sending a mail from yahoo to
mydomain.com
(error can be found in the lower part of this mail)
i tried sending a mail from gmail to mydomain.com and it returns no
error and
mail is delivered successfully
ERROR
Hi.
I am experiencing the exact same problem.
Yes, my domains are in the rcpthosts file.
It seems no one else has any idea, though I am pretty certain we are
not the only ones experiencing this problem.
Harry
On Jan 4, 2007, at 1:05 AM, JM wrote:
Hi all,
im experiencing some problem while
Hi Dan,
About 40 domains and about 90 e-mail address.
Rob
-Original Message-
From: Dan Herbon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 03 January 2007 16:00
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: RE: [qmailtoaster] Migrating from James to qmail
How many domains and users are we
Hello
Could you try this :
remove the domain from rcpthosts and put it in
/var/qmail/control/morercpthosts (create the file if it doesnt exist)
and issue the command /var/qmail/bin/qmail-newmrh
And retest
Give us the results pls
Cheers
-P
Harry Zink wrote:
I am experiencing the exact same
I have the full qmailtoaster on centos 4.4. I do not remember what version
it was I installed. How do I see this?
thanks
What do you have installed?
the newer installs of qmail toaster have a list manager built in.
thanks Q
On Wed, 2007-01-03 at 21:57 -0600, David Milholen wrote:
hello
I have all time about 300 mails in queue, all as local. Concurrentlocal is
set to 20. In send log I see only 2/20 to 4/20 for local delivery. Delivery
time is about 40 min. It's too slow.
Where I may search solution for this problem?
--
Wojciech Gabor
System uptime: 41 years 8 months 1 weeks
Wojciech Gabor wrote:
I have all time about 300 mails in queue, all as local. Concurrentlocal is
set to 20. In send log I see only 2/20 to 4/20 for local delivery. Delivery
time is about 40 min. It's too slow.
Where I may search solution for this problem?
Where'd so many queued messages
I've been tailing my /var/log/maillog log watching pop logins and I had a
quick question. The log shows the following:
-
mailserver vpopmail[12746]: vchkpw-pop3: (PLAIN) login success
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:66.*.*.*
-
My question is, what does the PLAIN mean? Does that
Greetings, Vince.
31 декабря 2006 г., 7:48:57 you have wrote:
Thanks for the update and patch. I've installed them and also set
DKDEBUG.
I looked through qmail-dk code (and did searches) but I don't seem to be
able to find where to control the scope of my outgoing signatures. Is
that
Greetings, Shai.
1 ?? 2007 ?., 8:23:22 you have wrote:
I want to disable one of the accounts on the server since we no
longer use it for getting new mail but on the other hand, want to keep
the emails there for review.
How can I do this?
# ~vpopmail/bin/vmoduser -b [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Alexey Loukianov wrote:
Greetings, Shai.
1 ?? 2007 ?., 8:23:22 you have wrote:
I want to disable one of the accounts on the server since we no
longer use it for getting new mail but on the other hand, want to keep
the emails there for review.
How can I do this?
#
Greetings, Vince.
4 января 2007 г., 0:44:36 you have wrote:
I think I narrowed down the issue. It's with mailing list programs.
All of my dk failures are list related. The one that was the most
troublesome shows up now with the new logging features:
2007-01-03 01:48:44.455021500
On Thu, 2007-01-04 at 10:46 -0700, Eric Shubes wrote:
Alexey Loukianov wrote:
Greetings, Shai.
1 ?? 2007 ?., 8:23:22 you have wrote:
I want to disable one of the accounts on the server since we no
longer use it for getting new mail but on the other hand, want to
keep the emails
I think the problem may be with the qmail-dk not setting an h= line
limiting what is signed.
Forwarded Gmail messages still show up as DomainKey-Status good, but
e-mails generated by the QmailToaster do not.
It looks like we don't have full compliance with the spec.
On 1/4/07, Alexey Loukianov
Well, I just did as you instructed, and the behavior has not really
changed.
I am able to SEND *from* the affected account, and the recipients
receive it.
When I try to reply from the affected account, or other try to send
mail from the account, I receive the following:
I fail to see
Kyle Quillen wrote:
On Thu, 2007-01-04 at 10:46 -0700, Eric Shubes wrote:
Alexey Loukianov wrote:
Greetings, Shai.
1 ?? 2007 ?., 8:23:22 you have wrote:
I want to disable one of the accounts on the server since we no
longer use it for getting new mail but on the other hand, want to
Ok
relay access denied
The ip you are sending from is it listed in your
/etc/tcprules.d/tcp.smtp file ? with a line with this option
RELAYCLIENT= so you dont have to auth to relay ...
If not what methode are you using to allow relaying through your server
? smtp auth, pop before smtp ?
Philip,
Initially, the error I received was RCPThosts related., specifically
the 553 or 554 related error.
These were, also, incidentally many of my roaming users (on Treo
PDAs, or on laptops), though the recent relaying issues happened on
my desktop at the office, using a newly created
On Wed, 3 Jan 2007 19:41:52 +0700, Firdaus Tjahyadi wrote:
i have configure my /usr/share/spamassassin/70_sare_stocks.cf file like this
bodySARE_PHYA /Physicians Adult Daycare/i
describeSARE_PHYA PHYA
score SARE_PHYA 2.66
Don't forget
wget http://saupdates.openprotect.com/pub.gpg
sa-learn pub.gpg
Erik
On 1/4/07, Quinn Comendant [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 3 Jan 2007 19:41:52 +0700, Firdaus Tjahyadi wrote:
i have configure my /usr/share/spamassassin/70_sare_stocks.cf file like this
body
that should be sa-update --import pub.gpg
Erik
On 1/4/07, Erik Espinoza [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Don't forget
wget http://saupdates.openprotect.com/pub.gpg
sa-learn pub.gpg
Erik
On 1/4/07, Quinn Comendant [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 3 Jan 2007 19:41:52 +0700, Firdaus Tjahyadi wrote:
i
This problem has me stumped at the moment.
A (relatively) high volume toaster (10.0.1.69) on CentOS4. It's been running
fine for the most part. However, when processing messages from a local web
server (10.0.1.66) relayed from postfix, the message doesn't go through.
FWIW (doesn't make sense to
This problem has me stumped at the moment.
A (relatively) high volume toaster (10.0.1.69) on CentOS4. It's been
running
fine for the most part. However, when processing messages from a local web
server (10.0.1.66) relayed from postfix, the message doesn't go through.
FWIW (doesn't make
Is your webserver SMTP host set to localhost or 127.0.0.1 ?
One of the issues I've run into with the FDR60 installs is that
localhost is defined with an ipv6 address. Attempting to connect to
localhost will fail.
-
Eric Shubes wrote:
This problem has me stumped at the moment.
A (relatively) high volume toaster (10.0.1.69) on CentOS4. It's been running
fine for the most part. However, when processing messages from a local web
server (10.0.1.66) relayed from postfix, the message doesn't go through.
FWIW
Sounds like an smtp route is missing in the postfix. Your postfix is
probably connecting to the outside static ip instead of attempting to
hit 10.0.1.69 directly on the private network.
See if, frm a diff machine, you can hit 10.0.1.69 from the outside ip.
On 1/4/07, Eric Shubes [EMAIL
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This problem has me stumped at the moment.
A (relatively) high volume toaster (10.0.1.69) on CentOS4. It's been
running
fine for the most part. However, when processing messages from a local web
server (10.0.1.66) relayed from postfix, the message doesn't go through.
Vince Callaway wrote:
Is your webserver SMTP host set to localhost or 127.0.0.1 ?
I'm not sure what you mean. However, when I ping localhost, it resolves to
127.0.0.1 so I think that's ok.
One of the issues I've run into with the FDR60 installs is that
localhost is defined with an ipv6
Erik Espinoza wrote:
Sounds like an smtp route is missing in the postfix.
I'll buy that, since the /var/log/maillog on the web server says:
Jan 4 21:47:51 hostname postfix/smtp[30371]: connect to
mail.mydomain.com[10.0.1.70]: No route to host (port 25)
(see reply to Jake)
Your postfix is
Hi all Can i use SURBL with my qmailtoaster installation it is the one
before domainkeys, latest spamasassin toaster.
are there any issue with this usage ?
thank you
Sorry for the late reply, My tcp.smtp file looks like this, i dont have a
domainkeys toaster.
127.:allow,RELAYCLIENT=
192.168.1.4:allow,RELAYCLIENT=
192.168.1.2:allow,RELAYCLIENT=
192.168.1.5:allow,RELAYCLIENT=
192.168.1.200:allow,RELAYCLIENT=
192.168.1.201:allow,RELAYCLIENT=
http://wiki.qmailtoaster.com/index.php/SURBL
On 1/4/07, Stanley Robins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all Can i use SURBL with my qmailtoaster installation it is the one
before domainkeys, latest spamasassin toaster.
are there any issue with this usage ?
thank you
32 matches
Mail list logo
