Hi !
Very strange issue here !
I've been using a qmailtoaster 4.2 for 2 years now . Everything ok .
Here is my setup :
Our ISP handles our domain (e-mails included ) . What I did is just
creating a forwarding rules on the firewall which routes e-mails coming
from the relaying server of our
Thanks Jake I will give it a try.
David Milholen wrote:
I need to finish what I started. I have a xls spread sheet with about
300
emails and I need them in a list I can send a single message to. I want
to
create a few more list so that I have a list for different
groups/subject.
I do
I will put that list in mine and see how well it works for me. I just know
that a link I had brought my server to its knees. What causes it to do
that?
It had been working fine until I rebooted for maint.
Thanks
On Mon, 2007-01-08 at 21:39 -0600, David Milholen wrote:
I found it a link in the
Massimiliano Fontana wrote:
Hi !
Very strange issue here !
I've been using a qmailtoaster 4.2 for 2 years now . Everything ok .
Here is my setup :
Our ISP handles our domain (e-mails included ) . What I did is just
creating a forwarding rules on the firewall which routes e-mails
coming from
What is up with the long string of numbers and letters?
David Milholen wrote:
I need to finish what I started. I have a xls spread sheet with about
300
emails and I need them in a list I can send a single message to. I want
to
create a few more list so that I have a list for different
David Milholen wrote:
What is up with the long string of numbers and letters?
You have it set for moderator-approve-before-send. That reply message is
so that someone (like me) can't send a message to your list, then spoof
the approving-email-address to get my spam message out. Would be
Massimiliano Fontana wrote:
Jake Vickers ha scritto:
Massimiliano Fontana wrote:
Hi !
Very strange issue here !
I've been using a qmailtoaster 4.2 for 2 years now . Everything ok .
Here is my setup :
Our ISP handles our domain (e-mails included ) . What I did is just
creating a forwarding
I thought that was why, thanks for the enlightenment:)
David Milholen wrote:
What is up with the long string of numbers and letters?
You have it set for moderator-approve-before-send. That reply message is
so that someone (like me) can't send a message to your list, then spoof
the
What is in /var/qmail/control/blacklists
I removed what you suggested . Now the system is flying !! thanks a
lot !
-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
Seems there are quite some problems with this today/last night.
If I am not mistaken the timeout is default 60 secs per rbl, normally one
would think this would not give to much problems. But then again if your
timeout on the client side is lowish and 1 or 2 are not working you will get
this
Jean-Paul van de Plasse wrote:
Seems there are quite some problems with this today/last night.
If I am not mistaken the timeout is default 60 secs per rbl, normally
one would think this would not give to much problems. But then again
if your timeout on the client side is lowish and 1 or 2 are
I have a customer who has lost the password to login into
domain.com/admin-toaster/. I am able to ssh to the box as root but
don't know where the .htaccess file is stored. Does anyone know where
this file is stored and if there is anything else to do to either
recover or change the password.
For a default install:
/usr/share/toaster/include/admin.htpasswd
For a non default install cat your /etc/http/conf/toaster.conf file to
locate the .htpasswd file
Dan
_
From: Josh Hopkins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 09, 2007 9:41 AM
To:
Dear all,
I've enabled the roaming users configuration as per the instructions in
http://wiki.qmailtoaster.com/index.php/Vpopmail_-_roaming_users_configuration.
However, I can't manage to have roaming working... here is a simulation of the
symptoms:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# telnet
On Tue, 2007-01-09 at 08:57 -0500, Jake Vickers wrote:
I did write a script that checks the response times on blacklists and
I've used your script and it works great. I don't use it to do an
automatic update, but use it to debug.
For those that don't know, the blacklists use a modified DNS
Fernando Azevedo wrote:
Dear all,
I've enabled the roaming users configuration as per the instructions
in
http://wiki.qmailtoaster.com/index.php/Vpopmail_-_roaming_users_configuration.
However, I can't manage to have roaming working... here is a
simulation of the symptoms:
[EMAIL
Greetings, Stanley.
5 ?? 2007 ?., 10:13:02 you have wrote:
I am sending out newsletters and simscan hits a bottleneck with
spamd and clamd, i have disabled some rules but still there a lot
problems at times..nowwhatiwanttodoisdisablespamfiltering
andclamscanningwithipaddress..solikeifmy
Greetings, Joseph.
5 января 2007 г., 20:29:12 you have wrote:
What is the proper way to disable and uninstall simscan and clamav. I
tried to do this just after my upgrade to the current version, but mail
stopped processing altogether. At that time, I merely uninstalled the
Greetings, Erik.
4 января 2007 г., 20:56:59 you have wrote:
I think the problem may be with the qmail-dk not setting an h= line
limiting what is signed.
Forwarded Gmail messages still show up as DomainKey-Status good, but
e-mails generated by the QmailToaster do not.
It looks like we
Greetings, qmailtech.
7 ?? 2007 ?., 5:29:19 you have wrote:
I'm trying my first install of QMT on CentOS 4.4. I've installed minimal
for OS Install and am following the CentOS install procedure. I'm running
each command in the scripts line by line to insure all is well, and when I
try
Is a restart of apache *required* for this upgrade for some reason? If so,
I'd like to include that in qtp-newmodel processing.
Erik Espinoza wrote:
Thanks for updating us quickly about this. Had me worried for a minute. . .
Erik
On 1/8/07, slamp slamp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i guess it
Greetings, Isianto.
9 ?? 2007 ?., 7:13:00 you have wrote:
Dear Erik,
Thanks for you answer
First of all sorry for my english
What I mean is I want to restrict the size of email being sent and
recieved. when I use databyte only an email being received is being
applied. But my client
I didn't know it was. I didn't have to restart apache on my side.
On 1/9/07, Eric Shubes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is a restart of apache *required* for this upgrade for some reason? If so,
I'd like to include that in qtp-newmodel processing.
Erik Espinoza wrote:
Thanks for updating us quickly
Greetings, Eric.
4 ?? 2007 ?., 19:41:19 you have wrote:
Do
# qmHandle -a
to try sending them right away. You should see 20/20 in the send log right
after this is run. (qmHandle is part of the qmailtoaster-plus package)
# qmailctl doqueue
will do just the same trick, but you don't need
Greetings, Dan.
4 января 2007 г., 20:01:29 you have wrote:
I’ve been tailing my /var/log/maillog log watching pop logins and I
had a quick question. The log shows the following:
-
mailserver vpopmail[12746]: vchkpw-pop3: (PLAIN) login success [EMAIL
PROTECTED]:66.*.*.*
Fernando Azevedo wrote:
Hi all!
I’ve finished a major upgrade (machine included) of some servers.
In the original machines Horde-Toaster was still used as webmail and now
SquirrelMail is the choice. The isse is that in horde there was a lot of
notes stored that my client wants to
Greetings, Stanley.
8 ?? 2007 ?., 10:35:02 you have wrote:
I am seeing a lot of emails like this in my queue. can anyone tell me what is
it all about ?
Who is this [EMAIL PROTECTED] ?
7 Jan 2007 08:55:08 GMT #8750141 36131 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
remote [EMAIL PROTECTED]
8
I'll not worry about it unless we hear of this again.
Thanks EE.
Erik Espinoza wrote:
I didn't know it was. I didn't have to restart apache on my side.
On 1/9/07, Eric Shubes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is a restart of apache *required* for this upgrade for some reason? If
so,
I'd like to
On Tue, 09 Jan 2007 17:22:09 +0100, Philip Nix Guru wrote:
look at point 3
3. The roaming system authorize a user who authentificated (pop3
before smtp)
to have tcp.smtp.cdb updated you need to check your mail with a
pop3 client
Also note that roaming access is only available to users
David Milholen wrote:
I will put that list in mine and see how well it works for me. I just know
that a link I had brought my server to its knees. What causes it to do
that?
relay.ordb.org has had some problems lately. I removed it back on 12/18. The
toaster crawls when an RBL is down or slow.
The new version allows upgrades from development (thanks to EE).
Blacklists have been modified too.
Documentation forthcoming.
NJoy!
--
-Eric 'shubes'
-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
Vince Callaway wrote:
On Tue, 2007-01-09 at 08:57 -0500, Jake Vickers wrote:
I did write a script that checks the response times on blacklists and
I've used your script and it works great. I don't use it to do an
automatic update, but use it to debug.
For those that don't know, the
Jake Vickers wrote:
Jean-Paul van de Plasse wrote:
Seems there are quite some problems with this today/last night.
If I am not mistaken the timeout is default 60 secs per rbl, normally
one would think this would not give to much problems. But then again
if your timeout on the client side is
I'd prefer the wishlist be added to the wiki. I've been very busy as
of late with the QmailToaster. I think I'll be moving the courier
packages over by early next week and shortly afterwards will be moving
the rest.
Thanks,
Erik
On 1/9/07, Eric Shubes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jake Vickers
Tks Eric!
I always google (after checking the wiki) before resorting to the list... I'll
keep looking anyway!
Fernando
De: Eric Shubes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Enviada: ter 09-01-2007 17:45
Para: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Assunto: Re:
You are correct. It took me forever to determine that, as it is no
longer optional on DKIM. DKIM is the new replacement for DomainKeys,
based on the same technology.
Erik
On 1/9/07, Alexey Loukianov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Greetings, Erik.
4 января 2007 г., 20:56:59 you have wrote:
I think
Alexey Loukianov wrote:
Greetings, Eric.
4 ?? 2007 ?., 19:41:19 you have wrote:
Do
# qmHandle -a
to try sending them right away. You should see 20/20 in the send log right
after this is run. (qmHandle is part of the qmailtoaster-plus package)
# qmailctl doqueue
will do just the
Philip,
If you notice the example below from my original e-mail, I've authenticated via
POP3 before trying the SMTP. I've now bolded that part to be more obvious.
Should anything else be changed during config time further that what is
described in the WIKI?
Thank you all in advance,
Eric Shubes wrote:
Jake Vickers wrote:
Jean-Paul van de Plasse wrote:
Seems there are quite some problems with this today/last night.
If I am not mistaken the timeout is default 60 secs per rbl, normally
one would think this would not give to much problems. But then again
if your
All,
Another input in case someone has any ideas: I've tried authenticating my SMTP
session and could not send the message anyhow... It returned an #5.3.0
permanent error
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# telnet mail.somedomain.pt 25
Trying 213.13.124.33...
Connected to mail.somedomain.pt
Hi Fernando
In the original machines Horde-Toaster was still used as webmail and now
SquirrelMail is the choice. The isse is that in horde there was a lot of
notes stored that my client wants to recover/import into squirrel. Does
anyone know where that info is stored and how to retrieve it?
The patches applied without any problems, using it now for some testing.
Do not really know how to test/fake a slow rbl tho ..
Jean-Paul
I intend to get this script (a very nice one I might add) included in
qmailtoaster-plus. None the less, I think these patches would be a
valuable
addition
Hello Fernando
Yes sorry
I read too quick ...
Actually I think I wrote the whole setup on the wiki
Try to run /home/vpopmail/bin/clearopensmtp
and check if tcp.smtp.cdb got updated in any way
Fernando Azevedo wrote:
Philip,
If you notice the example below from my original e-mail, I've
relay.ordb.org?
Jean-Paul van de Plasse wrote:
The patches applied without any problems, using it now for some testing.
Do not really know how to test/fake a slow rbl tho ..
Jean-Paul
I intend to get this script (a very nice one I might add) included in
qmailtoaster-plus. None the less,
Erik Espinoza wrote:
I'd prefer the wishlist be added to the wiki.
Done. I've added Jean-Paul's request to get it started.
I've been very busy as
of late with the QmailToaster. I think I'll be moving the courier
packages over by early next week and shortly afterwards will be moving
the
Thank you
Any docs on setting up either POP3-SSL or POP3-TLS? I know nothing about pop
or smtp SSL. Same type of certificate required that I'd use for a webserver?
Dan
-Original Message-
From: Alexey Loukianov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 09, 2007 12:39 PM
To: Dan
Hello,
Installed a new qmailtoaster fdr60 few days ago.
I'm trying to send an email to myself from outlook with smtp-auth
but looks like my home cable modem connection is blacklisted at sorbs.
Is there a way to use still this blacklists but accepting emails from smtp
authenticated users? Maybe
Dan Herbon wrote:
Thank you
Any docs on setting up either POP3-SSL or POP3-TLS? I know nothing about pop
or smtp SSL. Same type of certificate required that I'd use for a webserver?
Yes.
See http://wiki.qmailtoaster.com/index.php/Certificate
Use POP3-TLS, as POP3-SSL is depreciated.
Dan
Andras Kende wrote:
Hello,
Installed a new qmailtoaster fdr60 few days ago.
I'm trying to send an email to myself from outlook with smtp-auth
but looks like my home cable modem connection is blacklisted at sorbs.
Is there a way to use still this blacklists but accepting emails from smtp
Your message was rejected at the receiving end, not the sending end (if I'm
reading this right).
Given that your toaster is on a dynamic address, you'll need to re-route
your outgoing email (in those cases) using the /var/qmail/control/smtproutes
file. You can try rerouting to your ISP's outgoing
POP3-SSL isn't deprecated.
Most clients don't know how to do POP3-TLS, but definitely know how to
do POP3-SSL.
It's only SMTP-SSL that's been deprecated in favor of SMTP-TLS.
Erik
On 1/9/07, Eric Shubes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dan Herbon wrote:
Thank you
Any docs on setting up either
My bad. The SSL page on the wiki could use some clarification. ;)
Thanks for the correction, EE.
So in general, for secure connections, one should configure their client(s)
to use pop3-ssl (port 995) and smtp w/ tls (port 25). Right?
Erik Espinoza wrote:
POP3-SSL isn't deprecated.
Most
Yea I don't think the SMTP port changes, but I might be wrong.
Dan
-Original Message-
From: Eric Shubes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 09, 2007 3:49 PM
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] vchcpw-pop3
My bad. The SSL page on the wiki
-Original Message-
From: Jake Vickers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 09, 2007 12:29 PM
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] smtp-auth blacklist question
Andras Kende wrote:
Hello,
Installed a new qmailtoaster fdr60 few days ago.
I'm
Eric,
The email server is at remote location (T1 reverse dns)..
Using qmail for years but this was the first install with RBL SPAM etc..
Got scared first why is blocking me if I'm authenticated sender even if my
home ip is blacklisted..
Upgraded to devel toaster sending on port 587 fixed this
Dan,
If you used the easy way toaster installation from the web site then you
should already have a self-signed certificate and the appropriate firewall
settings (IMAP-SSL port 993, POP3-SSL port 995 and SMTP w/TLS port 25). All
you really need to do is try it from a client to see if it all
I've managed to build a new toaster on CentOS 4.4 and incoming mail is
arriving and readable ok. When I try to send an email, either to myself
or outside, I get an error message 'no valid mx record for domain'. I
built the toaster with djbdns as I have a couple DNS servers in my own
domain.
Thanks Eric,
I get this error even from the box itself using the squirrelmail client.
Kind regards,
Mark.
Erik Espinoza wrote:
Make sure you have smtp-auth enabled on the client, or that you have
specified 'RELAYCLIENT=' for the machine trying to relay through
your Toaster.
Erik
On
qtp-ami-up2date now handles release numbers properly. I also added a -d
(or -dev or -devel) flag for including checking the devel packages (in
addition to checking the stable site).
Documentation forthcoming.
NJoy!
--
-Eric 'shubes'
Hey Eric,
Does it ask questions for spambox/srs when building/upgrading the
qmailadmin/qmail-toaster packages?
On 1/9/07, Eric Shubes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
qtp-ami-up2date now handles release numbers properly. I also added a -d
(or -dev or -devel) flag for including checking the devel
That explains things. I thought your toaster was on a dynamic address.
I'm still confused though, as to why your toaster accepted the message to
begin with, then replied back with an email rejection. If the MSA session on
port 25 is rejected due to blacklist, wouldn't the message be rejected
Nope.
For spambox, it unconditionally adds that parameter for the
qmailadmin-toaster package. I haven't added anything for srs yet.
I kinda figured that it wouldn't hurt to have spambox as a default. Is there
a reason why someone wouldn't want it?
If these need to be optional (I can see where
What is the domain name configured for the client (sender's email address)?
(You don't need to answer here, just check it out for the next question)
What do you get when you 'dig' that domain's MX from the toaster?
Mark Piekos wrote:
Eric,
I added a screenshot from a thunderbird client which
Hi Eric,
I left it optional, as it requires the maildrop-toaster be updated as
well. I think spambox can be made a default in a future release with
the ability to turn it off.
Thanks,
Erik
On 1/9/07, Eric Shubes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nope.
For spambox, it unconditionally adds that
Sounds good. I'm guessing you can handle whatever dependencies in the spec
file. Let me know when it's in there and I'll remove that code from newmodel
(no big deal).
I'll tackle working anything special for srs into newmodel at some point in
the future. It'll handle installing the new package
If qmail-toaster is compiled with srs enabled, it requires that
libsrs2-toaster be installed.
I have updated the current.txt on the devel site to show
libsrs2-toaster before the the qmail-toaster package.
Thanks,
Erik
On 1/9/07, Eric Shubes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sounds good. I'm guessing
Eric,
Thanks for the suggestion. I did some 'dig-ing' and found an error in
my dns config. It's been that way for ages and shouldn't have worked.
I can only guess that there was something about the old toaster that
compensated for this.
I haven't been able to test it but expect it will
Perhaps the older toaster version you're running didn't check MX records for
sender (chkuser). Doesn't matter though. Glad you got your DNS straigtened out!
Mark Piekos wrote:
Eric,
Thanks for the suggestion. I did some 'dig-ing' and found an error in
my dns config. It's been that way for
Sounds good.
Is there any reason why someone would want to disable srs? If so, can it be
disabled even though qmail-toaster was compiled with it on and
libsrs2-toaster is installed? What should the default (stock) toaster be? It
seems to me that having srs enabled with libsrs2-toaster as a
Hey ES,
The reason that qmail-toaster requires a compile time option is because:
1) Not everyone is going to configure SRS
2) SRS can complicate things, thus I want to ensure admin's know they
are turning it on.
3) The SRS patch can't be runtime disabled. This WILL cause unexpected
issues if one
How to disable the SRS if compiled with SRS enabled?
Regards
--
Jakin Lee
See-Thru Data Systems Ltd.
Hong Kong
Tel : +852.28733883
Skype : seethru.jakin
-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
So, should I upgrade my whole package? or just the qmail part?
Maybe it will give me a leg up to install the large server patch. I
really think i need it because I have the one customer that has a legit
business for sending about 6000 msgs at one time.
I am even thinking of setting up another
You can't. That's why we made it optional.
On 1/9/07, Jakin Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How to disable the SRS if compiled with SRS enabled?
Regards
--
Jakin Lee
See-Thru Data Systems Ltd.
Hong Kong
Tel : +852.28733883
Skype : seethru.jakin
Eric,
Actually it's working perfectly on port 587.
But I thought it's should be possible to skip rbl chekcing, send out emails
even from blacklisted ip if smtp-auth is valid.
The server is setup correctly it can send email if default blacklist is used
but not with loose or moderate blacklists.
One thing to keep in mind when adding multiple ip's on a machine... the smtp
services will use the LAST ip listed on the box. That can play havoc with
reverse dns, tcprules, firewalls, ect. I learned it the hard way with a
machine I switched to add additional ip's last year and we started
200, is my databytes
On 1/9/07, Erik Espinoza [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Paste your databytes file. I want to verify this.
Erik
On 1/8/07, Isianto Istiadi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear Erik,
Thanks for you answer
First of all sorry for my english
What I mean is I want to restrict the
I'm sure 100%, since all connection from client (direct to internet)
to any pop/smtp server other than localhost are blocked
Isianto
On 1/10/07, Alexey Loukianov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Greetings, Isianto.
9 ?? 2007 ?., 7:13:00 you have wrote:
Dear Erik,
Thanks for you answer
First
Is there any apm box option in this 12/18/2006 edition?
I've already rebuild the qmailadmin, but still no spam check box in email
settings..
From the website:
10/28/2006 - Updated maildrop and qmailadmin package to include fixed
mailfilter. Build qmailadmin with --define 'spambox 1' to include
qmailadmin support for the new mailfilter. (Thanks to Mark Samples)
When you built qmailadmin, did you include the --define 'spambox 1'.
Dear all,,
Can somebody post me tips to stop Image SPAM.
Ashok Reddy D P
System Administrator Linux, Irix
--
You can add .jpg, .png and .gif to simcontrol. But then no images will
make it through.
Erik
On 1/9/07, ashok [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear all,,
Can somebody post me tips to stop Image SPAM.
Ashok Reddy D P
System Administrator Linux, Irix
81 matches
Mail list logo
