I am getting this error when builing lbrsr2-toaster.
RPM build errors:
File not found by glob:
/var/tmp/libsrs2-toaster-1.0.18-root/usr/lib64/libsrs2.so.*
File not found: /var/tmp/libsrs2-toaster-1.0.18-root/usr/lib64/libsrs2.a
File not found:
Hello
I was gonna install that new qt from the dev site
I was wondering if any1 ran into problems building the libsrs2 rpm ?
I have the problem on 2 different FC5 machines
same build error
any ideas ?
Thx
-P
cut here ---
Processing files: libsrs2-toaster-1.0.18-1.3.1
Executing(%doc):
Here is a longer detail of the compilation error
---cut
Processing files: libsrs2-toaster-1.0.18-1.3.1
error: File not found by glob:
/var/tmp/libsrs2-toaster-1.0.18-root/usr/lib64/libsrs2.so.*
error: File not found:
/var/tmp/libsrs2-toaster-1.0.18-root/usr/lib64/libsrs2.a
error: File not found:
For some reason, it wrote those files to this directory
/var/tmp/libsrs2-toaster-1.0.18-root/usr/lib/
and not
/var/tmp/libsrs2-toaster-1.0.18-root/usr/lib64/
Can you someone check the 64 bit build script?
Here is a longer detail of the compilation error
---cut
Processing files:
Of course I ment build error not compilation error
it definatly doesnt work on FC3 FC4 FC5 FC6 (manual compilation works)
all got the same error I listed below.
On centos 4.4 it worked
Philip wrote:
Hello
I was gonna install that new qt from the dev site
I was wondering if any1 ran into
Spanis
Hola todos, quiciera saber si alguien a implementado el bogofilter com
qmailtoaster y como lo ha hecho, por que he leido varios manuales pero no me
funciona, lo instale por medio de un rpm, pero no consigo que funcione con
qmail de antemano gracias, el sa no me esta filtrando y se me
sa-learn is using so much memory and CPU time that it is killing my
server. I have renamed it for now, but would like to know if there is a
way to limit the amount of memory or processes that it uses?
Thanks,
Warren
-
Warren (mailing lists) wrote:
sa-learn is using so much memory and CPU time that it is killing my
server. I have renamed it for now, but would like to know if there is
a way to limit the amount of memory or processes that it uses?
I had the same problem here. 67M a process eats up the ram
My system is taking a long time to give the SMTP greeting these days -
over 30 seconds in fact. There are generally less than 10 concurrent
incoming jobs according to the logs - in fact there were only 3 when I
telnetted to port 25 last, but it still took 32 seconds to get the greeting.
The
As been the problem for others the last days.
Check your blacklists , remove ordb.org entries (ordb.org does not exists
anymore).
Jean-Paul
- Original Message -
From: Warren (mailing lists) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Sent: Friday, January 12, 2007 3:24
Jake Vickers wrote:
Warren (mailing lists) wrote:
sa-learn is using so much memory and CPU time that it is killing my
server. I have renamed it for now, but would like to know if there is
a way to limit the amount of memory or processes that it uses?
I had the same problem here. 67M a
Jake Vickers wrote:
Warren (mailing lists) wrote:
sa-learn is using so much memory and CPU time that it is killing my
server. I have renamed it for now, but would like to know if there is
a way to limit the amount of memory or processes that it uses?
I had the same problem here. 67M a
Warren (mailing lists) wrote:
Jake Vickers wrote:
Warren (mailing lists) wrote:
sa-learn is using so much memory and CPU time that it is killing my
server. I have renamed it for now, but would like to know if there
is a way to limit the amount of memory or processes that it uses?
I had the
Warren (mailing lists) wrote:
Jake Vickers wrote:
Warren (mailing lists) wrote:
sa-learn is using so much memory and CPU time that it is killing my
server. I have renamed it for now, but would like to know if there
is a way to limit the amount of memory or processes that it uses?
I had the
So busy today, didnt have time to dig into it yet
but the spec file in the dist
(http://www.libsrs2.org/srs/libsrs2-1.0.18.tar.gz)
wont work either on a FC system.
Will check back later tonight
Philip wrote:
Of course I ment build error not compilation error
it definatly doesnt work on FC3
Not sure what the default is on the install these days, but you also
might consider disabling reverse dns checking, in the
/var/qmail/supervise/smtp/run file.
my run file:
#!/bin/sh
QMAILDUID=`id -u vpopmail`
NOFILESGID=`id -g vpopmail`
MAXSMTPD=`cat /var/qmail/control/concurrencyincoming`
I am also having trouble on a centos 4064 system (worked fine on cnt40
box)...
#rpmbuild --rebuild --with cnt4064 libsrs2-toaster-*.src.rpm
...snip
RPM build errors:
File not found by glob:
/var/tmp/libsrs2-toaster-1.0.18-root/usr/lib64/libsrs2.so.*
File not found:
Jason,
You appear to have the same problem as Trung, which is apparently limited to
64 bit machines. As he discovered, the files not found are being put in the
lib directory instead of the lib64 directory. I expect that's a bug in the
Makefile, which I'm sure EE will look into when he gets a the
Warren (mailing lists) wrote:
Jake Vickers wrote:
Warren (mailing lists) wrote:
sa-learn is using so much memory and CPU time that it is killing my
server. I have renamed it for now, but would like to know if there
is a way to limit the amount of memory or processes that it uses?
I had the
Hi Eric
there is no /usr/lib/libsrs2.so on any of the systems I tested, it is
the building script that bugs on fedora systems
I tested on 2 fc3, 1 fc4 and 3 fc5 none have the libsrs2 installed
it did work on a fc5 where I had libsrs2 compiled previoulsy
Eric Shubes wrote:
Jason,
You appear
Eric Shubes wrote:
Warren (mailing lists) wrote:
Jake Vickers wrote:
Warren (mailing lists) wrote:
sa-learn is using so much memory and CPU time that it is killing my
server. I have renamed it for now, but would like to know if there
is a way to limit the amount of memory or
That's very peculiar. Sounds like a bug all right. I'm not much help with
FC. I'm sure that EE (or someone else?) can help you out with it when he
gets the time.
Philip Nix Guru wrote:
Hi Eric
there is no /usr/lib/libsrs2.so on any of the systems I tested, it is
the building script that bugs
I have started getting a lot of backscatter, and see it is coming from
addresses that don't exist on the domain. I know there should be a way
to do a check at rcpt to: for bad addresses, but need to know how to
turn it on.
-
Nathan Grennan wrote:
I have started getting a lot of backscatter, and see it is coming from
addresses that don't exist on the domain. I know there should be a way
to do a check at rcpt to: for bad addresses, but need to know how to
turn it on.
I presume these are coming into your catchall
Eric Shubes wrote:
I presume these are coming into your catchall account.
Is
http://wiki.qmailtoaster.com/index.php/Account_verification_using_badmailto
what you're looking for?
I thought I had disabled the catchall a while back. I just checked and
found it enabled on the postmaster
Greetings,
I have re-released libsrs2-toaser, with minor packaging fixes. This
should work properly on 64 bit and Fedora releases. It is available
for download on the main site.
Thanks,
Erik
-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR
My apologies, This has been fixed and is available for download from
the main site.
Thanks,
Erik
On 1/12/07, Eric Shubes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's very peculiar. Sounds like a bug all right. I'm not much help with
FC. I'm sure that EE (or someone else?) can help you out with it when he
I got access to a 64 bit machine to test this, and foudn the problem.
This has been fixed and is avialable for download on the main site.
Thanks,
Erik
On 1/12/07, Trung Pham [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For some reason, it wrote those files to this directory
New package released fixes this. Please try again.
On 1/12/07, Philip [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello
I was gonna install that new qt from the dev site
I was wondering if any1 ran into problems building the libsrs2 rpm ?
I have the problem on 2 different FC5 machines
same build error
any ideas ?
Thx Erik
works on FC systems now
Erik Espinoza wrote:
My apologies, This has been fixed and is available for download from
the main site.
Thanks,
Erik
On 1/12/07, Eric Shubes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's very peculiar. Sounds like a bug all right. I'm not much help
with
FC. I'm sure that
Jake Vickers wrote:
Stefano Scalise wrote:
Hi to all,
I am going to implement a mail server based on qmailtoaster. I saw
that qmailtoaster comes with a mysql-based installation. As I need an
authentication method qmail-based, do you think it is easily
switchable teh authentication from
Nice job, EE. I don't know what we'd do without you!
Erik Espinoza wrote:
I got access to a 64 bit machine to test this, and foudn the problem.
This has been fixed and is avialable for download on the main site.
Thanks,
Erik
On 1/12/07, Trung Pham [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For some
Nathan Grennan wrote:
Eric Shubes wrote:
I presume these are coming into your catchall account.
Is
http://wiki.qmailtoaster.com/index.php/Account_verification_using_badmailto
what you're looking for?
I thought I had disabled the catchall a while back. I just checked and
found it
Evening
I am gonna feel guilty to annow EE with the FC machines
got this while building qmail-toaster-1.03-1.3.11
./compile srs.c
srs.c: In function 'setup':
srs.c:23: warning: implicit declaration of function 'chdir'
srs.c:24: warning: implicit declaration of function 'control_init'
srs.c:26:
Looks accurate to me. The amount of work to keep this codebase alive,
secure and stable takes a lot of time. Adding a major change like this
isn't in the cards. If someone wants to take the current base, rework
the vpopmail and merge it into the mainstream I can add it as an
unsupported feature
Warren (mailing lists) wrote:
...so I sent out all of these great replies, but after I had changed my
connection and forgotten to change my spf record to match - duh.
Doh! (It's actually in the dictionary now)
Anyway, I turned off sa-learn in the mailfilter script and do not have
to deal
Warren (mailing lists) wrote:
Jake Vickers wrote:
Eric Shubes wrote:
Warren (mailing lists) wrote:
Jake Vickers wrote:
Warren (mailing lists) wrote:
sa-learn is using so much memory and CPU time that it is killing my
server. I have renamed it for now, but would like to know if
I noticed that simscan was not able to be called in the logs. When I
try to run it directly (./simscan in the bin directory) it gives a segfault.
Any ideas?
W
-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
Hello Waren
I noticed the same thing the other day with simscan v1.3.1
try simscan -v ... it wont segfault .. it doesnt for me :)
Warren (mailing lists) wrote:
I noticed that simscan was not able to be called in the logs. When I
try to run it directly (./simscan in the bin directory) it gives
On Fri, 2007-01-12 at 10:48 -0800, Nathan Grennan wrote:
I switched it to bounce.
This should give me the desired recipient checking without any more
backscatter?
Problem now is backspam. Spammers use bogus addresses all the time. I
have a couple of domains that have been the victim of
Could you paste the log output. I've not noticed any problems.
Erik
On 1/12/07, Warren (mailing lists) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I noticed that simscan was not able to be called in the logs. When I
try to run it directly (./simscan in the bin directory) it gives a segfault.
Any ideas?
W
I noticed that simscan was not able to be called in the logs. When I try to
run it directly (./simscan in the bin directory) it gives a segfault.
Any ideas?
W
Warren,
Log sample?
P.S. When posting to the list, please do *not* reply to a previous message
and change the subject. This
On Centos 4.4
it worked fine
for the record
qmail-toaster-1.03-1.3.10.src.rpm with libsrs2-toaster-1.0.18-1.3.2.src.rpm
Philip Nix Guru wrote:
Hey Erik
Yes libsrs2-toaster installed fine (the new one you upped earlier)
FC5 is the actual system
checking on cnt44 in a few minutes just
Dan Herbon wrote:
I’ve been live on the new qmailtoaster server now for about 3 weeks and
no problems have arisen, everythings been great.
Today however I came across my first problem. A user we used to email
back and forth has an apostrophe in her name and for some strange odd
reason
You may possibly be able to edit the chkuser patch to allow it,
however know that if you don't follow the e-mail spec then many
different servers will reject you for invalid characters.
Thanks,
Erik
On 1/12/07, Eric Shubes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dan Herbon wrote:
I've been live on the new
Yea, I don't understand it either. In 10 years this is the first I've ever
seen someone with an email address with an apostrophe in it. I didn't even
think it was valid and would work, but apparently the lady has been using it
at her bank for years. Go figure.
-Original Message-
From:
Any update on this issue?
Thanks.
Hey Erik
Yes libsrs2-toaster installed fine (the new one you upped earlier)
FC5 is the actual system
checking on cnt44 in a few minutes just recompiling .. a few things first
Erik Espinoza wrote:
Hey Phillip,
Is it safe to assume that libsrs2-toaster
#define CHKUSER_ALLOW_SENDER_CHAR_2 '\''
that's the correct syntax
Dan Herbon wrote:
Ive been live on the new qmailtoaster server now for about 3 weeks and
no problems have arisen, everythings been great.
Today however I came across my first problem. A user we used to email
back and
Working on it.
Erik
On 1/12/07, Trung Pham [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Any update on this issue?
Thanks.
Hey Erik
Yes libsrs2-toaster installed fine (the new one you upped earlier)
FC5 is the actual system
checking on cnt44 in a few minutes just recompiling .. a few things first
Erik
So I have to have any user emailing this person to add a \ in front of the
email address?:
Bd\'[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Trung Pham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 12, 2007 4:37 PM
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster]
eh no..
Its just that to change qmailtoaster/checkuser you have to change the code a
bit.
Like Eric explained below.
- Original Message -
From: Dan Herbon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Sent: Friday, January 12, 2007 10:48 PM
Subject: RE: [qmailtoaster]
Seems the qmail-toaster list is getting very busy ... good thing!
Not sure but a seperate development list would be nice also?
Today I was working on the remote verification/callback patch for checkuser,
and I noticed something strange.
Not the biggest problem, but maybe someone knows why.
If
Yeah, you will need to edit the C code before compiling it.
eh no..
Its just that to change qmailtoaster/checkuser you have to change the code
a
bit.
Like Eric explained below.
- Original Message -
From: Dan Herbon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Sent:
Never mind the number problem part..
That was my own bad.
Jean-Paul
- Original Message -
From: Jean-Paul van de Plasse
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Sent: Friday, January 12, 2007 11:13 PM
Subject: [qmailtoaster] chkuser/qmail-smtpd oddness
Seems the
I just discovered (and fixed) a bug in qtp-newmodel. If you have
qmailtoaster-plus-0.2.3-1.3.5 or later installed, please upgrade to
qmailtoaster-plus-0.2.6-1.3.8.
The bug entailed a new 'feature' where qtp-newmodel will remember your
package selections if you interrupted the process before
I just upgraded to the latest stable toaster. Everything appears to be ok,
but I'm getting the subject message in my smtp log when a message is
scanned. It appears to scan ok though, and the message is delivered normally.
Not much about it on google, except one post that says setting NOP0FCHECK=1
Eric Shubes wrote:
I just upgraded to the latest stable toaster. Everything appears to be ok,
but I'm getting the subject message in my smtp log when a message is
scanned. It appears to scan ok though, and the message is delivered normally.
Not much about it on google, except one post that
Another poster asked about issues with Centos. I did a quick install a
few weeks ago and everything appeared to be ok. Turns out I was wrong.
The issue is with Spamassassin and perl modules. I started with a clean
install yesterday to check things out and finally gave up.
During the CPAN
Hi Eric,
The new install will add the NOP0FCHECK=1 automatically.
The new simscan has passive operating system fingerprinting, so that
you can do things like block Windows machines that come from *ppp*,
*dialup* and so forth. The P0F daemon, required for this, is not
going to be a part of the
I seem to remember reading about p0f checking and windoze machines and such.
I googled p0fcheck instead of p0f check. What a difference a space
makes. ;)
I told qtp-newmodel to restore my configuration files, which is why I didn't
pick that up. Do any other configuration changes come to mind?
No other config changes are necessary.
Erik
On 1/12/07, Eric Shubes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I seem to remember reading about p0f checking and windoze machines and such.
I googled p0fcheck instead of p0f check. What a difference a space
makes. ;)
I told qtp-newmodel to restore my
Vince Callaway wrote:
Another poster asked about issues with Centos. I did a quick install a
few weeks ago and everything appeared to be ok. Turns out I was wrong.
The issue is with Spamassassin and perl modules. I started with a clean
install yesterday to check things out and finally
Thanks a bunch!
Erik Espinoza wrote:
No other config changes are necessary.
Erik
On 1/12/07, Eric Shubes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I seem to remember reading about p0f checking and windoze machines and
such.
I googled p0fcheck instead of p0f check. What a difference a space
makes. ;)
Vince Callaway wrote:
Another poster asked about issues with Centos. I did a quick install a
few weeks ago and everything appeared to be ok. Turns out I was wrong.
The issue is with Spamassassin and perl modules. I started with a clean
install yesterday to check things out and finally gave
Probably did not need the whole thing :)
[See notes below]
On Fri, 2007-01-12 at 19:56 -0500, South Computers wrote:
[16097] dbg: diag: module not installed: IP::Country::Fast ('require'
failed)
[16097] dbg: diag: module not installed: Razor2::Client::Agent
('require' failed)
[16097] dbg:
Hi,
Just made a patch file and edited the wishlist so it contains a link to the
patch.
I decided to leave the connection limit part out, since I think that can be
better done with iptables.
But maybe I am wrong.
JP
rblsmtp.c.rbltimeout.patch
Description: Binary data
Vince Callaway wrote:
Another poster asked about issues with Centos. I did a quick install a
few weeks ago and everything appeared to be ok. Turns out I was wrong.
The issue is with Spamassassin and perl modules. I started with a clean
install yesterday to check things out and finally gave
I am using CentOS 4.x and installed the rpm's from rpmforge (old Dag
Wieers repo). This is what I have:
[15713] dbg: dns: is Net::DNS::Resolver available? yes
[15713] dbg: dns: Net::DNS version: 0.48
[15713] dbg: diag: perl platform: 5.008005 linux
[15713] dbg: diag: module installed:
[11473] dbg: diag: module not installed: IP::Country::Fast ('require'
failed)
[11473] dbg: diag: module not installed: Razor2::Client::Agent
('require' failed)
[11473] dbg: diag: module not installed: Net::Ident ('require' failed)
[11473] dbg: diag: module not installed: IO::Socket::INET6
Sorry, yes. realized that after I re-read the message:-)
Vince Callaway wrote:
Probably did not need the whole thing :)
[See notes below]
On Fri, 2007-01-12 at 19:56 -0500, South Computers wrote:
-
QmailToaster
You shouldn't set the catchall to bounce though... select delete. The
dictionary attacks will harvest the valid users if you select bounce!
George.
- Original Message -
From: Nathan Grennan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Sent: Friday, January 12, 2007 12:48 PM
Most people recommend against catchall's.
http://ask.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=07/01/10/2349241
On 1/12/07, George Sweetnam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You shouldn't set the catchall to bounce though... select delete. The
dictionary attacks will harvest the valid users if you select bounce!
Done. New package available on the devel site.
Thanks,
Erik
On 1/12/07, Erik Espinoza [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Working on it.
Erik
On 1/12/07, Trung Pham [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Any update on this issue?
Thanks.
Hey Erik
Yes libsrs2-toaster installed fine (the new one you upped
73 matches
Mail list logo
