Re: [qmailtoaster] spamhaus - what do you think?
On 2/1/07, George Sweetnam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I just replaced the old sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org (zen blocks all the dynamic ones now ... I'd use sorbs if i wanted that) with cbl.abuseat.org which is what blocks most of them anyway. I had sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org right after my cbl rbl list and found it blocked VERY few additional ip's... so I removed it completely. Plus the response time on sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org is horrid at peak times. Have you people had still problems with spamhaus? Specially with sbl.spamhaus.org and xbl.spamhaus.org (zen.spamhaus.org combines those two plus pbl.spamhaus.org which gives you the problems with dynamic addresses and you shouldn't use it). At the moment I'm using only sbl.spamhaus.org and haven't seen any slowdowns in mail traffic (BTW: how do you monitor rbl responsiviness anyway?). I'm wondering if I should swtich from sbl/xbl.spamhaus.org to cbl.abuseat.org that George recommended -- does anyone else have any experience with it? Regards, Peter - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [qmailtoaster] spamhaus - what do you think?
Peter Peltonen wrote: On 2/1/07, George Sweetnam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I just replaced the old sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org (zen blocks all the dynamic ones now ... I'd use sorbs if i wanted that) with cbl.abuseat.org which is what blocks most of them anyway. I had sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org right after my cbl rbl list and found it blocked VERY few additional ip's... so I removed it completely. Plus the response time on sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org is horrid at peak times. Have you people had still problems with spamhaus? Specially with sbl.spamhaus.org and xbl.spamhaus.org (zen.spamhaus.org combines those two plus pbl.spamhaus.org which gives you the problems with dynamic addresses and you shouldn't use it). At the moment I'm using only sbl.spamhaus.org and haven't seen any slowdowns in mail traffic (BTW: how do you monitor rbl responsiviness anyway?). I'm wondering if I should swtich from sbl/xbl.spamhaus.org to cbl.abuseat.org that George recommended -- does anyone else have any experience with it? I wrote a script that's on my site that will monitor BLs for you and remove the slow ones. v2gnu.com And I was using xbl-sbl from spamhaus, but they're going to drop those services in the near future since they combined them with zen. I have switched one machine to abuseat, and have not noticed anything major crop up yet. It's only been a couple days, so I'm waiting for more definitive data before I make the big switch. smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Re: [qmailtoaster] Problem with Qtp-newmodel upgrade
David J. wrote: What the /opt/qtp-sandbox/etc/tcprules.d/tcp.smtp should look like after the new version installed. David J. 127.:allow,RELAYCLIENT=,DKSIGN=/var/qmail/control/domainkeys/%/private :allow,BADMIMETYPE=,BADLOADERTYPE=M,CHKUSER_RCPTLIMIT=50,CHKUSER_WRONGRCPTLIMIT=10,DKVERIFY=DEGIJKfh,QMAILQUEUE=/var/qmail/bin/simscan,DKQUEUE=/var/qmail/bin/qmail-queue.orig,DKSIGN=/var/qmail/control/domainkeys/%/private,NOP0FCHECK=1 Note, the sandbox (/opt/qtp-sandbox) is like a temp working area. It's only use (purpose) is to build the binary rpms. It's kind of handy to leave around as a reference though. It can be safely removed after the upgrade process completes. Also note, this parameter is NOPnumber_zeroFCHECK, not NOPletter_ohFCHECK. -- -Eric 'shubes' - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: spambox and forwards
Peter Peltonen wrote: On 2/1/07, Peter Peltonen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have built my toaster with --define 'spambox 1. Spam sent to an account that has Spam Detection? enabled in qmailadmin is handled correctly and moved to the Spam subfolder. But it does not seem to work with forwards: Say I have email account peter that has spam detection enabled, and then a forward named peter.peltonen which mail is delivered to peter account. All spam sent to peter.peltonen is delivered to INBOX and not moved to the spam subfolder. I tested this with the GTUBE test spam message you get with spamassassin -D /usr/share/doc/spamassassin-toaster-3.1.7/sample-spam.txt So, doesn't anyone know a way to filter locally forwarded mail in spambox? Or is it impossible? If so, it makes spambox kinda useless for accounts that have aliases forwarded to them. Regards, Peter I haven't had a chance to look into how this works yet. I was hoping someone else would beat me to it. I don't know why forwarded emails aren't filtered, but I think you're right, in that forwarded messages should go to the spambox. This is a defect (imo). -- -Eric 'shubes' - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [qmailtoaster] Upgrade through qtp-newmodel Error
Eric Shubes wrote: Warren (mailing lists) wrote: Eric Shubes wrote: Thanks for using the Trac system, David. It appears that after submitting (or changing) a ticket, the screen doesn't come back (stays waiting), although the update does take. I'm guessing that's why there are 5 tickets you created for this. ;) No problem. I'll have to Trac that problem down. (pun intended) Eric, I had the same problem in Bugzilla recently. You might want to check your mail settings. In my case it was inserting the bug into the database then hanging on the SMTP send. W Thanks for the pointer, Warren. I'll look there first. Good chance that's it. Thanks again for the pointer, Warren. This was indeed the problem. There were a couple notify settings that I didn't have quite right (and logging was turned off by default!). Seems to be working ok now. -- -Eric 'shubes' - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [qmailtoaster] qtp-newmodel upgrade errors]
Eric Shubes wrote: Try using this for blacklists: -r zen.spamhaus.org -r bl.spamcop.net -r opm.blitzed.org -r list.dsbl.org -r cbl.abuseat.org -r dnsbl.sorbs.net They're working pretty well for me. I'm going to (try to remember to) change the -loose and -moderate blacklists with the next qtp release. I get The message could not be sent because one of the recipients was rejected by the server. The rejected e-mail address was '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'. Subject 't2 (oe) no TLS', ..., Protocol: SMTP, Server Response: '451 http://www.spamhaus.org/query/bl?ip=24.215.164.197', Port: 25, Secure(SSL): No, Server Error: 451, Error Number: 0x800CCC79 so I went back to the plain sbl.spamhaus.org default which works (although I think I'm seeing some spam I had not been seeing on this server).. Are you able to verify that your dnscache is running properly? Yes, it pings yahoo.com and 127.0.0.1 is the only nameserver in /etc/resolv.conf. Too bad the qmts scripts didn't refuse to operate and advise of cnt40 :) I know. That's why I wrote qtp-newmodel, so the scripts can tell what settings to use, and there'll be just one set of scripts, so maintenance will be easier too. Good, can't wait for the next release.
Re: [qmailtoaster] Problem with Qtp-newmodel upgrade
On Feb 6, 2007, at 12:54 AM, Eric Shubes wrote: I think I can take if from here. A little scripting here, a little testing there... ;) I think that's a little too long to wait though. I'm more of the opinion of if it doesn't die on its own, KILL IT! It's not as bad as it may sound. I just hate waiting for some unresponsive process to end when I'm trying to bounce the system (quickly). I can understand that. I was just giving you the information you'd asked for. :) I've thought about that too. The newmodel script really ought to let you rebuild and reinstall the current version. Why don't you write up a ticket for that? The brand spankin' new qmailtoaster-plus trac system is up and running now. Go to http://trac.shubes.net/qtp/ and select the New Ticket tab. Fill out whatever information you feel is appropriate, and submit it. Then it'll be tracked for all eternity, and you'll automatically be notified by email when anything happens to it (remember to put in your email address where it says anonymous). Oh, and please be patient with the site, as it's presently running on a puny PII-266! (although it's not all that slow) Done. Thank you. Roxanne Thanks again for the help. And thank you for building qtp- newmodel. That made my life much, much easier than it would have been otherwise. Mine too! I hope that it will help all toaster users get up to date with the latest software with the least amount of effort. Oh, one more thing. You'll need to add NOP0FCHECK=1 to your tcp.smtp rules (all lines except the first one) so you don't get an annoying message in your smtp (and submission I expect) logs. You can have a look at /opt/qtp-sandbox/etc/tcprules.d/tcp.smtp (if you haven't removed the sandbox) to see what it should look like. And don't forget to rebuild your cdb's after the change. I don't currently have any tcp.smtp rules. But I'll keep that in mind. Thanks for using (and helping improve) qtp-newmodel! -- -Eric 'shubes' - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list- [EMAIL PROTECTED] - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [qmailtoaster] spamhaus - what do you think?
Peter Peltonen wrote: On 2/1/07, George Sweetnam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I just replaced the old sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org (zen blocks all the dynamic ones now ... I'd use sorbs if i wanted that) with cbl.abuseat.org which is what blocks most of them anyway. I had sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org right after my cbl rbl list and found it blocked VERY few additional ip's... so I removed it completely. Plus the response time on sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org is horrid at peak times. Have you people had still problems with spamhaus? Specially with sbl.spamhaus.org and xbl.spamhaus.org (zen.spamhaus.org combines those two plus pbl.spamhaus.org which gives you the problems with dynamic addresses and you shouldn't use it). At the moment I'm using only sbl.spamhaus.org and haven't seen any slowdowns in mail traffic (BTW: how do you monitor rbl responsiviness anyway?). I'm wondering if I should swtich from sbl/xbl.spamhaus.org to cbl.abuseat.org that George recommended -- does anyone else have any experience with it? Regards, Peter I've been using cbl.abuseat.org for quite some time with no apparent performance issue. Looking at the spamhaus web site, I see that xbl.spamhaus is simply an incorporation of cbl.abuseat.org and njabl.org. So I guess I could dump cbl.abuseat.org and njabl.org with no functional loss and a little performance gain. I do still have some (a handful per day) rejections from abuseat though (it's checked after spamhaus). I'm guessing these might be newer posts, but I can't say for sure. It's a little aggravating that sbl-xbl will eventually become obsolete. You don't want to use zen unless/until your users are all converted to use the submission (587) port. I suppose that you could use sbl.spamhaus.org and xbl.spamhaus.org separately. Seems like a waste though. -- -Eric 'shubes' - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [qmailtoaster] qtp-newmodel upgrade errors]
Ray Lance wrote: Eric Shubes wrote: Try using this for blacklists: -r zen.spamhaus.org -r bl.spamcop.net -r opm.blitzed.org -r list.dsbl.org -r cbl.abuseat.org -r dnsbl.sorbs.net They're working pretty well for me. I'm going to (try to remember to) change the -loose and -moderate blacklists with the next qtp release. I get The message could not be sent because one of the recipients was rejected by the server. The rejected e-mail address was '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'. Subject 't2 (oe) no TLS', ..., Protocol: SMTP, Server Response: '451 http://www.spamhaus.org/query/bl?ip=24.215.164.197', Port: 25, Secure(SSL): No, Server Error: 451, Error Number: 0x800CCC79 so I went back to the plain sbl.spamhaus.org default which works (although I think I'm seeing some spam I had not been seeing on this server).. Ray, Looks like you have a DNS configuration error: $ host -t MX webaddress.com webaddress.com is an alias for dmhosting.g.ysm.yahoo.com. This command should return: webaddress.com mail is handled by 10 dmhosting.g.ysm.yahoo.com. [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ dig webaddress.com MX ; DiG 9.3.3rc2 webaddress.com MX ;; global options: printcmd ;; Got answer: ;; -HEADER- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 63533 ;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 1, AUTHORITY: 1, ADDITIONAL: 0 ;; QUESTION SECTION: ;webaddress.com.IN MX ;; ANSWER SECTION: webaddress.com. 3545IN CNAME dmhosting.g.ysm.yahoo.com. ;; AUTHORITY SECTION: g.ysm.yahoo.com.5 IN SOA glb-1.sjc.yahoo.com. hostmaster.glb-1.sjc.yahoo.com. 564 10800 3600 604800 60 ;; Query time: 29 msec ;; SERVER: 192.168.70.1#53(192.168.70.1) ;; WHEN: Tue Feb 6 08:34:27 2007 ;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 125 You don't have an MX record defined for webaddress.com. -- -Eric 'shubes' - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[qmailtoaster] some mail not arriving
Hi, I have this very strange problem some autogenerated email is not correctly deliverd. But my guess is that the content transfer encoding is causing this. However I did not manage to reproduce it in a telnet session. The recordio log shows : @400045c8a67438114f44 10070 220 i-serve.nl smtp ESMTP^M @400045c8a6750e354694 10070 EHLO [hostname]^M @400045c8a6750e3a1124 10070 250-i-serve.nl smtp^M @400045c8a6750e3a20c4 10070 250-PIPELINING^M @400045c8a6750e3a3064 10070 250-8BITMIME^M @400045c8a6750e3a4004 10070 250-SIZE 200971520^M @400045c8a6750e3a4bbc 10070 250 AUTH LOGIN PLAIN CRAM-MD5^M @400045c8a6751ffd338c 10070 MAIL FROM:[EMAIL PROTECTED] SIZE=1238^M @400045c8a6752011e46c CHKUSER accepted sender: from [EMAIL PROTECTED]:: remote [hostname]:unknown:[ip] rcpt : sender accepted @400045c8a675201566dc 10070 250 ok^M @400045c8a67531d9b9f4 10070 RCPT TO:[rcpt]^M @400045c8a675332a80cc CHKUSER accepted rcpt: from [EMAIL PROTECTED]:: remote [hostname]:unknown:[ip] rcpt [rcpt] : found existing recipient @400045c8a675332c3e1c 10070 250 ok^M @400045c8a6760952bddc 10070 DATA^M @400045c8a67609571b0c 10070 354 go ahead^M @400045c8a6761b28acc4 10070 Received: from mail pickup service by [hostname] with Microsoft SMTPSVC;^M @400045c8a6761b28c434 10070 Wed, 7 Feb 2007 05:02:12 +1300^M @400045c8a6761b28cfec 10070 Thread-Topic: Inschrijving^M @400045c8a6761b28df8c 10070 thread-index: AcdKCCnbBqCmMLcpSrOtsi+m2g13lw==^M @400045c8a6761b28eb44 10070 From: [sender]^M @400045c8a6761b28fae4 10070 To: [rcpt]^M @400045c8a6761b290a84 10070 Subject:+ @400045c8a6761b29163c 10070 Inschrijving^M @400045c8a6761b297bcc 10070 Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2007 05:02:12 +1300^M @400045c8a6761b298b6c 10070 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]^M @400045c8a6761b299b0c 10070 MIME-Version: 1.0^M @400045c8a6761b29a6c4 10070 Content-Type: text/plain^M @400045c8a6761b29b664 10070 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit^M @400045c8a6761b29c604 10070 X-Mailer: Microsoft CDO for Windows 2000^M @400045c8a6761b29d1bc 10070 Content-Class: urn:c+ @400045c8a6761b2be4fc 10070 ontent-classes:message^M @400045c8a6761b2bf49c 10070 Importance: normal^M @400045c8a6761b2c043c 10070 Priority: normal^M @400045c8a6761b2c0ff4 10070 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.3790.1830^M @400045c8a6761b2c1f94 10070 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 06 Feb 2007 16:02:12.0782 (UTC) FILETIME=[29FA6CE0:01C74A08]^M @400045c8a6761b2c2f34 10070 ^M @400045c8a6761b2c3aec 10070 Beste test, @400045c8a6761b2c4a8c 10070 @400045c8a6761b2c5644 10070 [some text] @400045c8a6761b2c8524 10070 @400045c8a6761b30cae4 10070 [some text] @400045c8a6761b30de6c 10070 @400045c8a6761b30ea24 10070 [some text] @400045c8a6761b30f9c4 10070 @400045c8a6761b31057c 10070 [some other text] twee weken vóór [some text.. not complete]+ @400045c8a6761b3e8684 tcpserver: end 10070 status 256 @400045c8a6761b40a194 tcpserver: status: 2/100 Where it shows vóór it is in fact vóór I did remove (i hope) all traces to the real sender and receipient, and really hope someone can shine a light on this, since I am really in the dark here. JP
Re: [qmailtoaster] qtp-newmodel upgrade errors]
Eric Shubes wrote: Ray Lance wrote: Eric Shubes wrote: Try using this for blacklists: -r zen.spamhaus.org -r bl.spamcop.net -r opm.blitzed.org -r list.dsbl.org -r cbl.abuseat.org -r dnsbl.sorbs.net They're working pretty well for me. I'm going to (try to remember to) change the -loose and -moderate blacklists with the next qtp release. I get The message could not be sent because one of the recipients was rejected by the server. The rejected e-mail address was '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'. Subject 't2 (oe) no TLS', ..., Protocol: SMTP, Server Response: '451 http://www.spamhaus.org/query/bl?ip=24.215.164.197', Port: 25, Secure(SSL): No, Server Error: 451, Error Number: 0x800CCC79 so I went back to the plain sbl.spamhaus.org default which works (although I think I'm seeing some spam I had not been seeing on this server).. Ray, Looks like you have a DNS configuration error: $ host -t MX webaddress.com webaddress.com is an alias for dmhosting.g.ysm.yahoo.com. This command should return: webaddress.com mail is handled by 10 dmhosting.g.ysm.yahoo.com. You misspelled my domain: host -t MX websaddress.com websaddress.com mail is handled by 0 email.websaddress.net. websaddress.com mail is handled by 10 post.websaddress.net. websaddress.com mail is handled by 20 email.websaddress.com. [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ dig webaddress.com MX ; DiG 9.3.3rc2 webaddress.com MX ;; global options: printcmd ;; Got answer: ;; -HEADER- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 63533 ;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 1, AUTHORITY: 1, ADDITIONAL: 0 ;; QUESTION SECTION: ;webaddress.com.IN MX ;; ANSWER SECTION: webaddress.com. 3545IN CNAME dmhosting.g.ysm.yahoo.com. ;; AUTHORITY SECTION: g.ysm.yahoo.com.5 IN SOA glb-1.sjc.yahoo.com. hostmaster.glb-1.sjc.yahoo.com. 564 10800 3600 604800 60 ;; Query time: 29 msec ;; SERVER: 192.168.70.1#53(192.168.70.1) ;; WHEN: Tue Feb 6 08:34:27 2007 ;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 125 You don't have an MX record defined for webaddress.com. Nope. I wanted that domain, but it was already taken :)
Re: [qmailtoaster] qtp-newmodel upgrade errors]
Rats! I just got this failure on the 2nd box: Installing courier-imap-toaster-4.1.2-1.3.6 in the sandbox ... error: failed to stat /flash: No such file or directory Preparing... ## file /usr/share/man/man8/imapd.8.gz from install of courier-imap-toaster-4.1.2-1.3.6 conflicts with file from package cyrus-imapd-2.2.12-3.RHEL4.1 - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [qmailtoaster] qtp-newmodel upgrade errors]
Ray Lance wrote: Rats! I just got this failure on the 2nd box: Installing courier-imap-toaster-4.1.2-1.3.6 in the sandbox ... error: failed to stat /flash: No such file or directory Preparing... ## file /usr/share/man/man8/imapd.8.gz from install of courier-imap-toaster-4.1.2-1.3.6 conflicts with file from package cyrus-imapd-2.2.12-3.RHEL4.1 Are you trying to run both cyrus-imapd and courier-imap? If so, why? If not, simply remove cyrus-imapd. -- -Eric 'shubes' - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [qmailtoaster] some mail not arriving
Always nice to give follow up on your own problems :) Guess this all boils down to the old crlf/barelinefeed problem. At least that is really the only way I can reproduce this. Even got myself into writing a small asp script to emulate this problem. Unless anyone has other ideas I guess I waisted my and your time with this. JP - Original Message - From: Jean-Paul van de Plasse To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Sent: Tuesday, February 06, 2007 5:40 PM Subject: [qmailtoaster] some mail not arriving Hi, I have this very strange problem some autogenerated email is not correctly deliverd. But my guess is that the content transfer encoding is causing this. However I did not manage to reproduce it in a telnet session. The recordio log shows : @400045c8a67438114f44 10070 220 i-serve.nl smtp ESMTP^M @400045c8a6750e354694 10070 EHLO [hostname]^M @400045c8a6750e3a1124 10070 250-i-serve.nl smtp^M @400045c8a6750e3a20c4 10070 250-PIPELINING^M @400045c8a6750e3a3064 10070 250-8BITMIME^M @400045c8a6750e3a4004 10070 250-SIZE 200971520^M @400045c8a6750e3a4bbc 10070 250 AUTH LOGIN PLAIN CRAM-MD5^M @400045c8a6751ffd338c 10070 MAIL FROM:[EMAIL PROTECTED] SIZE=1238^M @400045c8a6752011e46c CHKUSER accepted sender: from [EMAIL PROTECTED]:: remote [hostname]:unknown:[ip] rcpt : sender accepted @400045c8a675201566dc 10070 250 ok^M @400045c8a67531d9b9f4 10070 RCPT TO:[rcpt]^M @400045c8a675332a80cc CHKUSER accepted rcpt: from [EMAIL PROTECTED]:: remote [hostname]:unknown:[ip] rcpt [rcpt] : found existing recipient @400045c8a675332c3e1c 10070 250 ok^M @400045c8a6760952bddc 10070 DATA^M @400045c8a67609571b0c 10070 354 go ahead^M @400045c8a6761b28acc4 10070 Received: from mail pickup service by [hostname] with Microsoft SMTPSVC;^M @400045c8a6761b28c434 10070 Wed, 7 Feb 2007 05:02:12 +1300^M @400045c8a6761b28cfec 10070 Thread-Topic: Inschrijving^M @400045c8a6761b28df8c 10070 thread-index: AcdKCCnbBqCmMLcpSrOtsi+m2g13lw==^M @400045c8a6761b28eb44 10070 From: [sender]^M @400045c8a6761b28fae4 10070 To: [rcpt]^M @400045c8a6761b290a84 10070 Subject:+ @400045c8a6761b29163c 10070 Inschrijving^M @400045c8a6761b297bcc 10070 Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2007 05:02:12 +1300^M @400045c8a6761b298b6c 10070 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]^M @400045c8a6761b299b0c 10070 MIME-Version: 1.0^M @400045c8a6761b29a6c4 10070 Content-Type: text/plain^M @400045c8a6761b29b664 10070 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit^M @400045c8a6761b29c604 10070 X-Mailer: Microsoft CDO for Windows 2000^M @400045c8a6761b29d1bc 10070 Content-Class: urn:c+ @400045c8a6761b2be4fc 10070 ontent-classes:message^M @400045c8a6761b2bf49c 10070 Importance: normal^M @400045c8a6761b2c043c 10070 Priority: normal^M @400045c8a6761b2c0ff4 10070 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.3790.1830^M @400045c8a6761b2c1f94 10070 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 06 Feb 2007 16:02:12.0782 (UTC) FILETIME=[29FA6CE0:01C74A08]^M @400045c8a6761b2c2f34 10070 ^M @400045c8a6761b2c3aec 10070 Beste test, @400045c8a6761b2c4a8c 10070 @400045c8a6761b2c5644 10070 [some text] @400045c8a6761b2c8524 10070 @400045c8a6761b30cae4 10070 [some text] @400045c8a6761b30de6c 10070 @400045c8a6761b30ea24 10070 [some text] @400045c8a6761b30f9c4 10070 @400045c8a6761b31057c 10070 [some other text] twee weken vóór [some text.. not complete]+ @400045c8a6761b3e8684 tcpserver: end 10070 status 256 @400045c8a6761b40a194 tcpserver: status: 2/100 Where it shows vóór it is in fact vóór I did remove (i hope) all traces to the real sender and receipient, and really hope someone can shine a light on this, since I am really in the dark here. JP
Re: [qmailtoaster] some mail not arriving
Thanks for the update, JP. I was wondering about the ^M characters in your log, and lack thereof on some lines. I'm not knowledgeable enough on the rules for smtp though to comment. There is a nice writeup about the problem at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Newline. Perhaps you could sum up the CRLF/LF problem for us here w/ regards to the toaster? Jean-Paul van de Plasse wrote: Always nice to give follow up on your own problems :) Guess this all boils down to the old crlf/barelinefeed problem. At least that is really the only way I can reproduce this. Even got myself into writing a small asp script to emulate this problem. Unless anyone has other ideas I guess I waisted my and your time with this. JP - Original Message - *From:* Jean-Paul van de Plasse mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *To:* qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com mailto:qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com *Sent:* Tuesday, February 06, 2007 5:40 PM *Subject:* [qmailtoaster] some mail not arriving Hi, I have this very strange problem some autogenerated email is not correctly deliverd. But my guess is that the content transfer encoding is causing this. However I did not manage to reproduce it in a telnet session. The recordio log shows : @400045c8a67438114f44 10070 220 i-serve.nl smtp ESMTP^M @400045c8a6750e354694 10070 EHLO [hostname]^M @400045c8a6750e3a1124 10070 250-i-serve.nl smtp^M @400045c8a6750e3a20c4 10070 250-PIPELINING^M @400045c8a6750e3a3064 10070 250-8BITMIME^M @400045c8a6750e3a4004 10070 250-SIZE 200971520^M @400045c8a6750e3a4bbc 10070 250 AUTH LOGIN PLAIN CRAM-MD5^M @400045c8a6751ffd338c 10070 MAIL FROM:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] SIZE=1238^M @400045c8a6752011e46c CHKUSER accepted sender: from [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]:: remote [hostname]:unknown:[ip] rcpt : sender accepted @400045c8a675201566dc 10070 250 ok^M @400045c8a67531d9b9f4 10070 RCPT TO:[rcpt]^M @400045c8a675332a80cc CHKUSER accepted rcpt: from [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]:: remote [hostname]:unknown:[ip] rcpt [rcpt] : found existing recipient @400045c8a675332c3e1c 10070 250 ok^M @400045c8a6760952bddc 10070 DATA^M @400045c8a67609571b0c 10070 354 go ahead^M @400045c8a6761b28acc4 10070 Received: from mail pickup service by [hostname] with Microsoft SMTPSVC;^M @400045c8a6761b28c434 10070 Wed, 7 Feb 2007 05:02:12 +1300^M @400045c8a6761b28cfec 10070 Thread-Topic: Inschrijving^M @400045c8a6761b28df8c 10070 thread-index: AcdKCCnbBqCmMLcpSrOtsi+m2g13lw==^M @400045c8a6761b28eb44 10070 From: [sender]^M @400045c8a6761b28fae4 10070 To: [rcpt]^M @400045c8a6761b290a84 10070 Subject:+ @400045c8a6761b29163c 10070 Inschrijving^M @400045c8a6761b297bcc 10070 Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2007 05:02:12 +1300^M @400045c8a6761b298b6c 10070 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]^M mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]^M @400045c8a6761b299b0c 10070 MIME-Version: 1.0^M @400045c8a6761b29a6c4 10070 Content-Type: text/plain^M @400045c8a6761b29b664 10070 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit^M @400045c8a6761b29c604 10070 X-Mailer: Microsoft CDO for Windows 2000^M @400045c8a6761b29d1bc 10070 Content-Class: urn:c+ @400045c8a6761b2be4fc 10070 ontent-classes:message^M @400045c8a6761b2bf49c 10070 Importance: normal^M @400045c8a6761b2c043c 10070 Priority: normal^M @400045c8a6761b2c0ff4 10070 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.3790.1830^M @400045c8a6761b2c1f94 10070 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 06 Feb 2007 16:02:12.0782 (UTC) FILETIME=[29FA6CE0:01C74A08]^M @400045c8a6761b2c2f34 10070 ^M @400045c8a6761b2c3aec 10070 Beste test, @400045c8a6761b2c4a8c 10070 @400045c8a6761b2c5644 10070 [some text] @400045c8a6761b2c8524 10070 @400045c8a6761b30cae4 10070 [some text] @400045c8a6761b30de6c 10070 @400045c8a6761b30ea24 10070 [some text] @400045c8a6761b30f9c4 10070 @400045c8a6761b31057c 10070 [some other text] twee weken vóór [some text.. not complete]+ @400045c8a6761b3e8684 tcpserver: end 10070 status 256 @400045c8a6761b40a194 tcpserver: status: 2/100 Where it shows vóór it is in fact vóór I did remove (i hope) all traces to the real sender and receipient, and really hope someone can shine a light on this, since I am really in the dark here. JP -- -Eric 'shubes' - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
[qmailtoaster] squirrelmail and submission port
Is there a reason why the default config of squirrelmail is not using the submission port? Is it really necessary for squirrelmail to be checked against RBL's? I found that squirrelmail is much faster (sending) when configured to use the submission port since it bypasses RBL checks. This also prevents the error Server replied: 354 when an RBL timeout occurs. BTW I just updated to the latest and greatest including the 3 devel packages and everything is perfect (knocks on wood). Thanks.
Re: [qmailtoaster] qtp-newmodel upgrade errors]
Eric Shubes wrote: Ray Lance wrote: Rats! I just got this failure on the 2nd box: Installing courier-imap-toaster-4.1.2-1.3.6 in the sandbox ... error: failed to stat /flash: No such file or directory Preparing... ## file /usr/share/man/man8/imapd.8.gz from install of courier-imap-toaster-4.1.2-1.3.6 conflicts with file from package cyrus-imapd-2.2.12-3.RHEL4.1 Are you trying to run both cyrus-imapd and courier-imap? If so, why? If not, simply remove cyrus-imapd. Did yum remove cyrus-imapd and it removed, but I get the same error from qtp-menu newmodel. So I removed the imapd.9.gz by hand and ran newmodel again, only to get the SAME ERROR! Help?
Re: [qmailtoaster] Problem with Qtp-newmodel upgrade
Dear Eric, I Have run the qtp-newmodel and already got my toaster update, your script are running just fine. I wonder, the script are doing backup from my old toaster, I he was resoring the old version configuration, won't affecting my new Toaster..?? I have done several check on the wiki about the whole configurations, are those wiki update for the lastest one ..? If not, what part of the configuration which I have to consider to modify. Best Regards David J. :. PS I'm running my new version of toaster, bellow are the toaster package installed : libsrs2-toaster-1.0.18-1.3.2 isoqlog-toaster-2.1-1.3.2 spamassassin-toaster-3.1.7-1.3.6 ezmlm-toaster-0.53.324-1.3.2 maildrop-toaster-2.0.3-1.3.4 qmailadmin-toaster-1.2.9-1.3.3 vpopmail-toaster-5.4.13-1.3.3 clamav-toaster-0.90rc3-1.3.9 courier-authlib-toaster-0.59.1-1.3.5 control-panel-toaster-0.5-1.3.3 maildrop-toaster-devel-2.0.3-1.3.4 send-emails-toaster-0.5-1.3.3 ucspi-tcp-toaster-0.88-1.3.3 qmail-toaster-1.03-1.3.12 courier-imap-toaster-4.1.2-1.3.6 libdomainkeys-toaster-0.68-1.3.2 qmail-pop3d-toaster-1.03-1.3.12 squirrelmail-toaster-1.4.9a-1.3.5 vqadmin-toaster-2.3.4-1.3.2 qmailtoaster-plus-0.2.7-1.3.9 daemontools-toaster-0.76-1.3.2 ripmime-toaster-1.4.0.6-1.3.2 qmailmrtg-toaster-4.2-1.3.2 autorespond-toaster-2.0.4-1.3.2 ezmlm-cgi-toaster-0.53.324-1.3.2 simscan-toaster-1.3.1-1.3.4 - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [qmailtoaster] squirrelmail and submission port
Hey Slamp, I was under the impression that Squirrelmail used /usr/sbin/sendmail to send mail, not smtp. Doesn't your config.php have $useSendmail = true; Erik The reason squirrelmail uses On 2/6/07, slamp slamp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is there a reason why the default config of squirrelmail is not using the submission port? Is it really necessary for squirrelmail to be checked against RBL's? I found that squirrelmail is much faster (sending) when configured to use the submission port since it bypasses RBL checks. This also prevents the error Server replied: 354 when an RBL timeout occurs. BTW I just updated to the latest and greatest including the 3 devel packages and everything is perfect (knocks on wood). Thanks. - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [qmailtoaster] Site to Site QT Server Replication - 24 hours
Hi Craig, I manage to redo the testing after so long you replied the email :) The error I got was extracted out from Primary Server, it says Contacting to server. Error: Can't connect to server (192.168.119.133:1234) Deleting lock file I start the unison-run command with /unison/unison-run start, the next line shown me: sh-3.1# But, seems like it doesn't start the service on Secondary, that's y it cannot connect. Would u mind tell me what is the port number u use? Thanks - Original Message From: Craig Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Sent: Monday, January 22, 2007 10:21:25 PM Subject: RE: [qmailtoaster] Site to Site QT Server Replication - 24 hours Gabriel Where were you getting errors? I set up this procedure and it works like a charm on my system, but there are minor changes needed between various OS's. I set this up on Fedora Core 5. Let me know what errors you were getting and where and I will try and help you with it. Also I changed the timing on the script to more than 1 min as after a few weeks it started causing problems on our server with the replication itself, so now it is more accurate to say the backup server is only ever 10 mins (or cronjob based) from the primary. Regards. From: Gabriel Lai [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 22 January 2007 07:24 To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Site to Site QT Server Replication - 24 hours Joseph, Have you tried with the QMT Setup steps? I tested previously, but failed at certain level. If you have tested before, maybe you can help me out with the errors Thanks - Original Message From: Joseph Lundgren [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Sent: Friday, January 19, 2007 2:41:59 AM Subject: RE: [qmailtoaster] Site to Site QT Server Replication - 24 hours Gabriel, Please look at http://wiki.qmailtoaster.com/index.php/QMT_Failover_replication_Setup This page gives you a procedure to configure a backup qmt server that will be available for failover in the event of primary server failure. The backup server will only ever be 1 minute out from the primary. I believe that it covers what youre trying to achieve. Sincerely, -- Joseph Lundgren Systems Engineer Peak Internet, LLC [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: Gabriel Lai [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2007 1:12 AM To: Qmail Toaster List 2 Subject: [qmailtoaster] Site to Site QT Server Replication - 24 hours Hello all, I would like to setup a QT site where the 2 email servers will be doing replication to each other 24 hours live. eg: when mail coming from Internet to Mail Server 1, it will automatically replicate to Mail Server 2. Jake has point me the backup restore script guides, but that needs manual job when Mail Server 1 is down, someone have to manually restore the backup in Mail Server 2, then only can replace Mail Server 1. Have anyone tried to do so? Please assist. Sucker-punch spam with award-winning protection. Try the free Yahoo! Mail Beta. The fish are biting. Get more visitors on your site using Yahoo! Search Marketing. Don't pick lemons. See all the new 2007 cars at Yahoo! Autos. http://autos.yahoo.com/new_cars.html
[qmailtoaster] Need small help on QT
Dear All,, Good morning :-) I have installed QT in a test server. If I send an email from my yahoo id to [EMAIL PROTECTED] [ email id does not exist ], but it accepts the email an forwards to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Pls suggest why this is happening and what files shld I check around to solve this problem. Thanks in advance. Regards ashok --
[qmailtoaster] Possible to clean Virus Messages?
Hi there, is it possible (due to german laws) to clean virusses out of an email and then put it into an folder like we do with spam messages? Regards, Tim - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
