I don't use LVM.
I have two disks, one for the system install, and one for the /var and
/home dir.
Advantage: I can install a new operating system, without loosing data.
I have a private server on CentOS (qmail, http, foswiki, samba, download
progs). For a production server this can be
Eric Shubert wrote:
Eric Shubert wrote:
I just ran qtp-extraclam see how it's working.
If have this in my firewall:
-A INPUT -p tcp -m tcp --dport 873 --tcp-flags FIN,SYN,RST,ACK SYN -j
ACCEPT
Yet I get an email with this message:
/etc/cron.hourly/unofficial-clamav-sigs.sh:
rsync: failed
Maxwell Smart wrote:
The activity I see when I tail -f /var/log/qmail/smtp/current is what
I mean.
Is there someplace I can see a flow chart of a default setup? and how
to follow the mail through the system? This would be extremely helpful.
I can get you all of the detail you need, but I need
Patrick Ring wrote:
I'm loading up a fresh QmailToaster (to be used as a cache/backup)
and usually I've always been under the assumption that it is best to
do away with the LVM groups and format the partitions direct to the
drive. Is there an advantage to using LVM vs not using LVM for
Eric Shubert wrote:
Eric Shubert wrote:
I just ran qtp-extraclam see how it's working.
If have this in my firewall:
-A INPUT -p tcp -m tcp --dport 873 --tcp-flags FIN,SYN,RST,ACK SYN -j
ACCEPT
Yet I get an email with this message:
/etc/cron.hourly/unofficial-clamav-sigs.sh:
rsync: failed
Sorry guys a noob question: how do i can upgrade the unofficial script
with the new official one ?
Thx
Il giorno 25/set/2009, alle ore 13.04, Constantin IOAJA ha scritto:
Eric Shubert wrote:
Eric Shubert wrote:
I just ran qtp-extraclam see how it's working.
If have this in my firewall:
Hi guys,
i discovered my box needs upgrading and i fired qtp-newmodel script.
After donwloading some packages the scripts exits with this error:
***
Transaction Check Error:
file /usr/bin/spfquery from install of perl-Mail-
SPF-2.006-1.el5.rf.noarch conflicts with file from package
W dniu 25.09.2009 13:24, Kartone pisze:
Sorry guys a noob question: how do i can upgrade the unofficial script
with the new official one ?
Thx
Download and unpack http://www.inetmsg.com/pub/clamav-unofficial-sigs.tar.gz
(Script 1 from http://sanesecurity.org.uk/download_scripts_linux.htm)
W dniu 25.09.2009 14:04, Aleksander Podsiadly pisze:
W dniu 25.09.2009 13:24, Kartone pisze:
Sorry guys a noob question: how do i can upgrade the unofficial
script with the new official one ?
Thx
Download and unpack
http://www.inetmsg.com/pub/clamav-unofficial-sigs.tar.gz
[...]
I forgot,
Aleksander Podsiadly wrote:
Download and unpack
http://www.inetmsg.com/pub/clamav-unofficial-sigs.tar.gz
(Script 1 from http://sanesecurity.org.uk/download_scripts_linux.htm)
copy file clamav-unofficial-sigs.conf to /etc
edit file /etc/clamav-unofficial-sigs.conf, change 4 lines:
Patrick Ring wrote:
So far between the couple of answer I've got here, and the research I
had been doing. The concensus is about the same.
...It seems people who have been around Linux for a while prefer the
straight partitioning methods.
I would personally think that LVM would put a slight
OT - I get a ironic chuckle out of the people that NEED the 100Mb
wireless routers because their Internet is slow on their cable modem
(5Mb down).
I've heard this too! :-P
But, I guess in perspective, you're right about the performance versus
bandwidth. I guess I was looking at it from a
W dniu 24.09.2009 22:45, Patrick Ring pisze:
I'm loading up a fresh QmailToaster (to be used as a cache/backup)
and usually I've always been under the assumption that it is best to
do away with the LVM groups and format the partitions direct to the
drive. Is there an advantage to using LVM
Patrick Ring wrote:
OT - I get a ironic chuckle out of the people that NEED the 100Mb
wireless routers because their Internet is slow on their cable modem
(5Mb down).
I've heard this too! :-P
But, I guess in perspective, you're right about the performance versus
bandwidth. I guess I was
So it becomes very flexible when used that way.
This would lead to being able to make changes easily (once you learn the LVM
tools that is...).
I've used QMT for a good 4+ years now, but I've always done a very simple
install. I'm having to expand out now to accomodate larger needs. So,
Khan Mohamed Ashraf wrote:
On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 5:45 PM, Jake Vickers j...@qmailtoaster.com
mailto:j...@qmailtoaster.com wrote:
Khan Mohamed Ashraf wrote:
On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 7:55 AM, Jake Vickers
j...@qmailtoaster.com mailto:j...@qmailtoaster.com wrote:
Khan
W dniu 25.09.2009 14:28, Constantin IOAJA pisze:
*No need for 21 /dev/null in clamav-unofficial-sigs-cron !
set yes for silence - receive only error conditions - in
clamav-unofficial-sigs.conf : *
[...]
*You need to see errors, right?
Regards,
Constantin *
You're right. :)
I
John Hansen wrote:
Jake,
Are you suggesting that even if I use ezmlm for sending to this many
recipients (over 254) that I'll still receive chkuser errors?
John
Jake Vickers wrote:
Nope. ezmlm does not have the same limitation that chkuser does, since
it directly injects the messages.
Figured I would forward this to the list since it's meant to be there
and everyone seems to want to email me directly this week.
Original Message
Subject:Mails not being scanned / filtered by SA server
Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 18:50:24 +0530
From: Atul Paralikar
Am Thursday 24 September 2009 22:41:43 schrieb Jake Vickers:
John Hansen wrote:
Jake,
Are you suggesting that even if I use ezmlm for sending to this many
recipients (over 254) that I'll still receive chkuser errors?
John
Nope. ezmlm does not have the same limitation that chkuser does,
Aleksander Podsiadly wrote:
W dniu 24.09.2009 22:45, Patrick Ring pisze:
I'm loading up a fresh QmailToaster (to be used as a cache/backup)
and usually I've always been under the assumption that it is best to
do away with the LVM groups and format the partitions direct to the
drive. Is
Kartone wrote:
Hi guys,
i discovered my box needs upgrading and i fired qtp-newmodel script.
After donwloading some packages the scripts exits with this error:
***
Transaction Check Error:
file /usr/bin/spfquery from install of
perl-Mail-SPF-2.006-1.el5.rf.noarch conflicts with file from
Aleksander Podsiadly wrote:
W dniu 25.09.2009 14:28, Constantin IOAJA pisze:
*No need for 21 /dev/null in clamav-unofficial-sigs-cron !
set yes for silence - receive only error conditions - in
clamav-unofficial-sigs.conf : *
[...]
*You need to see errors, right?
Regards,
John Hansen wrote:
Am Thursday 24 September 2009 22:41:43 schrieb Jake Vickers:
John Hansen wrote:
Jake,
Are you suggesting that even if I use ezmlm for sending to this many
recipients (over 254) that I'll still receive chkuser errors?
John
Nope. ezmlm does not have the same limitation that
W dniu 25.09.2009 16:17, Eric Shubert pisze:
Thanks Aleksander and Constantin. You just made my scripting a bit
easier.
I'll be modifying qtp-extraclam to download the latest version and
install it, so as newer releases are done they won't need to be
incorporated into QTP. Simply
Eric,
If you're asking what other features could be included in the qtp. I
know of three that I use on my servers.
Webmin (QMT ISO option is a very old version)
Fail2ban
QSSEC IDS
Eric Shubert wrote:
Aleksander Podsiadly wrote:
W dniu 25.09.2009 14:28, Constantin IOAJA pisze:
*No need
I was meaning with regards to qtp-extraclam.
Please feel free to create an enhancement request ticket for each of
these (separate tickets please) if you'd like. Please include as much
detail (and links) as you can about them.
Maxwell Smart wrote:
Eric,
If you're asking what other features
Jake Vickers wrote:
Maxwell Smart wrote:
The activity I see when I tail -f /var/log/qmail/smtp/current is what
I mean.
Is there someplace I can see a flow chart of a default setup? and
how to follow the mail through the system? This would be extremely
helpful.
I can get you all of the
Maxwell Smart wrote:
This would be monitoring the /var/log/qmail/imap/current file or looking
at the contents in /var/log/qmail/imap correct?
# qmlog -f imap4
# qmlog -f imap4-ssl
(depending on which you use)
OK, I'll follow up on both suggestions later. I have some fabrication
work that
OK, my bad. I was thinking the more general qtp. Where would you like
me to send the enhancement request tickets?
Eric Shubert wrote:
I was meaning with regards to qtp-extraclam.
Please feel free to create an enhancement request ticket for each of
these (separate tickets please) if you'd
Hi John,
I think Eric is right.
I have a client using world merge for a list with about 1000 subscribers
with no problem through qmail-toaster.
Andreas
Am Freitag, den 25.09.2009, 07:48 -0700 schrieb Eric Shubert:
John Hansen wrote:
Am Thursday 24 September 2009 22:41:43 schrieb Jake
Atul Paralikar wrote:
Jake,
I think I have broken the SMTP server while I tried to recompile the CHKUSR
module for allowing mails from Blackberry users.
I followed your Video on building the Qmail-toaster from src for this.
My SMTP Server logs says error while loading shared libraries:
Eric Shubert wrote:
Maxwell Smart wrote:
This would be monitoring the /var/log/qmail/imap/current file or
looking at the contents in /var/log/qmail/imap correct?
# qmlog -f imap4
# qmlog -f imap4-ssl
(depending on which you use)
OK, I'll follow up on both suggestions later. I have some
Jake Vickers wrote:
Eric Shubert wrote:
Maxwell Smart wrote:
This would be monitoring the /var/log/qmail/imap/current file or
looking at the contents in /var/log/qmail/imap correct?
# qmlog -f imap4
# qmlog -f imap4-ssl
(depending on which you use)
OK, I'll follow up on both suggestions
You shouldn't need to recompile any more. Simply add
,CHKUSER_ALLOW_SENDER_CHAR_3=/
to the appropriate line(s) in /etc/tcprules.d/tcp.smtp, then
# qmailctl cdb
I guess it's a little late for that now. :(
Jake Vickers wrote:
Atul Paralikar wrote:
Jake,
I think I have broken the SMTP server
Any alternative? How do I get the server back to normal?
Regards,
Atul Paralikar
-Original Message-
From: news [mailto:n...@ger.gmane.org] On Behalf Of Eric Shubert
Sent: Friday, September 25, 2009 10:39 PM
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: quick
I'd try Jake's suggestions first. I think they're spot on.
Atul Paralikar wrote:
Any alternative? How do I get the server back to normal?
Regards,
Atul Paralikar
-Original Message-
From: news [mailto:n...@ger.gmane.org] On Behalf Of Eric Shubert
Sent: Friday, September 25, 2009 10:39
I am not quite sure what I am looking for so here goes. The first is
qmlog -f imap The second is qmlog -f smtp. You can see the login to
send the email and the times are identical. I then switched folders
causing it to login again and no mail. I have checked a couple of times
and no go. I
Jake, can you suggest?
-Original Message-
From: news [mailto:n...@ger.gmane.org] On Behalf Of Eric Shubert
Sent: Friday, September 25, 2009 11:02 PM
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: quick question - Reg.
I'd try Jake's suggestions first. I think
Hey Max,
I'm working this with someone else who appears to have the same
symptoms. It's still a mystery, but we're testing some things out. We'll
let you know when we find something, hopefully soon.
Maxwell Smart wrote:
I am not quite sure what I am looking for so here goes. The first is
Sorry, here was Jake's suggestion:
You are either missing the libc libraries or do not have the softlimit
set high enough for the smtp process.
Atul Paralikar wrote:
Jake, can you suggest?
-Original Message-
From: news [mailto:n...@ger.gmane.org] On Behalf Of Eric Shubert
Sent:
When I say locate lib.so.6 on my linux box and below are the results.
[r...@mail ~]# locate libc.so.6
/lib/libc.so.6
/lib/i686/nosegneg/libc.so.6
/lib64/libc.so.6
Is there anything missing.
I have increased the softlimt from 200 to 2. Below is the
softlimit from :
[r...@mail
You'll have to check the list archives, possibly the wiki, for
appropriate softlimit values for x86_64 machines. Unless someone with
that arch can chime in here quickly.
Atul Paralikar wrote:
When I say locate lib.so.6 on my linux box and below are the results.
[r...@mail ~]# locate
Sounds good.
FWIW I just did a telnet to my IMAP and it worked as expected with no
delays.
It's actually CJ Eric, Maxwell Smart is an alias that just stuck from
Win95 days. :)
Eric Shubert wrote:
Hey Max,
I'm working this with someone else who appears to have the same
symptoms. It's still
Ok CJ. I really like Max Smart though, from the old TV series. Used to
watch it all the time.
Anywise, try this:
# qmailctl stop
# queue_repair.py -r
# qmailctl start
I think you'll like it.
Please report the output of the queue_repair.py command. I think you'll
see some errors fixed there.
Eric, Thanks for your timely replies. I have increased the softlimit to
5 and now SMTP started working.
Thanks a lot.
-Original Message-
From: news [mailto:n...@ger.gmane.org] On Behalf Of Eric Shubert
Sent: Saturday, September 26, 2009 12:38 AM
To:
That fixed it. I had this problem once before with my old q mail rocks
install. That time it was my fault messing around with the queue while
it was running. Not sure what caused it this time.
You're showing your age now!
Cheers all thanks for all your efforts.
CJ
Eric Shubert wrote:
Ok
BTW, I'll answer to either. :)
Did you find out what caused the queue to get hosed?
Eric Shubert wrote:
Ok CJ. I really like Max Smart though, from the old TV series. Used to
watch it all the time.
Anywise, try this:
# qmailctl stop
# queue_repair.py -r
# qmailctl start
I think you'll
Nope. Usually operator error. ;)
Maxwell Smart wrote:
BTW, I'll answer to either. :)
Did you find out what caused the queue to get hosed?
Eric Shubert wrote:
Ok CJ. I really like Max Smart though, from the old TV series. Used to
watch it all the time.
Anywise, try this:
# qmailctl stop
#
I am not sure what operator error could have caused this. The fact that
it happened to both toasters is odd too.I could see this happening
to one. What was the case with your client that was experiencing the
same issue? When using the qtp-newmodel it stops and starts the toaster
as needed
Maxwell Smart wrote:
I am not sure what operator error could have caused this. The fact that
it happened to both toasters is odd too.I could see this happening
to one. What was the case with your client that was experiencing the
same issue?
We don't know the cause.
When using the
I did update both machines recently. Not sure if that had anything to
do with it or just coincidence. I am glad it's all back to normal. I
did learn a whole load more about DNS, and here I was actually thinking
I had a pretty good handle on it to begin with.
@Jake
I do like the idea of an
Maxwell Smart wrote:
I did update both machines recently. Not sure if that had anything to
do with it or just coincidence. I am glad it's all back to normal. I
did learn a whole load more about DNS, and here I was actually thinking
I had a pretty good handle on it to begin with.
@Jake
I do
Atul Paralikar wrote:
Eric, Thanks for your timely replies. I have increased the softlimit to
5 and now SMTP started working.
Thanks a lot.
If you built the package just like in the video, then you build for a
32-bit system and that would explain why your softlimit was too low.
Jake Vickers wrote:
Maxwell Smart wrote:
I did update both machines recently. Not sure if that had anything to
do with it or just coincidence. I am glad it's all back to normal. I
did learn a whole load more about DNS, and here I was actually thinking
I had a pretty good handle on it to
Eric Shubert wrote:
Jake Vickers wrote:
Glad to see you got it all figured out.
Actually the requests are more trouble than setting up an archive
would be. That's just a matter of copying the files into a directory
and adding a link on the site. I have to tar/gz and copy them to the
web dir
Maxwell Smart wrote:
Eric,
If you're asking what other features could be included in the qtp. I
know of three that I use on my servers.
Webmin (QMT ISO option is a very old version)
Fail2ban
QSSEC IDS
If you install the rpmforge repo, I know the first 2 packages are in the
repo and the
Sounds good. Not quite up to speed with the yum thing yet. I usually
just download and install from source tarballs. I have only started to
use CentOS with the QMTISO. I am used to SuSe which is a bit different.
Jake Vickers wrote:
Maxwell Smart wrote:
Eric,
If you're asking what other
Jake Vickers wrote:
Maxwell Smart wrote:
Eric,
If you're asking what other features could be included in the qtp. I
know of three that I use on my servers.
Webmin (QMT ISO option is a very old version)
Fail2ban
QSSEC IDS
If you install the rpmforge repo, I know the first 2 packages are
59 matches
Mail list logo
