[qmailtoaster] TAPS ISSUE

2012-05-17 Thread Manikandan Mariappan
Hi, I had a doubt in taps that four email ids has been created in server.That one email id is backup id and other three email ids are normal user ids. Example : Four email ids are :- t...@example.com e...@example.com inter...@example.com bac...@example.com vi

[qmailtoaster] Spam Mail

2012-05-17 Thread Manikandan Mariappan
Dear Support team, One of our users t...@example.com are getting valid mail( x...@domain.com) in spam folder at every time. Can you guide me how to resolve this problem. -- Regards, Manikandan.M

Re: [qmailtoaster] TAPS ISSUE

2012-05-17 Thread Bharath Chari
On Thursday 17 May 2012 06:36 PM, Manikandan Mariappan wrote: Hi, I had a doubt in taps that four email ids has been created in server.That one email id is backup id and other three email ids are normal user ids. Example : Four email ids are :- t...@example.com

Re: [qmailtoaster] TAPS ISSUE

2012-05-17 Thread Tonix (Antonio Nati)
Ideally you shoould find three copies (including sender), but I remeber TAPS only backups first match it finds in configuration. Probably, if you change the order of recipients (and use a different sender), you could check if only first recipient is backuped. Regards, Tonino Il 17/05/2012

Re: [qmailtoaster] TAPS ISSUE

2012-05-17 Thread Manikandan Mariappan
HI , If I sent mail from t...@example.com to te...@exapmle.com and te...@example.com Only two mails are delivered in bac...@example.com id. As per taps rule three mail should be delivered. One is from sent another two mail is incoming. On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 6:43 PM, Bharath Chari

[qmailtoaster] Re: TAPS ISSUE

2012-05-17 Thread Eric Shubert
It sounds to me as though TAPS is matching one sender and one recipient. Is this a bug, or perhaps a misunderstanding of TAPS behavior? It seems logical to me that there would be one outbound tap and one incoming tap. There can of course be only one sender on the outbound side. Why would

[qmailtoaster] Re: Spam Mail

2012-05-17 Thread Eric Shubert
On 05/17/2012 06:08 AM, Manikandan Mariappan wrote: Dear Support team, One of our users t...@example.com mailto:t...@example.com are getting valid mail(x...@domain.com mailto:x...@domain.com) in spam folder at every time. Can you guide me how to resolve this problem. --

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: TAPS ISSUE

2012-05-17 Thread Tonix (Antonio Nati)
http://www.inter7.com/qmailtap/README.tap qmail provides the ability to make a copy of each email that flows through the system. This is done using the QUEUE_EXTRA code. See qmail FAQ #8.2 The qmail tap patch adds additional functionality: 1) Specify which email addresses to tap

Re: [qmailtoaster] TAPS ISSUE

2012-05-17 Thread Manikandan Mariappan
Hi Tonino, Probably below mentioned rule applicable for source mail id's( t...@example.com) only, not a destination mail id(bac...@example.com) mails. Only one mail will be triggered On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 7:14 PM, Manikandan Mariappan mani11ma...@gmail.com wrote: HI ,

[qmailtoaster] DomainKeys not siging, DKIM does.

2012-05-17 Thread Ernesto Vargas
I have a been trying sign my messages with DK but I have only manage to sign them with DKIM. Which is good ofcourse. I have follow http://wiki.qmailtoaster.com/index.php/Domainkeys and http://wiki.qmailtoaster.com/index.php/How_to_Setup_DKIM_with_Qmail_Toaster line by line but still DK doesn't

[qmailtoaster] new server

2012-05-17 Thread David Milholen
Just got my new server up running with atmailopen and it looks good. Just trying to figure out why it is taking gmail and yahoo a while to send a message to the server. I have checked all of the obvious down to the last spf record. Dave -- David Milholen Project Engineer P:501-318-1300

Re: [qmailtoaster] new server

2012-05-17 Thread Maxwell Smart
On 05/17/2012 07:42 PM, David Milholen wrote: Just got my new server up running with atmailopen and it looks good. Just trying to figure out why it is taking gmail and yahoo a while to send a message to the server. I have checked all of the