Re: [qmailtoaster] re: Upgrading openssl in an old Qmailtoaster install - figgered it out

2018-07-12 Thread South Computers
. ;-) On 7/5/2018 6:48 PM, South Computers wrote: Did a comparison of /control directories from another toaster, and noticed the link from clientcert.pem -> servercert.pem. And realized I only had a servercert.rpm.new Renamed it. Doh! Working. Thank you to everyone who contributed,

Re: [qmailtoaster] re: Upgrading openssl in an old Qmailtoaster install - figgered it out

2018-07-05 Thread South Computers
mi, I'll buy you a round. Cheers! Scott Eric Broch wrote: Try this command from your CentOS 5 box openssl s_client -starttls smtp -no_ssl3 -no_ssl2 -debug -msg -connect fpl-com.mail.protection.outlook.com:25 What kind of beer? Hopefully not Schlitz. ;-) On 7/5/2018 5:57 PM, So

Re: [qmailtoaster] re: Upgrading openssl in an old Qmailtoaster install

2018-07-05 Thread South Computers
_ssl2 -debug -msg -connect fpl-com.mail.protection.outlook.com:25 What kind of beer? Hopefully not Schlitz. ;-) On 7/5/2018 5:57 PM, South Computers wrote: No worries, I appreciate it. tlsserverciphiers is fine. And checking the mail in the queue that fails with the TLS errors, they are all goi

Re: [qmailtoaster] re: Upgrading openssl in an old Qmailtoaster install

2018-07-05 Thread South Computers
HA256:ADH-AES128-SHA:ADH-CAMELLIA128-SHA:ECDH-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:ECDH-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:ECDH-RSA-AES128-SHA256:ECDH-ECDSA-AES128-SHA256:ECDH-RSA-AES128-SHA:ECDH-ECDSA-AES128-SHA:AES128-GCM-SHA256:AES128-SHA256:AES128-SHA:CAMELLIA128-SHA:PSK-AES128-CBC-SHA On 7/5/2018 2:49 PM, South Compute

Re: [qmailtoaster] re: Upgrading openssl in an old Qmailtoaster install

2018-07-05 Thread South Computers
Good question, hadn't considered that. Will check it tonight. Eric Broch wrote: What about your dh key, Is it to small? On 7/5/2018 1:28 PM, South Computers wrote: This is a repeat, my first reply went directly to Eric, sorry about that sir. Thank you Eric, might give it a shot

[qmailtoaster] re: Upgrading openssl in an old Qmailtoaster install

2018-07-05 Thread South Computers
t update my qmail-dk binary. I was hypothesizing it was only used to sign, not to communicate, and therefore the version of openssl didn't matter. I might be wrong, but I'm still sending mail? >> >> >> Brian >> >> >> On 7/5/18 06:38, South Computers wrote:

Re: [qmailtoaster] Upgrading openssl in an old Qmailtoaster install

2018-07-05 Thread South Computers
Interestingly, this broke DKIM. I don't have the time to look further right now, but disabled dk for the time being, and it's working. Was getting this in smtp/current when trying to send mail: @40005b3e1a821e069b7c qmail-dk:[3870]: Dying due to a POSSIBLE BUG! etc... South

Re: [qmailtoaster] Upgrading openssl in an old Qmailtoaster install

2018-07-05 Thread South Computers
Also mostly a lurker these days, but wanted to chime in and give a big thanks as well Eric. Much appreciate all your work to keep this going. Scott Also, if anyone else has neglected to keep their toaster up to date and needs to manually install the epel repo, at least for x86 on COS5: wget h

Re: [qmailtoaster] relay pool connection exhausted

2018-03-08 Thread South Computers
their email on the 6th, so I imagine this is related. There's also widespread reports that people can't access their email today. From: South Computers <mailto:i...@southcomputers.com>> Reply-To: <mailto:qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com>> Date: Thursday,

[qmailtoaster] relay pool connection exhausted

2018-03-08 Thread South Computers
Just had customers complaining about sending mail to AOL users, most are getting rejected with: (IP address of server)_failed_after_I_sent_the_message./Remote_host_said:_Relay_connection_pool_exhausted/ Anyone else seeing this or seen it before? Sure looks like an AOL problem, but not sure ye

Re: [qmailtoaster] Away message for all users in a domain

2017-09-06 Thread South Computers
#x27;re done 1) Remove autorespond for postmaster 2) cp -p /home/vpopmail/domains/mydomain.tld/.qmail-default.bak /home/vpopmail/domains/mydomain.tld/.qmail-default On 9/6/2017 2:58 PM, South Computers wrote: I have a client that wants me to put an away message for all users in that domai

[qmailtoaster] Away message for all users in a domain

2017-09-06 Thread South Computers
I have a client that wants me to put an away message for all users in that domain due to Irma's impending arrival. Anyone know if a down & dirty way to do it rather than through qmailadmin one by one? Thanks! - To unsubscrib

Re: [qmailtoaster] spamming on server

2017-08-16 Thread South Computers
Also check your /var/log/qmail/submission/current for bad activity Pedro Estevão wrote: Are you talking on a ilegit web hosting issue (script under wordpress site) or a ilegit access to your webmail (squirrelmail)? Or if I miss understood what are web hosting and webmail related? -Origina

Re: [qmailtoaster] spamming on server

2017-08-16 Thread South Computers
Check your /var/log/maillog for lots of different IPs sending through one account via smtp, or create a phpmail log file to detect where the bad script is, like this: https://blog.rimuhosting.com/2012/09/20/finding-spam-sending-scripts-on-your-server/ Pedro Estevão wrote: Are you talking on

Re: Fwd: Re: [qmailtoaster] Failure mail looping

2017-07-28 Thread South Computers
Sorry, meat locals. But also check rcpthosts

Re: Fwd: Re: [qmailtoaster] Failure mail looping

2017-07-28 Thread South Computers
Check your localdomains and smtproutes also. You may be forwarding a local to a smarthost/relay

Re: [qmailtoaster] Root forwarding

2017-03-24 Thread South Computers
# mysql -u root -p vpopmail Enter password: mysql [vpopmail]> select * from valias; On 3/24/2017 5:57 PM, South Computers wrote: Check in /var/qmail/alias/.qmail-root Fabian A. Santiago wrote: Can someone remind me where to look to discover why all system emails addressed to root are being s

Re: [qmailtoaster] Root forwarding

2017-03-24 Thread South Computers
Sorry, I misunderstood. I was under the impression you wanted to stop the forwarding. Fabian Santiago wrote: if i did that south computers, how would it know to go to postmaster? On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 8:13 PM, South Computers wrote: Fabian A. Santiago wrote: On March 24, 2017 7:57:33

Re: [qmailtoaster] Root forwarding

2017-03-24 Thread South Computers
Fabian A. Santiago wrote: On March 24, 2017 7:57:33 PM EDT, South Computers wrote: Check in /var/qmail/alias/.qmail-root Fabian A. Santiago wrote: Can someone remind me where to look to discover why all system emails addressed​ to root are being sent to: r...@domain.tld Rather than

Re: [qmailtoaster] Root forwarding

2017-03-24 Thread South Computers
Fabian A. Santiago wrote: On March 24, 2017 7:57:33 PM EDT, South Computers wrote: Check in /var/qmail/alias/.qmail-root Fabian A. Santiago wrote: Can someone remind me where to look to discover why all system emails addressed​ to root are being sent to: r...@domain.tld Rather than

Re: [qmailtoaster] Root forwarding

2017-03-24 Thread South Computers
Check in /var/qmail/alias/.qmail-root Fabian A. Santiago wrote: Can someone remind me where to look to discover why all system emails addressed​ to root are being sent to: r...@domain.tld Rather than @localhost Forcing me to create a forwarding address to send that to: r...@host.domain.tl

Re: [qmailtoaster] Validating RBLs are in use

2017-02-13 Thread South Computers
e should have 'check-dnsrbl' swapped out for 'dns-blacklist-entry' as it looks like the name of that parameter has changed. Thank you very much! -Chris On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 3:05 PM, South Computers mailto:i...@southcomputers.com>> wrote: That's wher

Re: [qmailtoaster] Validating RBLs are in use

2017-02-13 Thread South Computers
That's where is is on my centos 5 boxes, haven't upgraded them just yet. But it's irrelevant if you are running spamdyke, as blocklists are configured within spamdyke directly if you have it installed. Not sure if there's an easier way, but I just do a tail -n 100 /var/log/qmail/smtp/current

Re: [qmailtoaster] qmailtoaster.com

2016-09-08 Thread South Computers
Yup. Gilbert T. Gutierrez, Jr. wrote: I have not seen any email correspondence on the list for 3 days and I cannot see the web site. I am sending this email to see if the list is working or not. Gilbert On 9/5/2016 9:22 AM, Eric wrote: Thanks, Bharath! On 9/5/2016 9:51 AM, Bharath Chari w

Re: [qmailtoaster] urgent help required : qq soft reject

2015-10-13 Thread South Computers
to ? this error comes during peak working hours only. rajesh - Original Message - From: South Computers [mailto:i...@southcomputers.com] To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Sent: Mon, 12 Oct 2015 11:37:03 -0400 Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] urgent help required : qq soft reject Also

Re: [qmailtoaster] urgent help required : qq soft reject

2015-10-12 Thread South Computers
Also check your dns settings, check syslog for problems. And maybe try disabling a blocklist or 2, might have one down. Tony White wrote: Hi Rajesh, Check you ClamAV logs to see if this is causing the error. Verify you have the latest version of ClamAV as 0.975-1.4.1 had a bug when scanning.

Re: [qmailtoaster] simcontrol.cdb rebuild

2015-10-09 Thread South Computers
Thank you! Havrla wrote: mirror: http://wiki.qmailtoaster.net/ havrla Dne 8.10.2015 19:37, South Computers napsal(a): Also, a couple of resources for tyhe time being: Sorry to put liinks in, but: Giuseppe Perna wrote: Hello, i have modified the /var/qmail/control/simcontrol and set the

Re: [qmailtoaster] simcontrol.cdb rebuild

2015-10-08 Thread South Computers
Also, a couple of resources for tyhe time being: Sorry to put liinks in, but: Archive.org: https://web.archive.org/web/20150302083237/http://wiki.qmailtoaster.com/index.php/Main_Page Google cache (doesn't stay around too long, but for what it's worth): http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/sear

Re: [qmailtoaster] simcontrol.cdb rebuild

2015-10-08 Thread South Computers
qmailctl cdb Giuseppe Perna wrote: Hello, i have modified the /var/qmail/control/simcontrol and set the values spamhits. How should I rebuild simcontrol.cdb? p.s. because the http://wiki.qmailtoaster.com/ is offline? thanks --

Re: [qmailtoaster] RE: Shubes

2015-09-09 Thread South Computers
Thanks Dan! I will help in any way I can as well, just say the word. Shubes, hope all is well with you. Scott Dan McAllister wrote: QM Toaster Minions: I have tried contacting "Shubes" several times over the past few months, to no avail. He's either busy or incapacitated. It has been since

Re: [qmailtoaster] Can we now add CentOS 6 Qmailtoaster Install in the http://wiki.qmailtoaster.com/index.php/Main_Page#Installation

2015-09-09 Thread South Computers
Also been watching the list a little more lately, wondering what happened to Shubes. Anyone know? Eric, you ok? Scott Eric Broch wrote: Johannes, Thanks! I'm really not sure how to proceed at this point. I suppose I should contact EricS again and ask his status. I'm fairly sure that he get

Re: [qmailtoaster] rbl

2015-04-26 Thread South Computers
Also check here, makes sense: https://www.gypthecat.com/how-to-fix-mail-loops-back-to-myself Eric Broch wrote: But, this doesn't happen if you send mail from, say, yahoo.com or some other MX? Do you think this is a DNS issue? I found this link

Re: [qmailtoaster] rbl

2015-04-26 Thread South Computers
Also, can you telnet to your server & port, ie telnet mail.yourdomain.com 25 Dave M wrote: Sending from my Hotmail or a gmail account to an account on the new server, it get returned immediately with: mail for ( my external ip) :25 loops back to myself Dave M On 26/04/2015 9:51 AM, Fabian

Re: [qmailtoaster] rbl

2015-04-26 Thread South Computers
Are you sure your MX records are correct in DNS? Dave M wrote: Sending from my Hotmail or a gmail account to an account on the new server, it get returned immediately with: mail for ( my external ip) :25 loops back to myself Dave M On 26/04/2015 9:51 AM, Fabian Santiago wrote: Dave, So yo

Re: [qmailtoaster] Detecting compromised accounts

2013-06-11 Thread South Computers
Got it, thanks! LHTek wrote: Sorry about that. We did a site change and that file got moved. It's back in place now. Try the link again. *From:* South Computers *To:* qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaste

Re: [qmailtoaster] Detecting compromised accounts

2013-06-04 Thread South Computers
a user is sending out emails in access of the threshold. Pythng Script: http://www.lhtek.com/scripts/qmailsenders_threshold_rpt.txt I offer this only as a start. Let me know your thoughts. Thanks, Denny *Fro

[qmailtoaster] Detecting compromised accounts

2013-02-03 Thread South Computers
Looking for ideas on detecting compromised accounts, especially for smtp submission. While there are programs available to detect failed login attempts (fail2ban, etc), what if the person already has / knows the correct password, such as from a keylogger, or another account hacked elsewhere (fo

Re: [qmailtoaster] Dependencies Update

2013-01-30 Thread South Computers
To echo that, never had a problem with a yum update -y here. (At least with QMT) Cecil Yother, Jr. wrote: I use a cron to update weekly and have not had any issues to date. On 1/29/13 4:57 PM, Josh Bowling wrote: Hi all, I installed qmailtoaster on a couple CentOS 5.8 boxes a few weeks ago a

Re: [qmailtoaster] squirrelmail plugins / force https webmail alias

2013-01-08 Thread South Computers
Just to followup, my last problem was with modsecurity. A few clients with old sites on this box, have to have it. Did some exceptions for /webmail/ South Computers wrote: Thanks for the replay Gilbert. Figured that one out, but put it in my squirrelmail.conf instead, worked fine. Still

Re: [qmailtoaster] squirrelmail plugins / force https webmail alias

2013-01-08 Thread South Computers
the following in the bottom RewriteEngine on RewriteCond %{HTTPS} !=on RewriteRule .* https://%{SERVER_NAME}%{REQUEST_URI} [R,L] Gilbert T. Gutierrez, Jr. Operations Manager Phoenix Internet (602)385-0720 On 1/6/2013 9:06 PM, South Computers wrote: First, Happy New Year all! Just put a new

Re: [qmailtoaster] squirrelmail plugins / force https webmail alias

2013-01-07 Thread South Computers
] # Now, (separate from this), I need to figure out how to (easily) have all the virtual domains display the proper domain (instead of the document root) if someone types https://domain. Something to do with the vhost config in ssl.conf I presume. Another night. South Computers wrote: Thanks

Re: [qmailtoaster] squirrelmail plugins / force https webmail alias

2013-01-07 Thread South Computers
Thanks Sebastian. Not sure what you mean by location based (?) Sebastian Grewe wrote: Do a location based redirect? Shouldn't that also work outside a vhost configuration and hence be valid for everything? Cheers, Sebastian On 07.01.2013, at 05:06, South Computers wrote: First, Happ

[qmailtoaster] squirrelmail plugins / force https webmail alias

2013-01-06 Thread South Computers
First, Happy New Year all! Just put a new toaster online, replacing one I've had up for about 7 years. Went mostly smoothly, except for the http side of stuff. Pardon me for rehashing anything that's be brought up recently, haven't had the time to keep up lately. Anyway, getting the ever po

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: Did someone spam the list?

2012-08-12 Thread South Computers
I would say leave it as is unless we get more of them. Just wanted to mention it to see if I had missed something. Cheers! Scott Eric Shubert wrote: On 08/11/2012 05:58 PM, South Computers wrote: Got an ezmlm warning earlier, apparently I was rejecting something from the list as spam, (10.50

[qmailtoaster] Did someone spam the list?

2012-08-11 Thread South Computers
Got an ezmlm warning earlier, apparently I was rejecting something from the list as spam, (10.50 spam-hits). - To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaste

Re: [qmailtoaster] Barracuda as RBL

2012-07-12 Thread South Computers
If you're using spamdyke, put it in /opt/spamdyke/etc/spamdyke.conf Also you need to sign up with them for the service. Carlos Herrera Polo wrote: Thanks... i have to put b.barracudacentral.org in this file ? 2012/7/12 Jens Galsgaard mailto:j...@gitservice

Re: [qmailtoaster] Database issue in qmail

2012-07-04 Thread South Computers
You sure mysql is running? I had the same problem a couple of years ago, turned out one of the sites on the server was crashing mysql. rajeshrudramani wrote: Hi all, One of my mail server load is 70 consistently. Mails are in queue, when i checked the send log it shows below a

Re: [qmailtoaster] Just checking

2012-04-07 Thread South Computers
Thanks! Just seemed unusual. Actually, getting very little email at all, was concerned that I may have a problem. All appears fine though. altoproxima wrote: Nothing wrong there, It's just awefully quite :) Op 7 april 2012 21:08 heeft South Computers het volgende geschreven: Making

[qmailtoaster] Just checking

2012-04-07 Thread South Computers
Making sure I'm still receiving these. Have received nothing on this list since yesterday morning. - Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group (www.vickersconsulting.com) Vickers Consulting Group offe

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: Bellsouth Reverse dns

2012-04-06 Thread South Computers
Yup. They were actually very receptive to me also. It's good to keep phone numbers like that :-) For anyone that wants to whitelist their servers for the time being, here is at least a partial list: 204.127.217.101 204.127.217.102 204.127.217.103 204.127.217.105 204.127.217.104 204.127.217.10

Re: [qmailtoaster] Bellsouth Reverse dns

2012-04-06 Thread South Computers
Follow up: I called the ATT NOC to bring it to their attention. Will see what happens. South Computers wrote: It seems I am blocking anyone that uses bellsouth (and I assume ATT) mail servers within the last day or 2 dues to no reverse dns. Anyone else seeing this

[qmailtoaster] Bellsouth Reverse dns

2012-04-06 Thread South Computers
It seems I am blocking anyone that uses bellsouth (and I assume ATT) mail servers within the last day or 2 dues to no reverse dns. Anyone else seeing this? - Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group (w

Re: [qmailtoaster] Smtp problem URGENT

2012-03-27 Thread South Computers
Are you running another firewall on the box besides iptables? NMAP showing the port as filtered means it's being blocked. rajeshrudramani wrote: Hi, When i used NMAP cammand in server it showing smtp is filtered. What will be the problem. PORT STATESERVICE 21/tcp ope

Re: [qmailtoaster] Fwd: Smtp problem-Urgent

2012-03-27 Thread South Computers
you mentioned. But still i am facing same problem. In oulook for all user asking password pop screen gentrating again and again. Kindly help me to fix the same. Regards, Rajesh On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 6:01 PM, South Computers mailto:i...@southcomputers.com>> wrote: Is ip

Re: [qmailtoaster] Fwd: Smtp problem-Urgent

2012-03-27 Thread South Computers
Is iptables allowing port 25 connections? stop iptables: /etc/rc.d/init.d/iptables stop telnet localhost 25 don't forget to start iptables again: /etc/rc.d/init.d/iptables start rajeshrudramani wrote: Hi, In my qmail server port 25 connection could not established(we have

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: Backup MX with spamdyke

2012-03-05 Thread South Computers
:-) Indeed, very impressed. Equally impressed with qtp. Very nice work. Thank you Eric & Jake! Eric Shubert wrote: Great Scott! (as Mr Wilson would say?) ;) I expect you'll be pleased with spamdyke. It's an impressive piece of software. -

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: Backup MX with spamdyke

2012-03-05 Thread South Computers
Thanks Dan & Eric! Went ahead and did it on the backups as well & added the ips to the whilelist at the primary servers. Looks great so far! Cheers! Scott Eric Shubert wrote: Spamdyke needs to be on the perimeter (connected to the remote/sending server) in order to be effective. This is be

[qmailtoaster] ping

2012-03-04 Thread South Computers
Sorry. Guess my last message isn't going anywhere until spamdyke sees me sending another one here. - Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group (www.vickersconsulting.com) Vickers Consulting Group of

[qmailtoaster] Backup MX with spamdyke

2012-03-04 Thread South Computers
Finally got around to putting spamdyke on my servers. Yes, yes I'm a bit behind. Anyway, wondering if I should put it on my backup mx boxes as well. Pros or Cons? Thank you kindly, Scott - Qmailtoaster is s

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: Future Distros - RHEL/CentOS ONLY

2012-02-14 Thread South Computers
Sounds good to me as well. Thought I'd pop in here and throw my 2 cents in :-) Scott - Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group (www.vickersconsulting.com) Vickers Consulting Group offers Qmailt

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: Sad News

2011-08-01 Thread South Computers
al Message----- From: South Computers [mailto:i...@southcomputers.com] Sent: Monday, August 01, 2011 9:19 AM To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: Sad News I have had a lot of luck with scalix. I use qmt on my servers, and have the scalix box at the client use fetchma

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: Sad News

2011-08-01 Thread South Computers
I have had a lot of luck with scalix. I use qmt on my servers, and have the scalix box at the client use fetchmail to grab it. Works nicely, shared contacts, calendaring, email, etc. Free up to 10 users if I remember correctly. Not sure if it works with outlook 2010 yet, but definitely up to 20

Re: [qmailtoaster] CentOS 6

2011-06-08 Thread South Computers
If anyone wants to get ahead of the game, you might try scientificlinux. Another nice (well supported) rebuild of RHel. Got a box running it here if anyone (that I know) wants access. Eric Shubert wrote: Just an FYI, COS6 is scheduled to be rolling out to mirrors this coming Sunday 6/12, which

Re: [qmailtoaster] SMTP attack

2011-03-01 Thread South Computers
Sounds like they may have gotten hit with a virus or pissed someone off. I would block the domain from relaying & inform the customer, possibly make them change their email account passwords if it's not a large organization. Ask them to relay through their provider if possible for the time bein

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: barracuda rbl

2010-10-14 Thread South Computers
Thanks Eric! Planning on doing it this weekend. Cheers! Scott Eric Shubert wrote: Hey Scott. Thanks for this. BTW, I think you'll be kicking yourself for not using spamdyke earlier. ;) Be sure to use the qtp-install-spamdyke script to install it. You also might want to turn off greylistin

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: barracuda rbl

2010-10-12 Thread South Computers
Spamdyke definitely looks interesting, it's now on my to-do list. In the meantime however, I discovered the solution to my immediate problem, in case anyone else is having the same issue. To give credit, I found it here: gossamer-threads.com/lists/qmail/users/137702 From gossamer threads li

Re: [qmailtoaster] barracuda rbl

2010-09-28 Thread South Computers
Hmm.. Thanks Jake, will have to dig deeper tonight. Jake Vickers wrote: On 09/28/2010 10:32 AM, South Computers wrote: Not sure how long it has been since it worked, spam getting through has been up the last week or so, noticed barracuda wasn't catching anything. Is it just me or can a

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: barracuda rbl

2010-09-28 Thread South Computers
Actually I normally use it with my regular blacklists file. Still haven't gotten around to using spamdyke :-) Is Spamcop working well these days? Does it resolve for you? Thanks, Scott Eric Shubert wrote: South Computers wrote: Not sure how long it has been since it worked, spam ge

[qmailtoaster] barracuda rbl

2010-09-28 Thread South Computers
Not sure how long it has been since it worked, spam getting through has been up the last week or so, noticed barracuda wasn't catching anything. Is it just me or can anyone else resolve to their blacklist? Getting a host not found / unknown host for b.barracudacentral.org Thanks, Scott --

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: good RBLs to list in spamdyke

2010-08-10 Thread South Computers
fwiw, spamhaus & barracuda seem to do the best job for me. Not using spamdyke yet, but a sampling from smtp/current: @40004c6166b2314dc1ec rblsmtpd: 77.123.17.112 pid 553: 451 http://www.spamhaus.org/query/bl?ip=77.123.17.112 @40004c6166c71cbd529c rblsmtpd: 59.90.27.33 pid 581: 451 htt

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: Slowness in smtp

2010-07-11 Thread South Computers
For a quick test to see if it's your dns at the windoze box, try adding your toaster to the hosts file. Typically win boxes check the hosts file before dns. Also, check the blacklists on your toaster. You may have a slow dnsbl in there. Poh Yong Hwang wrote: Hi, Here is my resolv.conf :

Re: [qmailtoaster] qmail secure authentication help!

2010-05-31 Thread South Computers
For Outlook itself? For newer versions: Tools / email accounts / view or change existing accounts / select account / change / more settings / outgoing server / log on using / check the box for SPA carlos...@tmdigital.es wrote: Hi, i needed know how enable secure password athentication to wor

Re: [qmailtoaster] Opinions Please

2010-05-31 Thread South Computers
ed the TTL's, it would be very inefficient to have your DNS hammered from increased queries because of the short TTL's... Just my .02. Michael J. Colvin NorCal Internet Services www.norcalisp.com -Original Message- From: South Computers [mailto:i...@southcomputers.c

Re: [qmailtoaster] Opinions Please

2010-05-30 Thread South Computers
To clarify, ns1 would *not* failover to ns2. Both ns1 & ns2 would failover to a second set of ns1 & ns2's (duplicate but with different records). South Computers wrote: Thanks, Yes, that is always the problem with dns failover. But I have to say, it has worked extremely well

Re: [qmailtoaster] Opinions Please

2010-05-30 Thread South Computers
ests) would fail. I may not have understood what you were trying to say though.. Mike -Original Message- From: South Computers [mailto:i...@southcomputers.com] Sent: Sunday, May 30, 2010 11:17 AM To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Opinions Please That looks

Re: [qmailtoaster] Opinions Please

2010-05-30 Thread South Computers
That looks interesting. Been thinking about this myself a lot lately (failover, not load balancing, especially for http). Being in hurricane alley I think about this this time every year. Not too worried about mail, as I just use smtp routes to point everything back to primary mail server(s).

Re: [qmailtoaster] Server changes

2010-05-16 Thread South Computers
Ditto to that, got a lot of old memory around that will probably never be used. Also probably have some CPUs & motherboards if you want something newer. Just send me an email off list with an address if so. Maxwell Smart wrote: I likely have some PC133 RAM if you cannot find any locally. L

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: queue is stuck after move

2010-05-13 Thread South Computers
Kent Busbee wrote: On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 11:17 AM, South Computers wrote: Kent Busbee wrote: On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 10:36 AM, South Computers wrote: Let's look at permissions is 89:89 correct, or should it be 89:something else? I noticed that the permissions i

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: queue is stuck after move

2010-05-13 Thread South Computers
Kent Busbee wrote: On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 10:36 AM, South Computers wrote: Let's look at permissions is 89:89 correct, or should it be 89:something else? I noticed that the permissions in [r...@mail ~]# ls -ld /home/vpopmail/domains/northlakechristian.org/ drwx-- 134 vpo

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: queue is stuck after move

2010-05-13 Thread South Computers
Let's look at permissions is 89:89 correct, or should it be 89:something else? I noticed that the permissions in [r...@mail ~]# ls -ld /home/vpopmail/domains/northlakechristian.org/ drwx-- 134 vpopmail vchkpw 12288 May 12 08:42 /home/vpopmail/domains/northlakechristian.org/ everythin

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: queue is stuck after move

2010-05-13 Thread South Computers
Is this a new box? Did you disable selinux? Is it only one domain, or are you hosting others. If just 1, can you just start fresh? Kent Busbee wrote: On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 9:58 AM, Jake Vickers wrote: On 05/13/2010 10:27 AM, Kent Busbee wrote: On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 9:08 AM, Jake

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: Denying access to authenticated connections

2010-04-26 Thread South Computers
Eric Shubert wrote: Natalio Gatti wrote: On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 10:26 AM, Natalio Gatti > wrote: Hi List. I'm having a big spam problem. It seems that my users DB have been compromised, and I'm receiving authenticated connections from outside, that are

Re: [qmailtoaster] Still going down - now vdelivermail:_deferred,_database_down

2010-04-23 Thread South Computers
Disregard. Looks like this was a mysql issue with a massive database affecting everything else on the server. South Computers wrote: Well, my old fedora 6 box's hard drive finally died, but the other 2 toasters that I upgraded the clamav on randomly quit working. They work fine for

[qmailtoaster] Still going down - now vdelivermail:_deferred,_database_down

2010-04-22 Thread South Computers
Well, my old fedora 6 box's hard drive finally died, but the other 2 toasters that I upgraded the clamav on randomly quit working. They work fine for a few days or so, then give authentication errors when connecting via pop3, and getting different messages in send logs. Tonight it's this: de

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: clamav 0.94 end-of-life today

2010-04-17 Thread South Computers
Thanks Eric Hopefully will find some time to dig deeper this weekend. Still running since yesterdays reboot. Eric Shubert wrote: I wouldn't use vqadmin (in fact I don't even install it). It's broken in places. There's nothing there you really need. Use qcontrol instead if you really need a

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: clamav 0.94 end-of-life today

2010-04-16 Thread South Computers
ing again. I don't think I understand the problem precisely, so I'm not yet prepared to suggest a permanent solution. Other than upgrading of course. ;) South Computers wrote: Actually it broke 3 of my toasters completely. If anyone hasn't upgraded their clamav, you bett

Re: [qmailtoaster] Error sending Mail

2010-04-16 Thread South Computers
I put a copy on one of mine for the time being if you need it. Here: put the http:// in front of the line below. southcomputers.net/clamav-toaster-0.96.0-1.3.35.src.rpm Charles Ferland wrote: On 16/04/2010 7:58 AM, South Computers wrote: Check the log in send. Amit Dalia wrote: I had

Re: [qmailtoaster] Procedure to update Clamav

2010-04-16 Thread South Computers
You should not have to remove clam, just upgrade. that's what the "U" means in rpm -Uhv packagename Then restart qmail with qmailctl restart senthil vel wrote: Dear List, I am in need to update the clamav toaster. While searching the archives, i found two set of procedures. fir

Re: [qmailtoaster] Error sending Mail

2010-04-16 Thread South Computers
ssh to your server, or if standing in from of it: login as root. cd /usr/src/qtms-install/ (or whereever you download your source files to) wget http://www.qmailtoaster.com/download/stable/clamav-toaster-0.96.0-1.3.35.src.rpm see below if having problems downloading the package from q

Re: [qmailtoaster] Error sending Mail

2010-04-16 Thread South Computers
Check the log in send. Amit Dalia wrote: I had updated my server using qtp-newmodel 2 days back. And no log is getting generate in SMTP. Regards, Amit At Friday, 16-04-2010 on 16:25 Janno Sannik wrote: Just a wild guess - update clamav :D On 16.04.2010 13:45, Postmaster wrote:

Re: [qmailtoaster] clamav 0.94 end-of-life today

2010-04-15 Thread South Computers
Actually it broke 3 of my toasters completely. If anyone hasn't upgraded their clamav, you better do it! Quinn Comendant wrote: Just a reminder to everybody that ClamAV 0.94.x is no longer supported by signature file updates after 15 Apr 2010. http://www.clamav.net/lang/en/2009/10/05/eol-cl

[qmailtoaster] connect(): No such file or directory

2010-04-15 Thread South Computers
Just realized none of my 3 toasters were getting mail. Figured out it's the clamav. I assume others are having the same problem. I realize many of you may not get this until you figure it out yourself as your toasters may be down as well, but for those that are subscribed with another email a

Re: [qmailtoaster] 451 qq unable to read configuration (#4.3.0)

2009-01-05 Thread South Computers
Thanks Eric! Yes, this is an older box, no spamdyke. Will give recordio a shot. Cheers! Scott Eric Shubert wrote: South Computers wrote: 451 qq unable to read configuration (#4.3.0) Anyone seen this? This is the bounce message from my server when a customer attempts to send mail to me

[qmailtoaster] 451 qq unable to read configuration (#4.3.0)

2009-01-05 Thread South Computers
451 qq unable to read configuration (#4.3.0) Anyone seen this? This is the bounce message from my server when a customer attempts to send mail to me / my customer. But only from that one sender. They're using bluehost. Works fine from everyone else (or so it appears) with or without attachme

Re: [qmailtoaster] Happy New Year!

2009-01-01 Thread South Computers
Happy New Year back to everyone! Scott Jake Vickers wrote: Just wanted to say Happy New Year to everyone! - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted

Re: [qmailtoaster] POP3 Not working

2008-08-23 Thread South Computers
Probably either reverse dns lookups or blocklists. Got a call yesterday from a client about another error, was probably a blocklist down. Try temporarily removing all blocklists & see if it cures it, then put them back in one at a time. Andreas wrote: What do you have in the logs of pop3d (/

[qmailtoaster] Hmmmm

2008-08-23 Thread South Computers
Please ignore, wondering if a regular message to the group will be tagged as spam. - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted - To unsubscribe,

[qmailtoaster] ***SPAM*** Re: [qmailtoaster]

2008-08-23 Thread South Computers
Wow.. my own reply came in as spam on that one .. go figure! South Computers wrote: Searched my logs and I did receive the email but it was tagged as spam: Ditto here. Dude, please turn off the return receipt request option in your email client :-) Thanks! *X-Spam-Flag: * YES

[qmailtoaster] ***SPAM*** Re: [qmailtoaster] RE: Sale 79% OFF !!!

2008-08-23 Thread South Computers
Searched my logs and I did receive the email but it was tagged as spam: Ditto here. Dude, please turn off the return receipt request option in your email client :-) Thanks! *X-Spam-Flag: * YES *X-Spam-Checker-Version: * SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on mx.todhills.com *X-Spam-L

Re: [qmailtoaster] cn-kr.blackholes.us

2008-06-19 Thread South Computers
Thanks! I also found http://www.cluecentral.net/rbl/ as an alternative. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Looks like it's down.. If you're using this one, you might have to remove it for the time being at least. Yes blackholes seems to be down. And was a real problem for me today. I suggest t

  1   2   >