On 2/6/07, Jake Vickers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I wrote a script that's on my site that will monitor BLs for you and
remove the slow ones. v2gnu.com
I've just tried your script and it works great, thanks. I am running
it now once per hour (how often do you run it yourself?).
One thing came
Peter Peltonen wrote:
On 2/6/07, Jake Vickers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I wrote a script that's on my site that will monitor BLs for you and
remove the slow ones. v2gnu.com
I've just tried your script and it works great, thanks. I am running
it now once per hour (how often do you run it
On 2/1/07, George Sweetnam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just replaced the old sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org (zen blocks all the dynamic
ones now ... I'd use sorbs if i wanted that) with cbl.abuseat.org which is
what blocks most of them anyway. I had sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org right after my
cbl rbl list and
Peter Peltonen wrote:
On 2/1/07, George Sweetnam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just replaced the old sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org (zen blocks all the dynamic
ones now ... I'd use sorbs if i wanted that) with cbl.abuseat.org
which is
what blocks most of them anyway. I had sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org right
Peter Peltonen wrote:
On 2/1/07, George Sweetnam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just replaced the old sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org (zen blocks all the dynamic
ones now ... I'd use sorbs if i wanted that) with cbl.abuseat.org
which is
what blocks most of them anyway. I had sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org right
removed
it completely. Plus the response time on sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org is horrid at
peak times.
George.
- Original Message -
From: Jake Vickers [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Sent: Wednesday, January 31, 2007 7:21 AM
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] spamhaus - what do
@qmailtoaster.com
Sent: Wednesday, January 31, 2007 7:21 AM
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] spamhaus - what do you think?
Eric Shubes wrote:
There appear to be plenty of BLs out there already. I think we
simply need
to find a way to manage (classify/rate/select) them.
Perhaps it'd be useful to set up any
Erik Espinoza wrote:
http://www.corpit.ru/mjt/rbldnsd.html
On 1/30/07, Jake Vickers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Eric Shubes wrote:
Jake Vickers wrote:
Do you guys think a wiki page should be started so we can all help each
other out to find a good mix to replace zen?
I'd like to see some
Jake Vickers wrote:
Not really Toaster related, but has anyone else noticed issues now
that Spamhaus is merging their lists? I have one server that ONLY uses
zen.spamhaus.org in my /var/qmail/control/blacklists and I have had 10
users this week alone (on different ISPs - Roadrunner, Sprint,
I had serious issues with that when the merge happened. I had to drop
my blacklists entirely because of it.
On Jan 26, 2007, at 7:49 AM, Jake Vickers wrote:
Not really Toaster related, but has anyone else noticed issues now
that Spamhaus is merging their lists? I have one server that ONLY
Jake Vickers wrote:
Do you guys think a wiki page should be started so we can all help each
other out to find a good mix to replace zen?
I'd like to see some collaboration on RBLs in general. I suppose we could
use the wiki in addition to this list.
--
-Eric 'shubes'
Eric Shubes wrote:
Jake Vickers wrote:
Do you guys think a wiki page should be started so we can all help each
other out to find a good mix to replace zen?
I'd like to see some collaboration on RBLs in general. I suppose we could
use the wiki in addition to this list.
At this
http://www.corpit.ru/mjt/rbldnsd.html
On 1/30/07, Jake Vickers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Eric Shubes wrote:
Jake Vickers wrote:
Do you guys think a wiki page should be started so we can all help each
other out to find a good mix to replace zen?
I'd like to see some collaboration on RBLs
Jake Vickers wrote:
Eric Shubes wrote:
Jake Vickers wrote:
Do you guys think a wiki page should be started so we can all help each
other out to find a good mix to replace zen?
I'd like to see some collaboration on RBLs in general. I suppose we could
use the wiki in addition to
I have considered the same thing myself.. The problem would be the
inevitable ddos attacks. I was looking at spamikaze a bit.
At this point I'd even be amicable to running a BL, so that it fit MY
needs; it would be nice if it fit other people's needs as well.
I took a quick peek on the
I have always forced all my clients to use their ISPs smtp server. Helps
to keep me from getting blacklisted, saves bandwidth, etc. If they need
email on the road, that's what webmail is for.
snip
Grrr. I'm traveling right now
snip
Sure you've read this, but just in case:-)
To use verizon's
Not really Toaster related, but has anyone else noticed issues now that
Spamhaus is merging their lists? I have one server that ONLY uses
zen.spamhaus.org in my /var/qmail/control/blacklists and I have had 10
users this week alone (on different ISPs - Roadrunner, Sprint, Comcast)
that have
Jake,This has been causing problems for several of my customers and is a real
pain.The note on the spamhaus pbl removal list says that users using dynamic
IPs which have fallen into a blocked range don't need to apply as long as
they're using smtp authentication(?) - but this doesn't seem to
.
-Original Message-
From: Jake Vickers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 26, 2007 7:50 AM
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: [qmailtoaster] spamhaus - what do you think?
Not really Toaster related, but has anyone else noticed issues now that
Spamhaus is merging
Netnamin / Compusolve wrote:
Jake,
This has been causing problems for several of my customers and is a real pain.
The note on the spamhaus pbl removal list says that users using dynamic IPs which
have fallen into a blocked range don't need to apply as long as they're using
smtp
Thanks for that info Jake.
(My customers are mainly using dynamic IPs)
I'm using qmail-toaster-1.03-1.3.5 - does that have the port 587 submission?
Also in the newer versions that have this facility is 587 the standard port
used, or do you need switch it over to that port. If the latter then
Jake Vickers wrote:
Netnamin / Compusolve wrote:
Thanks for that info Jake.
(My customers are mainly using dynamic IPs)
I'm using qmail-toaster-1.03-1.3.5 - does that have the port 587
submission?
Also in the newer versions that have this facility is 587 the standard
port used, or do
22 matches
Mail list logo
