subject:"\[qmailtoaster\] Alternative email filtering \(Eset\?\)"

Re: [qmailtoaster] Alternative email filtering (Eset?)

2020-10-08 Thread Remo Mattei

here is my info

cat /etc/spamdyke/spamdyke.conf

dns-blacklist-entry=psbl.surriel.com
dns-blacklist-entry=bogons.cymru.com
dns-blacklist-entry=b.barracudacentral.org
#dns-blacklist-entry=combined.njabl.org
dns-blacklist-entry=cbl.abuseat.org
dns-blacklist-entry=zombie.dnsbl.sorbs.net
dns-blacklist-entry=dul.dnsbl.sorbs.net
dns-blacklist-entry=bl.spameatingmonkey.net
rhs-blacklist-entry=xx.r.mail-abuse.com:blocked using Trend Micro 
RBL+ see http://www.mail-abuse.com/cgi-bin/lookup?ip_address=%IP%
dns-blacklist-entry=“x.r.mail-abuse.com:blocked using Trend Micro 
RBL+ see http://www.mail-abuse.com/cgi-bin/lookup?ip_address=%IP%;
rhs-blacklist-entry=xx.q.mail-abuse.com:blocked using Trend Micro 
Network Anti-Spam see http://www.mail-abuse.com/cgi-bin/lookup?ip_address=%IP%
#

> On Oct 7, 2020, at 8:49 PM, Eric Broch  wrote:
> 
> Remo,
> 
> Can you share you implementations of Trendmicro, RBL, and the others?
> 
> Eric
> 
> On 10/7/2020 6:26 PM, r...@mattei.org  wrote:
>> I use Trendmicro rbl and a few others and have very little issues. Dspam 
>> spamassassin, clamav of course a special service is nice but I want to know 
>> where and what blocks it. 
>> 
>>> Il giorno 7 ott 2020, alle ore 14:21, Eric Broch  
>>>  ha scritto:
>>> 
>>> Let me know if you get a trial license, I'll do the same and check it out 
>>> as well.
>>> 
 On 10/7/2020 3:18 PM, Janno Sannik wrote:
 I'm already using proxmox mail gateway as outgoing server, but it does not 
 add any special virus protection to it. It's the same clamav. It's 
 actually more to give webui to monitor outgoing emails and logs and give 
 this to non-technical users.
 
 I understand that "use external service", but if we start to look at it 
 like this then why use qmail in the first place- use it as external 
 service and you get rid of all of the hassle :)
 
 The one reason to have all in the house is to have control over email 
 where they are and where they gets lost. Having services split around 
 everywhere makes it hard to trace if client comes with "I sent email, did 
 on arrive at inbox".
 
 It seems that Eset Mail Security is told to be compatible with Qmail 
 (https://help.eset.com/ems_linux/4/en-US/installation.html?scanning_of_inbound_email.html
  
 ).
  There is something weird going on with the price of 105usd for first year 
 and 55usd updates yearly which also gives you permission to use 5 
 simultaneous installations. It seems like the integration is somewhat 
 magical.
 
 I'd prefer the command line tool that could be fed with incoming emails 
 and make a move according to return code.
 
 I guess I'm going explore it myself and going for Eset linux file 
 security. It seems that it's possible to get some trial/test licenses to 
 check it out.
 
 
 Janno
 
> On 05.10.2020 16:28, Jeff Koch wrote:
> Janno - let us know what you find out - we could better virus filtering 
> as well. Drweb and avast may have Linux / qmail versions
> 
> Sent from my iPhone
> 
>> On Oct 5, 2020, at 9:19 AM, Eric Broch  
>>  wrote:
>> 
>> I used Sonicwall paid service and I know of others who have used 
>> Barracuda.
>> 
>> You would just set your MX record to point to the paid service MX and 
>> configure the paid service MX to route whatever domains are hosted on 
>> your QMT to it.
>> 
>> If you want outgoing service set up the paid service relay in QMT's 
>> smtproutes file. You'll also want to find out if the paid service does 
>> TLS if you need it.
>> 
>> I've also looked at things like Proxmox mail gateway and Mailcleaner 
>> (https://www.mailcleaner.org  && 
>> https://www.mailcleaner.org/documentation/ 
>> ). If necessary you'll also 
>> want to find out if they do TLS.
>> 
>> Eric
>> 
>>> On 10/5/2020 6:59 AM, Gary Bowling wrote:
>>> 
>>> 
>>> I don't know anything about eset. But, if I were looking for a paid 
>>> alternative for virus, I would look at relay services.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> A relay service that provides virus scanning makes things very simple 
>>> and once configured makes your email server administration the same as 
>>> it is now. Your server just sends outbound mail to the relay and 
>>> inbound traffic is routed to the relay and then forwarded to your 
>>> server (your dns mx records point to the relay service).
>>> 
>>> 
>>> This also makes it the relay companies responsibility to keep you off 
>>> blacklists and to resolve any issues with

Re: [qmailtoaster] Alternative email filtering (Eset?)

2020-10-07 Thread Eric Broch

Remo,

Can you share you implementations of Trendmicro, RBL, and the others?

Eric

On 10/7/2020 6:26 PM, r...@mattei.org wrote:

I use Trendmicro rbl and a few others and have very little issues. Dspam
spamassassin, clamav of course a special service is nice but I want to know
where and what blocks it.

Il giorno 7 ott 2020, alle ore 14:21, Eric Broch ha
scritto:

Let me know if you get a trial license, I'll do the same and check it out as
well.

On 10/7/2020 3:18 PM, Janno Sannik wrote:
I'm already using proxmox mail gateway as outgoing server, but it does not add
any special virus protection to it. It's the same clamav. It's actually more to
give webui to monitor outgoing emails and logs and give this to non-technical
users.

I understand that "use external service", but if we start to look at it like
this then why use qmail in the first place- use it as external service and you get rid of
all of the hassle :)

The one reason to have all in the house is to have control over email where they are and
where they gets lost. Having services split around everywhere makes it hard to trace if
client comes with "I sent email, did on arrive at inbox".

It seems that Eset Mail Security is told to be compatible with Qmail
(https://help.eset.com/ems_linux/4/en-US/installation.html?scanning_of_inbound_email.html).
There is something weird going on with the price of 105usd for first year and
55usd updates yearly which also gives you permission to use 5 simultaneous
installations. It seems like the integration is somewhat magical.

I'd prefer the command line tool that could be fed with incoming emails and
make a move according to return code.

I guess I'm going explore it myself and going for Eset linux file security. It
seems that it's possible to get some trial/test licenses to check it out.

Janno

On 05.10.2020 16:28, Jeff Koch wrote:
Janno - let us know what you find out - we could better virus filtering as
well. Drweb and avast may have Linux / qmail versions

Sent from my iPhone

On Oct 5, 2020, at 9:19 AM, Eric Broch wrote:

I used Sonicwall paid service and I know of others who have used Barracuda.

You would just set your MX record to point to the paid service MX and configure
the paid service MX to route whatever domains are hosted on your QMT to it.

If you want outgoing service set up the paid service relay in QMT's smtproutes
file. You'll also want to find out if the paid service does TLS if you need it.

I've also looked at things like Proxmox mail gateway and Mailcleaner
(https://www.mailcleaner.org && https://www.mailcleaner.org/documentation/). If
necessary you'll also want to find out if they do TLS.

Eric

On 10/5/2020 6:59 AM, Gary Bowling wrote:

I don't know anything about eset. But, if I were looking for a paid alternative
for virus, I would look at relay services.

A relay service that provides virus scanning makes things very simple and once
configured makes your email server administration the same as it is now. Your
server just sends outbound mail to the relay and inbound traffic is routed to
the relay and then forwarded to your server (your dns mx records point to the
relay service).

This also makes it the relay companies responsibility to keep you off
blacklists and to resolve any issues with blacklists.

I haven't done a search for relay companies, but I've thought about it. It
would remove all the things that are a hassle about running a mail server,
which is spam/viruses/blacklists/etc and place that responsibility on someone
else.

Just my 2 cents.

Gary

On 10/5/2020 8:39 AM, Janno Sannik wrote:
Has anyone tried/using alternative (maybe paid) service for virus scanning?

I'm thinking of getting Eset file server or email for linux package. I'm really
getting some viruses and Trojans going past clamav just to be hit on the head
with eset workstation security. File security is around 155usd first buy and
80usd /yearly for the updates next year.

So was thinking to get the file server client and run the CLI to play ball with
qmail.

Sample here:
https://forum.eset.com/topic/23639-is-there-any-working-cli-scanner-for-linux/

Has anybody done that or how hard would be to add ESET to the pipeline? For me
it does not seem too hard and I can make the legwork, but would rather get some
input before going forward with it.

Regards,

Janno

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com
For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com

- To
unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com For
additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com
For additional commands,

Re: [qmailtoaster] Alternative email filtering (Eset?)

2020-10-07 Thread remo

I use Trendmicro rbl and a few others and have very little issues. Dspam 
spamassassin, clamav of course a special service is nice but I want to know 
where and what blocks it. 

> Il giorno 7 ott 2020, alle ore 14:21, Eric Broch  ha 
> scritto:
> 
> Let me know if you get a trial license, I'll do the same and check it out as 
> well.
> 
>> On 10/7/2020 3:18 PM, Janno Sannik wrote:
>> I'm already using proxmox mail gateway as outgoing server, but it does not 
>> add any special virus protection to it. It's the same clamav. It's actually 
>> more to give webui to monitor outgoing emails and logs and give this to 
>> non-technical users.
>> 
>> I understand that "use external service", but if we start to look at it like 
>> this then why use qmail in the first place- use it as external service and 
>> you get rid of all of the hassle :)
>> 
>> The one reason to have all in the house is to have control over email where 
>> they are and where they gets lost. Having services split around everywhere 
>> makes it hard to trace if client comes with "I sent email, did on arrive at 
>> inbox".
>> 
>> It seems that Eset Mail Security is told to be compatible with Qmail 
>> (https://help.eset.com/ems_linux/4/en-US/installation.html?scanning_of_inbound_email.html).
>>  There is something weird going on with the price of 105usd for first year 
>> and 55usd updates yearly which also gives you permission to use 5 
>> simultaneous installations. It seems like the integration is somewhat 
>> magical.
>> 
>> I'd prefer the command line tool that could be fed with incoming emails and 
>> make a move according to return code.
>> 
>> I guess I'm going explore it myself and going for Eset linux file security. 
>> It seems that it's possible to get some trial/test licenses to check it out.
>> 
>> 
>> Janno
>> 
>>> On 05.10.2020 16:28, Jeff Koch wrote:
>>> Janno - let us know what you find out - we could better virus filtering as 
>>> well. Drweb and avast may have Linux / qmail versions
>>> 
>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>> 
 On Oct 5, 2020, at 9:19 AM, Eric Broch  wrote:
 
 I used Sonicwall paid service and I know of others who have used 
 Barracuda.
 
 You would just set your MX record to point to the paid service MX and 
 configure the paid service MX to route whatever domains are hosted on your 
 QMT to it.
 
 If you want outgoing service set up the paid service relay in QMT's 
 smtproutes file. You'll also want to find out if the paid service does TLS 
 if you need it.
 
 I've also looked at things like Proxmox mail gateway and Mailcleaner 
 (https://www.mailcleaner.org && 
 https://www.mailcleaner.org/documentation/). If necessary you'll also want 
 to find out if they do TLS.
 
 Eric
 
> On 10/5/2020 6:59 AM, Gary Bowling wrote:
> 
> 
> I don't know anything about eset. But, if I were looking for a paid 
> alternative for virus, I would look at relay services.
> 
> 
> A relay service that provides virus scanning makes things very simple and 
> once configured makes your email server administration the same as it is 
> now. Your server just sends outbound mail to the relay and inbound 
> traffic is routed to the relay and then forwarded to your server (your 
> dns mx records point to the relay service).
> 
> 
> This also makes it the relay companies responsibility to keep you off 
> blacklists and to resolve any issues with blacklists.
> 
> 
> I haven't done a search for relay companies, but I've thought about it. 
> It would remove all the things that are a hassle about running a mail 
> server, which is spam/viruses/blacklists/etc and place that 
> responsibility on someone else.
> 
> 
> Just my 2 cents.
> 
> 
> Gary
> 
> 
>> On 10/5/2020 8:39 AM, Janno Sannik wrote:
>> Has anyone tried/using alternative (maybe paid) service for virus 
>> scanning?
>> 
>> I'm thinking of getting Eset file server or email for linux package. I'm 
>> really getting some viruses and Trojans going past clamav just to be hit 
>> on the head with eset workstation security. File security is around 
>> 155usd first buy and 80usd /yearly for the updates next year.
>> 
>> So was thinking to get the file server client and run the CLI to play 
>> ball with qmail.
>> 
>> Sample here: 
>> https://forum.eset.com/topic/23639-is-there-any-working-cli-scanner-for-linux/
>> 
>> 
>> Has anybody done that or how hard would be to add ESET to the pipeline? 
>> For me it does not seem too hard and I can make the legwork, but would 
>> rather get some input before going forward with it.
>> 
>> 
>> Regards,
>> 
>> Janno
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail:

Re: [qmailtoaster] Alternative email filtering (Eset?)

2020-10-07 Thread Eric Broch

Let me know if you get a trial license, I'll do the same and check it
out as well.

On 10/7/2020 3:18 PM, Janno Sannik wrote:
I'm already using proxmox mail gateway as outgoing server, but it does
not add any special virus protection to it. It's the same clamav. It's
actually more to give webui to monitor outgoing emails and logs and
give this to non-technical users.

I understand that "use external service", but if we start to look at
it like this then why use qmail in the first place- use it as external
service and you get rid of all of the hassle :)

The one reason to have all in the house is to have control over email
where they are and where they gets lost. Having services split around
everywhere makes it hard to trace if client comes with "I sent email,
did on arrive at inbox".

It seems that Eset Mail Security is told to be compatible with Qmail
(https://help.eset.com/ems_linux/4/en-US/installation.html?scanning_of_inbound_email.html).
There is something weird going on with the price of 105usd for first
year and 55usd updates yearly which also gives you permission to use 5
simultaneous installations. It seems like the integration is somewhat
magical.

I'd prefer the command line tool that could be fed with incoming
emails and make a move according to return code.

I guess I'm going explore it myself and going for Eset linux file
security. It seems that it's possible to get some trial/test licenses
to check it out.

Janno

On 05.10.2020 16:28, Jeff Koch wrote:
Janno - let us know what you find out - we could better virus
filtering as well. Drweb and avast may have Linux / qmail versions

Sent from my iPhone

On Oct 5, 2020, at 9:19 AM, Eric Broch wrote:

I used Sonicwall paid service and I know of others who have used
Barracuda.

You would just set your MX record to point to the paid service MX
and configure the paid service MX to route whatever domains are
hosted on your QMT to it.

If you want outgoing service set up the paid service relay in QMT's
smtproutes file. You'll also want to find out if the paid service
does TLS if you need it.

I've also looked at things like Proxmox mail gateway and Mailcleaner
(https://www.mailcleaner.org &&
https://www.mailcleaner.org/documentation/). If necessary you'll
also want to find out if they do TLS.

Eric

On 10/5/2020 6:59 AM, Gary Bowling wrote:

I don't know anything about eset. But, if I were looking for a paid
alternative for virus, I would look at relay services.

A relay service that provides virus scanning makes things very
simple and once configured makes your email server administration
the same as it is now. Your server just sends outbound mail to the
relay and inbound traffic is routed to the relay and then forwarded
to your server (your dns mx records point to the relay service).

This also makes it the relay companies responsibility to keep you
off blacklists and to resolve any issues with blacklists.

I haven't done a search for relay companies, but I've thought about
it. It would remove all the things that are a hassle about running
a mail server, which is spam/viruses/blacklists/etc and place that
responsibility on someone else.

Just my 2 cents.

Gary

On 10/5/2020 8:39 AM, Janno Sannik wrote:
Has anyone tried/using alternative (maybe paid) service for virus
scanning?

I'm thinking of getting Eset file server or email for linux
package. I'm really getting some viruses and Trojans going past
clamav just to be hit on the head with eset workstation security.
File security is around 155usd first buy and 80usd /yearly for the
updates next year.

So was thinking to get the file server client and run the CLI to
play ball with qmail.

Sample here:
https://forum.eset.com/topic/23639-is-there-any-working-cli-scanner-for-linux/

Has anybody done that or how hard would be to add ESET to the
pipeline? For me it does not seem too hard and I can make the
legwork, but would rather get some input before going forward with
it.

Regards,

Janno

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com
For additional commands, e-mail:
qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com For additional
commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com
For additional commands, e-mail:
qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com
For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com

-
To

Re: [qmailtoaster] Alternative email filtering (Eset?)

2020-10-07 Thread Janno Sannik

I'm already using proxmox mail gateway as outgoing server, but it does
not add any special virus protection to it. It's the same clamav. It's
actually more to give webui to monitor outgoing emails and logs and give
this to non-technical users.

I understand that "use external service", but if we start to look at it
like this then why use qmail in the first place- use it as external
service and you get rid of all of the hassle :)

The one reason to have all in the house is to have control over email
where they are and where they gets lost. Having services split around
everywhere makes it hard to trace if client comes with "I sent email,
did on arrive at inbox".

It seems that Eset Mail Security is told to be compatible with Qmail
(https://help.eset.com/ems_linux/4/en-US/installation.html?scanning_of_inbound_email.html).
There is something weird going on with the price of 105usd for first
year and 55usd updates yearly which also gives you permission to use 5
simultaneous installations. It seems like the integration is somewhat
magical.

I'd prefer the command line tool that could be fed with incoming emails
and make a move according to return code.

I guess I'm going explore it myself and going for Eset linux file
security. It seems that it's possible to get some trial/test licenses to
check it out.

Janno

On 05.10.2020 16:28, Jeff Koch wrote:

Janno - let us know what you find out - we could better virus filtering as
well. Drweb and avast may have Linux / qmail versions

Sent from my iPhone

On Oct 5, 2020, at 9:19 AM, Eric Broch wrote:

I used Sonicwall paid service and I know of others who have used Barracuda.

You would just set your MX record to point to the paid service MX and configure
the paid service MX to route whatever domains are hosted on your QMT to it.

If you want outgoing service set up the paid service relay in QMT's smtproutes
file. You'll also want to find out if the paid service does TLS if you need it.

Eric

On 10/5/2020 6:59 AM, Gary Bowling wrote:

I don't know anything about eset. But, if I were looking for a paid alternative
for virus, I would look at relay services.

This also makes it the relay companies responsibility to keep you off
blacklists and to resolve any issues with blacklists.

Just my 2 cents.

Gary

On 10/5/2020 8:39 AM, Janno Sannik wrote:
Has anyone tried/using alternative (maybe paid) service for virus scanning?

So was thinking to get the file server client and run the CLI to play ball with
qmail.

Sample here:
https://forum.eset.com/topic/23639-is-there-any-working-cli-scanner-for-linux/

Has anybody done that or how hard would be to add ESET to the pipeline? For me
it does not seem too hard and I can make the legwork, but would rather get some
input before going forward with it.

Regards,

Janno

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com
For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com

- To
unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com For
additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com
For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com

Re: [qmailtoaster] Alternative email filtering (Eset?)

2020-10-05 Thread Jeff Koch

Janno - let us know what you find out - we could better virus filtering as 
well. Drweb and avast may have Linux / qmail versions

Sent from my iPhone

> On Oct 5, 2020, at 9:19 AM, Eric Broch  wrote:
> 
> I used Sonicwall paid service and I know of others who have used Barracuda.
> 
> You would just set your MX record to point to the paid service MX and 
> configure the paid service MX to route whatever domains are hosted on your 
> QMT to it.
> 
> If you want outgoing service set up the paid service relay in QMT's 
> smtproutes file. You'll also want to find out if the paid service does TLS if 
> you need it.
> 
> I've also looked at things like Proxmox mail gateway and Mailcleaner 
> (https://www.mailcleaner.org && https://www.mailcleaner.org/documentation/). 
> If necessary you'll also want to find out if they do TLS.
> 
> Eric
> 
>> On 10/5/2020 6:59 AM, Gary Bowling wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> I don't know anything about eset. But, if I were looking for a paid 
>> alternative for virus, I would look at relay services.
>> 
>> 
>> A relay service that provides virus scanning makes things very simple and 
>> once configured makes your email server administration the same as it is 
>> now. Your server just sends outbound mail to the relay and inbound traffic 
>> is routed to the relay and then forwarded to your server (your dns mx 
>> records point to the relay service).
>> 
>> 
>> This also makes it the relay companies responsibility to keep you off 
>> blacklists and to resolve any issues with blacklists.
>> 
>> 
>> I haven't done a search for relay companies, but I've thought about it. It 
>> would remove all the things that are a hassle about running a mail server, 
>> which is spam/viruses/blacklists/etc and place that responsibility on 
>> someone else.
>> 
>> 
>> Just my 2 cents.
>> 
>> 
>> Gary
>> 
>> 
>>> On 10/5/2020 8:39 AM, Janno Sannik wrote:
>>> Has anyone tried/using alternative (maybe paid) service for virus scanning?
>>> 
>>> I'm thinking of getting Eset file server or email for linux package. I'm 
>>> really getting some viruses and Trojans going past clamav just to be hit on 
>>> the head with eset workstation security. File security is around 155usd 
>>> first buy and 80usd /yearly for the updates next year.
>>> 
>>> So was thinking to get the file server client and run the CLI to play ball 
>>> with qmail.
>>> 
>>> Sample here: 
>>> https://forum.eset.com/topic/23639-is-there-any-working-cli-scanner-for-linux/
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Has anybody done that or how hard would be to add ESET to the pipeline? For 
>>> me it does not seem too hard and I can make the legwork, but would rather 
>>> get some input before going forward with it.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Regards,
>>> 
>>> Janno
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> -
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com
>>> 
>> - To 
>> unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com For 
>> additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com 
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com
> For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com
> 


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com
For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com

Re: [qmailtoaster] Alternative email filtering (Eset?)

2020-10-05 Thread Eric Broch


I used Sonicwall paid service and I know of others who have used Barracuda.

You would just set your MX record to point to the paid service MX and 
configure the paid service MX to route whatever domains are hosted on 
your QMT to it.


If you want outgoing service set up the paid service relay in QMT's 
smtproutes file. You'll also want to find out if the paid service does 
TLS if you need it.


I've also looked at things like Proxmox mail gateway and Mailcleaner 
(https://www.mailcleaner.org && 
https://www.mailcleaner.org/documentation/). If necessary you'll also 
want to find out if they do TLS.


Eric

On 10/5/2020 6:59 AM, Gary Bowling wrote:



I don't know anything about eset. But, if I were looking for a paid 
alternative for virus, I would look at relay services.



A relay service that provides virus scanning makes things very simple 
and once configured makes your email server administration the same as 
it is now. Your server just sends outbound mail to the relay and 
inbound traffic is routed to the relay and then forwarded to your 
server (your dns mx records point to the relay service).



This also makes it the relay companies responsibility to keep you off 
blacklists and to resolve any issues with blacklists.



I haven't done a search for relay companies, but I've thought about 
it. It would remove all the things that are a hassle about running a 
mail server, which is spam/viruses/blacklists/etc and place that 
responsibility on someone else.



Just my 2 cents.


Gary


On 10/5/2020 8:39 AM, Janno Sannik wrote:
Has anyone tried/using alternative (maybe paid) service for virus 
scanning?


I'm thinking of getting Eset file server or email for linux package. 
I'm really getting some viruses and Trojans going past clamav just to 
be hit on the head with eset workstation security. File security is 
around 155usd first buy and 80usd /yearly for the updates next year.


So was thinking to get the file server client and run the CLI to play 
ball with qmail.


Sample here: 
https://forum.eset.com/topic/23639-is-there-any-working-cli-scanner-for-linux/



Has anybody done that or how hard would be to add ESET to the 
pipeline? For me it does not seem too hard and I can make the 
legwork, but would rather get some input before going forward with it.



Regards,

Janno





-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com
For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com

- 
To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com 
For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com 


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com
For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com

Re: [qmailtoaster] Alternative email filtering (Eset?)

2020-10-05 Thread Gary Bowling


  
  


I don't know anything about eset. But, if I were looking for a
  paid alternative for virus, I would look at relay services. 



A relay service that provides virus scanning makes things very
  simple and once configured makes your email server administration
  the same as it is now. Your server just sends outbound mail to the
  relay and inbound traffic is routed to the relay and then
  forwarded to your server (your dns mx records point to the relay
  service).



This also makes it the relay companies responsibility to keep you
  off blacklists and to resolve any issues with blacklists.


I haven't done a search for relay companies, but I've thought
  about it. It would remove all the things that are a hassle about
  running a mail server, which is spam/viruses/blacklists/etc and
  place that responsibility on someone else.



Just my 2 cents. 



Gary



On 10/5/2020 8:39 AM, Janno Sannik
  wrote:

Has anyone
  tried/using alternative (maybe paid) service for virus scanning?
  
  
  I'm thinking of getting Eset file server or email for linux
  package. I'm really getting some viruses and Trojans going past
  clamav just to be hit on the head with eset workstation security.
  File security is around 155usd first buy and 80usd /yearly for the
  updates next year.
  
  
  So was thinking to get the file server client and run the CLI to
  play ball with qmail.
  
  
  Sample here:
https://forum.eset.com/topic/23639-is-there-any-working-cli-scanner-for-linux/
  
  
  Has anybody done that or how hard would be to add ESET to the
  pipeline? For me it does not seem too hard and I can make the
  legwork, but would rather get some input before going forward with
  it.
  
  
  
  Regards,
  
  
  Janno
  
  
  
  
  
  
-
  
  To unsubscribe, e-mail:
  qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com
  
  For additional commands, e-mail:
  qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com
  
  

  


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com
For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com

[qmailtoaster] Alternative email filtering (Eset?)

2020-10-05 Thread Janno Sannik


Has anyone tried/using alternative (maybe paid) service for virus scanning?

I'm thinking of getting Eset file server or email for linux package. I'm 
really getting some viruses and Trojans going past clamav just to be hit 
on the head with eset workstation security. File security is around 
155usd first buy and 80usd /yearly for the updates next year.


So was thinking to get the file server client and run the CLI to play 
ball with qmail.


Sample here: 
https://forum.eset.com/topic/23639-is-there-any-working-cli-scanner-for-linux/



Has anybody done that or how hard would be to add ESET to the pipeline? 
For me it does not seem too hard and I can make the legwork, but would 
rather get some input before going forward with it.



Regards,

Janno





-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com
For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com

Re: [qmailtoaster] Alternative email filtering (Eset?)

Re: [qmailtoaster] Alternative email filtering (Eset?)

Re: [qmailtoaster] Alternative email filtering (Eset?)

Re: [qmailtoaster] Alternative email filtering (Eset?)

Re: [qmailtoaster] Alternative email filtering (Eset?)

Re: [qmailtoaster] Alternative email filtering (Eset?)

Re: [qmailtoaster] Alternative email filtering (Eset?)

Re: [qmailtoaster] Alternative email filtering (Eset?)

[qmailtoaster] Alternative email filtering (Eset?)

9 matches

Site Navigation

Mail list logo

Footer information