Hi All,
I'm happy with Suresh's proposals (though note that the existing examples
build into a jar where they are now?)
Marnie
On 12/22/06, Alan Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wed, 2006-12-20 at 08:02 -0500, Carl Trieloff wrote:
> > I will send a separate proposal on the list of samples
On Wed, 2006-12-20 at 08:02 -0500, Carl Trieloff wrote:
> > I will send a separate proposal on the list of samples, but I believe
> > this is an ongoing process.
What we need is a language-neutral list of named examples that describes
what they do in AMQP terms.
Each language can then set up a
I will send a separate proposal on the list of samples, but I believe
this is an ongoing process.
Thanks, doing the above would be great as once the structure is created
I am sure we will
start adding examples ...
Regards
Carl.
arate proposal on the list of samples, but I believe
this is an ongoing process.
Regards,
Suresh
-Original Message-
From: Carl Trieloff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 19, 2006 5:53 PM
To: qpid-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: new client examples
Maybe structure wa
ve some discussion of how we actually want to
lay the examples out.
carl.
Das, Kapali Tejeswar wrote:
+1 from me.
Regards
Tejeswar
-Original Message-
From: Kodichath, Suresh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 18, 2006 4:05 PM
To: qpid-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 19, 2006 4:25 PM
To: qpid-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: new client examples
I think though should also be given so that we can lay examples down for
all the clients in a similar structure
so that someone can look and Java , or C++ or Python a
actually want to
lay the examples out.
carl.
Das, Kapali Tejeswar wrote:
+1 from me.
Regards
Tejeswar
-Original Message-
From: Kodichath, Suresh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 18, 2006 4:05 PM
To: qpid-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: new client examples
Hi,
I
+1 from me.
Regards
Tejeswar
-Original Message-
From: Kodichath, Suresh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 18, 2006 4:05 PM
To: qpid-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: new client examples
Hi,
I want to propose the following on this, considering the requirements
that
Yes,
Good idea.
Regards,
Bhupendra
On 12/18/06, Kelly, Brian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
+1 from me.
Brian
-Original Message-
From: Kodichath, Suresh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 18, 2006 4:05 PM
To: qpid-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: new client ex
+1 from me.
Brian
-Original Message-
From: Kodichath, Suresh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 18, 2006 4:05 PM
To: qpid-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: new client examples
Hi,
I want to propose the following on this, considering the requirements
that were raised
On 18/12/06, Kodichath, Suresh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
I want to propose the following on this, considering the requirements
that were raised earlier here.
The requirements are to have the examples compiled as a jar file in a
distribution(examples.jar), and also to have examples in sourc
Hi,
I want to propose the following on this, considering the requirements
that were raised earlier here.
The requirements are to have the examples compiled as a jar file in a
distribution(examples.jar), and also to have examples in source form in
the distribution under $QPID_HOME/examples.
The
Hi,
> Examples for that language should be included in the client jar.
I am adding a new JIRA issue to track this story. Also working on a
proposal based on the earlier comments, and will send it to this list.
Suresh
Yes we could certainly bundle them as part of the client. I am not
sure how many separate downloads we want to have, e.g. we almost
certainly want a "qpid all" download that includes the broker, client,
samples and docs. How many of these we want available as separate
bundles I am not sure.
On 13/12/06, Steve Vinoski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Then I guess I don't understand what value there is in adding them to
the main build. Where's the benefit? They'll only increase the build
time.
I don't really mind if they are not built by default (although I think
the time to compile if d
I'm agnostic on this subject, in that I don't have a strong view on where
they live.
They don't need to be in the main build, though I do think it'd be useful to
know when changes 'break' them. I don't have a religious view on how/where
they are distributed.
I'll keep an eye on this thread until
On Dec 13, 2006, at 5:15 PM, Robert Greig wrote:
On 13/12/06, Steve Vinoski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The problem with this is that you're trying to use the examples as
tests,
No, I'm really not wanting to do that.
Then I guess I don't understand what value there is in adding them to
th
On 13/12/06, Steve Vinoski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The examples depend on the client (since the examples exercise the
> client API - we should perhaps create another clientAPI module that is
> separate from client but that is a separate discussion). I think that
> the examples should theref
On 13/12/06, Kodichath, Suresh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
First I think we agree that the way we package the examples now needs to
be cleaned up, correct me if I am wrong.
No, I agree completely. This was the motivation for moving them from
where they used to live (as part of tests).
I am al
On Dec 13, 2006, at 4:19 PM, Robert Greig wrote:
On 13/12/06, Steve Vinoski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Dec 13, 2006, at 3:15 AM, Martin Ritchie wrote:
How so? I presume that we provide examples not for ourselves, but for
our users. Similarly, the sole purpose of the distribution directory
Hi Robert,
>> I do not agree with the idea of having samples under src/examples.
>> Samples (with their READMEs) are an important part of learning the
>> product for a new user and should be easily visible for them to be
>> useful.
>Exactly, we intended that a separate examples.tar.gz/zip get pro
On 13/12/06, Kodichath, Suresh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I do not agree with the idea of having samples under src/examples.
Samples (with their READMEs) are an important part of learning the
product for a new user and should be easily visible for them to be
useful.
Exactly, we intended that a
On 13/12/06, Steve Vinoski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Dec 13, 2006, at 3:15 AM, Martin Ritchie wrote:
How so? I presume that we provide examples not for ourselves, but for
our users. Similarly, the sole purpose of the distribution directory
is to build artifacts for our users. The examples a
JIRA issue to track the same.
Suresh
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Martin Ritchie
Sent: Wednesday, December 13, 2006 3:15 AM
To: qpid-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: new client examples
On 13/12/06, Steve Vinoski <[EMAIL PROT
On Wednesday 13 December 2006 03:15, Martin Ritchie wrote:
> I can't believe that maven forces you to only work on one "revision"
> of the code base at a time. I have a number of branches in development
> and having to do a main clean and install before I can build a
> distribution seems so unintui
On Dec 13, 2006, at 3:15 AM, Martin Ritchie wrote:
On 13/12/06, Steve Vinoski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Marnie, today you added the client/example directory, but I'm a
little puzzled by it, because I don't know what it's intended for.
One issue is that it's not part of the main build, so i
On 13/12/06, Steve Vinoski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Marnie, today you added the client/example directory, but I'm a
little puzzled by it, because I don't know what it's intended for.
One issue is that it's not part of the main build, so it will not
appear as part of any distribution. Another
Hi Marnie, today you added the client/example directory, but I'm a
little puzzled by it, because I don't know what it's intended for.
One issue is that it's not part of the main build, so it will not
appear as part of any distribution. Another issue is that I don't
think it should be part o
28 matches
Mail list logo
