> Dusan Zatkovsky wrote:
> > Hi there.
> >
> > What's the current status of jambi 4.6 and it build process?
>
> As you can see from the recent posts we are now in a state
> where we are able to compile everything. Have done
> some preliminary tests on our main product (Pharos), and it
> seems to b
Dusan Zatkovsky wrote:
> Hi there.
>
> What's the current status of jambi 4.6 and it build process?
>
As you can see from the recent posts we are now in a state
where we are able to compile everything. Have done
some preliminary tests on our main product (Pharos), and it
seems to be working quit
Good to hear, since I didn't test the latest typesystem changes on
Windows yet :-)
Helge
l...@helmis.at wrote:
> Many thanks! Works perfect!
>
> Best,
> Leo
>
>
___
Qt-jambi-interest mailing list
Qt-jambi-interest@trolltech.com
http://lists.trolltec
ext Dusan Zatkovsky skrev:
> My second question is about lib dir in qtjambi jar. What is compiled in
> libxcom_trolltech_qt_gui.so? I thought that it is only 'wrapper' around
> libQtGui.so, but it is _bigger_ than libQtGui.so.
>
>
Yes, that's the bindings library for QtGui. On Windows it's ab
Hi there.
What's the current status of jambi 4.6 and it build process?
I am asking because I have a idea to make qtjambi more attractive for java
developers - for example to mavenize and publish it to some official/custom
repo. I have made some maven stuff (*1) about qtjambi for my personal use
ext Helge Fredriksen skrev:
> FYI.
>
> Don't use the Qt Repo directly, you will get other compile errors
> then, like the one with
> the Qt 4.7 enum which I reported about earlier. I think you should be
> fine if you use the
> 4.6 RC1 snapshot, and put the changes to the qstatemachine.h depicted
FYI.
Don't use the Qt Repo directly, you will get other compile errors then,
like the one with
the Qt 4.7 enum which I reported about earlier. I think you should be
fine if you use the
4.6 RC1 snapshot, and put the changes to the qstatemachine.h depicted
in the patch file.
Also, you must of
